Is that camouflage on the UNDERSIDE of the drooped elevators ???
Check it out at 3:59
Ken
Could it have been done to ease production – if the elevators aren’t “handed” then you are not held up if you have two “lefts” and no “rights” – as they were made on a sub-contact basis, top side and bottom side would both be painted in camouflage so thet could be fitted to left or to right. By that time topside camouflage against ground attack a/c was the prime consideration – they’d even given up painting the undersides apart for the front 1/3 of the underside of the wing to render the planes inconspicuous to low flying aircraft.
I think the same was done with the He 162 – although by that time the camouflage simply consisted of wing in 81, aileron in 83 on one side and vice versa on the other
Especially Canada with all those lakes to play on.
I suspect in Canada there was an adequate supply of Norsemen – which OK weren’t amphibians – but had been designed from the outset as a bush plane with ease of fitment of either wheeled or float undercarriages – plus additional support in terms of its Canadian design, readily-available P&W Wasp engine and the sheer numbers flying.
A very sad business… One wonders what will actually happen to the Barra now it has left the workshop?
I fear the irony in my question about the restoration of Gladiator N5518 was somewhat lost. The Museum received the completed frame from an external contractor in 2010 – and the restoration appears to have progressed little in the intervening four years. Judging from available photos, all that seems to have been done is that a bare fin and fabric covered rudder have been fitted. I’d love to be proved wrong.
This glacial progress exhibited on the Gladiator allied to the fact that the Bluebird team have particular, probably unique, skills in the working and re-working of metal unlikely to be available to the Museum Friends who are seemingly now tasked with the rebuild, suggests that any prospects for seeing a completed Barracuda any time soon must be pretty minimal.
Another own goal by the guardians of our national aviation heritage.
Reputations take years to create and minutes to loose.
Couldn’t resist but post the rather appropriate cover illustration on the current ‘Britain at War’ magazine:
Have you been taking lessons from Twin Otter?
So it is a re-build from lake-bed recovered airframe(s); impressive stuff. Thanks!
Isn’t it the one that was recovered virtually complete (within weeks or months of its dunking near the edge of the lake) by a local pastor and then stored in a shed well into the early 1980’s before being restored
Is the Ju52 one of the lake recoveries with original floats – or is it an original?
Never really seen many pictures of the Mosquito since it left these shores. It was a T.III but now seems to have a FB.VI gun fit – was all the support/mounting/ammunition box structure for the guns added at the same time?
As Neville Shute, novelist, chief engineer of the R100 airship and founder of Airspeed once said
“You cannot argue stupidity, you just have to accept it patiently as one of those things.”
Interesting – under the wing fillet must be one of the best preserved examples of “RLM84” or the blue/green variant of RLM76 (take your pick) around. They say the antenna array needs replacing as it has been lost – is it the same as fitted to Me110G and Ju88G nightfighters – or are they all specific to type?
I’m looking forward to seeing this one completed
Thanks Jeepman
My pleasure – although perhaps it should be me who is thanking you for playing an important part in keeping the true stars of that seminal film in the air
This thread encouraged me to revisit, for the first time in about thirty years, the story of the discovery of that other well known Sahara wreck, the Lady be Good and the subsequent search for the crew. If you need a feel for the sheer enormity and extreme difficulty of the task facing a team searching for a body in the desert, you can do little better than obtain a copy of After the Battle Number 25, which outlines the story of the search for the bodies of the crew of the B-24 in 1959.
Although they bailed out over the desert, the crew, minus a member killed when his parachute failed to open, all eventually joined up to start walking through the desert to safety.
Once the plane had been found, search assets included desert navigation and survival specialists, trucks, an SC-47, a Bird Dog and two Sioux helicopters (flown in by C-130) as well as an RF-101 Voodoo and RB-66 specifically tasked with photo recce for the search on two separate occasions. 5,500 square miles of desert were painstakingly searched by land and air over a period of three months without finding the crew – although evidence of waypoint markers placed by the crew were found..
The first group of bodies were found by chance by an oil exploration party the following year – more than 50 miles from the bail out point. The final body was subsequently found, again by chance, over 90 miles from the point where the crew joined up after the bale-out.
At every level, the numbers are absolutely astounding.
I seem to recall that only two Heinkels G-AWHA and G-AWHB ( the one shown in the Duxford thread) were owned by the production company. The rest were leased for the duration of filming.
The other one, G-AWHA is now exhibited in it’s original Spanish colours by the Deutsches Museum at it’s out-station at the historic Oberschleissheim Airfield to the north of Munich.
Your model: your choice – and if you can’t be sure, it’s likely that nobody else can be either – so you’re not wrong whichever route you go as you have seen examples finished either way.
On the strength of this quickly googled b & w image though I would say silver – based on the reflectivity of that fairing compared with the day-glo areas
We can all console ourselves with the fact that Britain is helping with the Egyptian waste management industry
https://www.gov.uk/government/world-location-news/the-uk-supports-waste-management-industry-in-egypt
Perhaps we could help them recycle some aircraft grade aluminium……
Let’s just hope we see a successful outcome to this endeavour
I can understand the need for a stronger prop as snow and other stuff would end up going through the prop and would soon damage anything less durable. It’s probably an aero hub with some specially made blades.
Would the blades be for a runner, or just a static example?
Anon.
Hopefully a runner – although there’s the little issue of a 6:1 reduction gearbox to overcome first…………
Reference to it’s trip to Windmill Aviation for assessment is made in the latest edition of Aeroplane Monthly.