I
I have also seen his Staff car, many yrs ago, being restored at Baston, where ” Antique Autos” were restoring it.
I well remember that the glass that was in it was 2″ thick, and there was a bullet hole in the windscreen, which had penetrated only halfway through the screen, and which was NOT going to be re placed.I have a photo of it somewhere.
Jim.
Lincoln .7
I remember seeing it a Goodall’s Garage in Repton, Derbyshire, in September/October 1969 This car was discussed in a early edition of After the Battle (or it might have been Wheels and Tracks) and the Goering attribution is completely spurious – as was the apparent “self-destruct button” on the dashboard.
But the popular, cheery Sergeant Air Gunner from the Bronx whose idea it was goes west that very morning.
wouldn’t he be going East to bomb Germany instead?
This Pe-2 was recovered from some lake near Murmansk in the middle of the 1990s and later came in Norway
http://www.vhu.cz/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Image.jpg
As there are only 3 survivors, with one in Monino and one in Poland, this can only be the airframe that the Norwegians started restoring – although only the nose was completed and put on show at Bodo -will this nose follow the rest of airframe to Kbely
To save you searching
“C” Flight No 6 Service Flying Training School, Little Rissington, late 1939
Thanks snafu
appreciate your help in confirming
Indeed, they should never have allowed NX611 to slip through their fingers. Moggy
An odd comment, as NX611 was gifted to HAPS by the French following a direct request from that organisation as the aircraft were reaching the end of their Aeronavale service- along with the kind offer to fly it to either Australia or New Zealand where HAPS would assume formal ownership. In the event HAPS chose Australia where an overhaul took place before the flight back to GB
I fail to see therefore how the Australians allowed NX611 to slip through their fingers – unless you are suggesting that they could have impounded an aircraft that was legally transiting though Australia
the only ones having four numbers in their serial would be the first 200 – mark 1’s in the N7000-N7199 region
I wondered about that but the numbers quoted include
5784
5788
5820
Might be a good starting point to obtain “Lancaster Survivors” published by MMP which lists all the survivors, their history and current status.
http://mmpbooks.biz/shop2/product.php?productid=17570&cat=&page=1
Options seem limited but you could always make Kermit an offer he couldn’t refuse……
You could always re-read posts 16 and 25 above 😉
What Jeepman said, a couple of years back while the tank battle was going on they had a piper cub overhead in its spotting role, an excellent combination.
and Hairyplane last year acting for the other side……
We are indeed limited to a change of demarcation line so maybe just a change of ident.
Jeepman – my vote would be anything but the yellow trimmed one!
SX156 of 767 NAS had a white tail and rear fuselage – again for an exercise – but you’d probably get the “why didn’t you finish painting it” type of comment. 🙂
Other than specific exercise markings, the EDSG/sky schemes all seem very much of a muchness
For me the Victory Show at Cosby represents the way forward for “integrated” military and aerial shows. The two elements sit seamlessly together with the rough grass runway literally just “over the hedge” and there being some aerial involvement in the set piece demonstration battles. It has an atmosphere that you cannot obtain at somewhere like Duxford where the separation between the public areas and airside is readily apparent.
Before anybody starts banging on about safety, the arrangements at Cosby with “dead zones” etc during the display must have clearly been agreed by the CAA.
The presence of properly attired (and correctly aged) RAF air-crew and ground-crew re-enactors with the correct support vehicles at events like the East Kirkby night taxi does nothing but enhance the atmosphere
..and also a salutary lesson on the dangers of using “stock” photos – but why does their “news” include a piece on the creation of a micro-brewery in Cornwall? The only connection I can see is that they are supplying a pub called “The Spitfire Inn”
So it seems as if we sold surplus Sea Kings to the RAN – presumably for spares recovery – and now we’re buying at least one of those back plus others.
Wouldn’t it have been sensible to keep them in the first place?
Any ideas on the choice of registration?
If you’re talking about G-DINT, Tim Moore’s father’s nickname in the RAF was “Dinty”, His father flew Beaufighters – and Blenheims. In the Dabbling Duck at Great Massingham, I recall seeing a picture of the ARC Blenheim overflying the village green at Great Massingham at the instigation of Mr. Moore Snr.
Heard an interesting rumour about Beaufighter engines a few days ago – perhaps it needs following up…….