dark light

21Ankush

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,410 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion #1785592
    21Ankush
    Participant

    India to test Astra BVR missile guided test from a Su-30MKI launch platform

    India’s Astra missile flight test in September

    India will conduct the guided flight test of air-to-air missile Astra next month at Chandipur-on-sea in Orissa, a top defence official said Friday.

    ‘We have kept the launch window open for the flight test with the guidance systems of Astra from Sep 10-15. We will conduct the test on any one of the days when the weather is favourable,’ defence scientist V.K. Saraswat told IANS here.

    State-run Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) has already completed the control flights of Astra, designed for an 80-km range in head-on mode and 20 km-range in tail-chase mode.

    The beyond visual range missile has been integrated with the carrier aircraft Sukhoi-30 MKI. Integration with other fighter jets (Mirage 2000 and MiG 29) will be taken up after the guided test to verify its accuracy in destroying manoeuvring targets.

    ‘The results of various tests conducted in the development stages have been positive. The feedback has enabled us to prepare for the guided test and subsequent induction into the Indian Air Force (IAF),’ Saraswat said at a defence conference on ‘Networking and network-centric operations’, organised by the Computer Society of India.

    21Ankush
    Participant

    thanks for this article.

    in reply to: Russian/Georgian conflict impact of India? #2487175
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Actually if one simply looks to the past, India did to Pakistan, exactly what Russia did to Georgia- India split East/West Pakistan into 2 countries because of a similar situation, where West Pakistan began a genocide against civilians that caused millions of refugees to flee into India, leaving India with no option but to act. And even then, America tried to threaten India by sending its Navy into the Bay of Bengal region, instead of doing something about the genocide that the Western Pakistan Army was perpetrating on the populace of East Bengal. so, it seems that this kind of behaviour where the US ignores the cause of the conflict, as long as it suits it, is being repeated over again.

    Georgia did the same thing as Pakistan, by wiping out Ossetian cities and antagonised Russia enough so that Russia had to show Georgia its true place in the world’s scheme.

    How is it that Georgia’s actions are not a problem for you Scooter ?:rolleyes: if anything, being a Westener, you should be more worried about the human rights violations of the Georgians..but then like a true hypocrite, you’ll criticise Russia for its actions, while defending the invasion and continuing occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2487201
    21Ankush
    Participant

    cross-posting from BR.

    link

    Bangalore: Nearly 20 years after it promised an indigenous engine to power India’s light combat aircraft Tejas, the Gas Turbine Research Establishment, or GTRE, the country’s sole aero engine design house, is now seeking outside help.

    It has chosen French aircraft engine maker Snecma SA to jointly build an engine to replace Kaveri, a project named after the river in southern India. T. Mohana Rao, director of GTRE, a unit of the Defence Research and Development Organisation, explains why it had to choose a partner and talks about the future of the Kaveri programme.
    Edited Excerpts:

    What is the status of the Kaveri engine development project?

    We have a functional engine, but there is a slight shortfall in performance. It has achieved dry thrust of 4,600kg and reheat thrust of 7,000kg in Bangalore, which is around 3,000ft above sea level. So, it would be around 5,000kg dry thrust and 7,500kg reheat thrust at sea level. The engine is short of thrust by 400kg and overweight by around 150kg. Also, we still have to perform long- endurance tests of the engine to run for many hours.

    Does this mean the engine for the light combat aircraft would be further delayed?

    In aircraft engine development, particularly when you are doing it for the first time, you cannot set a timeline. We could take five or six years. The Indian Air Force (IAF) cannot wait for an engine for that long, and the government said if there is any engine house that we can partner, we could go ahead and do a joint venture on risk-sharing basis.
    Only NPO Saturn and Snecma responded of the five. General Electric Co., Rolls-Royce Plc. and Pratt and Whitney declined. Nearly two-and-a-half years after we started the process, we have identified Snecma. The government told us to consult IAF and decide on the air staff requirements before we sign a contract.

    Has Snecma given a timeline for the new engine?

    Snecma will bring its (engine) core that is named Eco. A core, which comprises a compressor, combustor and high-pressure turbine, is the heart of any jet engine. The engine will have less weight and more reheat thrust along with certain other changes to meet the original design intent. They will have a workshare of 45%, and ours would be 55%. Nearly 85% of the manufacturing would be within the country. The engine would be certified for fitting in the aircraft in around four years. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd will produce the engine and all future aircraft engines in India would be from the joint venture.

    But why so late? Couldn’t you have gone for a global partner much earlier and avoided delays?

    It was a decision by the government. When Kaveri was conceived, India did not have a design base for aero engines, except for some work we had done earlier. Globally, they first pick an engine and then build the aircraft. Here, we decided that by the time the light combat aircraft was ready, we should have our own engine. The engine (supplied by General Electric) currently powering the aircraft is inferior to Kaveri’s specifications.
    IAF wanted us to build a highly stable engine with a digital computer to control it, and a two-lane manual reversion (a backup for the first time in the world). Rolls-Royce and GE validated our design. Now we have a design base, huge infrastructure and talent pool in engines. We could not have built this if we had not taken up this project.

    What will happen to Kaveri and the work you have done?

    The core of Kaveri is performing well. Because of the lower thrust, it cannot be used on combat aircraft. It can be used to power unmanned combat aerial vehicles. We have already demonstrated a marine version of Kaveri using diesel as fuel for the Indian navy. It can also be used as a large 12MW industrial genset for power generation.

    So, it seems that GE and RR had validated the design earlier, but later on when the problems cropped up, GE declined to help GTRE so that the IAF would be forced to order the GE F-404-IN20 or GE F-414 to replace the Kaveri on all future Tejas fighters.

    After showing that kind of attitude, the claims of wanting to help India ring hollow. P&W don’t have a history of any work with the defence sector in India, so its hardly particularly surprising. Rolls Royce declining is also not particularly surprising, since they’re now pitching the Eurojet 200 to replace the Kaveri.

    just goes to show that there is nothing like indigenisation. The problem though is that, since the JV is now for sure with Snecma, and the first batch of Tejas fighters will fly with the F-404-IN20, why bother with having EJ200 or F-414s for the interim batch between the first 40 and the latter batches of Tejas Mk.2 with the JV engine? the IAF could end up with Tejas fighters with 3 different engines if that happens.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2491440
    21Ankush
    Participant

    the darker gray radome does look better than the earlier lighter gray radome..

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2492269
    21Ankush
    Participant

    IAF to soon sign a contract for Mi-17s from Russia

    link

    The Indian Air Force said on Thursday that India will soon sign a contract with Russia to receive 80 Mi-17 Hip-H multirole helicopters. Air Chief Marshal Fali Homi Major said preparations for signing the contract are now in their final stages. The deal is estimated at $1 billion.

    Indian media earlier reported that the contract was under threat over Russia’s attempt to significantly raise the delivery price, and that negotiations were stalling. A preliminary agreement to sell Mi-17 helicopters to India was reached in March 2007 at a meeting of the Russian-Indian intergovernmental commission on military cooperation.

    The Mi-17 is a version of the Mi-8 airframe. The helicopter has a takeoff weight of 13 metric tons and can carry up to 36 people or a payload of 4 metric tons within the cargo compartment, or 4.5 tons externally. The helicopters have been supplied to 80 countries.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2492282
    21Ankush
    Participant

    HAL bags a third order for the ALH Dhruv

    India bags $20 mn helicopter contract from Turkey

    Manu Pubby

    New Delhi, August 9: After getting a foothold in the South American market, India has bid successfully to get its second international contract for three Advanced Light Helicopters (ALH) for an estimated $ 20 million from Turkey amidst stiff competition from global players.

    The contract, finalised by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) on Saturday, comes weeks after India made its debut in the international helicopter market by winning a $ 50 million order for seven indigenously built ALH for the Ecuadorian Air Force.

    HAL Chairman Ashok Baweja confirmed that an Indian delegation in Turkey finalised the deal and the initial order of three helicopters is expected to go up further. The Indian Aviation giant will start delivering the three machines within six months.

    “It was a very difficult country to sell to and we have made a breakthrough. This (the three helicopters) is the first lot and we are hoping to sell more. Turkey is planning to buy more helicopters in several phases,” Baweja told The Indian Express.

    While he didn’t disclose the value of the deal, it is expected to be over the $ 20 million mark. Sources said Turkey is planning to buy around 17 ALH helicopters over the next few years and the total value of the deal could be close to $150 million.

    What makes the success even more special for HAL is that its helicopter won the bid in the presence of American giant Bell that was also in the fray. Turkey is also known to have traditional preference for US made defence products.

    After suffering a series of setbacks — it lost the race to supply 12 utility helicopters to the Chilean Air Force in January and the contract was bagged by American Bell 412 helicopter; and then failed to get a contract from Malaysia — the ALH seems to have made a mark in the international market.

    It had won the Ecuador contract amidst competition from Elbit (Israel), Eurocopter and Kazan (Russia), and with Turkey in the bag, will look forward to contracts in the Latin American market where it is the frontrunner in several trials.The USP of the helicopter is its price that is sign ificantly lower than its competitors.

    in reply to: Best/Worst looking military jet. #2454349
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Has to be the Mirage-2000 and the Rafale for me..those two are the prettiest of all..Jaguars and Mirage-F1s look the most handsome with their hulking stance and big wheels. thats the one aspect that I hate the most among some American fighters..most have spindly looking landing gear (bad on the F-16, but especially bad looking on the F-15, which otherwise is a good looking fighter from some angles).

    Among the Russian aircraft, the MiG-29 is hands down the best looking fighter. worst was probably the Flagon.

    Among the older jets, it has to be the Hunter..simply stunning lines and curves. a true thoroughbred. 🙂 where the Gnat’s aspect ratio was screwed up, the Hunter’s was just perfect.

    another ugly jet is the A-6 Intruder, IMO.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2454683
    21Ankush
    Participant

    I see your point how ever it is not exactly the same in the sence that when you pay for CATIA you pay for the right to use it for your own business needs where your own ideas are driving the designs. At that point CATIA is just facilitating your Design it is not driving it (and if it is driving it then you have to question the capabilities of the draftsman).

    just like the paint brush manufacturer that made the brush da vinci used does not own da vincis designs or ideas.

    Boeing on the other hand isnt proving a software that would facilitate ADA solving its LCA issues.. Boeing is solving the issues the LCA has. Completely different cases.

    Remember a lot of the issues the LCA faces are probably issues Boeing faces on the F/A-18EF or one of its other aircraft ages ago! so for boeing the IP to solve issues may already exist in its IP library.

    you’re talking only of CATIA or ENOVIA. however, Dassault and IBM have provided extensive consultation that goes beyond simply purchasing and paying for licensing CAD tools/software (for instance, Relational Layout Model methodologies). That does’nt mean that Boeing’s CAD models cannot be used without paying IBM a royalty every single time they’re used..the fact is that when the customer pays for the consultancy, the consultant in most cases cannot lay down restrictive clauses on how and when the product the consultant helped with, can be used, or whom it can be sold to.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2455892
    21Ankush
    Participant

    If Boeing give guidence and advise which helps to solve a problem related to the LCA i.e. reduce weight etc because of an idea Boeing provides than even if no equipment flies on the LCA technically boeing IP would be flying in the LCA.

    Its standard practise to do this.

    US ITR rules are less than humorous though.

    thats like saying that since Dassault provides the tools to Boeing for its CAD work, all design work thats been done by multinational engineers at Boeing plants is actually the IP of Dassault and IBM. Boeing is being paid for its services, and after that, it has no rights over the aircraft itself.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2456076
    21Ankush
    Participant

    I think this shows the attitude that we can come to expect from the US. Very disappointing. Pretty much ensures that the MRCA won’t be American, considering that just for consultancy, these guys act as if the Tejas is their IP. :rolleyes: Imagine what they’d do if India tried to integrated third party weapons/avionics onto an American MRCA candidate. best bet for India is to stay away from big ticket US weapons.

    Boeing delaying consultancy for Tejas programme

    Ravi Sharma

    Boeing has stipulated that Tejas should not be sold to another country without U.S. permission

    ADA officials find this unacceptable since no U.S.-made equipment is to be fitted on the Tejas
    ——————————————————————————–
    BANGALORE: The Bush administration seems to be dragging its feet over giving the go-ahead to Boeing providing consultancy for the light combat aircraft, Tejas, programme.

    The consultancy, offered to the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), which is designing and developing the Tejas), will run for 42 months.

    It envisages Boeing, which has sufficient experience on flight test programmes like its F-18 Hornet, providing the ADA with crucial inputs on flight tests that would help in avoiding unnecessary flights, saving costs and shortening of the design and development phases.

    Only consultancy: ADA

    Though U.S. laws concerning sale/consultancy in areas of defence have to necessarily be cleared by the U.S. Department of State, ADA officials are surprised that the consultancy has run aground. They say it is only in the form of assistance and no equipment is being sought for the Tejas.

    Boeing has stipulated that the Tejas should not be sold to any other country without the permission of the U.S. government.

    According to senior ADA officials, this stipulation is unacceptable, as the consultancy entails only assistance in flight testing.

    Said an official: “We can’t understand why the U.S. government is making a big thing out of something like a consultancy programme in flight testing. It is strange that it is being linked to the possible sale of the aircraft [Tejas]. This does not augur well for the seriousness of American weapons/defence corporation with India.”

    When contacted, a Boeing spokesperson in India said that the company would “continue to engage in discussions with the Government of India on how [they] may be able to contribute to the Light Combat Aircraft program.”

    The spokesperson did not wish to comment on Boeing’s stipulation, only saying that it was “something best answered by ADA.”

    The ADA, which has a firm order for 20 Tejas aircraft from the Air Force and hopes to get an order for another 20, is hoping to obtain initial operational clearance for the aircraft in 2010-11, according to its revised schedule.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2456388
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Kaveri joint venture

    link

    Bangalore: India’s gas turbine research establishment will partner French company Snecma SA to build engines for Tejas, the country’s light combat aircraft, after efforts by the defence lab to develop an engine on its own faltered.

    Snecma, a unit of Safran Group and earlier known as Société Nationale d’Étude et de Construction de Moteurs d’Aviation, which won a race against Russia’s Saturn NPO OAO to co-develop the Tejas engine, would take at least four years to build and certify the engine before it is put in the home-grown fighter. The technology would then be transferred to India’s military aeroplane maker Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, or HAL, to make the engines locally.
    “We don’t have the time now for the Kaveri to fully mature. In the co-development with Snecma, our R&D (work) also goes in,” said T. Mohana Rao, director of gas turbine research establishment, or GTRE.

    GTRE has spent nearly Rs1,900 crore of the Rs2,800 crore that was sanctioned since an engine project Kaveri, named after the river in southern India, began in 1989.

    After nearly two decades of development, Kaveri is overweight by around 150kg and cannot provide sufficient thrust from its core engine, required to power the fighter. A core—compressor, combustor and high-pressure turbine—is the heart of any jet engine. Air is compressed and mixed with fuel to drive turbines and create thrust.
    “It would have taken another five to six years or more (for Kaveri) to achieve (the full performance),” said Rao. “We firmed the partner, so IAF need not wait longer.”

    GTRE will open the commercial bid of Snecma and freeze the project cost once it finalizes with the Indian Air Force, or IAF, the so-called air staff requirements, which are the standards for the engine. Vincent Chappard, a Snecma spokesman in France, said he could not immediately confirm the development.

    Designing jet engines is complex and the technology, restricted. Only a handful of countries and firms such as General Electric Co., United Technologies Corp., Safran Group of France, Russia’s Saturn NPO, and Rolls-Royce Plc. have been able to dominate the market, globally. India, which saw its indigenous fighter HF Marut, built in the 1960s, fail due to lack of a powerful engine that was caused by technology denials from the West, felt a need for a home-grown engine when it began the Tejas fighter programme in the mid-1980s.
    The country’s Defence Research and Development Organisation, or DRDO, which anchors both fighter and engine development programmes, chose to fly Tejas with an General Electric engine, as any aircraft under development is flown with an engine that is already proven.
    Tejas is a single-engine supersonic fighter with delta wings and no tail, and uses fly-by-wire technology that enables a pilot to control the plane electronically through on-board computers.
    Tejas, which in Sanskrit means radiance, flew for the first time in January 2001 and is currently undergoing development trials. Since then, test pilots have flown 912 sorties on nine Tejas aircraft, including a production standard version that reached supersonic speed on its first flight on 16 June.

    Now, Snecma will bring in the core called “Eco” for the new engine, and integrate it with systems developed for Kaveri. (used on the M-88 Eco)

    Analysts say global firms which denied India the same technology a few years ago, are sharing it now to tap into India’s growing economy, and the country should not hesitate in partnering with them.“At some point of time, we need our own engine. This is a good development,” said Philip Rajkumar, a former head of the light combat aircraft programme and author of The Tejas Story, a book on the aeroplane’s development.

    Meanwhile, the Aeronautical Development Agency, the aeroplane design lab of DRDO, has invited General Electric and Eurojet Turbo GmbH, a German engine maker in which Rolls-Royce has a stake, for higher-powered engines that would be modified for the Indian fighter, but has not settled on the vendor. IAF has insisted new planes other than the initial requirement of 48 Tejas fighters should have a higher-powered engine.

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2458266
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Chinese had full rights to bring down that spy plane..

    then I’m sure you have no sympathy for the downed PN Atlantique that was shot down by the IAF MiG-21 when spying inside Indian territory. 😉

    21Ankush
    Participant

    US Congress suspends move to upgrade Pakistan fighter fleet

    WASHINGTON: The US Congress moved Tuesday to suspend a bid by President George W Bush’s administration to shift millions of dollars in aid to Pakistan from counter-terrorism programmes to upgrading Islamabad’s F-16 fighter jets.

    “We have requested a hold on the administration’s planned reprogramming pending additional information,” said a joint statement by Democratic lawmakers Howard Berman and Nita Lowey, who head key panels in the House of Representatives.

    “We are concerned that the administration’s proposal to use military assistance to pay for the F-16 upgrades will divert funds from more effective counterterrorism tools like helicopters, TOW missiles, and night-vision goggles,” said Berman, chairman of the House foreign affairs committee, and Lowey, chairwoman of the appropriations subcommittee on foreign programmes.

    The White House said last week that it wanted to shift 230 million dollars in aid to Pakistan from counter-terrorism programmes to upgrading Pakistan’s aging F-16 fighter jets.

    The move, it said, was aimed at easing fiscal pressures faced by the Pakistani government stemming partly from soaring food and energy costs.

    US lawmakers were reportedly angered by the move. They felt that Pakistan did not use its F-16s in support of the campaign against fighters in its remote tribal areas out of a fear that civilian casualties could fuel support for extremists.

    US President George W Bush held talks with Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani on Monday focused on cooperation to fight Taliban and al-Qaida extremists and easing Pakistan-Afghanistan tensions.

    Gilani, whose new government has been facing intense US pressure to crack down on Pakistan-based militants, told reporters after the meeting that Pakistan was committed to fighting extremists.

    The package for the F-16 fighters would run about two-thirds of the 300 million dollars that Pakistan will get this year in US aid for military equipment and training, the Times said.

    The 2008 fiscal year state and foreign operations bill that passed Congress last December specifically required that military aid to Pakistan be used for counter-terrorism and law enforcement activities directed against al-Qaida and the Taliban, according to lawmakers Berman and Lowey.

    The hold requested by the legislature would “provide time for Congress to make a more considered judgment in consultation with the administration and the government of Pakistan,” their statement said.

    Requests for a hold by lawmakers are usually abided by the administration, congressional aides said.

    Berman and Lowey also said that they were proposing that Congress provide 200 million dollars in economic assistance to Islamabad to relieve some of Pakistan’s budgetary constraints.

    “This will help Pakistan set its own spending priorities while preserving US military aid for its intended purpose — counterterrorism activities against al-Qaida and the Taliban.”

    “We are committed to helping Pakistan’s new democratic government address the current economic crisis, brought on by rising food and fuel prices, which has impacted its ability to fund its F-16 upgrades,” the lawmakers said.

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2459643
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Guys are there any good Rafale airshow vids? Or demo displays etc.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=ctMM4zqO9a4

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,410 total)