dark light

The Flying Dude

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: lots of wheelz with russian airliners #651957
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Re: lots of wheelz with russian airliners

    Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
    hi i noted that russian airliners have more wheels than western. do they think it’s cool (it is actually, look at the tu 144). the tu 154 has the number of wheels like the 777 but it maybe wheigs half. and the tu 204 is an a321 but it has wheels like the 757.

    Hi Jeanske,

    Wysiswyg and Theplane are right! I remember reading an interview with the main designer of the Tu124 he was asked “why he designed the main gear that heavy and rugged as it does not have a good effect on the descent?” he answered: “Do you think i’m crazy? I know very well that the landing is not affected positively, but in the harsh winters of Siberia and unpaved strips could damaged a landing gear beyond repair” ……i was so impressed by this that i never forgot this quote and it was some 10-15 years ago that i read it. It is true that the more wheels the better the weight is distributed and does not press as much on the strip or taxiway. This means a much better handling on the ground especially on unpaved runways as the plane does not sink in the mud or sink in the ground.
    The larger western aircrafts also use this principle see B747, A340, DC10/MD11, Galaxy C5 or the newly C17.

    IO hope this helps 😀

    in reply to: RIAT Photos (Sunday) #727674
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Originally posted by GZYL
    The teaser question, is a Myasischev M-50 I think.

    Yep, that’s correct it’s a Myasischev M-50 🙂

    in reply to: RIAT Photos (Sunday) #728815
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    LN excellent….very very nice pics…..may also add this one?
    This is more a teaser….can anyone tell me which plane this is? a hint…it’s a Soviet experimental :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Designing 3? #733348
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Originally posted by A330Crazy
    Air Canada TU-154

    A330Crazy Never thought i would see a Tupolev in Air Canada schemes 😀

    in reply to: A300 & A310 #733352
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    ehhh oops sorry…it’s just majestic to see the Mriya (AN225) make a turn like this just after take off 😀

    in reply to: A300 & A310 #733357
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Originally posted by KabirT
    why wold any one buy A310s when the A332 is avialable? Anyway A310 is the worst aircraft one can travel on.

    I’m sorry Kabir but i don’t share your views on this one. I flew A310 of KLM and i like it….however, it’s not a popular aircraft, i think A300 is far more popular but i like the looks of A300 better than A310 it’s not my favourite but it flew well even through turbulance.

    in reply to: Todays Pics #642212
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Monster, where were these pics taken? Which airport?

    in reply to: Todays Pics #642256
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Excellent Pic…..i would love to have one of those for christmas:p

    in reply to: Another Teaser….? #644500
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    I would go for an MD11

    in reply to: Airbus' common cockpits vs Boeing's #644506
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Does the seniority system apply also for the in flight crew too? Air host/hostess???
    I knew about it but never thought it was this big ‘a deal.

    I bet this RAAF pilot couldn’t be bothered as he’s “burning” fuel away 😀

    in reply to: Teaser- What's this ? #644737
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Ok I got another teaser….
    This is the cockpit of which Aircraft? anyone?? 😀

    in reply to: Farewell nice Lady #644748
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Wow She looks magnificent…..i agree with Steve Rowell, it’s sad the concorde belongs to the past now. I hope if it ever gets a sucessor that it will resemble this grand “old” lady.
    Thanx Hand!

    in reply to: Airbus' common cockpits vs Boeing's #644880
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Originally posted by Cyprioteagle
    Flying dude,

    You are correct that if an airliner adobted an all-airbus fleet would save some money, by avoiding some training cost and also having one pool of pilot for all the aircraft.

    However, you have neglected other overhead costs like maintenance that would be relatively the same if you had a mixture of Airbus – Boeing fleet. An A320 would require its own set of spares, than the A319 or an A330 or A340. Even some older A320’s cannot take the same spares as the newer built A320.

    Having a combination of Boeing and Airbus fleet, airlines have a relatively strong bargaining power as they do not rely entirely on one supplier of aircraft. So when the time comes to replace them or expand their fleet size they can get better negotiation terms, than be considered given that an airline is an all-Boeing or an all-Airbus!

    Cyprioteagle,

    Very good point and i overlooked maintanance indeed, and the fact that some older A320’s cannot take the same spares as the newer built A320’s is new to me…i’ve learned something new again 😉

    Thanx!

    in reply to: Farewell nice Lady #644891
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Ok great, thanx! 😉

    in reply to: Farewell nice Lady #644896
    The Flying Dude
    Participant

    Great shots! Do you happen to have the Air France concorde in formation with patrouille de France flew on 14 juillet?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)