dark light

jeepman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,647 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rare or Unique WW2 Aircraft? #935078
    jeepman
    Participant

    What about the Hotspur at Middle Wallop – some new material but tail section is restored original as well IIRC

    I’m sure Elliott has more than a few pieces of Whitley,,,,,,,,,,,

    Two Skuas have been recovered – one at FAAM, one in Norway

    If all the Wellington “scraps” were gathered in one place, another could be easily built up

    Preserved Axis Aircraft lists 16 Ju88 survivors

    jeepman
    Participant

    The aircraft is housed in a lovely purpose built hangar on Bravo Dispersal and is maintained by skilled former BBMF personnel.

    How do you get to build a private hangar on an RAF base then?

    in reply to: East Fortune Improvements #937760
    jeepman
    Participant

    The biggest single improvement for me would be to restore the Beaufighter

    jeepman
    Participant

    ..and look what happened when someone followed up rumours of a buried WW1 tank in France

    http://www.tank-cambrai.com/english/home.php

    never say never – but always have some sort of confirmation from the archives if you can find it!

    in reply to: The Hendon Lancaster #942271
    jeepman
    Participant

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Last-Lanc-Patrick-Kilvington/dp/0908175329

    or even

    http://mmpbooks.biz/shop2/product.php?productid=17570&cat=&page=1

    Which gives an excellent, well illustrated, synopsis of the history of, and the current location/status for, every surviving Lancaster

    in reply to: Airworthy Mosquito for sale? #951754
    jeepman
    Participant

    surprised at this news, after all the expense, waiting and delight at her long awaited return to flight 2012! If this is true lets really hope that she does indeed come to England. I can’t think of another type that would be so well received. What price for a zero timed better then new airworthy Mosquito?????

    Would the CAA allow it to fly in the UK with a UK registration?

    in reply to: Bisley Wreck #953086
    jeepman
    Participant

    Not a Wellington but a Blenheim..

    suggest you read the OP again….

    The Wellington was behind the photographer when he took the picture of the Blenheim V (aka Bisley)

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #956494
    jeepman
    Participant

    funny thing preconceptions – for reasons unknown I had assumed there would be ruddy great tanks in the polytunnels – into which the components would be submerged for treatment. Obviously not.

    can I just say that this was in no way intended to be a criticism of the preservation technique adopted or an attempt to suggest to the RAFM how they should preserve the airframe – it was simply a comment about how I had anticipated they would address the issue based on previous recoveries such as the Hunley:

    http://dspace.rubicon-foundation.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/9012/AAUS_2005_6.pdf?sequence=1

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #957661
    jeepman
    Participant

    I thought the idea was that it had be kept wet to prevent corrosion, in these pics it looks rather dry.

    funny thing preconceptions – for reasons unknown I had assumed there would be ruddy great tanks in the polytunnels – into which the components would be submerged for treatment. Obviously not.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #958385
    jeepman
    Participant

    Blame Vickers-Supermarine, they designed it…. Not very pretty, which is why Nick Grace developed the “lowered” version used on ML407 and PV202.

    Thought it was the Russians who first used the “two standard canopies joined by a clear section” set-up on the Spitfire IX UTI – although IIRC in a slightly different position along the length of the fuselage

    in reply to: Short Stirling next? #963155
    jeepman
    Participant

    Before diving the deep for Stirlings, have the potential dry recoveries in Russia and Egypt been completely discounted/discredited yet?

    So that’s a “yes” then David..

    in reply to: Short Stirling next? #963727
    jeepman
    Participant

    Before diving the deep for Stirlings, have the potential dry recoveries in Russia and Egypt been completely discounted/discredited yet?

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #963973
    jeepman
    Participant

    Paul – I agree 100% with the sentiment! Merseyside has a rich naval heritage and its a scandal that it couldn’t even be moved across the Mersey to Liverpool.
    I don’t believe for one minute that it couldn’t have been made viable as an attraction. The submarine HMS Onyx which was built at Cammell Laird’s left the area for Barrow – whilst a German U-boat was put on display at Woodside !

    don’t forget they also allowed the last remaining LST in the UK (LST7074 – a D-Day veteran)which formed part of the collection (I’m classing it as an aircraft carrier because of the Brodie system used to launch and retrieve L-4s) to lapse into dereliction and sink – it may have been scrapped by now

    in reply to: AEF Chipmunk safety video #971545
    jeepman
    Participant

    I will always remember waddling out to the aircraft wearing the parachute.

    That brings back memories – CCF 1947 pattern RAF battledress in the early 1970’s with 7AEF at RAF Newton. The harness pulled the crotch up so the trousers went half-mast – which added to the general feeling of looking like a complete idiot when you tried to nonchalantly walk out to the Chippie doing a passable impression of the Hunchback of Notre Dame -and then you had to climb up onto the wing root….

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #973593
    jeepman
    Participant

    I believe the items removed from the wreckage are currently in the museum at hawkinge.

    No chance of a photo then……

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,647 total)