He, because a gentleman always opens a door for a lady.:D
Don’t talk stupid, he’s not got pockets you know:D
There was one report that said it had been seen crawling back into the water across the road on the east-side of the Loch.
Fish, yes. Something that wasn’t a fish and was larger than a fish…no.
The canal would be difficult to transverse without being seen due to the seven locks between the loch and the sea, and the creature would need to be very patient and determined, knowing what it needed to do and when to makes its move.
The river would also be difficult; it is shallow along most of its length, knee deep in the low season at its deepest, and there are also two weirs to navigate. Salmon can get through since the fish channels were designed for their transit, but a larger ‘monster’ whose head might be the size of a salmon (I mean, who knows?) would have great difficulty.But its dead – there hasn’t been a reported sighting of Nessie for 18 months… http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-26081992
But little fish have of habit growing in to very large fish, beluga sturgeon at 15ft long would get your attention don’t you think.
Granted, but it is not going to make a habit of annually negotiating the locks/fish runs/weirs, is it..;o)
I just said that something could get in to Loch Ness by the Caledonian/Canal, I didn’t say it went on vacation every bleeding year.:D
Porsche
Why not just buy a real one off Ebay, for less than $18,000?
Jeez, another kraut with no knickers on.
Looks like a Whale Shark made it through the locks.
…with a little help from Photoshop or something.[/QUOTE]
Must have had a key after all then.:D
Interesting to speculate what the chap in the big Dodge (image #2) is trying to indicate.
The size of his manhood perhaps?
Moggy
The p”llocks taking a picture π
Nice set of pics Anna π π
By David Cenciotti
The incident happened on arrival day at RIAT Cottesmore in 2001.
Some photographers and aircraft spotters were next to the perimeter fence on the northeastern side of the airport next to the runway 23 threshold. This spot provided a unique point-of-view as arriving and departing aircraft were pretty close.
A B-1B Lancer 86-0104, 34th Bomb Squadron, was preparing for his rehearsal: it taxied to the holding point of runway 23, entered the runway and lined-up, while many photographers thought that the Boneβs departure would provide the perfect opportunity to get an impressive shot.
However, as the pilot pushed the throttles to the stop, to full afterburner, exhaust gases reached the spotters assembled just a few meters behind the American bomber.
Heat haze hit the photographers, some of those barely manage to escape the jet blast: some were burnt, others slightly injured cuts and bruises, others simply shocked.
Fortunately, nobody was seriously hurt.
Click on the image below to watch the video.
It shouldn’t take long to figure out.
20476096_10214128877756146_2846522881946137738_n by philip elcock, on Flickr
I used to fit Sprinkler systems and a 300 head system in a large store used to be about Β£120,000, so Β£200,000 might not be few off.
Sorry, I don’t believe that figure, nor do I believe the Β£200,000 figure I’ve heard to fit a sprinkler system to Grenfell Tower; I think these figures are just being plucked out of the air (or at least out of context) to fuel the general level of media, political and public (in that order) ‘outrage’!
So what do you think the figure would be to fit a sprinkler system in that building? CD
You asked why they didn’t use it, I’ve told you.
I wad hoping for a realistic answer rather than another question.
1925
For centuries there have been taboos against such weapons, but the use of poisonous gas in World War I led to the first international agreement β the 1925 Geneva Protocol β banning asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases and bacteriological methods of warfare.8 Apr 2013