I can not make full identification of the aircraft in the background of the first picture you posted Dean, but it certainly looks like a Miles Master (and probably a Mk. II/III as well). Here are the reasons. It is single engine, with somewhat marked dihedral on the outer wing panels . It has what appears to be that strange Miles Master maingear geometry when sitting on the ground. The nose seems a bit too broad (thick) to be an inline engined variant, hence a Mk.II/III. And the engine is running, if the propblades are anything to go by!
Hope it all makes sense!
Iยดll get my coat, where is the door?
This is easy ๐
It is the Airboein 777 ๐ ๐ ๐
Commercial maybe?
Talking about spelling and grammer we have to realise that not everyone speeks English as their first language. There must be members on here for who Eenglish is not their first language. As long as we can understand what they are saying, does it realy matter? Personaly it does not bother me, i know they are trying.
Thank you Ollie! English is certainly not my first language, not the second (Danish), but a third! Sometimes, I really struggle to make a readable post on here (on a serious matter), and then find that it has been misunderstood.
One thing that is worth keeping in mind, and I’ve found to my cost, humour is not universal. What I find very funny when I think about it in Icelandic, is not funny at all when read by english speaking readers.
That is why I rarely post any more, I do have an opinion on a lot of things that go on here on this site, and would like to participate, but my humour is completely different to you guys and, if it is on a serious note, my posts frequently misunderstood as being hostile or rude. What would work in my language certainly does not work on here, I have to live with it
All I’m going to say is this. My photos are crap, my equipment is crap and none of my pictures are ground-to-air, and many out of focus. I enjoy them for what they are, for the memories etc. I would not post them, ever, on a forum alive with more or less pro guys with the top end gear and experience to match. If I do post, it is alway done with a certain disclaimer of quality.
Your photos Ollie are sometimes a bit dodgy, out of focus, blurred etc. Nothing I could do better, however, I do not think EN830 has to go all the way to the other forum and be a pain in the back side there. He is just telling the truth. When you are competing/comparing with (arguably) the best of the class, you will get a knock down once in a while. If you had been at it as long as some of these guys, with the correct equipment, you would be at their level, but you are not at the moment. So keep practicing, keep shooting aeroplanes but do not expect universal approval right away. In 30 years time you might be the greatest photographer of aeroplanes, but at the moment you are not! EN830 is not a pain in the **se, that should be elsewhere, he is just telling the truth as it is right before our eyes.
Keep shooting Ollie. Keep it to your self until it is of real quality. Then post. Do not say people are having a dig because they do not like your photos, because, frankly, some of them are best kept a secret
Ok. Forgive me but Iยดm not hot on Spitfires. It is a Mk IX or Mk. XVI that has been converted to Grice Tr 9 status. And it is in America. For the Serial, I can not read it, and I do not care what it is :diablo: All that matters too me is to see another Spit flying ๐ ๐ ๐
DBW, I think it’s time for me to eat some humble pie here ๐ฎ
Of course, if checking out on a new type, I would do the walk around with the student! I just missed the part in the previous posts about it being an entirely new type to the student. Sorry about that!
Something from the Miles stable?
A good idea! They are, by all accounts, terrific aircraft, but I suspect a little to dear as a trade up from a Luton. Try ringing hairyplane and ask him the price for his spottless Magister ๐ ๐
I was a little surprised that I wasn’t supervised closely, although I think she was watching from the Clubhouse.
I’ve been in her shoes. She WAS watching from the clubhouse (or at least I would have been)! When you have got a student with previous experience of things aeronautical, you let them get on with it on their own. Even if you watch very closely in the background. It does tend to get people down if they get the impression that (with all their expertize) they are not allowed to even preflight the aircraft without supervision. So, they are frequently sent out by them selves to do what the checklist says they should be doing, closely watched from a convienient window in the club house. Afterwards there might be a grilling on what are you looking for here, why is that checked and if you move that what should happen there etc.
My name is galdri and I smoke :rolleyes: In fact I smoke about 5 cigars (the small variety) a day, but if it is a bad day maybe 10. I started smoking out of boredom 5 years ago, at the ripe old age of 28 ๐ฎ At least when I was smoking my cigar, another 10 minutes of complete and utter bordom were and over done with. And the thing is, I liked it from the first puff. This is an addiction that is probably in our genes. My father used to smoke (He quit 25 years ago), my grandfather smoked, my great grandfather smoked etc. I’ve never tried to quit, because I like this thing. Ok, Ok, I know! It will kill me ( or so the doctors say), but I can think of so many thing that will kill me, without me ever getting near another cigar again (how about getting pissed and ending up with a less than reputable lady). Hell, my smoking grandfather lived to be 98 years old before he passed away!
Having said that, however, I’m all for the ban on smoking in certain public places. The work place should, ofcourse be smoke free. All public transport should be smoke free. All restaurants should be smoke free. But Pubs? Well, there I would like to have a designated smoking room.
My name is galdri and I smoke :rolleyes: In fact I smoke about 5 cigars (the small variety) a day, but if it is a bad day maybe 10. I started smoking out of boredom 5 years ago, at the ripe old age of 28 ๐ฎ At least when I was smoking my cigar, another 10 minutes of complete and utter bordom were and over done with. And the thing is, I liked it from the first puff. This is an addiction that is probably in our genes. My father used to smoke (He quit 25 years ago), my grandfather smoked, my great grandfather smoked etc. I’ve never tried to quit, because I like this thing. Ok, Ok, I know! It will kill me ( or so the doctors say), but I can think of so many thing that will kill me, without me ever getting near another cigar again (how about getting pissed and ending up with a less than reputable lady). Hell, my smoking grandfather lived to be 98 years old before he passed away!
Having said that, however, I’m all for the ban on smoking in certain public places. The work place should, ofcourse be smoke free. All public transport should be smoke free. All restaurants should be smoke free. But Pubs? Well, there I would like to have a designated smoking room.
Why does the Sabre look rediculous? It is just at the 3/8 ths part of a roll ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ Fighters do tend to roll, you see ๐
All joking aside, I can see both sides of the argument. It certainly isn’t pretty hanging aircraft like that (that’s from the anorak), but it does tend to keep these things out of the weather (the realistic speaking) and it WILL impress Joe Public and might keep the museum shop buisy (The Buissness man speaking).
What has been removed from the airframes to lighten them, to allow them to be hung up from the ceiling can always be put back in, provided it was not thrown away afterwards. That would be a lousy curator that would allow that to happen! I just hope the engineers AND curator did not compromize the structural integrety of the airframes to hang them that way, because if they did, that would be a lousy custodianship of something that is meant to last for future generations.
So if A) nothing is thrown away and B) the structural integrety is not compromised, I personally think this is one of the best ways to preserve aircraft in a setting where Joe Public MIGHT want to see them
As for building hrs galdri is right, an instructor’s rating is generally the way to go, galdri has over estimated on the price a little bit here, you can get one in the UK for about ยฃ5,000,
…………….. also galdri is correct regading hrs on type after you have obtained a nice shiny type rating, you can pick up a 737 TR for about 14,000 euros if you shop around
Dean
Ok, I admit! I multiplied the wrong way around ๐ฎ 5000 pounds for an instructors rating is about correct.
However, I would like to take issue with the 14000 Euros for the type rating on the 737. I’m sure you can FIND a place prepared to give you a rating for that kind of money, but what is the training like? Would you really know the first thing about flying the beast? This is one of the areas where it does not pay to go for the cheap option. Go for a good, quality training. It will cost you money, but will save you a lot of troble later.
Hi Soft,
Be careful talking to Instructors about things like this. They want your buissnes to keep bread on the table, so they will not give you all the home truths about ‘being a pilot’. Go and find someone that is actually flying for the airlines to get an honest, down to earth answer. Initially they will tell you ‘Yeah it’s great!’, but if you start talking about how they got there in the first place, you’ll find that it is a rocky road indeed for all but the fortunate few.
I may not be the best quilified person to answer your questions, but I’ll give it a go.
1. The length of time to finish the Modular Frozen ATPL depends on two things. First of all MONEY, and the second is TIME. If you have the money and the time you could reasonably expect to finish in about 18 months time. In that case, it would be more or less a full time job, so you can expect little or no income while getting it done. Judging by your comments about ab initio training, I guess that would not be possible. So it really is all up to you! One thing to bear in mind, though, is that after all the theoretical exams for the frozen ATPL have been passed, you have only 24 months timebracket to finish the flying part.
2 and 3 together. I do not know of any sponsorship programs at the moment, all that I’ve heard about is what you are descriping, ie. ‘You learn to fly with us, and you MIGHT have a change with so and so’. But I must admit that I’ve not been listening to the grapevine with this in mind. It is not too bad for the tops of class, they will probably get to work for So and So through this arrangement, but the majority, probably, will be left standing. If you are the unlucky one, then you will find the going hard indeed. Very few airlines take on pilots with only 200 hrs fresh out of school (ok, they are out there, but very very few). That will mean hourbuilding, up to at least, say, 500 hrs. That can be done several ways. You could get your self an instructor rating (lots of money, think in the region of 10000 pounds all told) and start hourbuilding that way, but the pay is not high at all. Route two is to find a gliding – or para club that needs a pilot. It will get you the hours, but it will involve a lot of hanging around the airfield on very little (next to nothing) pay, so your income to pay off the loans, presumably taken to finish the licence, will be very limited. The third route is to take out another loan and do the hour building by renting a plane to fly around. (that will be very, very expensive). Once you have hit the 500+ hour mark, and there is still no F/O position in sight, what do you do?
A lot of pilots (even with 200 hrs. total) go for a typerating, ie, they pay a lot of money to learn to fly a specific type of aircraft. A Boeing 737 type rating will set you back about 20.000 pounds. And that is not the complete story, because if you want to go for a typerating you will have to have a valid twin IR (included in most frozen ATPL courses) and an MCC rating (not always included in the frozen ATPL courses). An MCC rating will set you back about 5000 pounds if it is not included in your basic course. There is even one more snag, once you have finished your ground school and simulator for a certain aircraft type, and passed the checkride, you are still not a fully fledged pilot on type and few airlines want a pilot that is not fully qulified (but they are out there, Ill come back to that in a minute) To be let loose, as we call it, you need 40 sectors or 100 hours under the supervision of a line training captain. This is called line training. Some airlines in the UK, flying the B737, charge you for the privilage of flying for them during line training. The latest prize I heard was 10000 pounds for 100 hrs (heard on the grapevine, truthfullness not known). Other airlines (mainly eastern European) will pay you about 700 Euros a month during linetraining, and if you pass the line check, they will offer you a job with 1400 Euros a month. Given the chance, I would rather go for the UK line training, even though it costs money, as the training is genarally top notch. The eastern European way of doing things, in this respect, leaves a lot to be desired. I know, as I’ve had the ‘pleasure’ of re-training some of the guys that went there.
And this is the Catch 22 that you so correctly descripe in your post. The airlines are accepting pilots with less and less total time, but with lots of hours on type. That’s how they do it. They expect You to pay the training cost, that once was theirs. The MCC, the type rating, and the line training has to be paid by YOU, when you end up in this situation. On top of that, you’ll have to live on, say, 1400 Euros a month for some time while waiting for some opening somewhere with a decent pay check.
All that I’ve written above is a worst case thing. Maybe You’ll get lucky and be working with a decent paycheck right out of school. But I don’t think I would be doing you any favours by blowing sunshine up ……..(you know what ๐ ๐ ๐ ). I’ve seen exactly this scenario happen to a lot of people that I’m currently working with.
4. I’m trying not to generalize here, but I think you’ll find it pretty much impossible to live in Inverness once you get a job. First of all, the rosters with many of the smaller operators can only be descriped as ‘forcasts’ of work. They WILL change and what was supposed to be a day of might not be, and to find that out while just walking in the door at home after a four hour travel to spend a few days with the family can be very irritating (been there, done that, got the t-shirt). Besides, most operators WILL use you to the maximum allowed, and with the smaller ones, you will probably not get more than maybe 7 whole days off in a month (the legal minimum, at least here in Iceland), and it is a regulatory requirement for them to give you at least 36 hrs. off every 7 days (Icelandic rules again), so there you’ll have 2 days off every seven days. If it is possible for you to travel home to Inverness, spend time with your family, and travel back again in that time, fine. But then you would be keeping two households, one where you work and one back home in Inverness, and that will cost a lot of money! Even if you are with the big ones, Ryanair or EasyJet or Thomas Cook or what ever, You would need to keep two homes if you intend to live in Inverness.
The only guys that do not have to think about this are the long haul guys, (BA, Virgin, etc, etc,) they can live anywhere they like, because they go away and are gone for a week or two on some round the globe trip. When they come to the UK, they will probably be left to their own devices for one or two weeks before being called up on to work again!
This has grown a lot longer than I thought when I first set out! But this is how it looks from my view point. It may look a bit pessimistic, but this is how it works for most of us. Like I said earlier, I’m not trying to blow sunshine up …………, I’m just being honest.
Hope you still want to consider the ATPL. It would be my honour to fly with you one of those days ๐ ๐
Icelandair is having a few 787’s. I think they have got 3 firm orders with 5 options, but I can’t be bothered to check.