dark light

Ravula

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 122 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Can Su-30MKI supercruise? #2544532
    Ravula
    Participant

    There has been a lot of discussion on tail radar on MKI here. A search will bring it up. AFAIK, No tail radar on MKI

    in reply to: Can Su-30MKI supercruise? #2544557
    Ravula
    Participant

    there is no tail radar on MKI

    in reply to: Pakistan AF #2547612
    Ravula
    Participant

    GD, how does some one own 50% of a design? One wing, half cockpit… How?

    in reply to: Pakistan AF #2548753
    Ravula
    Participant

    Wow! No flames in over 3 pages involving JF-17, LCA, India, Pak. Shows what a single temp ban could do…. 😀 Nice discussion guys.

    One more question: Is there any specific plans by Pak/PAF on what the next step should be? Given Indian experience with Marut, lacking one could seriously hamper future work.

    in reply to: Report:N.Korea performed first-ever nuke test-What's next? #2549951
    Ravula
    Participant

    China and India doesn’t have fundamental problems with each other, and the differences they have on some land issues can be negotiated, but even then that’s never a problem in developing other areas of China-India relationship.

    Assam
    Sikim
    Tibet
    Akash Chin
    Pakistan
    Nepal
    Burma/Mayanmar (?)
    Bangladesh
    Water resources

    for starters…….

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1806573
    Ravula
    Participant

    Thanks Sean.

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1806593
    Ravula
    Participant

    AvP?

    in reply to: J-10 versus LCA-AESA #2556629
    Ravula
    Participant

    This thread needs to be closed and closed NOW

    in reply to: J-10 versus LCA-AESA #2558271
    Ravula
    Participant

    What other meaning could this have?????

    “””And the LCA we must remember is an extremely small aircraft, plus is designed to have a low RCS. So the LCA can have the first look advantage“””

    You claimed that the LCA will have first look, which you have not proven to be true, all you have done is listed some design features which supposely decease the RCS. You have not proven it can get a first look

    UNDERSTAND NOW?????????????.

    Its only taken 1 day :rolleyes:

    You know, ‘can have’ and ‘will have ‘ mean different things in english.

    in reply to: The Myth of Su-30MK as a long-range fighter #2592349
    Ravula
    Participant

    Here is something that is actually being done – Su-30MKI takes off with full bombload from Pune (Mahrashtra), bombs a range in Pokhran (Rajasthan), -> IFR -> bombs a range in North East India -> IFR -> does a “mission” over the andaman islands and returns to Pune. Calculate what the related range covered is, with two IFRs and full bombload.

    😮 😮 😮

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2557102
    Ravula
    Participant

    How else will it attract potential customer’s attention? I don’t think HAL is/was trying to claim technical mastery over everything aerospace by parading IJT.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force News & Discussion June- Aug 2006 #2557135
    Ravula
    Participant

    Why would you consider IJT a joke? Its needed, isn’t it?

    in reply to: The Indian MMRCA Saga #2580301
    Ravula
    Participant

    Politically unstable? How so?

    in reply to: Belarus to buy 18 IAF SU30K #2596822
    Ravula
    Participant

    remember, these Ks were supposed to be modified into MKIs. Compared to that, refurbing them should be easy.

    in reply to: Should the Indian Airforce go for the Mig-31 ? #2600352
    Ravula
    Participant

    What IAF strategy? care to explain? 😮

    Sure, IAF strategy to buy EFs :diablo: 😀 :rolleyes: :p

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 122 total)