dark light

Gareth Horne

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 249 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lincs. Lancaster Assoc. open day photos #1426405
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    One or two more that I missed from yesterdays selection…

    http://www.pbase.com/gareth_horne/image/34329417.jpg

    http://www.pbase.com/gareth_horne/image/34329426.jpg

    http://www.pbase.com/gareth_horne/image/34329421.jpg

    http://www.pbase.com/gareth_horne/image/34330772.jpg

    http://www.pbase.com/gareth_horne/image/34330776.jpg

    in reply to: Breighton Summer Show #1427822
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    Nice set of images there Steven, you’ve got more detail in the Hurricane than I ever seem to manage!

    Perhaps this is a good time to remind people this coming Sunday is the last Breighton Fly-In for this year. Always worth a visit. Going to a long winter until next may!

    in reply to: Lincs. Lancaster Assoc. open day photos #1427830
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    cheers everyone, Septic – no tripod, but the lens is a 70-200VR (Vibration Reduction) which helps in these sort of situations 🙂 . Shutter speed was a 60th of a second.

    Gnome – hadn’t noticed that light showing up until you mentioned it! Don’t know if it was OEM but I’m guessing showing a red light in your belly ‘somewhere over Germany’ wouldn’t have been a good idea! 😮

    in reply to: East Kirkby Today #1430191
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    very good, looks like a perfect evening for a taxi run!

    in reply to: Nikon D70 pointed skywards #1433170
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    White balance allows you to set the camera for the ‘colour’ of the light you are shooting under Tony. To a human eye a sheet of white paper appears the same colour in daylight, under a fluorescent strip light, or even an old fashioned light bulb. Cameras aren’t as clever as the human eye unfortunately, and that is what the white balance setting does. With film cameras it was necessary to buy different types of film (tungsten, daylight etc) or use coloured filters in front of the lens, so in this way digital is much simpler.

    Its possible to set white balance accurately using the pre set function, but this is usually only necessary if working in mixed lighting conditions (inside a museum hall for example). For outdoor photography just set daylight, (sunny, cloudy or shade) depending on the conditions. Auto white balance is an option but I always prefer to set it myself, it retains consistency throughout a set of photographs, and I’ve never seen an auto function that I’m fully happy with.

    If its ‘a-bit-sunny-a-bit-cloudy’ sort of a day I usually opt for the cloudy setting, that gives a slightly warmer result which is usually more aesthetically pleasing. This really comes down to personal preference. Once you’ve set it just get on with shooting unless the light changes dramatically.

    As for exposure compensation I always aim to push the histogram as far to the right as possible, without getting clipped highlights (a sharp vertical spike on the right of the screen). It all depends on the position of the sun, how bright a day it is, and the colour of the thing you are photographing. On a bright sunny day and a mid toned aircraft I’d probably start with a +ve third of a stop compensation dialled in, going up to +1 stop or more some something black (Lysander or Lancaster for example).

    For a white aircraft it may be zero or even -ve exposure compensation is needed to avoid the ‘blown highlights’ (pure white recorded with no detail in them). On a dull day the contrast between dark and light areas of your photographs is much less so you can get away with dialling in much more exposure compensation, so you may be using +2 for dark toned aircraft, and +third or +two thirds for light toned aircraft.

    These are all based on my D100, all cameras are different, its just a case of playing about with it until you get the feel of your exposure system. Get used to checking your histogram after each pass its much better to find out after a couple of shots than when you get back home with a card full to download!

    Hope that helps!

    in reply to: pictures ov planes #1433639
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    Brilliant photos, thanks for posting them! 🙂

    in reply to: Nikon D70 pointed skywards #1433647
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    A friend of mine has a D70, very nice camera, in many ways better than my D100 for airshows since the buffer clears much faster.

    Exposure wise dialling in exposure compensation is certainly necessary, try to get used to reading the histogram to judge exposure, rather than relying on the ‘look’ of the image on the screen. The camera displays tend to be set as bright as possible to make them readable in sunlight, rather than a true indication of how the shot will look on the PC or when printed.

    Lens wise a Sigma 50-500EX provides a good compromise between cost and performance but requires good light to perform well. It covers virtually all the focal lengths you could need at a display. This year however, I’ve mainly been using a 70-200VR and 300mm prime, both with and without a 1.4x teleconverter. Given the less than stellar weather at some shows the extra speed has been useful.

    Look forward to seeing your photos!

    in reply to: Airwar '74 – More Warbirds in colour & b/w #1437847
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    what a fantastic collection of images from those early days of warbird preservation. Thanks for sharing!

    in reply to: Silly question #1438911
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    theres a picture of a black JP arriving at the grass strip at Breighton on their website, not seen it myself (yet) though!

    in reply to: Seafury and Seahawk fly #1551784
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    That is good news, its certainly time the RNHF had something to celebrate.

    Looking forward to seeing the photographs from the Yeovilton show on here next week then!

    in reply to: Le Bourget museum restoration facilities #1556705
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    Its actually a Sandringham, a post war rebuld to airline standards. According to this link JM719 G-AKCO/VH-APG/F-OBIP was built for BOAC to fly New York to Bermuda, but ended up being used in Southern Africa.

    How it ended up in France isn’t stated!

    in reply to: Crunchie display team #1558913
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    Not found any photos of the Chrunchie scheme, but here’s the previous Yugo one, at Yeovilton in 1988. Looks a pit dull compared to todays flash paint job doesn’t it!

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/GarethHorne/misc%20jpgs/yeovilton_1988_1.jpg

    in reply to: The first Warbird you saw fly! #1558914
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    Sally B at a Yeovilton airshow, mid 1970’s, looking lovely in bare metal finish.

    PA 474, Spit and Hurr. were also in attendance, but it was the shiny B17 that really caught the attention of a plane mad eight year old.

    in reply to: Breighton – pictures from Sunday #1561449
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    … Were you the chap with the Cannon gear I saw? Glad to see you captured that low pass by the Spitfire – I was using my film camera for that so I don’t know if I got it – probably not. He was very low wasn’t he!

    No, I was using a Nikon D100, one of the few non Canon shooters at airshows these days!

    Got lucky with the spitfire pass photo I posted, in the next frame the only bit of aircraft visible is the tail!! 😀

    in reply to: Breighton – pictures from Sunday #1561577
    Gareth Horne
    Participant

    lovely collection of photos there Drossel – and you managed a shot of the Buchon from the side with the cowlings on! 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 249 total)