The A340 has gone out of production as well now – so BBMF might have to start looking for something else to fit……
So where did the IWM (ex-Hungarian) one go? Or is it still there?
Still there just before Christmas – in the same hangar as HMS Stickleback IIRC
That prop could have gone to the Barra restoration being undertaken by Mike and the Bluebird team
Perhaps it’s this one
OK, here’s my first shot of the year I’m calling it “Dawn over the Ju52”.
Dawn over the Ju52
Where’s Dawn, i can’t see her in the photo.
Won’t she need more than 4 airworthy engines? A spare in case she goes tech away from home?
Given that these are replacements for the current engines used for taxying presumably it’s just a case of sending the current engines, once removed, to MH for rebuild to airworthy standards – isn’t it?
I tend to view this forum as like spending a night in the pub with your mates – you’re going to get the serious, the silly, the left field, the facts, the jokes, the stupid conversations and the curious connected discussions, just as you do on here.
That’s part of the appeal – you never know what you’re going to get – but I bet we all know more now than before we chanced upon this place.
If you don’t like it walk away – it’s bigger than any individual and if anybody comes here to gain or seek credibility, I humbly suggest you perhaps look elsewhere first
For the same reason that we shipped out Spits etc. to Burma in crates. If you have to transport a short range fighter over a great distance, it makes more sense to put it in a box and load it on a ship than to fly it there.
Fighter aircraft of the 1930s were not very good at flying over large expanses of water.
Spitfires in Burma in crates – never heard of that before……
I wonder if it would have taken a bubble canopy mod?
It could – as in the Avia S-199 in post war service
The Galland hood more correctly an Erla haube (after Erla – an Me109 sub-contractor) and IIRC had little if anything to do with Galland
I thought that some recognition for Bomber Command aircrew had been planned at the end of the war but Harris felt that the medal should also have been awarded to ground crew so it came to nought.
Or is that an urban legend although I’m sure I read it in a book by Prof Richard Holmes and in the Probert biography of Harris
Aeroplanes don’t normally sit on axle stands to assist their tyres in staying just a few cm above the ground.
The difference between axle stands and wires is?
Moggy
significant, in my mind.
Nine times out of ten you don’t notice axle stands and the airframe appears to be in a natural, normal state. Hanging from wires in a building with no noise or (forward) movement is an unnatural state.
I know which I prefer notwithstanding the valid comments about conservation – such as cutting holes in panels or adding additional strengthening around suspension points because the load is not spread across the entirety of the wing as in flight. I seem to remember that Culley’s Camel needed work to address distortion to the frame caused by hanging
Can someone explain this concept to me?
How is an aircraft sitting on the ground more ‘alive’ than one displayed as if in its natural element?
Moggy
Because aeroplanes don’t usually need wires to help them fly, the engine is making a noise and the propeller is going round. They don’t often fly in buildings either!
Conversely when it’s not flying it’s on the ground, sitting on it’s undercarriage and invariably has the engine stopped. This is how most museum airframes are displayed – and is a perfectly natural state. Silently hanging by wires is not.
:diablo:
Thankfully luminous dials do not seem to have been a problem for Cotteswold or a number of other WWII pilots who are happily still with us.
Peter
my thoughts exactly………….
Does anybody know if any pilots have ever suffered a demonstrable level of radiation poisoning as a result of their close proximity to luminous instruments over a period of time?
When the time, funding and runes fall together for a return to flight and repaint, it would be nice to see the Wildcat in an authentic Fleet Air Arm Wildcat VI scheme rather than it masquerading as one of the earlier versions. Wildcat VIs were operated in both camo schemes and overal GSB schemes so there are plenty of authentic options available.
On an associated point, the recent SVAS news item refers to progress with the Sopwith Camel reproduction and the winding down of the Northern Aeroplane Workshop, responsible for the M.1c and Triplane reproductions in the Collection, as well as the Camel.
I think it only right that we collectively pay tribute to, and thank them for, what they have achieved, don’t you?