dark light

Mark A

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 93 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The jet glider has arrived. #418298
    Mark A
    Participant

    It put on quite an impressive display at Oshkosh this year:
    http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t50/alberym/Oshkosh%202010/DSC_0121.jpg

    in reply to: European "User Fees", or more friendly flying #418428
    Mark A
    Participant

    In Europe, airfields are not publicly or municipally funded, but operated as businesses. The only source of income is from fees for landing, nav service (for IFR), parking, hangarage, fuel sales etc.

    I think the main reason for the relative high cost is not inefficiency or gross profiteering, but the relative low level of activity compared to the US.

    En-route charges in Europe currently apply only to aircraft above a certain size (2.3T IIRC), who file IFR flight plans. The system of billing is fairly well automated and seems to me a reasonable way of passing the cost to those that benefit from the service.

    I enjoy flying in the US with the freedom and relatively low cost, but it does seem to be partly at the expense of ordinary taxpayers who benefit relatively little. As the overall system works well enough, I won’t rock the boat.

    in reply to: EAA or AOPA #418473
    Mark A
    Participant

    No contest for me. I belong to both EAA and AOPA (good magazines and on-line services from both).
    I fly an RV-4 which is fast, sporty and economical. Night and IFR is allowed if you’re suitably equipped and licensed – unlike in Europe.
    If you build yourself, you can also get a repairman’s certificate allowing you to sign off your own maintenance, repairs and condition inspections. If someone else built it, it’s still generally easy to find an A&P who will supervise and sign-off an owner annual.
    If you stick with the best of the EAA types then safety is at least as good as with factory builts.

    in reply to: Taylor Monoplanes #418640
    Mark A
    Participant

    I had one about 25 years ago, and it was good cheap fun flying, if not particularly fast.
    From memory it was an RAF48 aerofoil in the centre section (48′ chord). Plagiarized by Ken Rand for the KR1 and KR2.

    in reply to: West Malling 1984 – plane ident please #538943
    Mark A
    Participant

    http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t50/alberym/Wings%20over%20Camerillo%20-%20Aug2010/DSC_0014.jpg
    http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t50/alberym/Wings%20over%20Camerillo%20-%20Aug2010/DSC_0013.jpg
    Here she is getting a bit of care and attention at Camerillo

    in reply to: West Malling 1984 – plane ident please #538963
    Mark A
    Participant

    The Mk14 in the first photo, I saw at Camarillo last week looking very good, but still undergoing restoration. It wasn’t in the flying display. I can post a current picture if you’re interested.

    in reply to: Oshkosh Sloshkosh #544131
    Mark A
    Participant

    WB981 – Google Osa’s Ark and all will be revealed.

    No. 10 is the Seafire. A beautiful restoration job and a privilege to see it there. Unfortunately I left before I was able to see her airborne.

    in reply to: Mystery aircraft – surveying, mapping? #421637
    Mark A
    Participant

    A few years ago, a colleague of mine was flying OS survey flights which involved flying several very accurate gps tracks moving across a few hundred metres each time, generally on clear cloudless days.
    The so-called satellite views of Google maps etc are obtained in a similar fashion and updated periodically.
    I think a Cessna 310 was used in the case I recall.

    in reply to: How safe is spectating at your local airfield? #421639
    Mark A
    Participant

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/leicestershire/4139576.stm is the only incident I recall of a spectator at an airfield being killed in the approach area. And he was standing on top of a car directly under the approach.
    There are several airfields that have public rights of way across the field – Huddersfield and Clacton included IIRC, but I don’t recall any incidents.

    In most cases it’s safer than crossing the road.

    in reply to: Rare Bears New Livery! #427476
    Mark A
    Participant

    She put on a good show at Reno last week, but Strega left everyone in its wake.
    http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t50/alberym/Reno%202009/DSC_0107.jpg
    http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t50/alberym/Reno%202009/DSC_0127.jpg

    Or, for a flavour of the whole event go to http://s157.photobucket.com/albums/t50/alberym/Reno%202009/ and hit slideshow on the right if you’ve a few minutes to waste.

    in reply to: Air Race @ North Weald. 26.04.09 #430056
    Mark A
    Participant

    I arrived at North Weald on Sunday with a spare battery after Ben (race 78) had called me with starting problems on Saturday that meant he had to bow out of the Saturday event.
    To cut to the chase, we started OK and I found myself in the pillion seat for a practice lap (with one of the corner tents missing to add to the entertainment) and then for the Battle of Britain race. Managed to grab a bit of shaky video from the hot seat at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXxuPCg7uZI

    If anyone has any good snaps of G-MARX on her first race outing, I wouldn’t mind a copy to markalbery metronet.co.uk.

    We ended about 2 minutes behind scratch at about 185mph, but it was his first go, so plenty of learning points.:)

    in reply to: Coonagh airfield, Limerick #430506
    Mark A
    Participant

    Official information is on AIC 09/08 which you can download if you register on the EADS site. Pasted from there (formatting lost):

    Aerodrome Location and Elevation Licensee:
    Coonagh, Co. Limerick
    EICN
    52 39 59N
    08 40 55W
    2NM West of Limerick
    6 ft
    Mr. D. Lehane
    Portdrine,
    Cratloe
    Co. Clare
    061 357126
    061 326600
    085 1382386
    Landing Area Facilities Ground Services
    Runway 10/28 Lighting Nil Fuel Mogas
    Dimensions 416m x 9m Radio 129.9 MHz Hangar Yes
    Surface Bituminous Customs 48 HR Pn
    (outwards only)
    REMARKS:- Prior Permission Required.
    Notes:
    i. Only experienced, fully licensed pilots with recent currency in light aircraft short
    field techniques will be granted permission to use the airfield.
    ii. Prior to use, pilots intending to use Coonagh aerodrome should seek a local
    briefing from a flying club instructor through http://www.limerickflyingclub.com
    iii. Movement of aircraft confined to runway and taxiway.
    iv. Caution : Narrow runway width may give the illusion of longer runway length
    and the runway may appear further away then it really is.
    v. Obstacles penetrating the 28 and 10 approaches and the transitional surfaces for
    Runway 10/28, including a mobile object on the road.
    vi. Short field operations are the norm.
    vii. All circuits should be flown to the south of the Shannon River at 800 ft avoiding
    built up areas. Pilots are reminded of the proximity of the P9 and the Shannon
    Control Zone.

    in reply to: Specific Gravity for 100/130 Octane fuel #430703
    Mark A
    Participant

    0.72 kg/litre or 6 lb/USG

    in reply to: Convert NPPL to Single Engine licence (JAA PPL) ? #430798
    Mark A
    Participant

    I helped a chap do such a conversion a few years ago. Effectively I just had to bring him to the standard required for the NST and GST for SSEA and cover the basic instrument flying etc.. About 5-6 hours did the job if I remember correctly.

    As its the addition of a class rating rather than an initial issue, I believe you could do the training at an unlicensed field too.

    in reply to: Cessna 150 vs 152 #430948
    Mark A
    Participant

    Generally the 150 does everything a few knots slower than the 152, but the differences aren’t great.
    The 150 has 40 deg. max flap extension, which requires more carefull handling during a go-around. Keep the speed at 60-65 mph until you’ve cleaned to flaps 20.

    ASI is usually MPH on the main scale on 150 and usually Knots on the 152.

    You occasionally see ‘long range’tanks and/or ‘cruise’ props on 150s which aren’t very useful mods. 30 US gals on board will make it a single seater and a coarse prop gives a lousy climb performance.

    Handling is generally quite docile, though stalls with power and flaps can be quite entertaining. Fun to spin and quick to recover, anything more exciting and it would need to be an Aerobat.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 93 total)