dark light

Mark A

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 93 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is Carol Vorderman 'insane'? #389954
    Mark A
    Participant

    As I understand, she’s planning to get her CPL and IR first, although there’s not much alternative to having an IR as most choices of route will have sections where you won’t get a VFR cleasrance.

    If you take Polly Vacher as an example. She learnt to fly fairly late in life albeit much under the tutelage of the legendary late Peter Thorn and subsequently set out on 3 round the world trips in her Piper Dakota. It involves a bit of risk, a lot of money and determination, but most of the flying is hours of straight and level with not much to do.

    Good luck to her!

    in reply to: World Tour #392170
    Mark A
    Participant

    I met CarolAnn Garratt last year at Sun’n’Fun in Florida. She was giving a presentation on the latest of her world tours.
    She certainly found a few interesting places en-route. You can see her route and flight log here

    in reply to: Can I opt for PPL while being on Warfarine medicine? #393221
    Mark A
    Participant

    I’d echo the comments about contacting the medical section or an AME.

    They are usually very helpful and keen to get someone flying wherever possible.

    There are actually a few options:

    • A full EASA PPL requires a Class 2 medical or higher
    • An NPPL with UK privileges including carrying passengers
    • An NPPL with safety pilot (or solo)

    The full PPL has defined medical requirements that you can read here.
    Have a look at the section on Haemotology for the Class 2. A lot may depend on your history and the underlying medical condition.

    The NPPL has a requirement based on the DVLA Group 2 professional driver standard and you can use a medical declaration from your GP.
    If you don’t reach that standard, you can get a Group 1 declaration that is the same as saying you are fit to drive a car and will be subject to the safety pilot or solo limitation.
    The NPPL is only valid in UK airspace at present.

    in reply to: Considering Malta air rally #393382
    Mark A
    Participant

    If you want a consistent chart format for the whole route, then Jepps would be the way to go (assuming this is a VFR trip). Sadly, they are discontinuing this series on paper, but current editions may still be available.

    Peter Mundy’s shop at Lelystad has a good stock of European charts and a good mail order service.

    The Eurocontrol EAD site is free to register and will give you access to AIP, AICs etc for all Europe.

    Skyvector seems very popular as an EFB alternative, but I have no personal experience.

    Do you plan to cross the Alps? If so, an early morning crossing usually works best.

    Through Italy, it will pay to phone airfields in advance to ensure fuel availability. You can’t trust the AIP and Notams to be accurate in that respect.

    It should be a great trip. Have fun!

    in reply to: 3 blade propeller recommendations for O-360 engine #397240
    Mark A
    Participant

    Craig Catto makes some of the best wooden/composite props for the homebuilt market.
    He is very knowledgeable and has a great reputation for customer service, but you may have to wait in line a while for delivery.

    In the certificated world, I’d probably suggest MT in Germany.

    in reply to: Sindlinger Hurricane plans #397982
    Mark A
    Participant

    I believe Fred is alive and well and still sells the plans.

    You may be able to make contact through this Yahoo group.

    in reply to: Suffolk Light Aircraft Crash: One Person Dead #398010
    Mark A
    Participant

    Can we call an end to this debate?

    We fly with at least three sets of limitations: those of the law, those of the aircraft and its equipment and, most importantly, those of the pilot’s skills and experience.

    You can go inadvertently into instrument conditions, especially at night. That’s why there is an element of instrument training in the PPL syllabus (although it emphasises the 180 turn which isn’t always the best way of regaining VMC).

    But more accidents are caused by people deliberately continuing into instrument conditions without the appropriate skills and/or equipment.

    We never get to know all the details of accidents like this and have to rely on the skills of the investigator to determine probable cause and make any recommendations as a consequence.

    Fly safely and always keep a bolt-hole or two in reserve.

    in reply to: Suffolk Light Aircraft Crash: One Person Dead #398165
    Mark A
    Participant

    Have it your way if you like, but VMC is nothing to do with having a horizon or being able to see the ground (except for the case I mentioned). It is for the purpose of maintaining safe separation from other traffic and ground based obstructions by visual means.

    You may well be in VMC in conditions that call upon instrument flying skills, but they are still visual meteorological conditions as defined by ICAO, rules of the air etc. If you have another ‘official’ definition of VMC, I’d be pleased for you to provide a reference.

    I’ll be quite happy to give you the source for the official definition of VMC.

    In nearly all cases when I’ve been flying above a solid layer it has been easy flying in good VMC. I have experienced the ‘white out’ conditions that you describe over the sea; I was a passenger on one such occasion where the pilot had no real instrument experience. I ended up doing the flying ‘on the clocks’ while he maintained the lookout. Immediately after he went and got some instrument training.

    in reply to: Suffolk Light Aircraft Crash: One Person Dead #398175
    Mark A
    Participant

    I agree! you cannot be VFR on top. (You can be VMC on top but that is actually IFR.)

    There seems to be quite a bit of misinformation here.

    You most definitely can fly VFR above a solid layer. The rules only specify vertical and lateral distance from cloud and flight visibility.

    Below 3000′ there are reduced separation options that specify clear of cloud and in sight of the surface.

    I most certainly don’t fly ‘head down’ when above a solid layer and in clear visibility, just keep a normal lookout and instrument scan as I would when flying below cloud. You can get fooled by a sloping ‘cloud horizon’, but it’s relatively unusual.

    Having a good plan for getting down at destination or in an emergency is a good idea, but that’s a different question.

    Mark A
    Participant

    I’d love to watch it as I’m planning a trip (summer) through that area.

    All I get is “This content is currently unavailable”

    May be regionally restricted?

    in reply to: The Cat sat on the Mat. #398841
    Mark A
    Participant

    Capitalising your (non-proper) nouns has revealed you as a potential German and hence ineligible for level 6 English.

    in reply to: Taylor Mono plane help! #399025
    Mark A
    Participant

    I had a Mono a long time ago and IIRC we had no cable tensometer.
    It varied with the seasons anyway, being a wooden airframe.

    We used “engineering judgement” adjusting the turn buckles until there was no chance of slipping on the pulleys, but not so tight you wear the bearings, pulley and tuffnel fairleads.

    Your inspector (assuming LAA) is the ultimate arbiter. You won’t find tensions quoted in AC43, but there is a lot of good general guidance about cable control inspection and maintenance (Chap 7 I think). Worth a read on safetying turnbuckles too.

    in reply to: Oil change method #399206
    Mark A
    Participant

    I’ve done it both ways depending on circumstances. If cold, I’ll always give it an hour or so to fully drain while I get on with other stuff. Multigrades seem to flow out quite well hot or cold.

    Assuming that the plugs are also coming out for cleaning and gapping, then pulling the prop through a few times will get a bit more of the residual oil out too.

    If you do regular compression checks at oil change time, it seems sensible to do it with consistent engine temperature either cold or warm.

    in reply to: Colour blind. PPL with restrictions or NPPL #400735
    Mark A
    Participant

    Beware the forthcoming move to EASA licensing and how it’ll affect the IMC rating. Some more info here.

    in reply to: Colour blind. PPL with restrictions or NPPL #400742
    Mark A
    Participant

    The medical standards for PPL etc haven’t changed markedly as they are broadly in line with ICAO standards and recommendations.
    If you passed the lamp test, you should still be able to do so and hence have no day, radio equipped restriction.
    I believe an IMC and even an IR can be issued to colour-blind applicants, but limited to day only.

    If you can’t pass any of the colour vision tests, then you will be restricted to day only.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 93 total)