dark light

21Ankush

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 1,410 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: HURKUS,Turkey's New Trainer #2433323
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Its good to know of a new program starting in a new place, but like Deino mentioned, the step up from a trainer to a fighter is huge, to say the least.

    also, since the Turkish Aerospace Industries have not made any fighter as yet, to now work on a 4th or 5th generation fighter would be very ambitious and if I might say, well near impossible on their own. first of all, since Turkey is a F-35 customer, their AF will not want something that is a big step down from the F-35, so that means a fighter on par with or even better than the F-35 would be required because it could only possibly be operational in the late 2020s or even later than that, looking at long drawn fighter development projects the world over..

    but then again, from the country’s point of view, nothing stirs the industrial and engineering base of the country like a prestigious fighter project. it spans such a wide gamut of technologies that it is bound to invigorate research and development into hitherto under-developed fields, which will only help Turkey’s economy and industrial base. another positive spin-off is that once you start developing your own fighter, it automatically means that supplier countries like the US (especially), which would previously bar export of their best non-degraded fighters, start to think twice..Japan tried that route with its scaled down 5th generation demonstrator project.

    21Ankush
    Participant

    Timely report Ankush.
    As I could make out recently, there is a fair amount of support for the respect to the LCA amongst key decision makers & the aircraft is seen as being a useful part of the IAF inventory.

    indeed, it makes sense to base the first Tejas’ close to HAL and ADA facilities in Bangalore..will be easier to get engineers and technicians on to the air base in time, and that is essential initially, to overcome teething troubles. then again, the fact that finally someone is developing air bases and thinking of basing squadrons of fighters in the Deccan peninsula is heartening. will allow the IAF to base Su-30MKIs and that way extend its reach..if at any later date, the IAF needs to interdict enemy shipping, this would be essential.

    21Ankush
    Participant

    and more on the Mirage-2000 upgrade

    Rajat Pandit , TNN 14 July 2009, 03:28am IST

    NEW DELHI: Even as Prime Minister Manmohan Singh left for Paris on Monday to further consolidate the ‘strategic partnership’ with France, the two
    countries are now all set to ink the around Rs 10,000 crore deal (approximately $2 billion) to upgrade the Mirage-2000 fighter jets in IAF’s combat fleet. This will be the second mega defence deal to be signed with France in recent times after the ongoing mammoth Rs 18,798 crore project to construct six Scorpene submarines at Mazagon Docks in Mumbai.

    With defence secretary Vijay Singh being part of the PM’s entourage to Paris, sources said the announcement about the upgrade of the French-origin Mirages is very much on the cards during the trip. The ‘differences’ over the upgrade project had been ‘resolved’ after almost two years of hard-nosed negotiations, which were bogged down for some time because French companies Dassault Aviation (aircraft manufacturer) and Thales (weapons systems integrator) wanted close to Rs 14,000 crore for the programme.

    ‘‘The two sides have now arrived at a reasonable price around Rs 10,000 crore. The first four to six Mirages will be upgraded in France, with the rest 50 or so being upgraded in India by Hindustan Aeronautics under transfer of technology,’’ said a source.

    Under the upgrade, the entire airframe will be stripped down to be re-wired and re-equipped with new avionics, mission computers, glass cockpits, helmet-mounted displays, electronic warfare suites and of course weapon systems to extend and enhance the operational life of the multi-role fighters by around 20 years.

    India had first inducted 40 Mirages in the mid-1980s, with over 20 more being bought in later years. IAF has had a ‘good’ experience with the fighters, which successfully carried out ‘targeted bombings’ during the 1999 Kargil conflict. Some years ago, IAF had even pitched for the advanced Mirage-2000-Vs for its gigantic $10-billion project for 126 new medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA).

    The defence ministry, however, told IAF to go in for ‘a global tender’ for the MMRCA project, and France too closed its Mirage production line. Now, the French Rafale is competing with American F/A-18 ‘Super Hornet’ (Boeing) and F-16 ‘Falcon’ (Lockheed Martin), Russian MiG-35 (United Aircraft Corporation), Swedish Gripen (Saab) and Eurofighter Typhoon (consortium of British, German, Spanish and Italian companies) in the hotly-contested MMRCA race.

    21Ankush
    Participant

    Request for Proposals for new engine for the Tejas Mk.2 likely soon. hopefully by the end of the year 2009, or early in the first quarter of 2010, the decision would’ve been made on which engine will power the Tejas Mk.2. and the number of engines will also surely go up as more spares are required to keep a 5 squadron Tejas Mk.2 fleet active.


    Indian Engine RFP Expected This Week

    The long-awaited request for proposals (RFP) to provide 99-125 engines for the Indian Air Force’s Tejas Light Combat Aircraft is expected to be released this week.

    Proposals for the two candidate engines — GE’s F414 and Eurojet’s EJ200 — will be due by Oct. 12 if the RFP is released on July 17.

    In October 2007, Eurojet signed a nondisclosure agreement with the Bangalore-based Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), which is developing the LCA and evaluating alternatives to the GE F404 engine powering the Tejas prototypes and initial production aircraft.

    A senior official of Eurojet says it will transfer data under the agreement to India’s Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE), which is responsible for developing the indigenous Kaveri engine planned for the LCA.

    “We have interest in doing more with GTRE. However, we shall wait for milestones to be reached,” an official says. “Once you have a ticket to ride….synergies [with other projects] are quite natural, though the customer might think different.”

    With severe delays to the Kaveri program and performance limitations with the initial LCA, the Indian air force is keen to push ahead with an off-the-shelf engine acquisition. Former air force chief Fali Homi Major said early this year: “We need five squadrons of the Mk2 LCAs. When integrated with the new engines, the LCA Mk2 should fly in 2013.”

    The GE414 powers the Boeing F/A-18E/F and Saab Gripen NG, while the EJ200 powers the Eurofighter Typhoon. All three aircraft are contenders in India’s 126-aircraft multirole fighter competition now under way.

    “Our engine needs minimum changes and will not delay the LCA,” the Eurojet official said.

    link

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – II #2433601
    21Ankush
    Participant

    hardly new for India..the Klub missiles also did not perform as expected during trials..had these been Indian indigenous missiles, the Air Force or Army or the sensationalist media would’ve trash talked them into oblivion and they’d never even get inducted. just compare the number of tests and user trials that indigenous missiles undergo as compared to foreign ones. with the Israeli Crystal Maze missile, it failed once, second time it didn’t hit the target as close as required, and the third time it worked well. and yet it was inducted without so much as a word being uttered.

    for the MRCA competition, with AMRAAMs, MICA, Meteors on offer with other platforms for the MRCA, it would appear that within the IAF, the discontent with Russian supplies would make sure that the MiG-35 doesn’t get selected. oh and by the way, the R-77 is not that cheap either..2 crore rupees for each R-77 translates to nearly $ 4,00,000 per missile.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Typhoon thread III #2435667
    21Ankush
    Participant

    That is likely. I don’t see them using the reserves to replace the GR4’s. Perhaps more F35’s or UCAV’s. The tech for a full UCAV should have matured by then.

    So then they’d keep a pool of 64 Typhoons just to rotate airframes from active to reserve in order to preserve their airframe life ? they must be having at least 6000 hours of TTL on their airframes when they’re new, so that would mean at least 30 years of service, and probably another 1000 or more hours with Life Extension, so I don’t quite understand why they would need to preserve airframe life further with such a large number of reserves ?

    in reply to: Hot Dog Typhoon thread III #2435673
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Actually the F35 fleet is likely to be smaller. At the moment only 66 can safely be assumed to be bought because 66 tail numbers have been reserved. It might be that we do get more than that, but with the state of MOD finance, we won’t be getting all 150 planned.

    However, they replace the Harriers. The Typhoons mainly replace the Tornado F3 and Jaguar etc. The fate of the replacement for the Tornado GR’s hasn’t been decided yet. They still have quite a bit of life in them.

    indeed, those GR.4s will be able to serve till 2025 or thereabouts from what I read..but when they retire, that will be a large number of fighters to replace, and looking at Jackonicko’s post, maybe those 64 odd reserves will be used to replace them then. what else would they do with such a large number of reserves ? But then again, some of the older Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 fighters may find buyers, bringing down the number of reserves.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Typhoon thread III #2435720
    21Ankush
    Participant

    It´s official, two RAF front line Typhoon sqn´s slashed. From seven to Five.

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090706/text/90706w0012.htm#column_558W

    how many aircraft would that make it then ? If I’m not wrong, a squadron would be 18-20 aircrafts plus a couple of attrition spares. that would mean that the RAF would only operate 150-155 Typhoons in all ? is that adequate considering that eventually all Harriers and Tornados will retire, leaving them with only about 280 combat fast jets including the 130 odd F-35s that will be split with the RN ?

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2029016
    21Ankush
    Participant

    :rolleyes:

    It would appear that India is doing a good job of spending the £1 billion in ‘aid’ that the UK provides every year.

    That money would buy a lot of kit for our troops currently fighting and dying in Afghanistan.

    oh ? conveniently forget all the looting the UK carried out in the 1800s and 1900s, not to talk of all the Indian soldiers who died fighting a WWI and WWII that India itself had nothing to do with..:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2029221
    21Ankush
    Participant

    8 seems to be too small a number of aircraft to be modernised to me. I know they are down to about 14 Sea Harriers in total after losing many to accidents over the last two decades, but shouldn’t they be upgrading all of the remaining airframes? If the aircraft are to remain viable as the backbone of the IN FAA for the next ten years or so (alongside the Mig 29s when they enter service) then all the SHARs will be needed so that airframes will be available for training as well as frontline service.

    As far as I know, they’re only upgrading the single seaters which are the combat fighters, whereas the rest are twin seaters that are simply used for conversion training and have no radar on board anyway.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – II #2436387
    21Ankush
    Participant

    it may very well be in a hot day high up in the mountains when you are also carrying their luggage and a bunch of goats.

    what might the goats be for ?

    in reply to: MMRCA news (including the Rafale bid) #2436667
    21Ankush
    Participant

    SAAB is hardly stupid, they talked with all of these because they offered some kind of advantage. The Israelis has special connections that could help Gripen in the MRCA that the americans might not have liked.

    But in technical capability and tradition of cooperation Selex was the best option and is probably better for other markets.

    Saab is wisely staying away from the Israelis..there was a stink raised sometime ago when IAI was one of the companies listed for bribing an Ordanance Board official, and it was blacklisted, but it appears that because of the scale of the Israeli involvement in the Indian defence forces’ arms, they might have gotten away this time..

    and while they may have contacts, the LAST thing a Congress led govt. would want is to have allegations of corruption for such a big deal and to their credit, the Congress Govt. did bring in a lot of regulations that will hopefully make for a more transparent procurement process..of course, only time will tell if that does happen or not.

    in reply to: MMRCA news (including the Rafale bid) #2436714
    21Ankush
    Participant

    This has a very special smell to it, much like the many made up stories from indian “journalists”. Is this Prasun K. Sengupta known for this kind of stories?

    The original story is from Israel so I think it probably has some value to it, even if I think it is probably not the whole truth.

    since when did people start swallowing the regurgitated crap that Sengputa serves as “indepth” articles ? his articles on the Indian ATV (Advanced Technology Vessel), MiG-29K, T-90, etc. were so detailed, and so obviously made up fiction, that it left very little credibility for its author..he has been caught plagiarising articles (Bill Sweetman’s stuff) in his articles on the Su-30MKI and the MiG-29K, has been caught fibbing about a DRDO radar being reverse engineered from a Polish radar (when in fact they were both developed as part of a JV) and despite being caught red-handed doing so and confronted with facts, he continues with these articles that are just fiction for the most part..I treat his articles as such- just pure masala entertainment with very little or no basis in truth or facts. I’d suggest you treat it the same.

    in reply to: MMRCA news (including the Rafale bid) #2436785
    21Ankush
    Participant

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/06/07/327209/paris-air-show-gripping-gripen.html

    http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/9286/vixen1000esparis.jpg

    And with the MMRCA there’s certainly no rush to worry about.

    if Saab has the attitude you have, they’ll be out of the competition pretty soon because Sweden is a political lightweight compared to the rest of the countries in the tender and won’t be able to convince the MoD to let the Gripen IN re-enter the competition like the Rafale did.

    but looking at how they managed to roll-out a Gripen Demo JUST before the MRCA RFPs were sent out, and how they’ve worked out a new radar supplier after both IAI and Thales backed out, its obvious that they are very serious about timelines and the MRCA competition itself..

    the IAF wants to field test a radar, and unless there is a WORKING model on a prototype fighter, it will not make the cut. there are other fighters in the competition that have a working AESA and the IAF Air Chief Marshal has made it very clear that the IAF evaluation teams will be very objective and any fighter that doesn’t meet their requirements for field testing, will be eliminated.

    21Ankush
    Participant

    Are only 40 Jags to be upgraded to DARIN 2? If so is this the 40 NAVWASS equipped airframes supplied directly by BAe? No plans for upgrading any of the DARIN 1 aircraft to DARIN 2 standard?

    why do a DARIN-II standard upgrade for these DARIN-I Jags when a DARIN-III upgrade is in the works ? My guess is that the DARIN-I Jags will get directly upgraded to DARIN-III standards.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 1,410 total)