as per Vayu Aerospace magazine (and this is one of the better journals in India dedicated to defence), the Tejas has completed full envelope expansion for Initial Operaing Capability (IOC) by Dec 2009 during the trials held in Dabolim, Goa. also talks about the second order for 20 more Tejas Mk1s as an expression of confidence by the IAF.
PAF Mirage crashes near Chakwal
Pilot ejected safely
PAF fighter jet crashes
Updated at: 1300 PST, Wednesday, December 16, 2009ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Air Force (PAF) Mirage fighter jet has been crashed in district Chakwal on Wednesday.
According to PAF spokesman, pilot has been ejected safely and no damage has been reported on the ground. The crash happened due to technical fault, he added.
I wished that a strike on a distant well defended surface target could be pictured somehow…That much more representative of what is truely done in the last conflicts and what put a challenge to modern aircrafts most recently…(bosnia, kosovo, iraq…).
Air to Air is somewhat (almost) a joke now ! Just for fun and to debate in forums:D
thats what all Super Hornet fans say !:P
All this could be done if there is nothing about it in their contract, and I do not know if there is or is not. Assuming that spare parts largely come from OEM, that OEM would have to be taken on board in some form even if IAF decides to go the Israeli way.
I’m not sure if it works that way with every manufacturer, although different contracts could possibly have different terms..HAL recently upgraded the MiG-27s on its own with no OEM support whatsoever. they then upgraded the BAe Sea Harrier on their own, again with BAe not being involved at all..that is in addition to what was done progressively to the Jaguar fleet as well. however for the MiG-29 upgrade, they did go to the OEM since they had a proven upgrade to the SMT standard and they only wanted a step up from that using technologies shown on the MiG-29K and MiG-35.
On the other hand, IAI wont touch the engine or relife the airframe. That will have to be HALs job and thats not going to be easy.
minor correction Teer, if Life Extension Studies are done in India, it’ll be the responsibility of the Structural Integrity Division of NAL, not HAL.
And while they may have original spares etc for a complete overhaul, to get an overall idea of the fatigue life they may have to test a Mirage to destruction to get an idea of the TTL for the airframe beyond what was initially stated. Thats a loss of an airframe more or less, which is where the OEM has the advantage since they have the design data and can often relife without having to do such comprehensive “test till fatigue crack” tests.
thats correct. they did it on a MiG-21 Bis to get an idea of how much the actual TTL of the MiG-21 Bis airframe is compared to what the manufacturer originally stated. they did it on a MiG-29 as well
why upgrade the mirages then?
because there is a lot of investment sunk in for these Mirages in the IAF..add to that the fact that when the IAF actually still operates a few squadrons of MiG-21Ms that will retire soon, then the question of retiring multi-role Mirages that proved their worth in Kargil, with life in their airframes doesn’t even arise. and the IAF needs all the airframes it can get and keep in service. already everyone is cribbing about the falling squadron numbers in the IAF. When the MRCA comes into the IAF in numbers, there will be more breathing room to decide about what to do with the MiG-29UPG, Mirage-2000-UPG and Jaguar DARIN II/IIIs.
at worst, they could go in for a limited upgrade like the LUSH (Limited Upgrade of Sea Harrier) upgrade for the IN’s Sea Harrier fleet that was done by HAL with an Israeli radar, Derby and some other indigenous products.
Again the total numbers of aircraft alone do not give any accurat picture of the capability of a nation airforce firepower.
Thanks
very true..Syria apparently has more combat aircraft than Israel and yet we all know who the dominant air-power in that region is and that too with nearly a hundred fewer combat aircraft. Its just amazing how dense the fighter population is in such a small region with Egypt, Syria and Israel all having fleets of combat aircraft that are among the 10 largest in the world..
Teer, I did not and do not intend to bring the LCA start date into disreputation. So taking a leaf from LCA’s book, can we agree that MCA project has not started yet and we could consider it to have started (officially) once the PD etc. has been completed?
Vikas, I would think that the current state of the MCA is similar to what is being done for future generation aircraft in civilian programs- for instance, Boeing has been working for years on a 737 replacement, purely product development wise to firm up a concept, decide on what technologies to incorporate, what advances are required, what materials to use, etc. its been going on for years, but there is no Full Scale engineering work going as yet, with the 747-8 and 787 eating up all engineering resources except for those in PD. Its only when they can finally arrive at a solution that addresses all the requirements from a 737 replacement (lesser drag, lower fuel burn, more green, lower noise, even more advanced materials, etc.) will they actually start Detail design. I would imagine that the MCA is in a similar phase. they first need to firm up what design to go with, what technologies to incorporate and when thats done, get work started on that in concurrence with the Detail design..and this time around, the IAF is (at least from reports) involved in discussions with ADA on what it wants and hopefully will embed program managers to give inputs at all times.
Offset related offers have come in for both the EJ200 and the F414
Tejas engine offset offers come in
Praveena Sharma / DNASaturday, December 12, 2009 3:34 IST EmailBangalore: European aerospace company Eurojet and America’s General Electric submitted offset proposals for their bids for light combat aircraft Tejas engines to the ministry of defence on Friday, a day before the deadline expires — December 12.The Indian government invites offset proposals from bidders of defence and civil aircraft deals.
An offset obligation is expected to be discharged through direct purchases or by executing export orders for defence products and components manufactured by or services provided by Indian defence industries. In many instances, it also involves technology transfer and training for military requirements.
As per the defence procurement policy 2006, 30-50% offset obligation is mandatory for the winner of the defence deal. There are two offset proposals — technical and commercial — submitted by each bidder, which are opened after completion of technical and commercial evaluations. For instance, technical offset proposal is opened after the technical evaluation and commercial offset offer after commercial evaluation.
Since the offset programme of the Indian government will require transfer of the key technology, the two aerospace companies need clearances from their respectively governments or regional economic organisations.
Apparently, Eurojet, which will be supplying its EJ200 for the new LCA Tejas, has got clearance from Nato Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency (Netma) for the transfer of “key technology” under the offset programme.
“In their proposal, they (Eurojet) have accepted to transfer key technology. They have also mentioned in the same note they can discuss transfer of other technologies too,” the source said.
According to him, if the European engine maker offers 100% transfer of technology, the price of its bid would shoot up; “Then its bid would not be competitive.”Eurojet has said it would form a joint venture with Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd or some private company to fulfill its offset obligation.
GE, which will supply the F-414 engine, is also said to have acquired the approval of the US government for technology transfer for the LCA programme. The two companies that have bid for the $750 million order for 99 engines for Tejas.
With a better engine the Tejas would certainly make history but I still do not understand why the mk2 Snecma is not good enough if it powers the already in IAF service mk2h. It is a known engine and surely can be bought with full tot and production.
I presume you’re talking about the Mirage-2kH..(M2K-H)..the Snecma M53-P2 is a generation older than the M-88 which is the latest engine that Snecma produces. They don’t even produce these engines anymore. Even if they did, its weight is much higher than any of the engines that have ever been considered (F-414, F-404 IN20, F-404F2J3, EJ200, M-88, RD-33MK, etc.). So, even while its thrust in AB is quite good, its not possible to use this engine in the Tejas without all-up weight going up significantly which will defeat the purpose of the extra thrust.
IAF orders inquiry into incident involving Prez’s copter
Mi-8 in VVIP transport role in India…I didn’t know that. Are there any plans to replace these in near future?
yup, they’re getting the AW101s..its a deal thats almost through and the deal has been fast-tracked since its meant to be for the VIPs and VVIPs..no delays when it comes to helicopters for the politicians.
It says it reached above 1350KM/hr but it does not really say at what altitude etc and if the tanks of the Tejas were empty, what it was carrying etc etc..
too ambiguous.
And we already know that the LCA reached Mach 1.4 at 11 km alt. So it’s obvious that this has to be the max speed at low alt. as for the tanks of the Tejas being empty, I’ve rarely read any specs about the fastest speeds with drop tanks or the quantity of internal fuel left..one thing we know for sure is that it carried the 2 R-73 dummies on its outermost wing pylons..it flies with them always AFAIK.
IAF orders inquiry into incident involving Prez’s copter
Mi-8 in VVIP transport role in India…I didn’t know that. Are there any plans to replace these in near future?
Oh they’re very close to a purchase of AW101s. After all we’re talking about India’s politicians. The deal has been fast tracked as compared to the long pending LUH deal.
over 1.2 Mach at sealevel in a warm climate is BIG achievement! that needs to be confirmed.
but if its true, im impressed!
I think thats what a slightly better written article stated. link was provided by VikasRehman in a post above (thanks for that Vikas)
Panaji, Dec 8 :Light combat aircraft (LCA) Tejas notched a speed of over 1,350 km per hour — the fastest by an indigenously-made fighter aircraft — during its sea level flight trials off Goa Tuesday, a senior Indian Air Force official said.
Tejas which is undergoing rigorous testing in saline, humid marine conditions in and off the coast of Goa, had performed admirably in the two-week long trials in Goa, Air Commodore Rohit Varma who is also the commanding officer of the Bangalore-based National Flight Testing Centre (NFTC) told reporters at the INS Hansa naval base Tuesday.
“The trials which lasted for two weeks comprised of flutter clearances, weapons firing, performance, stability and avionics validation. The LCA is the first supersonic fighter being manufactured indigenously by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL),” Varma, an elite pilot himself, said.
As part of the initial operational clearance, the Aeronautics Development Agency (ADA) had inducted three aircraft to Goa for conducting various sea-level flight tests, he said.
Varma also said that the LCA had already been tested in other extreme atmospheric conditions.
“Tejas has already been tested for high altitude and cold climate at Leh and in the desert environment of Rajasthan,” he said. “During the trials Tejas clocked in excess of 1,350 kmph,” Varma said, adding that the ADA in tandem with HAL was also in the process of manufacturing a naval version of the LCA.
“While the present trials are in progress for the air force version, the first prototype aircraft for the navy is also under production. The LCA-navy will be capable of taking off and landing on an aircraft carrier,” he said.
The LCA is expected to cost Rs.150 crore per aircraft and will find its home at the Sulur air force base near Coimbatore. The Indian Air Force has already ordered 20 LCAs from HAL, which will be delivered to them by 2013.
Air Vice Marshal Shankar Mani, who was also present during the media briefing, said the IAF could place a further order of 20 more LCAs after the first order.
My interpretation is that the aircraft reached a higher speed than it had ever reached before ie > 1,350 KMPH.
incorrect. the Tejas had crossed Mach 1.4 by end of 2006 itself. I’ll post the link to that when I can find that report tabled to the Parliament by the Standing Committee on Defence.
see this report on the flutter testing of the LCA. on slide 5, it shows that the Mach 1.4 at 10 km altitude was done. I believe that the speed given in the article as the highest speed ever reached represents the lowest corner point of the flight test for flutter (1364 kmph) at around 7 km altitude (shown as a proposed point for flutter testing).
Im just a bit confused with the above article. Am I right in assuming that its talking about the AF version and not the naval version? Also what does ultimate in ultimate speed mean? Surely, 1350 KMPH (Mach 1.27) can’t be the top speed…unless its at some particular altitude?
yeah there’s something wrong with that figure..the Tejas had crossed an envelope of Mach 1.4 by the end of 2006 itself as per the Standing Committee on Defence report to the Parliament. This must’ve been at sea level or something that the DDM (the guy calls Air Commodore Rohit Varma as Commander Varma, which indicates he’s not really a defence correspondent) didn’t catch. a pity.