A Swift Temco, I think it is called
Why not put the only Icelandic Beech on here. It is a C-45H, 52-10672 and has been here from 1968. First as an airliner and later in civilan ownership. It is maintained in airworthy condition, but very rarely flow, usually only once or twice a year.
10 The Best all around World Aerobatic Pilot no contest the one and only Sean D. Tucker he does things that even the Demo teams stop and go Wow at.
Cheers
RER
Well, I will have to dispute that 😉
He might be the most prolific DISPLAY pilot in the States, but the States is NOT the world. Display flying does not figure in the FAI catalouge, so how is one to judge who is the best when it comes to judging a display. Fact of the matter is, an interesting and spellbinding (high scare factor?) display, might be ‘badly’ flown if you put on your ‘Aerobatic judge’s’ glasses. To find the Best All Aound World Aerobatic you would have to look for the last World Aerobatic Champion. That guy has been measure against a set standard, and come out as a winner in his class.
Give it a rest guys 😮 Nothing will ever come out of this discussion. Some on this forum are absolutely sure that all commercial pilots are all arrogant bas#ards. No matter what, nothing is going to change their view. All I can say is that there are bad apples on both sides.
I’ve got SEP, MEP, FI(A), FE(A) (all valid) and practice aerobatics during my spare time. Because I drive a Boeing for a living, I must be an arrogant bas”ard according to some posts on here. Well, that is a cross I must bear!
I believe this Spitfire has a Clipped wing for performance reasons not due to workshop space, Oh thanks for the double posting award thats what happens when P.C has a crash dueing a posting but i will off course treasure this Award 😀 .
Another post more or less at the same time as mine! We are thinking in unision 😮
The contra prop Spitfire PR19 currently causing excitement/rumour has non standard clipped tips due to the small workshop it was rebuilt in- or is this an urban myth :confused:
🙂
Well at least it is ‘clipped’. But I find it highly unlikely that a multi million dollar restoration would have clipped wings because of too small a workshop :confused:
Picture nicked from http://http://www.planesoffame.org/museum-aircraft.php
There was I suppose the rounded and square wings of the different BF109 variants.
Yes but they weren’t ‘clipped’ as such, the wing area was much the same, even a little more on the squre tipped ones
Of the top of my head, I can not recall any other ‘clipped wing’ besides the Spitfire, if we are talking combat types only. The Piper Cub and the Tailorcraft lightaircraft, had clipped wings as a after market mod, and were used as aerobatic trainers/airshow machines.
On the subject of performance and handling, clipping the wings increases the wingloading and therefore makes for a higher stalling speed. The Roll rate will increase and the speed ( at low level), how ever turning radius will increase.
Hope that answers some of your questions.
Martin is right here, spin training is not a requirement of the JAR’s for an ATPL ticket. However, JAR’s are the minimum standards, so any country could have more stringent rules. Italy might have a spin training as a minimum standard for ATPL.
erm … je ne comprend pas … if your argument is correct, shouldn’t Mustangs be the best buy … ie. the least black-holish?
I’ve my own personal black hole. That’s my hangar and what’s in it! And it ain’t no Mustang. Just a Gemini. If it was a Mustang, the hole would be even larger 😉 😀
Ok Daz, here goes it goes. :rolleyes:
I hope you did your research before buying it! Did it come with a ‘servicable’ tag attached (a green or yellow thingy). If it did, it should be servicable, barring any ‘incidents’.
If not, you can not be sure it’s working and it would need an overhaul, just to be on the save side of things. If it needs an overhaul, I hope you didn’t pay too much for it 🙁 When you send one of these things in for an overhaul, you don’t get the same instrument in return (usually), but another in servicable condition ( a kind of exchange service). The companies doing the overhauls have one price for a fully serviceble one, off the shelf. Then they ususally state a price for a ‘core’ that would be subtracted from the shelf price. At the moment I’m too lazy to go on the internet to check the ‘core’ price for a turn and bank (but you could), hopefully you didn’t pay more than that for it!
And before anyone starts to jump high and low, you would not, technically speaking, need a turn and bank with a servicable tag on it for a ‘homebuilt’, but it is kind of embarrasing having your shiny little aircraft standing in front of you, but some instruments not working 😮
Then it’s the next question. Why would you need a turn and bank indicator? As you may have realized, most homebuilds suffer obese. The best way to try to contol it, is to have as little of anything as possible, right down to the minimum required for legal reasons. As your ‘Spitfire’ would never be anything but a fair weather flying machine stick, to the absolute minimum VFR equipment. In my country, the panel would consist of: RPM indicator, oil pressure and temperature indicator, an airspeed indicator, an altimeter, a clock, a compass, a radio, and (depending on where you intend to fly, check your airspace) a transponder. A ‘nice to have’ would be a little ‘ball in a tupe’ (turn indicator), to check for ballanced flight, sold for 29 quid by Light Aero.
If you have any qestions, PM me. I will not bit your head off 😉 😀
Did the maths my self, and the price is correct! Unbelievable. An aircraft like that for 140K! It’s a real steal, alright
We need a TBM!
It’s a steal at around £140K
I can whole heartedly agree with this first comment. I WANT ONE 😀 😀
Are you sure there is not some decimal mistake in that price? 140K for a first class TBM? :confused:
They don’t need ‘R’ for that! If the engine is running at ‘high-ish’ powersettings that will happen.
A Sea Fury is supposed to have a five blade prop, doesn’t it 😉 😀