dark light

21Ankush

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 1,410 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Two PIA 773ERs damaged on ground. #528035
    21Ankush
    Participant

    😀

    in reply to: FC-1 Prototype 04: the Saga Continues #2524055
    21Ankush
    Participant

    it is a PS’ed pic..

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2524226
    21Ankush
    Participant

    politicians and subcontinental DDM journos are such a bunch of nitwits !!! 😀 the only two fields that I can think of where consistent bad performance will never be accountable.

    in reply to: Indian MiG-27's #2524650
    21Ankush
    Participant

    here’s a pic of Adml (retd) Arun Prakash who was part of the evaluation team that evaluated the Rafale M. Courtesy Harry.

    21Ankush
    Participant

    the Chinese aviation industry is almost equal to Russian one and they already have history of making airliners, jet engines and bombers.

    seriously deluded..:rolleyes: what a joke !

    in reply to: Indian MiG-27's #2525772
    21Ankush
    Participant

    RSK MiGs record relating to spares and support is poor and that is well known to pretty much anyone who has followed the IAF’s issues in the past..dont ask stupid questions as to why the IN went to MiG to purchase the MiG-29K- they did’nt have a choice..whereas in the past the IAF has turned down additional Fulcrums when offered by RSK MiG, preferring Su-30s.

    in reply to: sri lanka to get mig-29s #2526369
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Hyperwarp, if a country’s AF has 5 fighters in its inventory, at any given time, 1 or 2 may be in reserve, 1 or 2 may be in maintenance and the other will be flying. to give round-the-clock Air Defence in the form of a solitary Fulcrum, you would need a few more just in case one breaks down and the others are being turned around. take into consideration that for 1 hour of flying an older used Fulcrum, it would probably need 10-15 hours of maintenance

    in reply to: Snowbird down #2526802
    21Ankush
    Participant

    condolences to the bereaved family. 🙁

    in reply to: MiG-35 & MiG-29KUB #2527449
    21Ankush
    Participant

    I dont think that logic applies to the MiG-29K..IN’s order is for 12 MiG-29Ks and 4 MiG-29KUB’s..they are completely combat capable, but their primary role is that of trainers. but yes, having a combat capable trainer is a very important step as compared to the MiG-29UB that was basically of no combat use.

    in reply to: Indian MiG-27's #2527827
    21Ankush
    Participant

    post upgrade cant they get the Komar podded radar ? IFR would be so damn handy for them for a maritime role as the long arm of the Tupolevs and Mays..:(

    in reply to: Taiwan RoCAF fighters Takeoff/landing on highway! #2527833
    21Ankush
    Participant

    who cares what your analysis of this whole situation is- its their money, their tactics and their planning for an eventuality- for you to come along stringing a “stunt” theory and calling this all a waste of time and money is pretty remarkable ! :rolleyes: of course they dont have anything better to do than to tear dividers apart and get multimillion $ jets streaming across highways for attracting crowds..what a novel way to recruit new kids and get some much needed PR, is’nt it !? and the tactical use of such ops ? or the possibility that such training could come in use someday ? zilch since you said so, O Great One.

    your nationality has a lot to do with the “holier than thou” attitude you’re displaying and it obviously does’nt go down well that they’re trying to work out different tactics for some eventuality ..”stunt” and “ulterior motives” indeed..:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Indian MiG-27's #2527861
    21Ankush
    Participant

    no IFR would mean that they’re firmly establishing the MiG-27s as Tactical strike aircraft..one question Harry..No.2 Sqdn operates a maritime mix of MiG-27s as well..what anti-shipping missiles do they use ? and do they carry any podded radar ? if not, how do they detect and lockon to a ship ?

    in reply to: sri lanka to get mig-29s #2527880
    21Ankush
    Participant

    almost all the suggestions made do not take into account the time factor. the Sri Lankan govt would not like another attack to happen and so this Air Defence need is very pressing..going to a country and asking it to modify/upgrade or custom build a platform with xyz equipment will take time and SL Govt cant afford that. if the MiG-29s come with pilots/equipment, then this is good for a little while- in the meantime the SLAF can look for a better option that is cheaper to procure/maintain and can provide for the future as well.

    in reply to: Taiwan RoCAF fighters Takeoff/landing on highway! #2527881
    21Ankush
    Participant

    its their money and they value it a lot less than their nation’s security. so why on earth should it bother you ? any effort made that may be of slight use during wartime is worth it, especially when its the case of a Goliath constantly threatening a David. you can say what you like, but at the times of tension, if all roads are dividerless and even a few of them can sustain fighter ops, its worth it. dispersed ops is always a lot more difficult to track than a stationary airbase and the military of Taiwan understands that.

    in reply to: Taiwan RoCAF fighters Takeoff/landing on highway! #2530922
    21Ankush
    Participant

    why would that be ineffective? if tensions with China increased, they could remove all the dividers on all roads overnight and that would allow them a lot greater flexibility. I think its a great thing that they’re planning for this kind of a scenario considering China’s ballistic missiles will definitely go for the airbases during a first strike, if it ever happens.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 1,410 total)