Not an aviation moment, but aviation related:
In the Dam Busters, when the crews get into the crew buses to go out to embark the Lancasters following the briefing – with the Eric Coates march swelling up……
You know damn well that there are only about three crew buses and they’re driving around in a big circle – but it doesn’t matter…..
what about the Hardy that used to be on an Irish farm back in the eighties according to W&R?
Thought it was a Hector – and I think it’s been consumed in some of the other Hawker biplane rebuilds hasn’t it?
thanks Bruce
Interesting that a seemingly recent manufacturing process should effectively have already been “lost” only 70 years later.
Such is the speed of technology I guess.
Why is it not possible to reproduce these seats as per original?
There is a saying that “if man made it, man can remake it” – but is there something that now precludes these seats being made to original specification – or does it relate to certification. Are the chemicals originally used now too dangerous to consider reuse perhaps?
I have it in mind that these seats are made of some sort of resin impregnated paper or fabric – despite often being referred to as “bakelite” – so what stops their reproduction?
Any insight welcome
thanks
I seem to recall reading somewhere that the Airfix markings were correct, based on recent research
Roy Sutherland raised this same query on Hyperscale on 4th January
that thread also refers to this discussion:
http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=70002
No doubt Edgar will be along to provide a definitive answer in due course…..
I mentioned that on the other forum, I wondered if the double row would be unique to a particular mark?
the front ones almost seem to have been bent to fit – note the angled edges which seem to preclude their use to hold cartridges. It’s almost as if they’ve been added to provide additional support to the back of somebody’s legs…..
mmmmmm……..:D
Note the bracket for a Verey pistol on the RHS and a bracket for the Verey cartridges across the front – which suggests it’s from a Mk V or earlier although I’ve never seen that double stacking arrangement before
Person in your first film in above link is a member here Jeepman…. I don’t think it would be right to give out Merlinpetes name though….. so I won’t :p
I’d be more than happy to be able to put my name to that wonderful Welland engine restoration but sadly 4 cylinder side valve engines are undoubtedly the limit of my own skills
Presumably it must be the earliest Rolls-Royce jet engine in operational condition – or is it?
…But more importantly, will it be at Legends?? 😀
Regards;
Steve
here’s a video of the same gentleman with a Welland
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0vHNiMJLIQ
which did appear at Dx
Anyone know the progress of these two?.I know it will be in the book,but can’t wait that long,speaking of which any idea when said book will be published?Thanks.
Last week I seem to recall that one of the authors said that it would be at the back end of the year
fascinating reading – and an interesting link to the BBMF Hurricane LF363 as it is currently painted
fascinating reading – and an interesting link to the BBMF Hurricane LF363 as it is currently painted
So Mark 12 is the originator of the yellow post-it note
On a more serious note, has the pool of Mosquito survivors or surviving rebuildable identities actually grown since the publication of Mosquito Survivors which must be 20 years ago now. Does seem very static compared with many other types where one or more airframes (and in some sases very many more) can probably be added to a list that existed 20 odd years ago
So Mark 12 is the originator of the yellow post-it note
On a more serious note, has the pool of Mosquito survivors or surviving rebuildable identities actually grown since the publication of Mosquito Survivors which must be 20 years ago now. Does seem very static compared with many other types where one or more airframes (and in some sases very many more) can probably be added to a list that existed 20 odd years ago
Agreed, but they were slightly different to a 6pdr field gun. I understand from some of the crews that flew them that the effect of firing them was equivalent to the aircraft seeming to stop in mid air for a moment!
the 75mm cannon fitted in the B25 was a development of M3 75mm gun fitted to the Sherman tank, This itself was a development of the famous French WW1 75mm field artillery cannon which was used by the US Army well into WW2 as the M1897 Field gun. The weight of the projectile was 14lbs