dark light

jeepman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,576 through 1,590 (of 1,647 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Veteran & Vintage aircraft 1974 edition question #1416890
    jeepman
    Participant

    I can remember (in 1975/76) going through Leslie Hunt’s V&VA in search of surviving Grumman TBM/TBF Avengers. Among the ones listed (I think to remember) were some survivors in Japan. In the 1978 edition (which I have bought in the RAF Museum 2 decades ago), no Avengers are listed in Japan (anymore). As there are still claims that 3 Japanese Avengers are preserved, I wonder if anybody can check the locations listed in 1974. BW Roger

    2nd edition of Bob Ogden’s book of Museums and Collections in Asia (published about 4/5 years ago I suppose ) doesn’t list any Avengers in Japan – just a couple of Trackers

    jeepman
    Participant

    Are the Stuka and Spitfire at Chicago still hung from the ceiling like that? It doesn’t seem to be a very practical way to display them.

    Anybody mentioned this to those responsible for the AAM,Airspace, Lambeth and Milestones of Flight/new Cosford development???? 😉

    in reply to: This Morning at Duxford (Thursday) #1423548
    jeepman
    Participant

    ummm

    I thought we were talking about a Spitfire TrIX 🙂

    in reply to: What's in the box? ISO Container at DX today #1426940
    jeepman
    Participant

    What exactly is this rumour about a Stirling in China? I have seen snippets of the rumour on here but nothing explaining what it is about. Is this a forum ‘in joke’ or is there really a possibility that a Stirling has survived behind the Bamboo Curtain? Can someone explain please?

    Perhaps this is it, perhaps not……

    On the 22 December 1947, OO-XAC was at K’un-ming, China. With a full load of passengers the Stirling failed to get of the ground and careered into a cemetery at the end of the runway. The co-pilot was killed and the pilot suffered a broken arm and hip. The passengers all survived unhurt, while the Stirling was a complete write off.

    in reply to: Spitfire C.O.G.E.A OO-ARC/NH188 #1428709
    jeepman
    Participant

    If I were a guessing man I’d say some time between 13th February 1962, and 7th June 1964. Perhaps it was photographed during the Autumn of 1963, going by the trees, although “Spitfire Survivors” only has it being repainted as AU-H “in 1964”,which doesn’t tie up with trees/scheme/date of last flight so something’s wrong there,but Mark 12 will undoubtedly have the answer!

    in reply to: Strange B-17 with only 2 engines. Very old thread #1432171
    jeepman
    Participant

    Umm….

    Perhaps it was done by the bloke who did the two engined Halifax….

    in reply to: Scrapyard Photos; Any More? #1433518
    jeepman
    Participant

    RAF Neptune MR1s

    HP57 – regards the Neptune nose -I fear she was converted into coke tins
    as she certainly hasn’t surfaced since – very sad! There is however an ex RAF Neptune in the U.S . There is just the matter of the pond between us and it and the asking price!

    Didn’t many of the ex RAF Neptunes move on to Brazil under MDAP???

    There might be the odd one hanging around over there……

    in reply to: Supermarine Spiteful, a hypothetical project #1433577
    jeepman
    Participant

    Cees – sorry mate – I only go on holiday with Jeepwoman!!

    But if you’re going, you could borrow the 1914 Pattern Rolls-Royce A/C from it’s current custodians for me and hide it in the freight pannier under the Hali’s fuselage

    Cheerio

    in reply to: Supermarine Spiteful, a hypothetical project #1433611
    jeepman
    Participant

    Blimey I must be slowing in my old age

    Wonder if there are still any Halis in Pakistan………………;)

    in reply to: Supermarine Spiteful, a hypothetical project #1433648
    jeepman
    Participant

    Spiteful/Seafang

    I think so, the first Spitful prototype was a high back Mk XIV fuselage fitted with the new wings.

    Cees

    As you know Cees – a pet project of mine as well and you probably recall I too raised it many moons ago on either WW,VAF or WIX suggesting the Indian sub-continent as a source of wings. I too got the same answer about the rarity of Attackers…. 🙂

    IIRC the Spiteful/Seafang fuselage was simply a late mark Spitfire fuselage with a raised cockpit area

    in reply to: Beaufighter G-DINT(Zombie thread 2005) #1436120
    jeepman
    Participant

    urm

    shouldn’t those be three bladers??? 😉

    still smarting from the third of a kill snatched from my grasp

    my argument would be that at that stage of the war they would have fitted whatever seat they could salvage……… 😉

    onwards and upwards

    in reply to: Spitfire colours for Albert Ross #1436708
    jeepman
    Participant

    USS Wasp Spits

    If you want to cause a furore on Hyperscale, just ask about the colours of the Spits flown off the Wasp. General consensus is that it was a US Navy non-specular dark grey (or was it dark blue? – both would be available) paint that was used.

    in reply to: OK Luftwaffe experts… #1348235
    jeepman
    Participant

    Snap

    Mark 12 – you beat me to it – in 109s isn’t the seat attached to the rear cockpit bulkhead – so I was going to suggest Bomber, Recce or Maritime instead where the seat is floor mounted.

    if it came from Cranfield then it follows that it might be salvaged from one of the LW aircraft that appeared there after the war – the Ju 388L might be the most likely candidate in such circumstances

    Otherwise it might just be part of the 1000 tons (!!!) of LW equipment garnered and shipped to Cranfield as part of Operation Medico – including trial pieces – is the seat back more reclined than the norm??

    This might provide you with an answer though

    GERMAN AIRCRAFT COCKPITS 1911-1970. by , Peter W. Cohausz Publisher: Schiffer Military History.

    Either that or perhaps Mikael could help

    in reply to: Westland Wallace replica may fly over Everest #1354502
    jeepman
    Participant

    Shame…..

    ..they didn’t do the wings first – could have gone to the RAFM for their Wallace 🙂

    in reply to: DTD 314S marking on Spitfire IX on #1356630
    jeepman
    Participant

    DTD Specs

    DTD = Air Ministry’s Directorate of Technical Development

    DTD308 was the specification for a cellulose based material consisting of a pigmented primer suitable for direct application to metal or timber and a pigmented cellulose finishing coating suitable for application over the primer – by brush or spray. Temperate and tropical types were available

    DTD314 was the specification for a synthetic finishing material consisting of a pigmented primer suitable for direct application to metal or timber and a pigmented synthetic finishing coating suitable for application over the primer – by brush or spray.

    DTD308 was underscored with a “C”
    DTD314 was underscrored with an “S”, as outlined in Mark 12’s response, to ensure that when refinishing the wrong paint wasn’t used. Hands up who’s been there – spraying celly over sythetic to get a luverly crackle finish and then having to go back to square one (ie bare metal). 🙁

    Specification was stencilled in 1″ high letters – in black on most colours but in red on Night painted areas.

    The best source of explanation of these and other DTD finish codes is the series of booklets on RAF Colours written by Paul Lucas from which I blagged this explanation.

    Wasn’t there an explanation of Spitfire IX noses in Air Enthusiast a while back which might also be of some assistance

Viewing 15 posts - 1,576 through 1,590 (of 1,647 total)