dark light

arthuro

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,261 through 1,275 (of 1,287 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: what is the big deal about the Rafale #2513420
    arthuro
    Participant

    I just would like to bring a small contribution from what I’ve read about the rafale, and more specificaly about supercruise.

    I have read in air fan “special rafale” that the rafale M is able to supercruise with one 1000L supersonic drop tank and 4 Ato A missiles. it was a pilot from the navy who told that.

    in reply to: Mirage 2000 #2533040
    arthuro
    Participant

    hello everyone!

    there was a very interesting thread on f16.net on the mirage 2000.
    http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-1872.html

    there was an HAF mirage 2000 who said this when comparing the f16 and the mirage 2000

    “Would you agree with these statements of a former HAF fighter pilot?

    <>

    This true.

    >>With good pilots on both sides, they are probably equal in dogfight>>

    This is wrong. A good pilot in an M2K will kill a good pilot in an F-16 9 out of 10 times (1 provided for launch failure).

    I served in an M2K fighter squadron in HAF. We analyzed tactics and combat scores against HAF F-16 squadrons all the time.

    The M2Ks higher INSTANTANEOUS turn rate gives it an advantage during the first pass. The F-16 cannot outturn the Mirage. It has to climb in hopes of avoiding the lock. A good M2K pilot will end it right there (the Magic 2 is a better IR weapon than the AIM-9L/M).

    A rookie in the M2K, however, will probably lose the F-16’s climb. The more powerful viper will escape and will then gain the advantage because of 1) Altitude 2) Higher SUSTAINABLE turn rate.

    As for turn rates, altitude differences are purely theoretical and in practice make no difference EXCEPT for sea level manuevers where the more powerful Viper starts gaining the advantage.
    Would you agree with the statement that F-16 is a better choice for multi role missions than Mirage 2000 ?

    Absolutely. The M2K is a multi-role fighter also, but its performance varies greatly among roles – whereas the Viper performs almost all missions at a very satisfactory level.

    HAF M2Ks are specialized. 331’s (where I served) primary role is now TASMO (naval strike with AM-39 Exocet) and 332’s primary role will become Deep Strike (with SCALP EG). CAP & Air Supremacy are their secondary roles.

    The F-16 sqdns OTOH undertake a number of roles such as SEAD, CAP, CAS, and numerous specialized strike missions (enemy AFBs, enemy C&C centers etc). The Viper is a much more volatile weapons system”

    source: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-1872-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-45.html

    regards

    in reply to: Most maneuverable modern non-TVC fighter? #2536454
    arthuro
    Participant

    about rafale maneuvrability there are interestings news from the 10th fox three magazines.

    http://new.isoshop.com/dae/dae/gauche/sponsors/sponsor_rafale/img/fox3_10.pdf

    this is an extract about wvr engagements versus mirage 2000 and F16

    “Obvious advantage
    During their stay, each pilot flew several missions every day and, for all Mirage 2000 and F-16 aircrews involved, the exercise was their first encounter with the Rafale. Needless to say, they were all impressed by the latest Dassault fighter.« In a dogfight, using only our guns and short range missiles, it is indeed very difficult for a Mirage 2000 pilot to win the
    day against a Rafale, admits Commandant Jean-Roch Piselli, t h e ‘B o s s ’ o f E C 1 /5 Detachment. Considering the imposed rules of engagement
    during the first phase of the exercise, our only real oppor-tunity was to fire first, just after the crossover. Even though the Mirage 2000 is equipped with
    notoriously effective fly-by-wire controls, it does not offer the same level of performance in terms of manoeuvrability and engine thrust and response.
    We have to select full afterburner as soon as the fight begins while the Rafale pilot can throttle back and even remain in full dry, military power: we burn more fueland our infrared signature is significantly higher whereas
    he can reaccelerate very rap-idly if needed. »
    Flottille 12F was declared fully operational in June 2004, and the Rafale pilots now perfectly know how to handle their air-craft to quickly win the fight:
    « we always devise a ‘game plan’ to exploit both the Rafale’s fantastic acceleration and its outstanding agility, explains Lieutenant-Commander PascalCassan. Against a F-16, the Rafale is more powerful in the whole flight envelope, and is considerably more manoeu-vrable below 300 knots.Against a F-16, the Rafale is more powerful in the whole flight envelope, and is considerably more manoeu-vrable below 300 knots.
    Ideally, after the crossover, I will climb into the sun to force him to slow down. I will constantly threaten him by pointing the Rafale’s nose in his direction. That will force him to tighten his turn even more, and his speed will wash out very rapidly. On the contrary, the F-16 pilots will do what they can to keep their speed and energy up. » Numerous ‘beyond visual range’ (BVR) engagements were simulated during the week, and the Rafale proved as deadly in the long-range arena as in a dogfight: « I think that our RBE2 electronic scan-ning radar is very good, indi-cates Lieutenant Le Bars.
    Against a F-15 or a F-16, two aircraft types that have enor-mous
    radar cross-sections because of their massive air-intakes, our detection ranges are excellent. In a BVR sce-nario, we always try to engage at high level and fire our lethal Mica missiles at high altitude to give them the longest pos-sible range. Ideally, we will ‘loft’ the radar-guided Micas to boost their range before diving down to low level while simultaneously opening left or
    right. In doing so, we deny the opponent any opportunity to fire back. When in the ‘merge’, we quickly gain the upper hand against a F-16: with our large
    delta wing and our canard foreplanes, we have consid-erably
    more authority in pitch and we can turn more tightly, the Rafale offering better sus-tained turn rates than the F-16 at low, medium and high levels.the Rafale offering better sus-tained turn rates than the F-16 at low, medium and high levels.
    Our Snecma M88-2 turbofans are so powerful that we often have to reduce power to avoid overtaking our prey.» All participants agreed that this first edition of the Flottille 12F Air Defence Week was a total success. Flottille 12F spe-cialists are already busy preparing the 2007 event which should attract a larger foreign contingent. By July 2007, the first four Standard F2 omnirole Rafale fighters will be in service with the unit, and they are likely to partici-pate in the exercise too.”

    regards.

    in reply to: Rafaele- improvement to same. #2552287
    arthuro
    Participant

    does not work 😡

    in reply to: Rafaele- improvement to same. #2552290
    arthuro
    Participant

    you can see these saw tooth ram strips on these pictures:

    in reply to: Rafaele- improvement to same. #2552478
    arthuro
    Participant

    you are correct sealordlawrence, austin posted this article on eurofighter typhonn starstreak.net.

    2) Storm Warning
    Edefence
    The Rafale is poised to become Europe’s premier fighter-bomber
    by Michal Fiszer
    Jun. 6, 2005
    France’s Rafale is the most capable aircraft of the three new-generation fighters developed in
    Europe over the last two decades. Although the Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, and Saab
    Gripen are all currently being developed as multirole aircraft, only in the case of the first were strike
    capabilities made a priority from the very beginning of the program. The remaining two were initially
    optimized for air-to-air missions, with attack capabilities added later. When current conflicts demand
    mainly air-to-ground capabilities, the Rafale (the name means “squall”) better fits those
    requirements, being a true strike fighter by its very nature, and it is not any worse in air combat
    than its two European competitors. Various circumstances dictated that that Rafale would be fully
    multirole, while the Gripen and Typhoon are fighters with strike capabilities. Dassault goes even
    farther and calls its aircraft “omni-role,” which means that Rafale can perform ground-attack
    and air-combat tasks in one sortie
    The requirement for stealth led to redesigning the fuselage, which produced Rafale’s
    characteristic shape. The radar-absorbent materials initially used caused the dark color of the
    Rafale C prototype (shown here), but later special electromagnetic-transparent paints were
    developed so the aircraft could receive any color scheme.
    This is not to say that the Rafale’s superiority as a European air-combat platform is absolute. There are
    many factors that weigh against the aircraft, chiefly complexity and cost. Moreover, not every nation
    has the same requirements for its air arm, and there are many qualities to recommend the Typhoon and
    Gripen, not to mention comparable candidates from Russia and the US. To date, no foreign customer
    for the Rafale has been found, while Saab already has three export customers for Gripen – the Czech
    Republic, Hungary, and South Africa – and even Eurofighter has found an export sale outside of its
    consortium membership – as of now, though, only to Austria. One could ask why such a capable and
    technically successful aircraft as the Rafale has had such a difficult road. Perhaps the Rafale is
    “over qualified,” and potential customers, including France, do not wish to pay for capabilities
    that they do not need.
    Nevertheless, as we shall see, a combination of good planning and good fortune has conspired to place
    the Rafale at the forefront of European tactical aircraft.
    Early Development
    Initial studies for an Avion de Combat Tactique (ACT; Tactical Combat Aircraft) started at the French
    Ministry of Aviation as early as in 1975. At this early stage, the aircraft was to be a prospective
    supplement to the Mirage 2000, which first flew in 1978. The Mirage 2000 was to be a light fighter in
    the F-16 class, optimized for air defense and related tasks, while the ACT was to be a heavier and more
    capable aircraft, optimized for ground attack, reconnaissance, and air superiority. Among the authors of
    these early requirements, called ACT 92 (1992 was the year of expected service entry), was LtCol
    Vincent Lanata, later Chief of Staff of the French Air Force.
    Initial studies for an Avion de Combat Tactique (ACT; Tactical Combat Aircraft) started at the
    French Ministry of Aviation as early as 1975. Early efforts to cooperate with the Anglo-German
    effort that would lead to Eurofighter did not pan out, and the French pursued the ACT on their
    own. The French had a requirement for a multirole aircraft, and the Rafale’s unique “omni-role”
    nature is a function of this. Pictured here is the Rafale B.
    The UK and Germany initiated an international consortium to develop a future multirole aircraft in
    1977. It was even agreed that the aircraft would be a two-engine, single-seat multirole fighter with a
    delta wing and front horizontal control surfaces (canards). The aerodynamic layout was actually
    proposed by France, which joined the consortium. However, due to conflicting requirements,
    cooperation ended in the spring of 1981. Germany wanted to build an air-defense and air-superiority
    fighter; the UK wanted to build a heavy multirole aircraft with an emphasis on air-to-air missions;
    while France wanted a lighter multirole fighter with the emphasis on air-to-ground missions. Finally,
    the common development effort split into the French ACT 92 and the German-British European
    Combat Fighter (ECF), resulting from the British Air Staff Target (AST) 403 and German Taktisches
    Kampfflugzeug (TKF) 90 requirements. The ECF finally evolved into the four-nation (with Italy and
    Spain) Eurofighter Typhoon, and France decided to proceed with ACT 92 on its own.
    On Oct. 30, 1978, Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet (presently Dassault Aviation, Paris, France)
    received an initial contract for the development of the ACT 92 project, supplemented on December 20
    by a contract for its naval version. In 1979, more serious studies about possible configurations of the
    new aircraft were undertaken by the Office National d’Études de Recherches Aéronautiques (ONERA;
    the National Office for Aviation Studies and Research). The project was conducted under the codename
    Rapace – bird of prey. In March 1980, Dassault-Breguet started studying four aerodynamic
    configurations, all with canards and delta wings. Two had a single vertical tail fin, while the others had
    double vertical fins.
    Ten of the first production batch of F1-standard aircraft built were Rafale M naval single-seat
    fighters, eight of which equip the 12F Squadron (shown here), replacing obsolete Vought F-8E
    (FN) Crusader fighters. Total requirements of the French Navy call for 60 aircraft (all single-seat
    Rafale Ms), and the French Air Force ultimately is to procure 95 Rafale C single-seat and 140
    Rafale B two-seat fighters.
    In October 1982, Charles Hernu, the French minister of defense, announced that Dassault-Breguet
    would build a technology demonstrator called the Avion de Combat Epérimental (ACX; Experimental
    Combat Aircraft), based on the ACT 92 study. On April 13, 1983, it was decided that the ACX would
    be built according to the project prepared at Dassault Technical Department and headed by Bruno
    Revellin-Falcoz. The design team was led by Jean-Jacques Samin and Claude Hironde. The Dassault-
    Breguet proposal was prepared in close cooperation with ONERA, the Ministry of the Air Force, and
    the Délégation Générale pour l’Armement (DGA; France’s top military-procurement authority). In
    September 1984, the French government, acknowledging that other countries’ requirements were too far
    apart from French operational needs, decided to build a combat version of the ACX with the newly
    designed Snecma M88 engines. The proposal totally eliminated any hope that France cold be lured back
    into the ECF program, since those specifications were not acceptable to Germany and the UK.
    The new aircraft was named the Rafale by Dassault, and the ACX technology demonstrator became
    Rafale A. Among the requirements for the new aircraft, three elements were especially
    interesting: the decision to design the aircraft with the use of available stealth technologies, while
    keeping the accepted aerodynamic lay-out, including radar-absorbing materials (RAMs), shaping
    of some features (such as the fuselage, inlets, etc.), and extensive use of composite materials; the
    decision to equip the aircraft with a glass cockpit and employ a hands-on throttle and stick
    (HOTAS) and fly-by-wire controls; and the decision to integrate all of the avionics, navigation,
    fire-control, and self-protection equipment into a single system controlled by a central mission
    computer.
    The requirement for stealth led to redesigning the fuselage, which produced the Rafale’s present
    characteristic shape. A single air intake was split into two side-mounted intakes that were carefully
    shaped to prevent an enemy’s radar from observing Rafale from the front hemisphere by getting returns
    off the moving parts of compressors. The vertical fin was made of electromagnetic (EM)-
    transparent composites. The RAMs initially used caused the black color of the Rafale C
    prototype, but special EM-transparent paints were later developed so the aircraft could receive
    any color scheme. All of those undertakings dramatically reduced the radar cross-section (RCS)
    of the Rafale, especially from the front. It is very difficult to assess the Rafale’s RCS due to the high
    level of classification, but sources have unofficially said that Rafale has a much lower RCS than the
    Typhoon, a fighter of roughly the same size.
    Initially, a more stealthy version of Rafale was to be developed. It was named Rafale D (D for “discret,”
    or stealth) and was to be built in land-based and naval versions. But it was later decided that the serial
    Rafale would be of reduced overall size and that, with the end of the Cold War, such high levels of
    stealthiness would not be required.

    In the spring of 2002, 12F Squadron became operational, and with seven Rafales, it deployed
    aboard the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle (shown here), which went to the Indian Ocean in
    support of Operation Enduring Freedom. While the Rafales were not combat ready, they did
    engage in mock air combat with US Navy F-14 and F/A-18 fighters. By all accounts, the Rafales
    put in an impressive performance. In March 2004, Charles de Gaulle again set off to the Indian
    Ocean, where her embarked Rafale squadron took part in the Northwind 2004 joint exercises
    with Mirage 2000-9s of the UAE. Later, the aircraft took part in the Varuna exercise conducted
    with the Indian Navy, and Rafales were matched against Indian Sea Harrier FRS.51s. Another
    exercise, Red Shark, conducted with Saudi Arabia, enabled Rafales to conduct practice
    engagements against Saudi Tornado F3s.
    Building of the Rafale A technology demonstrator started at Dassault’s Saint-Cloud factory in March
    1984, before a contract with the DGA was signed. It was temporarily powered by General Electric
    F404-GE-400 engines (68.8 kN of reheated thrust each). The first flight took place at Istres on July 4,
    1986. Four years later, the aircraft was re-engined with Snecma M88-2 engines with 72.9 kN of thrust
    each. The Rafale A was used for tests until 1994.
    Progress in electronics enabled a reduction in the size of the Rafale’s airframe. This resulted in an even
    lower RCS. It is also worth emphasizing that the smaller and lighter airframe used in production
    Rafales enables them to fly in “supercruise” mode – supersonic flight without the use of
    afterburners. Supercruise enables the aircraft to execute a part of the ingress and/or egress route
    at supersonic speed without serious penalty to its tactical radius.
    Rafales of the F2 standard can carry an assortment of precision-guided weapons, including laserguided
    bombs (shown here, on a Rafale B), Apache stand-off missiles, and SCALP cruise missiles.
    Future enhancements will enable Rafale to carry anti-ship missiles and other strike weapons,
    including the nuclear-armed ASMP-A missile.
    Four such redesigned pre-production aircraft were built: a Rafale C single-seater for Air Force, a Rafale
    M single seater for the Navy, a Rafale B two-seater for the Air Force, and a Rafale M two-seater for
    Navy. They were first flown on May 19, 1991; Dec. 12, 1991; April 30, 1993; and Nov. 8, 1993,
    respectively. The Rafale B was the first aircraft to receive the newly developed Thomson-CSF and
    Dassault Electronique (now merged into Thales) Radar à Bayalage Electronoique Deux Plans (RBE2;
    Radar With Two-Axis Electronic Scan), the Spectra self-protection system, and the final version of the
    F1 standard avionics and navigation system. The use of the two-seater made tests of the aircraft’s
    electronics systems easier. (Note that the designation Rafale M for the pre-production two-seater is
    confusing, because the designation Rafale N had been reserved for such aircraft.)
    All Rafale production versions are incrementally divided into four standards, called F1, F2, F3, and F4
    in France, and also referred as Block 01, Block 5, Block 10, and Block 15 for export purposes. All of
    the land-based Rafales have 14 hardpoints for external weapons. The naval Rafale M has thirteen
    hardpoints due to the reinforcement of the fuselage structure for carrier operations, so it has one central
    fuselage station instead of two in tandem. The F1 can carry up to 10 MICA EM and Magic-2 air-to-air
    missiles (6+4, or 5+4 in the naval version). Interestingly, F1 aircraft do no carry MICA IR missiles. The
    central fuselage stations are intended for MICA missiles, while the rear station can accept a drop tank.
    Four additional stations are mounted on the fuselage sides – the rear pair for MICA missiles and the left
    front for the Damocles targeting pod (used in F2 and above aircraft). Six additional stations under the
    wings can be used for two drop tanks and four MICA missiles. The outer stations and wingtip stations
    can be used only for Magic-2 infrared-guided short-range missiles.
    The Rafale is equipped with a single 30mm GIAT 791B cannon mounted on the right engine duct. The
    gun has a rate of fire of 2,500 rounds per minute, and the fighter carries 125 rounds of ammunition.
    Sensors and Electronics
    The RBE2 radar had been in development since 1989. It was decided that the radar would receive a
    new phased-array antenna with full electronic scan, instead of the electro-mechanical scan employed by
    the Eurofighter Typhoon’s Captor radar. Initially, the radar received a passive phased-array
    antenna, but ultimately an active electronically scanned array (AESA) will be fitted. According to
    French Ministry of Defense (MoD) sources, the RBE2 radar has a modest range about 100 km
    against fighter aircraft, but it operates in a low-probability-of-intercept (LPI) mode and is
    resistant to deception jamming. The Typhoon’s Captor has a range of 160 km against fighters
    but is considered more prone to jamming and can track fewer targets. The French Air Force
    accepted the penalty in range reduction for the benefits of LPI and other characteristics.
    Moreover, in network-centric operations, a common air picture will be transmitted via the
    Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) to the Rafale, enabling the aircraft to make
    use of off-board sensors.
    According to Thales, the radar operates in the X band and can use low, medium, and high pulserepetition
    frequencies. It can track up to 40 air targets in track-while-scan mode and, according
    to an unofficial source, can engage up to eight of them with missiles launched in short intervals.
    Normally up to six (five on the naval Rafale M) MBDA (Paris, France) MICA EM missiles can be
    carried. An unusual feature of the infrared-seeking MICA IR version is that the missile can receive
    mid-course update commands from the radar to compare the target location with the location of its
    seeker’s track or for lock-after-launch engagements. The effective range of both the infrared- and radarhoming
    missile versions, therefore, reaches 70 km. Electronic beam steering enables the RBE2
    radar to search the airspace in various patterns, probably up to 60 degrees in any direction from
    the fixed antenna axis. The radar enables not only track while scan but also so-called “track here while
    scan there.” For example, the RBE2 can readily track airborne targets while searching for another
    airborne target in another sector. The radar performs automatic prioritization of threat targets and has
    the ability to discriminate a single aircraft in a group in raid-assessment mode. The F1 standard radar
    has no air-to-ground functions.
    The Rafale’s RBE2 radar has a modest range of about 100 km against fighter aircraft, but it
    operates in a low-probability-of-intercept (LPI) mode and is resistant to deception jamming. The
    French Air Force accepted the penalty in range reduction for the benefits of LPI and other
    characteristics. Moreover, in network-centric operations, a common air picture will be
    transmitted via the Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) to the Rafale,
    enabling the aircraft to make use of off-board sensors. This Rafale B carries an assortment of
    MICA EM (inboard) and Magic-2 (outboard) air-to-air missiles.
    The AESA radar is not being incorporated into the F3 standard. The development of the AESA
    version of the RBE2 radar started officially in April 2002, when the DGA awarded Thales a
    contract for development of an active-array radar demonstrator optimized for the Rafale. Called
    the Démonstrateur Radar à Antenne Active (DRAA; Active Array Radar Demonstrator), the program
    culminated in a series of demanding flight tests to validate the system’s detection performance. In
    December 2002, the first flight of the AESA system was carried out in a Mystere XX flying testbed
    belonging to the French MoD and located at the Flight Test Center at Cazaux. Subsequently, the DRAA
    was fitted to the two-seat production Rafale B301, which flew with it for the first time in May 2003.
    The next step is now the Démonstrateur Radar à Antenne Active Modes Avancés (DRAAMA;
    Advanced Modes Active Array Radar Demonstrator) program, which was officially launched by the
    DGA in July 2004. The DRAAMA will be entirely new and will benefit from the latest
    developments in radar and solid-state technology. It is possible that the AESA radar will be
    introduced with the F4 standard and/or will form an upgrade package for earlier aircraft.
    The Spectra [Système de Protection et d’Evitement des Conduites de Tir du Rafale] self-protection suite
    has been integrated by Thales, but it consists of elements built by various companies. The Spectra
    consists of a radar-warning receiver (RWR), missile-launch-warning system (MLWS), laserwarning
    receivers (LWS), a management computer, four chaff/flare dispensers, and a built-in
    jammer, all integrated into a single automatic system. The RWR and active jamming system were
    developed by Dassault Electronique (presently Thales) and are integrated as the Détection et
    Brouillage Electromagnétique (DBEM) system. According to an unofficial source, in the F1
    standard, the DBEM can detect transmitters over the frequency range of 2-18 GHz, but this was
    increased to 2-40 GHz on the F2 standard. The system has a very high accuracy of up to one
    degree in azimuth. The DBEM automatically detects, classifies, and identifies emitters and inputs
    information about them into the computer. The Spectra’s active jamming subsystem uses phasedarray
    antennas located at the roots of the canards. Reportedly, the antennas can produce a pencil
    beam compatible with the accuracy of the receiver system, concentrating power on the threat
    while minimizing the chances of detection. It also uses other low-probability-of-detection
    techniques, so the Rafale’s electronic-countermeasures (ECM) capability is also compatible with
    its stealth requirements. The MLWS was developed by Matra (presently MBDA) and is called the
    Détecteur infrarouge de Départ de Missiles (DDM; missile-launch-detection system). It works in two
    infrared (IR) bands to increase detection reliability. Its primary detector is mounted on top of the
    Rafale’s tail. The LWS was developed by Thales and is called the Détection et Alerte Laser (DAL). The
    whole Spectra suite is integrated with three dedicated computers, developed by Thales and MBDA and
    called the Gestion de l’Interface et Compatibilité (GIC).
    http://warships.ru/France/Fighters/Rafale_M_(Cockpit).jpg
    Rafale-M Glass Cockpit
    The Rafale received a glass cockpit from the very beginning. Four color monitors were mounted in the
    cockpit, one head-level 254×254-mm (10×10-in.) display, one weapon- and system-status monitor
    below it, and two smaller 127×127-mm (5×5-in.) displays on each side of the main tactical display. All
    displays were developed by Sextant Avionique (presently Thales) with the use of active-matrix and
    liquid-crystal display (LCD) technologies. The two small displays are controlled by touch. Thales also
    delivered the CTH3022 wide-angle (32×20º) holographic head-up display (HUD).
    Rafales are powered by two Snecma M88-2 engines with 72.9 kN of thrust each. Rafales are able
    to fly in “supercruise” mode – supersonic flight without the use of afterburners. Supercruise
    enables the aircraft to execute a part of the ingress and/or egress route at supersonic speed
    without serious penalty to its tactical radius.
    All of the Rafale’s avionics and electronics were integrated through four Mil Std 1553B data buses and
    two Mil Std 1760 data buses. The latter operate in the ADA language and enable use of most modern
    types of weapons. Integration was achieved through two Dassault Electronique (presently Thales)
    mission computers, replaced by a single, more capable computer on the F2 standard and above. The
    heart of the navigation system is formed by two Sagem (Paris, France) Sigma 95N (RL90) lasergyroinertial-
    navigation systems (INSs) with embedded GPS receivers from Thales. Thales also
    delivered the NC 12E TACAN, the TLS-2020 multi-mode receiver (MMR), and the AHV-17 radar
    altimeter, the latter of which was later replaced by the AHV2930. The TLS2020 MMR performs
    various functions: instrumental-landing-system (ILS) and microwave-landing-system (MLS) functions
    for approach and landing operations and VHF-omnidirectional-range (VOR) functions for en-route
    navigation. The AHV2930 digital radio-altimeter has an extended range of 0 to 10,500 feet in altitude
    with optimized performance for very low-level flight, as well as a low probability of detection.
    The Rafale’s communications suite provides secure and interoperable voice and tactical datalink
    communications using NATO standards: SATURN (Second-generation Anti-jamming Tactical UHF
    for NATO) and MIDS. The Rafale is equipped with two Thales radio sets: the TRA2020 for basic
    V/UHF voice communications and the TRA6031 V/UHF radio set, which provides fast-frequencyhopping
    SATURN capabilities while being compatible with radios presently in use.
    The identification-friend-or-foe (IFF) function is performed by the SB25A Combined Interrogator-
    Transponder, also developed by Thales. This new IFF MKXII equipment is the first of its kind using
    electronic-scanning technology. It includes Mode S capability is prepared to accept the future Mode 5
    IFF waveform
    Four Production Standards
    The F1 was an interim standard, actually optimized for air-combat missions, since developing the airto-
    air fire-control system was a much easier task than the air-to-ground system. Only 13 production
    aircraft were built to the F1 standard. The service interested in the F1 was the French Navy, since it
    urgently needed a replacement for its aging Vought F-8E(FN) Crusader fighters. Ten of the F1s built
    were Rafale M naval single-seat fighters, eight of which equip the 12F Squadron. The three remaining
    were two Rafale B two-seat fighters and a single seat Rafale C for the French Air Force. First flight of
    the Rafale B took place on Nov. 24, 1998. The Rafale M was flown for the first time on July 7, 1999,
    and the Rafale C first flew on April 16, 2003 (and was the last Batch 1 aircraft to leave the factory).
    While the F2 standard is not yet the ultimate version of Rafale, it can be treated as fully combat
    capable. The F2 is actually the first version that will enter regular service in both the French Air Force
    and French Navy. The whole order for the F2 standard, placed in 1999, covers 48 fighters: seven Rafale
    Cs and 25 Rafale Bs for the Air Force, and 16 single-seat Rafale Ms for the Navy. Currently, three
    production F2s have been built, all two-seat Rafale Bs for the Air Force. The latest of these was handed
    over to CEAM (the French Air Force Test Center) in Mont-de-Marsan in April 2005.
    The aircraft’s avionics system received a new-generation mission computer, more capable than the
    previous two combined. It is the Thales Modular Data Processing Unit (MDPU). The core software
    system of the MDPU includes mission, displays, cartographic, network, flight-management, and other
    critical flight software. The MDPU is connected to 1553 and 3910 data buses. All major systems
    onboard the Rafale are connected to the MDPU via interface units. These data buses are completed by
    point-to-point video networking, linking aircraft systems with the displays and recording systems.
    Developments in the RBE2 radar enabled a ground -mapping mode and Doppler beamsharpening
    mode, boosting the aircraft’s ground-attack capabilities, since F2 the system can
    perform terrain-following and ground-proximity-warning modes. The new radar capabilities
    also enabled the integration of more types of air-to-ground weapons on the aircraft.
    Rafales of the F2 standard can carry up to two MBDA Apache stand-off missiles (140-km range) or
    two MBDA SCALP mini-cruise missiles. The SCALP [Systéme de Crosiére conventional Autonome à
    Longue Porté] weighs 1,500 kg and has a range of 400+ km. Laser-guided weapons are also new with
    the F2. Up to five GBU-12 or three GBU-10 Paveway IIs can be carried, as well as the French
    BGL1000. In the future, Paveway III bombs will also be carried. In the anti-ship role, the Rafale F2 is
    to carry two AM39 Exocet Block 2 missiles, although full anti-ship capabilities will await the F3
    standard. The conventional-weapon load includes up to 22 bombs weighing 250 kg (French) or 500 lb.
    (NATO), up to 10 bombs of 400 kg (French) or 1,000 lb. (NATO), or up to three of 1,000 kg (French)
    or 2,000 lb. (NATO). Among the new air-to-air load are the MICA IR infrared-guided medium-range
    missiles.
    In further development, the Rafale F2 is to be able carry some more air-to-ground guided weapons.
    The most interesting of them is the Sagem AASMINS/GPS-guided bomb, something of a
    “European JDAM” (see below). Other unspecified weapons are likely to be integrated in the
    future, possibly including the Alenia/MBDA PGM-500 and PGM-2000 HAKIM family of laserguided
    bombs and the Elbit (Haifa, Israel) Whizzard guided-bomb family, consisting of Lizard
    laser-guided and OPHER imaging-infrared-guided bombs.
    Under the F2 standard, the Rafale’s avionics were integrated with the MIDS tactical informationdistribution
    system, working in the Link 16 format. Aircraft are fitted with the MIDS Low Volume
    Terminal (MIDS-LVT), developed by the EuroMIDS consortium, which consists of Thales (Colombes,
    France), Marconi Selenia Communications (Rome, Italy), Indra Sistemas (Madrid, Spain), and EADS
    Deutschland GmbH Defense and Security Systems Division (Unterschleissheim, Germany). The
    MIDS-LVT provides Link 16 for real-time tri-service tactical information exchanges with command
    centers, airborne early-warning aircraft, warships, and other fighters. The MIDS-LVT also provides two
    additional secure voice channels. The system enables the creation of a common recognized tactical
    picture. Now the picture obtained from Air Force E-3F AWACS and Navy E-2C Hawkeye aircraft can
    be distributed in real time among the Rafale fleet. Also, the aircraft can exchange pictures seen by
    onboard radars, as well as imagery from the Damocles pod (see below). One of the most interesting
    features of the MIDS is the ability to share data from the Spectra electronic-warfare (EW) system in
    real time, fusing it into a common recognized EW-situation picture.
    And finally, the ultimate F2 aircraft will receive the Optronique Secteur Frontal (OSF) system (see
    below), developed by Thales Optronique in cooperation with Sagem.
    After the 1999 order, development of the Rafale was slowed down by French authorities. This was
    largely due to the developing concepts of network-centric warfare (NCW), under which information
    technologies produced many changes in the fields of tactics and weapons. It was decided that
    prolonging the Rafale’s development would result in an aircraft that better fit new and future
    requirements. Discussion of the requirements for the F3 standard were finalized in late 2003, and
    Dassault received a contract for its development in February 2004. In December of that year, an order
    was placed for delivery of 59 F3-standard Rafales, bringing the total number of aircraft to 120 (13 F1s
    and 48 F2s, plus 59 F3s). This was a major reduction from the previously planned procurement of 234
    fighters for the Air Force alone. According to previous plans, many more F1- and F2-standard aircraft
    were to have been produced before switching to the F3. Now the numbers of the earlier versions have
    been reduced, and production is to be shifted to later-standard aircraft (F3 and F4). Total requirements
    of the French Navy call for 60 aircraft (all single-seat Rafale Ms), and the French Air Force ultimately
    is to procure 95 Rafale C single-seat and 140 Rafale B two-seat fighters.
    The F3 standard aircraft is to receive a modernized radar, but still with the passively scanned antenna. It
    will include a range of new modes, such as synthetic aperture radar (SAR), enhancing ground attack
    capabilities. Again according to unofficial information, the improved radar can perform various modes
    simultaneously, for example air-to-ground and air-search modes at the same time.
    The F3-standard aircraft will have full anti-ship capabilities. This means that the RBE2 radar and OSF
    will have naval-target-detection and -tracking capabilities. The aircraft will also carry MBDA Exocet
    Block 3 missiles and possibly newly developed anti-ship missiles in the future.
    As of the F3 standard, the Rafale will gain a reconnaissance capability, allowing the Mirage F1CRs to
    be phased out. The Rafale F3 is to carry the newly developed Recce NG pod from Thales Land and
    Joint Systems (see below).
    F3-standard aircraft will also be equipped with a helmet-mounted cueing system. For a long time, the
    Thales Topisght-E system was mentioned in the context of the Rafale, but recently Sagem Gerfaut is
    listed as the future provider of Rafale’s helmet-mounted cuing system, according to Dassault
    information. Both systems are very light and have some helmet-mounted display capability. For the F4
    standard, development will probably aim for a full helmet-mounted display and elimination of the
    HUD.
    Changes in French Air Force doctrine have caused the service to emphasize its procurement of
    two-seat Rafale B aircraft at the expense of single-seat Rafale C aircraft (shown here). French
    Air Force representatives maintain that the experience from recent conflicts has shown that, in
    dense air-defense environments, the workload is too great for a single pilot – a conclusion that
    has been reached by many air forces. Intriguingly, the French Navy abandoned its plans to
    procure a two-seat version of the Rafale.
    The F4 standard has not yet been defined. It is expected that the version will be equipped with
    new Snecma M88-3 engines, with 15-20% more thrust to cope with the greater weight of new
    avionics and weapons. As for new armaments, Meteor and IRIS-T air-to-air missiles are
    mentioned, although a decision regarding their integration on the Rafale has not yet been made.
    The F4 standard will also probably include an AESA-type radar. The F4 version is to be
    operational after 2010, and most decisions have been deliberately prolonged to enable better
    adaptation of requirements to future threats.
    As has been suggested above, the development of the aircraft platform is not the only way the French
    are planning to expand and improve the mission capabilities of the “Rafale package.” A host of sensor
    and weapon systems and mission-specific applications will be added to the aircraft over time. Some of
    the more important of these parallel development efforts are outlined below.
    Damocles Targeting Pod
    The Damocles navigation and targeting pod was developed by Thomson-CSF Optronique (now
    Thales). The company’s experience in this area goes back to the 1970s with the development of the
    first-generation ATLIS TV/laser-targeting pod, followed by the second-generation CLDP 8-12μ system
    in the early 1990s. Development of the Damocles pod started in the mid 1990s and was partially
    financed by the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which had ordered the system for its Mirage 2000-9s.
    The Damocles pod has been introduced into French Navy service and is operational on carrier-based
    Super Etendard aircraft.
    The Damocles pod, in its baseline configuration, has a third-generation thermal-imagery camera,
    working in the waveband of 3-5 μm, and a navigational forward-looking IR (FLIR) sensor mounted in
    the pylon. The navigational FLIR sensor has a 24×18-degrees field of view. The main sensor is used for
    targeting purposes, with selectable fields of view: wide (4×3º), intermediate, and narrow (1×0.75º). It is
    fully stabilized, enabling an observation range of up to 40-50 km. Along with the camera, the Damocles
    pod is also equipped with two laser sets working in the 1.5- and 1.06-μm wavebands, used for range
    finding, target designation, and laser spot tracking. The lasers’ ranges enables them to be used from
    outside the firing envelope of many air-defense systems. The Damocles camera and lasers can be cued
    to the target by other aircraft systems, including indirectly by the RBE2 radar. The pod has also an
    automatic track mode. The laser-designation system of the Damocles pod is compatible with Paveway
    II and III, Alenia/MBDA PGM-500 and PGM-2000 HAKIM, and Elbit Lizard guided bombs.
    Optronique Secteur Frontal (OSF)
    Thales also developed a very advanced built-in electro-optical (EO) targeting system for the Rafale,
    called Optronique Secteur Frontal (OSF; Front Sector Optronic). The system is mounted in front of the
    cockpit and consists of two optical modules. The right-side module has a long-wave (8-12 μm) infrared
    camera used for target search and track. The range of the camera is believed to be up to 90 km in ideal
    conditions. The left-side module carries a CCD TV camera for daytime target identification. The
    system also includes a laser rangefinder for use against air targets.
    The OSF system does not replace the Damocles pod. Indeed, the OSF system is primarily an air-to-air
    search, track, identification, and localization sensor, with a limited air-to-ground localization and
    identification function. The OSF system is to be introduced from the F2 standard onward. In F2.1, it
    will be air-to-air capable, and in F2.2 it will also gain an air-to-ground capability. From the F3 standard,
    the OSF system is also to be also adapted for anti-ship missions. A future enhancement has been
    proposed to the French Air Force and French Navy with a night target-identification function based on
    a mid-wave IR sensor that would replace the CCD TV camera.
    Recce NG
    The Thales Recce NG is intended to be not just a reconnaissance pod. It will be a complete
    reconnaissance system. The pod is the airborne element of the system. The ground elements consist of a
    mission-planning system and a station for receiving, processing, and disseminating intelligence data in
    real time.
    The Recce NG system offers the capability to perform both high- and medium-altitude strategic
    reconnaissance and low-altitude tactical reconnaissance during the same mission. The system has three
    digital optronic sensors: two bi-spectral sensors for long-range reconnaissance (IR and visible) and a
    high-speed tactical IR line scanner for low-altitude reconnaissance. The bi-spectral sensors offer several
    fields of view – narrow field for medium-range reconnaissance and very narrow field for long-range,
    stand-off reconnaissance. The optics of the visible and IR cameras are mounted on a flexible bearing,
    enabling the systems to be directed vertically and at oblique angles in any direction from horizon to
    horizon, and with significant agility in azimuth.
    The French Navy’s relative lack of mid-air refuelling assets may partially explain its reluctance
    to pay a range penalty in order to accommodate a second crew member in its Rafales. Here, a
    Rafale M gets a drink from a Super Etendard “tanker.”
    The Recce NG pod also includes a Recce Management System (RMS) that incorporates advanced
    operational functions for itinerary surveillance (line search), multiple-point image gathering, ad-hoc
    stereoscopic data acquisition (pinpoint tracking), real-time datalink management, and digital recording.
    The pod is equipped with two antennas to transmit high-speed image data in the optical range and
    another antenna for acquiring and tracking the pod from the ground without a pre-defined air meeting
    point. The ground element is fully mobile and includes a mission-planning system. Imagery acquisition
    can be pre-planned or reprogrammed in flight. The ground segment includes a transportable ground
    terminal and antenna linked to the imagery-acquisition system onboard the pod. Prototype Recce NG
    pods are now flying, and the system is expected to be operational on the Rafale after 2008.
    AASM: the European JDAM
    Among the new weapons that are to be integrated beginning with the Rafale F2 standard, one of the
    most interesting is the AASM, developed by Sagem. This is a conversion kit for 500-lb.-class bombs,
    such as the Mk82 general-purpose, BLU-111 cluster, and CBEMS/Bang penetration bombs. The
    guidance section includes an INS and GPS receiver enabling 10-meter accuracy in any weather. The
    whole modernization kit is extremely cheap , which enables air forces to use this type of weapon en
    mass to achieve high-destructive effects in a very short time. The bombs are also equipped with folded
    wings, which enable a glide range of 15 km when dropped from low altitude or 50 km when dropped
    from medium to high altitudes. Another interesting feature is that the guidance processor enables the
    pilot or weapons officer to select the angle at which the bomb impacts the target.
    Additionally, for contingency-type operations, the guidance section can include not only the INS/GPS
    for aiming at a pre-selected point, but also an imaging-IR (IIR) seeker. Use of the IIR seeker restricts
    attacks to a single target per “drop,” while INS/GPS mode only enables every bomb to be aimed at a
    different target and dropped simultaneously. The Rafale can carry up to six AASM bombs on two triple
    racks under the wings.
    ASMP-A Missiles: Nukes for the Rafale
    The F3 standard will be nuclear capable, and Rafale aircraft in the both Navy and Air Force services
    will be armed with new ASMP-A missiles. The ASMP-A [Air-Sol Moyenne Portee Ameliore; air-toground,
    medium range, improved] missile is to replace the existing ASMP missiles that have been used
    since 1988 on the French Air Force’s Mirage 2000N and the French Navy’s Super Etendard strike
    aircraft . The ASMP missile and the French concept of “less-than-strategic” nuclear strikes were
    developed during the Cold War with a major European war in mind. Defense requirements and policy
    have changed dramatically since then, however. One of the most serious threats to any Western
    country’s national security is proliferation of weapons and ballistic-missile technologies that would
    enable “rogue” states to launch a nuclear attack or threaten to do so. To deal with such situations, as
    well as other contingencies involving conflict with established powers, the French MoD decided to
    increase its nuclear deterrence capabilities. Now Mirage 2000N K3 or Rafale aircraft, with the
    assistance of aerial refueling and/or forward airbases, would be able to attack almost any location in the
    world. With the missile’s range of over 500 km, in many cases, the attacking aircraft would be able to
    launch a strike without penetrating the enemy’s territory.
    A host of sensor and weapon systems and mission-specific applications will be added to the
    Rafale over time. This Rafale B carries the Damocles navigation and targeting pod. The
    Damocles pod, in its baseline configuration, has a third-generation thermal-imagery camera, a
    navigational forward-looking infrared (FLIR) sensor mounted in the pylon, and a pair of lasers
    for range finding, target designation, and laser spot tracking.
    The range increase to about 500-600 km is not the only improvement in the new missile. The additional
    range is to be achieved without substantially increasing the missile’s dimensions and weight.
    Ultimately, after the future withdrawal of the Mirage 2000N, the ASMP-A missile would be carried by
    the Rafale, from the both land bases and the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, so missile is to fit the
    Rafale’s existing under-fuselage weapon station. To achieve this task, MBDA used a very modern
    liquid-fuel ramjet engine called the Vesta [Vecteur a Stratoreacteur], developed by Aerospatiale
    Missiles and Celerg. It was originally designed for the ANF anti-ship missile, development of which
    has been cancelled. In addition to its fuel efficiency and high thrust-to-weight ratio, the engine is also
    equipped with a thrust-vectoring system, enabling the missile to perform sharp maneuvers. The ASMPA
    is to be also fitted with lightweight nuclear warhead called the TNA [Tete Nucleaire Aero-Portee].
    Missile guidance is to be developed by Thales Avionics (Paris, France) and will be of an INS/GPS type.
    The inertial system will be based on precise laser ring gyros, and the GPS-guidance system will be
    provided with anti-jamming devices. The guidance computer will enable the missile to use various
    routes and flight profiles to optimize air-defense-penetration capabilities. The missile will be able to
    operate over a very broad flight envelope at high-supersonic speed. Also to increase air-defensepenetration
    capabilities, the missile is to be built using stealth principles.
    Reportedly, 47 nuclear-tripped ASMP-A missiles are to be produced and introduced to service on
    Mirage 2000Ns in 2007 and on Rafales a year later. Presently, three Mirage 2000N K2 squadrons can
    carry ASMP missiles. Two of these (EC 01.004 Dauphine and EC 02.004 La Fayette) are based at
    Luxeuil, with the third (EC 03.004 Limousin) at Istres. The French Navy’s 12F Squadron of Rafale Ms
    will probably receive the ASMP-A missile as well.
    Rafale in Service
    In December 2001, the first Rafale Ms were delivered to Navy Squadron 12F at Landivisiau, which had
    turned in its F-8E(FN) Crusaders in late 1999. In the spring of 2002, 12F Squadron became operational,
    and with seven Rafales, it deployed aboard the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, which went to the
    Indian Ocean in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. In June 2002, mock fights were conducted
    between Rafales and US Navy F-14s and F/A-18s, with results that reportedly were quite surprising to
    the US Navy aviators. According to a French source, the Rafale was hardly detectable by radars on both
    types of US aircraft and was always able to conduct the first attack with the use of medium-range
    missiles. The Rafale was also very agile and maneuverable in a dog-fight engagements. Also during the
    operation, Rafales executed touch-and-go landings of the US Navy aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis
    in a demonstration of NATO interoperability.
    In March 2004, Charles de Gaulle again set off to the Indian Ocean, where her embarked Rafale
    squadron took part in the Northwind 2004 joint exercises with French Mirage 2000s based at Djibouti
    and with Mirage 2000-9s of the UAE. Later, the aircraft took part in the Varuna exercise conducted
    with the Indian Navy, and Rafales were matched against Indian Sea Harrier FRS.51s. Another exercise,
    Red Shark, conducted with Saudi Arabia, enabled Rafales to conduct practice engagements against
    Saudi Tornado F3 aircraft. By the summer of 2004, Rafale Ms had accumulated 4,400 flying hours over
    approximately 2,000 sorties and had live-fired 20 Magic-2 and 10 MICA missiles.
    The next French Navy squadron to receive Rafales is to be 11F in 2006 and 17F in 2007-2008. The
    squadrons will receive F2- and F3-standard aircraft, respectively. It is planned, however, that all Navy
    squadrons will be gradually be brought up to the F3 standard. The 11F and 17F Squadrons both
    presently fly Super Etendard aircraft, with air-to-surface as their primary mission. Interestingly, in 2004
    it was decided not to proceed with the two-seat Rafale N for the Navy, and the first flight of the model,
    planned for 2005, has been cancelled. All French Navy aircraft will now be delivered as single-seat
    Rafale Ms.
    One can speculate as to why the French Navy eliminated the two-seat Rafale N, particularly since the
    French Air Force has increased the proportion of two-seat models it plans to order, with (ultimately)
    140 two-seat and 95 single-seat aircraft. The official statements of both services are different. Air Force
    representatives maintain that the experience from recent conflicts has shown that, in dense air-defense
    environments, the workload is too great for a single pilot. That conclusion has been reached by many
    air forces. Meanwhile, the French Navy officially announced that development of the two-seat Rafale N
    was cancelled as unnecessary, primarily due to high costs.
    However, behind these official and somewhat contradictory statements are some other factors. One of
    them is that Rafale N was to be heavier by about 1,000 kg than the land-based single-seater, thus
    reducing range and combat radius. Moreover, the two-seaters have slightly less internal fuel capacity.
    Operating from land bases, the French Air Force is usually able to bring tankers to the mission area for
    in-flight refueling, so the two-seater’s decrreased range and combat radius penalty are not as important
    as for the Navy. Another issue is that after 2015, considerably more of the tasks assigned to manned
    tactical aircraft will be undertaken by unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVS), such as the Neuron
    being developed by Dassault.
    According to the current French assessment, UCAVs will not replace manned aircraft in total but will
    operate with them in mixed formations (see “The Robot’s Got Your Back”). The man-in-the-loop factor
    is very important in dynamically changing tactical situations, in which unexpected circumstances
    emerge. Greater integration on UCAVs into the overall framework of modern combat aviation is being
    enabled by the network-centric warfare concept. In the future, Rafales equipped with state-of-the-art
    sensors and data-exchange capabilities will form the core of sensor-to-shooter networks over enemy
    territory, supported by more dedicated sensors (AWACs, Airborne Ground Sensors, and signalsintelligence
    platforms) operating over friendly territory. So France’s Rafales will also perform a leading
    role for the UCAVs in integrated strike packages, essentially serving as “UCAV leaders.” In such a
    case, the two-seat version is essential for the role. From the Navy perspective, carrier strike groups do
    not have the capacity to support large numbers of UCAVs. Moreover, it must be assumed that losses
    among UCAVs will be considerably higher than among manned aircraft, and replenishing the
    battlegroup’s stock of such systems would be difficult. Therefore, French naval aviation will continue to
    rely on manned platforms to execute its tactical and strategic missions, so the Navy’s requirement for
    two-seat Rafales is not as pronounced as in the Air Force.
    One could ask why such a capable and technically successful aircraft as the Rafale has had such
    a difficult time finding export orders. Is the Rafale what the Russians call a “golden fish,” an
    expensive but useless piece of military equipment? The Rafale certainly is not cheap. But it is the
    most impressive aircraft to come out of Europe in two decades. Time will tell whether the Rafale
    will find a home among the great combat aircraft of the world.
    The first operational French Air Force unit will be the 1/7 Provence at Saint-Dizier (Base Aérienne
    113) beginning in 2006, replacing the Jaguar ground-attack aircraft the squadron currently operates.
    Another Jaguar squadron at the base will be the next to convert. All Jaguars will eventually be retired
    from the French Air Force and replaced by Rafales. The next aircraft to be replaced by Rafales are
    Mirage F1CT fighter-bombers and Mirage F1CR reconnaissance aircraft, between 2008 and 2015. The
    Mirage 2000 will remain in service alongside Rafales, at least until 2015. It is planned that, in 2008, the
    French Air Force will have 40 Rafales, 30 Mirage 2000-5, 60 Mirage 2000C/D (reduced from 80 in
    2005), 60 Mirage 2000D, 40 Mirage 2000N (reduced from 60 in 2005), 40 Mirage F1CR, and 40
    Mirage F1CT (reduced from 60 in 2005) aircraft. These are currently authorized strengths, and there is
    likely to be some slight variance when the time comes. In 2015, the number of Rafales deployed by the
    French Air Force is scheduled to reach 140.
    Rafale: Right Now?
    The Rafale is a very capable aircraft. It can deliver of up to three to four tons of ordnance within a
    tactical radius of 1,050-1,500 km. With a full internal and external fuel load, it can conduct over threeand-
    a-half hours of combat air patrol 800 km away from its base, armed with eight air-to-air missiles.
    The range on internal fuel is 2,100 km, but with three large drop tanks, it climbs 5,500 km (according
    to unofficial figures). Range can be further enhanced by the use of conformal tanks on the upper part of
    the connection between the fuselage and wings. The air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons set is very
    impressive, enabling all-weather, day and night attack capabilities, including stand-off attacks with
    conventional and nuclear payloads. When we add some stealth capabilities – less than F/A-22 Raptor
    and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, but close – then anyone must agree that the Rafale is a great technical
    success.
    So why has no export customer been found? The answer is complex. First, one has to consider that the
    Rafale is an aircraft in a class between the F-16 and F-15 – or maybe more appropriately – in a class
    between the F-35 and F/A-22. Regardless, it is not a cheap plane. It is simply not an option for poorer
    countries. At the same time, Dassault is offering its successful Mirage 2000 fighter, which benefited
    from the down-transfer of some technology from the Rafale. It seems that Dassault does not want the
    Rafale to spoil Mirage 2000 sales, and it also does not really want to sell the system before it is fully
    mature. From a marketing standpoint, it is possible that some customers might buy the Rafale in the
    future to replace Mirage 2000s purchased today, so why skip ahead? Moreover, not all countries may
    be offered Rafale, since the aircraft incorporates many critical technologies that are important for
    France’s security. (The reader might have noticed these security concerns in the amount of “not
    officially confirmed” data throughout this article.)
    Among the current potential foreign customers of the Rafale are Thailand and Singapore, especially the
    latter. The Rafale was not selected in the tender for the Republic of (South) Korea Air Force, losing to
    the Boeing (St. Louis, MO) F-15K, a version of the F-15E (see “EW Suite Flies on New Korean F-
    15K”). According to Dassault (and most likely it is true), the Rafale was the clear performance winner
    in Korea, but political pressure from US sources influenced Korea’s choice.
    The delay in procurement of the aircraft by France is caused primarily by the rapid development of the
    concept of network-centric warfare and its implementation across the armed services. As networkcentric
    forces materialize, the allocation of missions and roles between manned and unmanned aircraft
    will change considerably, so manned aircraft systems will have to be reconfigured accordingly. Thus, it
    is better to wait and adjust aircraft development to emerging requirements than to take the wrong way
    prematurely.
    Rafale Order Status
    Rafale M Rafale C Rafale B
    Placed Orders: (1 seat) (1 seat) (2 seat)
    Standard
    10 1 2
    F1 (1994)
    F2 (1999) 16 7 25
    F3 (2004) 12 36 11
    Total Orders 38 44 38
    Expected Orders: 22 51 102
    Total Aircraft Planned: 60 95 140
    Basic Technical Data
    Wingspan: 10.8 m
    Wing Area: 45.7 sq. m
    Length: 10.3 m
    Height: 5.3 m
    Empty Weight: 9,040 kg (Rafale C)/9,600 kg (Rafale B)/9,900 kg (Rafale M)
    Maximum Weight: 24,500 kg
    Internal Fuel: 4,500 kg
    External Fuel: 7,500 kg
    Maximum External Load: 9,500 kg
    External Stores Stations: 14 (Air Force)/ 13 (Navy)
    Heavy Charges & Fuel (“wet”)
    Stations: 5
    G Limits: +9 G/-3.2 G
    Maximum Speed: Mach 2*
    Maximum Speed at Sea Level: Mach 1.14*
    Supercruise: Mach 1.2*
    Approach Speed: 120 knots
    Take-Off Distance: 400 m
    Landing Distance: 450 m
    Roll Rate: 270º/sec.*
    Max Instant Turn Rate: 32º/sec.*
    Max Climb Rate: 305 m/sec.*
    Combat Radius: 1,100-1,500 km with full load; 1,850 km with conformal tanks
    *Figures from unofficial sources, not confirmed by Dassault.
    *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been
    specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available without profit to those who
    have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance their
    understanding of arms trade activities, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe
    that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.
    Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond
    ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
    For more information go to:
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

    in reply to: Rafale Fox 3 Vol 10 Publication #2555686
    arthuro
    Participant

    ok, sorry i misunderstood!

    in reply to: Rafale Fox 3 Vol 10 Publication #2555700
    arthuro
    Participant

    good.
    Apparently it is said that rafaleM often train with typhoons

    ” Flottille 12F Air Defence Week seeks to familiarise air-crews
    with the employment of advanced air-defence tac-tics,
    explains Jérôme Puech. We knew we could host a fair
    number of aircraft at Landivisiau. This is why we invited
    quite a large number of French and foreign units: French Mirage
    2000s, Spanish and Swiss F/A-18s, Belgian, Italian, Dutch
    and Portuguese F-16s, British Typhoons and Hungarian
    MiG-29s. We wanted to make sure that every participant
    would get the best training opportunity: first time a week-long intensive air defence exercise from its Landivisiau Naval Air Stationhome-base, in Brittany, Western France. “

    what a fighter!

    “During their stay, each pilotflew several missions everyday and, for all Mirage 2000and F-16 aircrews involved,the exercise was their firstencounter withthe Rafale.Needless to say, they were allimpressed by the latest Dassault
    fighter.« In a dogfight, using only ourguns and short range missiles,it is indeed very difficult for aMirage 2000 pilot to win theday against a Rafale, admitsCommandant Jean-Roch Piselli,t h e ‘B o s s ’ o f E C 1 /5Detachment. Considering theimposed rules of engagementduring the first phase of the
    exercise, our only real oppor-tunitywas to fire first, just afterthe crossover. Even though theMirage 2000 is equipped withnotoriously effective fly-by-wire
    controls, it does not offerthe same level of performancein terms of manoeuvrabilitya n d e n g i n e t h r u s t a n dresponse. We have to select
    full afterburner as soon as thefight begins while the Rafalepilot can throttle back andeven remain in full dry, mili-tarypower: we burn more fueland our infrared signature issignificantly higher whereashe can reaccelerate very rap-idlyif needed. »Flottille 12F was declared fully operational in June 2004, and
    the Rafale pilots now perfectly know how to handle their air-craftto quickly win the fight:« we always devise a ‘gameplan’ to exploit both the Rafale’s
    fantastic acceleration and its outstanding agility,explains Lieutenant Commander PascalCassan. Against a F-16, the Rafale is more powerful in the
    whole flight envelope, and is considerably more manoeu-vrable
    below 300 knots.Ideally, after the crossover, I will climb into the sun to force himto slow down. I will constantly threaten him by pointing the
    Rafale’s nose in his direction.That will force him to tighten his turn even more, and his speed will wash out very rapidly. On the contrary, the F-16 pilots will do what they can to keeptheir speed and energy up. »
    Numerous ‘beyond visualrange’ (BVR) engagementswere simulated during the
    week, and the Rafale proved as deadly in the long-rangearena as in a dogfight: « I thinkthat our RBE2 electronic scan-ningradar is very good, indi-catesLieutenant Le Bars.Against a F-15 or a F-16, two
    aircraft types that have enor-mous radar cross-sections
    because of their massive air-intakes,our detection ranges
    are excellent. In a BVR sce-nario, we always try to engage
    at high level and fire our lethal Mica missiles at high altitude to give them the longest pos-siblerange. Ideally, we will‘loft’ the radar-guided Micas
    to boost their range beforediving down to low level while simultaneously opening left or right. In doing so, we deny the opponent any opportunity to
    fire back. When in the ‘merge’, we quickly gain the upper hand against a F-16: with our largedelta wing and our canard foreplanes, we have consid-erablymore authority in pitch and we can turn more tightly,
    the Rafale offering better sus-tained turn rates than the F-16
    at low, medium and high levels.
    Our Snecma M88-2 turbofans are so powerful that we often
    have to reduce power to avoid overtaking our prey.»
    All participants agreed that this first edition of the Flottille
    12F Air Defence Week was a total success. Flottille 12F spe-cialists
    are already busy preparing the 2007 event
    which should attract a larger foreign contingent. By July2007, the first four StandardF2 omnirole Rafale fighters will be in service with the unit,and they are likely to partici-patein the exercise too.”

    in reply to: Passive radar on aircraft? #2556600
    arthuro
    Participant

    intresting thread.
    it seems that PESA are also able of LPI caracteristics, how can it works?

    “The RBE2 radar had been in development since 1989. It was decided that the radar would receive a
    new phased-array antenna with full electronic scan, instead of the electro-mechanical scan employed by
    the Eurofighter Typhoon’s Captor radar. Initially, the radar received a passive phased-array
    antenna, but ultimately an active electronically scanned array (AESA) will be fitted. According to
    French Ministry of Defense (MoD) sources, the RBE2 radar has a modest range about 100 km
    against fighter aircraft, but it operates in a low-probability-of-intercept (LPI) mode and is
    resistant to deception jamming. The Typhoon’s Captor has a range of 160 km against fighters
    but is considered more prone to jamming and can track fewer targets. The French Air Force
    accepted the penalty in range reduction for the benefits of LPI and other characteristics.
    Moreover, in network-centric operations, a common air picture will be transmitted via the
    Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) to the Rafale, enabling the aircraft to make
    use of off-board sensors.
    According to Thales, the radar operates in the X band and can use low, medium, and high pulserepetition
    frequencies. It can track up to 40 air targets in track-while-scan mode and, according
    to an unofficial source, can engage up to eight of them with missiles launched in short intervals.
    Normally up to six (five on the naval Rafale M) MBDA (Paris, France) MICA EM missiles can be
    carried. An unusual feature of the infrared-seeking MICA IR version is that the missile can receive
    mid-course update commands from the radar to compare the target location with the location of its
    seeker’s track or for lock-after-launch engagements. The effective range of both the infrared- and radarhoming
    missile versions, therefore, reaches 70 km. Electronic beam steering enables the RBE2
    radar to search the airspace in various patterns, probably up to 60 degrees in any direction from
    the fixed antenna axis. The radar enables not only track while scan but also so-called “track here while
    scan there.” For example, the RBE2 can readily track airborne targets while searching for another
    airborne target in another sector. The radar performs automatic prioritization of threat targets and has
    the ability to discriminate a single aircraft in a group in raid-assessment mode. The F1 standard radar
    has no air-to-ground functions.
    The Rafale’s RBE2 radar has a modest range of about 100 km against fighter aircraft, but it
    operates in a low-probability-of-intercept (LPI) mode and is resistant to deception jamming. The
    French Air Force accepted the penalty in range reduction for the benefits of LPI and other
    characteristics. Moreover, in network-centric operations, a common air picture will be
    transmitted via the Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) to the Rafale,
    enabling the aircraft to make use of off-board sensors. This Rafale B carries an assortment of
    MICA EM (inboard) and Magic-2 (outboard) air-to-air missiles.
    The AESA radar is not being incorporated into the F3 standard. The development of the AESA
    version of the RBE2 radar started officially in April 2002, when the DGA awarded Thales a
    contract for development of an active-array radar demonstrator optimized for the Rafale. Called
    the Démonstrateur Radar à Antenne Active (DRAA; Active Array Radar Demonstrator), the program
    culminated in a series of demanding flight tests to validate the system’s detection performance. In
    December 2002, the first flight of the AESA system was carried out in a Mystere XX flying testbed
    belonging to the French MoD and located at the Flight Test Center at Cazaux. Subsequently, the DRAA
    was fitted to the two-seat production Rafale B301, which flew with it for the first time in May 2003.
    The next step is now the Démonstrateur Radar à Antenne Active Modes Avancés (DRAAMA;
    Advanced Modes Active Array Radar Demonstrator) program, which was officially launched by the
    DGA in July 2004. The DRAAMA will be entirely new and will benefit from the latest
    developments in radar and solid-state technology. It is possible that the AESA radar will be
    introduced with the F4 standard and/or will form an upgrade package for earlier aircraft.
    The Spectra [Système de Protection et d’Evitement des Conduites de Tir du Rafale] self-protection suite
    has been integrated by Thales, but it consists of elements built by various companies. The Spectra
    consists of a radar-warning receiver (RWR), missile-launch-warning system (MLWS), laserwarning
    receivers (LWS), a management computer, four chaff/flare dispensers, and a built-in
    jammer, all integrated into a single automatic system. The RWR and active jamming system were
    developed by Dassault Electronique (presently Thales) and are integrated as the Détection et
    Brouillage Electromagnétique (DBEM) system. According to an unofficial source, in the F1
    standard, the DBEM can detect transmitters over the frequency range of 2-18 GHz, but this was
    increased to 2-40 GHz on the F2 standard. The system has a very high accuracy of up to one
    degree in azimuth. The DBEM automatically detects, classifies, and identifies emitters and inputs
    information about them into the computer. The Spectra’s active jamming subsystem uses phasedarray
    antennas located at the roots of the canards. Reportedly, the antennas can produce a pencil
    beam compatible with the accuracy of the receiver system, concentrating power on the threat
    while minimizing the chances of detection. It also uses other low-probability-of-detection
    techniques, so the Rafale’s electronic-countermeasures (ECM) capability is also compatible with
    its stealth requirements. The MLWS was developed by Matra (presently MBDA) and is called the
    Détecteur infrarouge de Départ de Missiles (DDM; missile-launch-detection system). It works in two
    infrared (IR) bands to increase detection reliability. Its primary detector is mounted on top of the
    Rafale’s tail. The LWS was developed by Thales and is called the Détection et Alerte Laser (DAL). The
    whole Spectra suite is integrated with three dedicated computers, developed by Thales and MBDA and
    called the Gestion de l’Interface et Compatibilité (GIC).”
    http://warships.ru/France/Fighters/Rafale_M_(Cockpit).jpg

    it seems that spectra is also able to provide a firing solution alone.

    “One of the more challenging aspects of Rafale operations is how to fully exploit its capabilities, and especially its range of passive sensors. Pilots, for example, can use its TV/thermal imaging observation system (dubbed Optronique Secteur Frontal, and similar in principle to infrared scan and track) to visually identify other aircraft at ranges of more than 50 kilometres (approx. 30 nautical miles), and transmit this and other tactical data to other aircraft using their MIDS datalink.

    Another unique capability, according to Col. François Moussez, the French Air force’s Rafale program officer is that it can fire missiles at targets detected and designated by its integrated Spectra countermeasures suite, again without any need for active transmissions that can give away its position.”

    in reply to: 72 Typhoons to Saudi-Arabia – confirmed by Saudi MoD #2585660
    arthuro
    Participant

    Rob L

    The Austrians did evaluate the Typhoon, along with other modern combat aircraft [Gripen for example].

    Do you have a source for this information? I am intrested

    in reply to: 72 Typhoons to Saudi-Arabia – confirmed by Saudi MoD #2585663
    arthuro
    Participant

    Two exports sales are very nice for the Typhoon. I hope it could accelerate a decision about tranche 3.

    That being said we shoul make a distinction between an open competition and a direct negotiation with politicals trade off.

    SA bought tornadoes F3 for political reasons, since they already had the F15 which was a more potent air superiority fighter.( I think it was due to the fear of an Air to Air weapon embargo) These contracts with SA are very politicals.

    An other example:there are currently negotiations between France and SA for a possible Leclerc deal, but SA have already Abrahams I think. There is nothing very rational here.

    For Austria, a fighter like typhoon or rafale is overqualified. Gripen would have been a more sensible choice. Here again, politics…

    This article cannot be more explicit about rafale vs F15 and Typhoon during open competitions. I don’t think it is serious to believe the pilot is a plain lihar.

    Rafale, the French fighter, scrambles for export orders
    By Christina Mackenzie
    International Herald Tribune

    Published: July 16, 2006 Paris

    Riddle: Which combat aircraft outperforms its competitors in dogfights, is frequently classed first on technical merit in international tenders, is capable of covering a broad spectrum of air missions and is competitively priced, but has yet to win a single export order from a foreign air force? Answer: the Rafale, the French fighter developed and manufactured by Dassault Aviation.

    In development since the mid-1980s and in French naval carrier-based service since 2004, Rafale is a so-called fourth-generation fighter, a sophisticated multirole jet with advanced avionics and weapons systems, but less able to avoid radar detection than “fifth generation” stealth fighters like the Lockheed-Martin F-22 Raptor or the U.S.-European F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

    Competitors include the U.S.-made F- 15 Eagle, in service in various versions since the 1970s, the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-18E/F Super Hornet, the Eurofighter Typhoon and the Swedish-built JAS-39 Gripen, marketed in collaboration with BAE Systems of Britain.

    Dassault and the French Ministry of Defense hope that exports may now take off after Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin declared operational a first French air force squadron of 20 Rafales on June 27.

    “It’s almost impossible to sell a combat aircraft not operational in its own air force,” Gérard David, head of communications for Dassault said during an interview by telephone. “The doors are now open to Rafale’s export career.”
    Within the French military, the Rafale eventually would replace existing air force and naval fighters and fighter- bombers, including the Mirage IV, F1 and 2000; the Jaguar; Crusader; Etendard IV and Super-Etendard.

    “This is going to reduce our operating costs tremendously through rationalization of maintenance,” said General Patrick Dufour, director of the Rafale program at the Délégation Générale de l’Armement, France’s defense procurement agency.

    Colonel François Moussez, a pilot who has flown 150 hours on the Rafale, said that two could do the work of six existing air superiority/defense and air-to-surface attack jets. “With the Rafale,” he said, “we can do simultaneous multimission management: air-to-air, air-to- ground, reconnaissance at the same time.”

    Moussez said that in dogfight exercises, the Rafale had outflown F-15, F-16 and F-18 opponents, and in technical and performance evaluations “we have systematically won against the F-15 and the Eurofighter Typhoon.”
    Yet it lost to the F-15 in competitions to sell to South Korea and Singapore. Moussez said it was outflanked in the former case on political grounds and in the latter case on costs, noting that the dollar had depreciated 30 percent over the period of the Singapore competition.

    In competitions to sell combat aircraft, “the principal criterion is political. It has little to do with aircraft performance,” Moussez said.

    Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with Teal Group in Fairfax, Virginia, also says that politics play a major role in fighter procurement. “Aggressive U.S. foreign policy” was a primary cause of export wins by U.S. military jets, he said during an interview by telephone.

    Bob Kemp, director of sales for the Gripen, was not so sure. “There is no doubt a political factor,” he said during an interview. But “the first thing is, the aircraft must be able to do the job, and the second is financial.”
    The Gripen, in operation with the Swedish Air Force since 1997, has been sold or leased to three countries and is quietly adding more orders, partly because it is “half the price of our competitors,” Kemp said.

    Pricing combat aircraft is notoriously complex, with deals often involving industrial offsets and seldom reflecting full aircraft development costs. While Dufour put the average cost of a Rafale at €50 million, or $64 million, and the Typhoon – a collaboration grouping Italy, Germany, Spain and Britain – at about £65 million, or $120 million, Kemp said both aircraft had been offered to Singapore and South Korea at about $95 million each, compared with a basic price tag of $45 million to $50 million for the Gripen.

    Combat aircraft technology “costs what it weighs,” Kemp said. “The Typhoon is basically twice the weight of the Gripen – and costs twice as much.”
    The Typhoon, although lacking air-to- ground capacity in its current version, already has one export customer. Austria signed for 18 aircraft in August 2003 and Britain has signed a preliminary agreement with Saudi Arabia to supply at least 24 Typhoons from the British production run of 89 aircraft, although no final deal has been sealed.

    Meanwhile Gripen has sold 28 aircraft to South Africa, the first of which left Sweden by ship in early July for the Overburg test flight center near Cape Town. Hungary has signed a lease and purchase agreement with Sweden for 14 aircraft, of which the first five were handed over in March. And the Czech Republic has leased 14 aircraft, all of which have been delivered. Norway and Denmark have also requested information on the Gripen from Saab, its manufacturer.

    French procurement officials, comparing the sales prospects of the Gripen and Rafale, said the Gripen was designed for a different type of mission. The Rafale, a twin-engine aircraft with a maximum takeoff weight of 24.5 tons, can carry 9.5 tons of weapons slung under its wings, while the single-engine Gripen, with a maximum takeoff weight of 14 tons, carries only 5 tons of weapons.

    Kemp agrees. Buyers of the heavier fighters “pay for longer range and heavier weapons loads,” he said, fitting them for a strategic defense role that some air forces may find less relevant than it was at the height of the cold war.

    Still, by 2030, many countries will need to renew their combat aircraft fleets including some, like India and Japan, that may face significant strategic challenges. Saudi Arabia may finalize its Typhoon deal at the Farnborough Airshow, and analysts say other likely customers in the near future include Morocco and Brazil.

    Excluding the United States, Russia and China, the open export market is estimated by analysts at around 3,000 aircraft. France traditionally holds between 10 percent to 15 percent of this market. Based on political preferences and past performance, France could hope to export about 300 Rafales, analysts say.

    in reply to: Which fighter as the best carrier based plane? #2045636
    arthuro
    Participant

    here it is jonesy,

    “Despite this apparent complexity, Rafale was designed to operate with bare-bones support, and for instance has entirely done away with scheduled maintenance – a premiere for an advanced combat aircraft. Thanks to its permanent auto-testing processing and real-time monitoring airframe fatigue by the aircraft’s own computer, maintenance operations depend on the real condition of individual components. Furthermore, all operational and maintenance paperwork is stored in a single computer database, allowing detailed monitoring of aircraft condition by maintenance crews as well as outside contractors.

    “Our design objective was to reduce maintenance man-hours per flight hours by 23% compared to the Mirage 2000,” says Col Moussez, “and on initial experience we in fact achieved better than 25%.” “

    in reply to: Which fighter as the best carrier based plane? #2045739
    arthuro
    Participant

    to answer to the topic I think that superhornet, F35C and rafale are all very well suited for modern military operation, ( L16, survivability and lethality) I don’t care which is best. The matter is, can it perform the mission?

    in reply to: Which fighter as the best carrier based plane? #2045741
    arthuro
    Participant

    emgy,

    I agree, all rafale have a cft capability. But when I spoke about the M, I meant that M88-3 would be better if they eventually decide to buy cft. Because if it wants to operate with the maximal load in hot condition, like for afganistan (and the rafale M is heavier than the B and the C) this would be more “comfortable” in terms of performance.

    in reply to: Which fighter as the best carrier based plane? #2045744
    arthuro
    Participant

    No, emgy i never heard about the MN buying CFT. I think it would require M88-3 due to the increased weight. But this is purely hypothetical. don’t forget that the MN has an air refuliing capacity, with refueling pods under rafale or super étandart.

    Another thing, the M88-2E4 ( Etape4, which means stage4) is the engine curently in service aboard the rafale. All the M88-2E1 were bring to this latest standart.
    The M88 ECO ( and the M88-3) are something different. They require further developments, 90% is achieved.

    About AtG capacity, The AASM from sagem is similar to the SDB. It is an all weather, multi target bomb. The differnce is that it has a booster in order to be fired at low altitude with a security range (15km at low altitude).

    regards.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,261 through 1,275 (of 1,287 total)