It’s needed a repaint for years,
Why? – it’s refreshing to see a “used” finish for a change
the greasy, waxy substance is cosmoline. Many NOS jeep parts are still wrapped in the stuff. I always find the easiest way of cleaning things off is to just drop them in a bath of turps.
Other ways of use included wrapping the boxed part in wax proof paper and then immersing the complete package in the warmed liquid cosmoline. There is a certain pleasure to be derived from unwrapping these parts nowadays and finding they are a good today as the day when they were manufactured 70 odd years ago
What would be the approved repair scheme for damage like that – would it be a case of beating out the dent (if you can gain access) and attaching a plate over the tear or will it require replacing the whole panel?
Just interested
Interesting colour variation on the port u/c door already……
[reference the above post)
There seem to be quite a few people on here who think that it is rather more than a “no-brainer”
Reference Posts #83 and #84
Hence my question in the first post……………………….
have you tried googling “Port Victoria PV” – that seemed to bring up quite a lot for all of the PV series – including 3-view drawings
Anybody know if there is involvement from OFMC and TFC this year?
Three or four times a week, I see Tiger Moth R5136 in wartimw training colours up from nearby Netherthorpe aerodrome. I must buy a flight one day – would be quite fun to drive up in the jeep and then fly in the Tiger
Just been up to Brodsworth Hall near Doncaster today where the BBMF Dakota gave an excellent short display at quite a low level.
Interesting one – for me, after further thought, the issue with half covered, half restored (or even hanging) aircraft seems to be that the plane is preserved in an “un-natural” state which you would never see when the aircraft was in service
However, put in some mannequins with pots of dope, lengths of linen etc as if they’re repairing damage and I’m fine with that – it shows the structure and also commemorates the airframe riggers responsible for keeping the aircraft in the air night after night at the same time. The cutaway Catalina is also fine – as that’s how it appeared as a training aid.
Reference #10
It was ordered and built as a bomber and only converted to a navigation trainer in 1948
I’m happy to help at the Norfolk end – will combine with something like a visit to the Muckleburgh collection or lunch at the Dabbling Duck in Great Massingham depending on times…….
Something here
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2008/20080803/spectrum/main4.htm
I wonder what else lies behind hidden doors in the sub-continent……….
Disappointed that the “black and white” version isn’t being printed this time – so I have a B&W Vol 1 and, in time a Colour Vol 2. Would have preferred a matching set, but that is not to be.
If I’d known that there would be no B&W vol 2, I would have gone for the colour version first time around.
Not my shout – but in my mind as it will be the sole survivor, it represents and commemorates everyone who flew, flew in and perished in Barracudas – so to some extent the serial number is inconsequential. Having said that, if one of the assurances given to the families of the crew of DP872 was that their aircraft would be rebuilt as a commemoration then I think that promise should be honoured.
An alternative would be to give the rebuild a serial number of one more that the serial number of the last Barracuda II built – that way nobody can attribute the aircraft to a particular crew – and the source airframes can always be listed on an explanatory board adjacent to the rebuilt airframe. 99% of people viewing wouldn’t care about the serial number anyway.
The old Warbirds Worldwide Forum also seems a long time ago now doesn’t it.
Many forget that the WIX Forum grew out of the shreds of the WW Forum as a way to continue our discussions.