Substantial remains of CF-HMX at Hall Lake
Re the above.
You probably could but it would take ages to number every brick so that they went back in the same place. Haven’t you ever been to Beamish?
A propos absolutely nothing, I saw a car registration “VC10JET” a couple of days ago. Must be a fan…..
Wonder what they are going to do about engines. I seem to recall that the Merlins fitted to the Hornet were quite special, in terms of 1 rotation and 2 frontal area to fit the shaped aerodynamic nacelles. I thought they are as rare as the proverbial rocking horse poo.
That Spitfire must have been going fast when it hit the back wall of the garage……
With dual interests in historic aviation and the restoration of military vehicles, the Victory Show has always been my favourite show, particularly given the East Midlands location. This is only enhanced by the proximity of the airstrip and “apron” areas which are an integral part of the showground. Where else can you see the nose of a Dakota looming over a hedge with a Sherman tank or White half-track in the foreground.
I was there yesterday, and the ground had undoubtedly suffered from the rain on Friday. Open fields, rain and heavy wheeled and tracked vehicles are not a good mixture, as many armies have found in the past. The mud was “challenging” despite the prodigious amounts of straw laid down. Sight of the day for me was the front wheel of an M8 Greyhound not rotating but just snowploughing the mud in its way as it went past.
I am no expert, but the ground conditions on the airstrip, notwithstanding the apparent difficulties of the display area imposed by the CAA, might well have been a game-changer as well.
Although a disappointment, the cancellation of the airshow side was not the ruination of the day for me as it gave more time to chat with friends and other owners of vehicles similar to my current project, wander round the vehicles a couple of times more and spend more time in the sales stalls.
One can only feel sympathy for the show’s organisers. One hopes the situation can be recovered for future years and the show has not been dealt a body blow.
Why – because those were not the captions that originally appeared in the article…….
they have been corrected since i posted the original comment
Thanks for that- do you have contact details- pm me if preferred
Many thanks
Thanks John, was aware of that one. Can’t remember if it was on here or HMVF.
Being used as a bridge seems quite a logical use for a surplus QM. Just cut off the front end with a gas axe and you have an instant girder bridge complete with wheels to position it…..
Thanks – I will pm you
Imgur seems to be an alternative to PB favoured by many since PB committed corporate hari-kiri
Re the above, John Smiths Mosquito NZ2336, mentioned on here only recently, is arguably in the same condition as TV959 was before its reincarnation and is not a museum airframe yet any suggestion that airframe should be rebuilt to flying condition is quite rightly met with howls of protest.
I fail to see how the rebuild of TV959 can be justified when there are calls for John Smith’s Mosquito to be remain untouched.
Other than the wing detached for display at Lambeth, is it true to say that TV959 was seriously compromised, it seemed pretty complete otherwise. Presumably the original fuselage was destroyed upon completion of the restoration -or was it?
Might be mind numbing and irritating but people on here are talking about it – so job done
Forget a remake of 633 Squadron – it looks as if it’s a live action remake of Disneytoon’s Planes