dark light

jawad

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 235 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan's Missiles and Strategic News/Disscussions #1817388
    jawad
    Participant

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4827734.stm
    Pakistan launches cruise missile

    Cruise missiles can be targeted with pinpoint accuracy
    Pakistan says it has tested a cruise missile for the second time.
    The Babur missile is capable of carrying nuclear and conventional warheads and has a range of 500km (310 miles), a military statement said.

    Pakistan had fired its first cruise missile last August and described the launch as a “milestone” in its history.

    Cruise missiles are usually low-flying guided missiles. South Asian nuclear rival India had no comment on the latest launch.

    Last year Pakistan and India agreed to give each other advance notice of future nuclear ballistic missile tests. The agreement, however, does not cover guided missiles.

    Routine

    Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf witnessed the test launch at an undisclosed location and congratulated the scientists involved, a military official told the AFP news agency.

    “All phases of the planned trajectory were extremely successful and the missile impacted with pinpoint accuracy,” the military said in a statement.

    India and Pakistan routinely test-fire their missiles.

    Last March, Pakistan successfully tested a long-range nuclear-capable missile – the Shaheen II, with a range of 2,000km (1,250 miles).

    The two countries have twice veered close to war since their nuclear tests in 1998 – over Kashmir in 1999 and again in 2002.

    Both countries have limited command-and-control structures, and neither has developed the technology to recall a nuclear-tipped missile fired in error.

    in reply to: Pakistan's Missiles and Strategic News/Disscussions #1817462
    jawad
    Participant

    it will Never happened in past A-2-S
    Even a new video will be ???????
    And u r not suppose to test all parameters in single test so each time they will be telling that missile met all the set parameters and thats it/
    All the missiles go through this process

    in reply to: Pakistan's Missiles and Strategic News/Disscussions #1817481
    jawad
    Participant

    Pakistan all set to test cruise missile

    From DILSHAD AZEEM
    ISLAMABAD – Pakistan is all set to test-fire “Babur” cruise missile with its improved version in a day or two after completion of its successful laboratory tests, The Nation has learnt here.
    “All arrangements have been made to test-fire the cruise missile on Monday. It will have capability to hit pinpointed targets from surface, warship or submarines,” the sources maintained.
    The “Babur” missile will have a range of nearly 300 miles to hit the target either from a fixed location or the submarines.
    “The laboratory tests showed cent per cent accuracy in the latest technology of the cruise missile,” the sources said.
    “The Babur missile is prepared mainly for the submarines but it can also be fired from the fighter jets and have capability to chase the target in case of movement,” they disclosed.
    In response to a question, the sources revealed that the cruise missile would be undetectable from the radar system before or after its launching to hit the target. “This is the latest technology in the world.”
    Pakistan has already fired the first version of the “Babur” but its improvement is continuing as Islamabad continues to improve its defence capabilities.
    http://nation.com.pk/daily/mar-2006/20/index5.php

    in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2572543
    jawad
    Participant

    What next from vikasrehman & co … JF-17 has AESA radar, TVC, stealth, supercruise ??

    AESA can only be there in future so far no one have it in South Asia and most of the new 4gen will get AESA update in future(Rafel/EF2000/JAS39/LCA All of these are planing for AESA in future)
    TVC is already available with RD-33 series but who wants it for a work hourse like JF-17
    Reduced RCS is some thing that will be a better word then stealth for every 4 gen aircraft
    At this point of time no one is interested in things like supercruise but USA
    It requires 1.2-1.4 TWR to achieve this kind of things so…… 😀

    in reply to: India seals high-tech U.S. arms deal #2575905
    jawad
    Participant

    F-16 MKI will be the most economical option but will india go for it when PAF already have placed a order for f-16s ?
    IAF will like to go for some thing which USA will be using in next 10-15 years as frontline jet
    And PAF and PLAAF will be facing a different jet then F-16(China with J10) for which they can train them self
    AS far as TOT is concerned well USA record is worst upto now even UK is not happy
    Good luck to INDIA :rolleyes:

    in reply to: India seals high-tech U.S. arms deal #2576042
    jawad
    Participant

    I think that the Scorpene bribe allegations will hurt the French mRCA chances. Also there is a genuine negative attitute towards the French due to the fact that what they sell to India, they will send to anyone else for money.

    See the latest sub offer to Pakistan for details.

    Bribe allegations may be true
    as it had already happned with PN in A-90B deal

    in reply to: India seals high-tech U.S. arms deal #2576059
    jawad
    Participant

    Well the F-18 is a sure thing now. Its going to be the F-18 and the Mig-35. Keeps both Unkil and your traditional friend Russia happy. Would love to see the Rafale in IAF colours but that seems to be a remote possibility now.

    U r right
    F/A-18E/F looks to be the winers for sure for indian contract
    but contract details are some thing which will be very interesting due to US record of TOT
    MiG-35 is also a very Good choice and might get a smaller order to keep russians happy but in reality i dont think that it will fit indian requirments as IAF already have SU 30 MKI with TVC and they are not required to buy every fighter with this capability

    in reply to: U.S. to make initial shipment of 2 F-16's to Pakistan #2609616
    jawad
    Participant

    Doesn’t mean it won’t work past 20 kilometers.

    well thats what i asked. Why not tested for atleast its no escap zone of 30-35km????

    Is it because of radar range?
    And what is range of radar in Lookdown shootdown mod?

    in reply to: U.S. to make initial shipment of 2 F-16's to Pakistan #2609620
    jawad
    Participant

    Without BVR missiles, the capability of an F-16 block 52 that pakistan has bought will fall short of the capabilities of the latest BVR capable Mig-21 bison with the latest new aveonics, cockpit and weapons.

    no offence friends 🙂

    Did IAF tested Bison with R-77 for range more then 20km ever??????????

    in reply to: PAF news and speculation #2618441
    jawad
    Participant

    As for the AEW issue, its stupid to think that the only logic for an AEW platform is simply because India is getting it, India has a bigger budget, Pakistan does not, the other issue is that India intends to be the agressor in the air war and Pakistan is in theory supposed to be the defender, no way she will win as an attacker anyway, hence it would be better served to spend the money on ground based radars with S-300 type clones, this competing with India logic is stupid

    PAF was looking for E-3in 80s was offered E-2 which was rejected by PAF dueto its bad performance.
    Plus the fact that Pakistawn lacks str-depth and in conflicts in areas like LOC+lahore,etc to prevent IAF attacks PAF will always be required to detect in comming attacks early and use its best source to defend Pakistan and this type of early warning can be provided by AEWs only as land based radar’s ability to detect low flying attackers from a long distance is always a question.
    Plus quick deployment is also advantage that AEW offers
    not to forget tyhat in AEW enviroment socalled long range detection advantage of SU30 will also be not there for IAF
    In the end in case of pakistan defence money is never a big problem
    Atomic+missile programes are clrear examples
    Pakistan is already investing in LAND based radar{RADAR from china and us ar comming}+SAM from China and locl? will also be there{yes should invest more in this but not at cost of AEW}

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2628102
    jawad
    Participant

    It’s $75 mil a piece at most. Your numbers are incorrect.

    yes i think it was 6b$for 80 F-16E/F and 2-2.6b$ for weapons

    Would such a price tag fit indian plans for a multirole aircraft that is supposed to fit between LCA and MKI (correct me if im wrong on this).

    f-16 Block50/52 is good for that but F-16E/F Block60/62 or F-16E/F Block70/72 along with F/A-18E/F is just above every thing IAF can get now tec wise

    Money is really not a problem for India. The stated budget for MRCA is $9 Billion. You do the math.

    even if these 9b$ are just for planes then to they are not enough for 126 for 70/72 block plus time factor as IAF is looking to replace MIG21s out of service they can not wait long to develop a fighter with having risk of delays also as this 126 plane order is placed by IAF due to delay of LCA , as at time F-16 block 70 odd will be ready it will be same time at which LCA and Pak-FA is supposed to be ready for induction..

    someone is offering you F/A-18 E and F, will you reject it outright?

    :confused: :confused:

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MARCH 2005 #2628549
    jawad
    Participant

    xanadu Is the F-18 really superior to the F-16? Y not offer India the F-15 since they r looking for a strike aircraft. In my opinion the biggest plus for India in this F-16 for Pakistan deal is the supply of nuclear technology for civilian use. If this is true it will have far reaching consequences. This means that India is welcomed into the nuclear club.

    well i think that real advantage for india will be in field of Missile defence and electronic warfare.
    F-16 block60/62 and F/A-18 E/F are equiped with AESA
    But will F/A-18 E/F fit in IAF’s requirment at this time is real question for IAF?{They rejected UK’s offer of EF2000 because of this reason}
    If they realy want it they will have to modify their requirments as F/A-18 E/F is not a med weight fighter and is in more comparable to SU30 but with smaller RCS and range
    http://vayu-sena.tripod.com/comparison-f16-f18-su30-1.html
    F-16 block60/62 and F/A-18 E/F are more comparble to Rafale and EF2000 both in Tec and in their ability.And F-16 block 50/52 and F/A-18 C/D can be compared to Mirage 2005MKII and MIG-29M

    in reply to: SU30MKI v/s F-16 #2628561
    jawad
    Participant

    For aircraft N011M has a 350 km search range and a 200 km tracking range. The radar can track and engage 20 air targets and engage the 8 most threatening targets simultaneously. The forward hemisphere is ±90º in azimuth and ±55º in elevation. These targets can include cruise/ballistic missiles and even motionless helicopters. A MiG-21 for instance can be detected at a distance of up to 135 km. Design maximum search range for an F-16 target was 140-160km. A Bars’ earlier variant, fitted with a five-kilowatt transmitter, proved to be capable of acquiring Su-27 fighters at a range of over 330 km. In comparison, the advanced Kopyo radar found in the latest MiG-21UPG can detect small drone targets at a range of 50 km. Another radar meant for the Flanker family, Phazotron-NIIR’s Zhuk-MS radar has a range of 150-180km against a fighter and over 300km against a warship. N011M can withstand up to 5 percent transceiver loss without significant degredation in performance. Additionally the Su-30MKI can function as a ‘mimi-AWACS’ and can act as a director or command post for other aircraft. The target co-ordinates can be transferred automatically to atleast 4 other aircraft. This feature was first seen in the MiG-31 Foxhound, which is equipped with a Zaslon radar.

    http://vayu-sena.tripod.com/info-su30mki.html#8

    on the other hand new f-16 block52 is equiped with the V(9) version of the AN/APG-68 radar .The V(9) version of the AN/APG-68 radar provides both improved air-to-air capabilities and air-to-ground capabilities. These include:
    30 percent increase in detection range .ie range of areound150km?
    Plus Mirage 20005MKII’s RDY2 have range of around 140 EL/M2035 offered for j10 have 148km
    so their would be no advantage of long range detection but R-27 will certainaly gives first missile to be fire by SU30MKI

    in reply to: PAF News and Discussion #2628566
    jawad
    Participant

    so do you think your discussion is of much higher level. You also quoted cash price of $1.2B at that time. what happened to that figure now?

    yesterday CNN in its report about F-16s for Pakistan talked about a deal worth 10b$ For india and 1.5b$ for PAF.

    in reply to: PAF News and Discussion #2629013
    jawad
    Participant

    Shaikh Rashid Ahmed, Information Minister of Pakistan, Friday confirmed that the US government has formally informed Pakistan and Pakistan would be able to get most modern F-16s.

    This is realy nice for PAF but what version of F-16 PAF will get?

    Golden_Arrow Block 52s for sure.

    Phase I: Buy old F-16s from the storage, and get them through MLU upgrades in the US. Mean while Lockheed Martin will conduct a MLU upgrade at Kamra in Pakistan for the current 32 F-16s.

    Phase IIa: Buy 40 new F-16s that will be somewhere between Block 52 and 60

    PhaseIIb: During the 3rd phase of delivery schedule PAF, is planning to place an order for another 50+ F-16s, thus the finances will be spread out over the period of 4 to 7 years.

    PAF pilots have test flown the UAE Block 60 F-16s and were quite impressed with it for obvious reasons. I think one big difference we would see is PAF wouldn not go with the spine, rather the clean look of Block 52 F-16s.

    After reading all this i am :confused:
    so what version it will be and for how many PAF will go?{32 F-16MLU will be included in all deals}

    1 F-16 Block 52
    2 F-16 Block 52+
    3 F-16 Block 60/62{as earlier it was also called F-16C/D}
    4 F-16 Block –{somewhere between Block 52 and 60}
    5 F-16 MLU {32+—old F-16s from the storage of USA/EU}
    6 or combination of above

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 235 total)