Berlusconi
Since you admitted you don’t know much about heliopters, please allow me to make some observations:
The Panha 2091 in the photo has the same flat windows that late model and updated AH-1s have. There is nothing uniquely Iranian about it…US, Japanese, Israeli and other Cobras have it. (I believe US Army tests showed that the curved glass gave off more reflections).
flat panels being uniquely Iranian, no. But the fact remains that Iran received only the curved glass models of the AH-1, and that the Panha is a reversed engineered cobra with modifications done on the window.
TEEJ
Interesting but i have to tell you the other side of the History, according to a Russian TV program i watched named “Udarnaja Sila” that talked about the MiG-29 claimed, the MiG-29 Fulcrum Shot down a F-117, consider this is a TV Program,: Yefim Gordon in His Book MiG-29 Fulcrum even claimed the Djuvic even recieved a medal by Slodoban Milosevic him self for his kill.
According to Gregory R. Copley who wrote in ” The International Strategies Studies Assosiation Journal”, (US) May, 1999; the US lost not one but three F-117, one of those was shot down by a MiG-29.
This was a US publication with access to “highly reputable sources”
The Serb Air Force contrary to your claims does not admitt only two aircraft as shot down.
Udarnaja Sila has interviews with Valery Menitsky and other people involved in the MiG-29 program and excellent footage by the way
Confirmed kills yeah yeah yeah well let`s start by seeing the physical evidence since the F-14 has IRST and TV systems i guess you can provide Gun camera pictures or a picture like the Syrian MiG-23 wreckage on an Arab town street unless you prove it with pictures all are unconfirmed claims or at least an offical Iraqi Saddam Era statement.
Specially the famous 4 MiG-23 kill by a single AIM-54 uh i would like to see that picture have you seen it can you post it?
well but if you have pictures are not considered claims and are considered confirmed kills. you need official statements of a nation saying we lost the aircraft if not a picture to prove it either of the gun camera or the wreckage but Gun camera is better because it proves it was not a SAM but a fighter what shot it down
How about you follow your own statements and provide actual pictures or official statements proving the loss :rolleyes:
Thanks, some of these projects are known even to me. I actually have to give some credit to the Iranians: they succesfully developed a decent aerospace industry from the scratch. Especially the helicpopter business seems promising.
no problem, I would have posted more but the site went down last night. And yes, it’s something that makes them stand out from the rest of their neighbors, even if some of the stuff they make is considered obsolete by western standards.. it’s a start.
But we should not make the mistake and derive from that that the Iranians have F-14 equipped with Phoenix ready to fight. All missiles they have are oudated (missiles have a best-before date). Maybe they increased the life time. But reverse engineering the whole system? I doubt it.
From confirmed kill records, I do believe the last use of the Phoenix to kill was in either 88 or 89.. so that gives us 17 years since then. The picture above (a link) shows a recent F-14 with Phoenix under the belly. The dummy rounds are blue while the real ones are white. It does not necessarily mean its useable of course, but does imply that they still exist.
Same with the AEW aircraft. Using it without Russian spares seems impossible, especially because I doubt that the radar matches the airframe, hence that the radar is downrated. the Russians would never give away their latest AEW aircraft to Iraq.
Thats because the Russians didn’t give an AEW aircraft to Iraq. It’s just an IL-76 using a French radar.. although yes, French spares would be difficult (especially after Chirac’s latest remark).
back to the missiles thing.. I don’t know the status of how far along they are on the Aim-54 reverse engineering, other than that the project and the missle are called Phoenix (yes, makes it much confusing when searching for it).
There is also another project called Project Fatter, which seems to be based on the AIM-9P.
the funny thing is..
one could take any aircraft, over emphasize it’s one strength, downplay its weaknesses..then de-emphasize every the strengths of any other aircraft.. then yes, it would be superior.. any aircraft would be if you kept using that logic.
Referreing to this passage:
Hmm, the Iran has 30 Tomcats available. Will their “considerably upgraded” radar make the difference? The same article says:
Let’s always remember that US/alliance forces have the initiative to strike their targets at their time with their weapons of choice. In a battle of equal contenders, this initiative normally gives the decisive advantage. But the “considerably upgraded” radars don’t make it an even match.
Update me on Iran’s domestic projects? All I read is so foggy and unclear that I hardly can believe it.
naturally so as I believe the US forces have better advantages that the Iranians can’t match no matter what they upgrade.
As requested here’s some projects/info i’ve gathered elsewhere:
AEW – Iran has two taken from Iraq, the Adnan (a modified Il-76). Although the Adnan itself was supposedly unimpressive and the Iranians might be modifying one of them.
here is a pic of it in Iraqi colors
ASM – Zoobin, an ASM that seems to be influenced by the Maverick and GBU-8. domestic
Trainers – Dorna (2 seat prop driven training aircraft, domestic).
Fajr 1 (another domestically developed prop trainer, not sure on seating).
Paratsoo – reversed engineered Beech F.33
some pics if you click here
Helicopters – Panha 2091 – reversed engineered AH-1J
note, the different glass frame in comparison to the AH-1
here is a regular Iranian Cobra for comparison.jpg)
Shabaviz 75 (obviously a reversed engineered Bell helicopter..but since there’s soo many damn Bell helicopters that all look the same and have different designations, I can’t remember what exactly it is enginered from)
Shahed 274
Tanker – 747 tanker modified.
http://myaviation.net/search/photo_search.php?id=00360149&size=large
F-4s- From that site you quoted me from..it is mentioned that they have at least 14 in service (a low number from what they had before). Several did receive the Peace Enforcer upgrade before the revolution. Modified to carry the Kh-58
Saaqeh- appears to be a domestic aircraft derived from the F-5 but with two vertical stabilizers
F-14 – an additional link in regards to making spare parts for them
http://www.mehrnews.com/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=150670
from a post earlier here, an F-14 with phoenix under it. Given the paint job on it, it is recent, at least within the last 6 years
supposedly tested to fire the Sedjil (air to air hawk)
Zafar – made after Iran-Iraq war, but seems that the Iranians did not express too much interest in it.
Missiles –
Fateh-110 – domestic, solid propellent surface to surface missile. Some claim it is based on the Chinese DF-11
Falaq – an air to air missile.. can’t find too much info on this one and will post more later if I find anymore.. not sure if this is the reverse engineered Phoenix either.
others:
news link regard to Iran’s air defense
http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=34673&NewsKind=Current%20Affairs
some kind of cruise missle
http://img177.echo.cx/img177/2973/cruisemissile2mv.jpg
How did Iran update their SR-missile technology?
Did they develop new Sparrow versions or the Iran AMRAAM?
How did their update AD-networks, datalinks, ECCM, radar technology?
How did they update tactics without having any benchmark (the Iraqis don’t really count)?
What is the status of the Irian AWACS?
How good is Iranian sattelite surveillance?I accept that 25 years did not pass without any change in Iran. But the basics are limited. They have F-5 and F-4, and some F-14. Germany had the more modern F-4F and upgraded them with newest radar technology. Now they can compete with modern fighters in the BVR regime (not in dogfight).
first you seemed so certain that they have not updated their fighter fleet, yet now you ask multiple questions and acknwoledged that there are changes.. I provided the link to where I got the information, it’s up to you to actually read it.
but at the same time with statements such as this:
Fighters are constantly upgraded. The -C models of F-15/16/18 were the first that can be upgraded by loading a new software version on the radar computer. The Iranian fighters are standard 1975. They might have upgraded, but they surely don’t compare to US-standard 2006.
you seem to know what they have have upgraded. There’s a difference between fact and speculation. Especially since the extent of upgrades on western aircraft are much more easily available than that of what Iran has.
let me ask you this, are you even familiar with any of Iran’s domestic projects and arms industry?
b-2 is a bit easier to shoot down then f-22 look what happened with the f-117a in serbia and they did not have as much money as iran right now an a airforce like theres b-2 you can shoot down easily. But also the Russians are for sure very keen to give Iran maybe some kind of very high quilty equipment beaucse the Russians would like to look in the B-2 and F-22 just look what happened in Serbia the russians looked inside the F-117a. Plus for cruise missiles Iran can easily purchase a KA-50 that has a anti ship misiles and can carry torpedoes so you can sink a ship like that easily it aint hard but ud need more then just one KA-50 maybe around 4-6.
B-2 and F-117’s operate at different altitudes.
I think the one to deliver is the one who makes the boldest claim. That is actually you. I just stick to the things one can assume from the obvious facts. Those are:
– Iran has only 1970 and early 1980 fighters
– Iran has a serious problem with spares and upgrades
– Iran has not updated its fighter fleet since
– most countries use stuff from 1970 and 1980, the F-16, F-15, etc some of its neighbors use aren’t exactly 1990’s material. Of course, if you count in it’s new developments like the Shafaq and Azaraksh, then literally, those would be “2000” fighters.
– Iran inherited a massive aeronautical complex (help built by the Americans of course), that’s comparable to the size of McDonnel Douglas’ plant in St. Louis, they’ve spent years reverse engineering American aircraft, which has led towards new spares being made for F-4s and F-14s, upgrades to Cobra helicopters, and downright total copies of F-5s.
-F-14, F-4s, and MiG-29s have all been updated. Please refer to the link posted earlier.
PZL Sokol in Indian(?) markings:
This painting is only for film needs.
could be Irish
The DPW purchase of U.S. ports was interesting. The U.S. lamestream media played up the security issues mainly because they dislike GWB. The politicans who are thinking ahead to the 2006 Nov election cycle, joined in and the public got hysterical. You are aware that the seller was a U.K. firm and that the majority of major U.S. ports are (already) managed (not owned) by foreign companies based in Singapore, PRC,etc. Those deals were all pre 9/11 of course.
actually, a considerable (if not the largest) amount of those opposing the deal were actually other Republicans.
The DPW purchase of U.S. ports was interesting. The U.S. lamestream media played up the security issues mainly because they dislike GWB. The politicans who are thinking ahead to the 2006 Nov election cycle, joined in and the public got hysterical. You are aware that the seller was a U.K. firm and that the majority of major U.S. ports are (already) managed (not owned) by foreign companies based in Singapore, PRC,etc. Those deals were all pre 9/11 of course.
actually, a considerable (if not the largest) amount of those opposing the deal were actually other Republicans.
i really can’t see it
Field 100 MiG-29s versus 100 F-16 and tell me who rules having both air forces AMRAAM and R-77s
The West hardly acknowledges any Iraqi or Serb kill.
sure, one can change the scenarios to benefit the situation.. but in the real world, war is never fair and you will never get 100 vs 100. Hell, most MiG-29 operators don’t even use their MiGs the way the Soviets planned on using them.
Field 100 MiG-29s versus 100 F-16 and tell me who rules having both air forces AMRAAM and R-77s
The West hardly acknowledges any Iraqi or Serb kill.
sure, one can change the scenarios to benefit the situation.. but in the real world, war is never fair and you will never get 100 vs 100. Hell, most MiG-29 operators don’t even use their MiGs the way the Soviets planned on using them.
I think these are some really nice ideas. A reverse engineered f-14 is clearly more likely that a MiG-31 and if they have a russian radar that would mean they could fire the Adder. That would make the Tomcats really really potent.
I also like the Iran + X factor analogy…
in terms of reverse engineering on the F-14.. I’ve heard differing reports. US gov’t reports from a few years ago put it around 50% (although they did not list what component they were able to reverse engineer).
however from articles in air combat information group, put it at a more optomistic number of 90%.. the 10% being primarily the engine and radar. This article here click here says the Tomcats have been upgraded, both the radar and the phoenix missle.