dark light

21Ankush

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,410 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: India's New Small Fighter Bet #2531001
    21Ankush
    Participant

    like Swerve and I said already- what RAAF purchased is of no concern to the IAF. the IAF will evaluate a fighter and based on what costs, ToT and sanction proofing the supplier can give it, will give its recommendations. then the GoI will make its decision the RAAF purchase of 24 interim SH’s is of the least significance to the IAF or the GoI unless it means a reduction in the price of the SH by a significant amount- highly unlikely as well.

    in reply to: sri lanka to get mig-29s #2531003
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Austin, the problem with going in for MiG-21-93s are where do they get them ? the only ones made are the Bisons and the IAF wont loan any. if there are any spare MiG-21Bis frames then they could get their hands on them and get them upgraded, but then again time is also a constraint.

    in reply to: sri lanka to get mig-29s #2531006
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Garry, MiG-27s dont hav Gatling cannons. they have Gsh-6-300 6 barrel cannon. and they can carry the R-60MK which should be more than adequate to tackle Zlins for now. for the future, SLAAF needs to evaluate whether it really needs to spend much needed resources on an Air Defence platform along with its associated equipment. would make a lot more sense to get MANPADS and a couple of 3D radars near their main airbases..

    in reply to: India's New Small Fighter Bet #2531431
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Scooter, what Australia purchases is firmly its own business. the IAF is not the kind of force to be influenced by the “interim” purchase of 24 Super Hornets by a force that it has no links with whatsoever.

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2531699
    21Ankush
    Participant

    would like to add to what Nick said about IAF aircraft with EW pods- MiG-21 Bisons carry the Elta El-8222 pod as well..

    in reply to: Sad day for RAF Jaguar! #2531746
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Well, India has been talking about re-engining its Jaguars with the same power plant in the Taiwanese IDF Fighters. So, the Jag could be around for many years to come……:D

    kindly provide source.

    in reply to: Sad day for RAF Jaguar! #2531751
    21Ankush
    Participant

    😡 after F-14 now Jaguar:confused: its regrettable

    hey ! the Jag still serves and so does the F-14 ! the day that IRIAF stops using its F-14s will be the day that the fighter’s era will truly come to a halt..as for the Jag, its future with the IAF is secure for another 20 years at least.

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2532106
    21Ankush
    Participant

    A question here Nick- is former ACM Krishnaswamy referring to peacetime intrusions into Pak airspace by the No.35 Rapiers to collect data on locations of radar sites ? what jamming do you think he is referring to ?

    in reply to: Rafale news #2532527
    21Ankush
    Participant

    which could then well be said about all American AESA radars brochure specs as well..nevermind.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2532555
    21Ankush
    Participant

    It is a Rafale thread after all….nice bridge back to the topic Ankush!

    The reason I brought up the Rafale was that the whole MKI vs Eurocanards started off with Jackonicko’s remark that the Rafale would outclass the best developed Flanker- which I think is quite unreasonable without even looking at what the best developed Flankers can throw at you..

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2532558
    21Ankush
    Participant

    yes Hyperwarp. thats taken from this very video.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2532573
    21Ankush
    Participant

    It is a Rafale thread after all….nice bridge back to the topic Ankush!

    Indeed that will be an interesting event. I sincerely doubt the RoE’s will allow either side to go to the extent of their capabilities though and I equally doubt that one side will be allowed to ‘outclass’ the other even if that is the way it turns out.

    Lets face it the F3’s managed to return from India with a modicum of pride and dignity for their BVR performance at least so its a given that events will be tailored such that neither side will be allowed to be embarrassed!.

    yes I doubt that they’d allow the MKI to fully display its capabilities or be allowed to “outclass” the Typhoon, just as it was’nt against the F3..;)

    in reply to: Rafale news #2532586
    21Ankush
    Participant

    yes, the Captor is a very capable radar by all the reports that indicate that- yet, so is the phased array Bars of the MKI- even the earlier generation N001 cassegrain array radar on the Su-30 K/MK could detect F-15s earlier than F-15s could detect them in Cope India..so with an antenna diameter of 1 m, the Bars is a radar that could detect a fighter sized target at ranges easily approaching, if not surpassing, the Captor’s.

    so assuming] that the Bars and Captor both have similar detection ranges, and assuming that the Typhoon has an RCS 1/4th smaller than that of the MKI, the Typhoon would detect the MKI first, out at 150 km. whether it gets a positive IFF at this distance or not I dont know..anyway, its too far for it to be able to take a shot with the AIM-120C- so the Typhoon will essentially try to get into a good position for a shot. in the meantime, the MKI with a dedicated WSO, will detect and start tracking the Typhoon around the 80-100 km mark (assuming that the Typhoon’s RCS is around 3/4th that of the MKI), which is still at the outermost limits of the engagement envelope for either jet- so the only advantage that the Typhoon has at this time is the fact that it started jockeying for a better shot earlier.

    apart from that, how does it matter if the R-77 has a lower PoK or is kinematically not quite as good as the AIM-120C ? the Typhoon pilot will not try to test it out and merge when the MKI has launched a salvo of R-77s at it- whichever guy shoots first, the other gets his lock and fires a shot back- at such ranges its safe to say that they’d have enough time to do so before having to engage countermeasures. so, basically at this stage, both jets are going to engage in heavy evasive maneuvering, countermeasures deployment and jamming. here again, the MKI has a dedicated WSO to do that, improving its chances of escape- whereas, for the Typhoon the chances are that its a single seater, with the pilot having to deal with it. definitely not an easy situation for the single seater Typhoon pilot.

    in all likelihood, the MKI would be MORE THAN competitive against a Typhoon and even more so against the Rafale due to the MICA’s shorter range.

    anyhow, hopefully we’ll get some information on the Typhoon-MKI matchup soon when the RAF and IAF exercise..

    in reply to: Rafale news #2532599
    21Ankush
    Participant

    dont dismiss it out of hand quite so quickly Zedro..what if the IAF decides to go in for the Rafale ? it may find it itself facing MKK’s or what if Japan decides to go in for interim Typhoons ? it too may find itself facing the MKK..

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2532625
    21Ankush
    Participant

    Do the MKIs have an internal EW suite or is everything carried on pods? Also, are there any pics of the MKI carrying the el8222?

    What about the chinese MKK? do they have internal self-protection or pod mounted?

    Joey: Whats the status of SIVA. The specs look good. Is it operational or in trials mode?

    Kaduna, it was seen on a MKI during Exercise Sindex. here’s a link to a small clip taken during Exercise Sindex

    mms://media.mindef.gov.sg/26oct04_EXsindex_hi.asf

    at one stage during the clip right after a Mirage-2000 lands, the Su-30MKI is shown with a El-8222 on a wing pylon.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,410 total)