dark light

jeepman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,321 through 1,335 (of 1,647 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: It's Container Time Again #1263817
    jeepman
    Participant

    “The Chinese T’ Shirts have finally arrived”

    Stop stirr(l)ing it…..

    in reply to: Westland Whirlwind Fighter #1264398
    jeepman
    Participant

    Whirlwind

    if you are thinking of a replica/reproduction, Peregrine engines are going to be a problem – I think Steve Vizard has cornered the market in available engines. They only built a relatively small number – hundreds rather than tens of thousands. The last survivor’s engines were used for propeller testing I think

    In the days of the old WIX Whirlwind project I recall there was some debate about substituting modified Kestrels.

    The rest of the structure seems relatively straightforward – the wing centre section seems to use the same profile all the way accross . Similar commonality in the aft fuselage IIRC

    Wonder if G-AGOI still exists and if there’s anything else down there……..

    in reply to: RN Skua in Norway….WoW! (2007 story continues) #1284100
    jeepman
    Participant

    It seems that the fjord Skua is to be restored by the Bodo museum when it is raised.

    However I hope nevertheless that this might help in some way with the restoration of the example at the FAAM – weren’t they lacking drawings for the centre section – perhaps there can be some reverse engineering

    Perhaps the HLF might allocate some funds to permit them to restore both the Skua and the Barracuda……………:rolleyes:

    in reply to: He 219 pictures? #1316018
    jeepman
    Participant

    UHU at NASM

    there seems to be quite a bit of debate recently about its colours over on Hyperscale – particularly as the scheme seems to blow existing theories out of the water

    Apparently the sqiggle overspay was the controversial light blue-green clour similar to Sky which nobody seems able to agree about – sometimes referred to as “RLM84” – some say it’s a proper RLM colour – for which all documentation has been lost – others say it’s a variation of an existing colour caused by shortages of raw products

    that “84” has been replaced by 76 on the repaint, although apparently the wing root areas remain in their original finish – all other areas had been affected by a reaction between the original colours and american paints applied in the immediate post-war era

    in reply to: Will it be at Legends? #1325940
    jeepman
    Participant

    Doh!:D How didn’t I spot that…?! “Couldn’t see the Wood for the tree’s”:(

    shouldn’t that be

    “I can’t see the woad for the Pees”

    in reply to: wrecks recovered in Afghanistan #1332237
    jeepman
    Participant

    thought it was the Americans who took a couple of Renault FT17 back to the Patton Museum at Fort Knox

    in reply to: Cosford is just ace! #1245394
    jeepman
    Participant

    time for you to go moggy

    shut the door after you

    in reply to: Aircraft names and places (Merged with a zombie) #1245816
    jeepman
    Participant
    in reply to: Cosford is just ace! #1246050
    jeepman
    Participant

    I can reassure you though, however bad it is, it will be a million miles better than IWM North.

    Moggy

    I posted my comments here when the NCWE Origami thingy first opened – I think they accord with many of the views expressed here – around visibility, access and the shop as well as the absence of any fit in the built environment

    OK – there’s very little hardware at IWM North but I actually found the whole package much more thought provoking than the NCWE – but presumably that’s horses for courses

    in reply to: Blair P-38 #1254019
    jeepman
    Participant

    The poster for the latest incarnation of a well known annual show involving the aerial perambulations of heavier-than-air machines of the aggressive variety (other airshows are available) shows a P-38

    might this be TB’s or is it Glacier Girl?

    in reply to: HAC YAK1 #1258335
    jeepman
    Participant

    mmmmmmm……………….

    “a further dozen or so Hawker biplanes”

    can’t wait!

    in reply to: WW1 aircraft survivors? #1259849
    jeepman
    Participant

    and there’s more………….

    three or four more German types to add, courtesy of the new Flypast

    all at DTM Berlin

    Pfalz DVIII D191/18 and the Jeannin Stahltaube A.180/14 used for recce in the first year of the war

    there’s also a Halberstadt CLS.1 Fuselage and another Junkers J4 Fuselage 805/17 or 805/18

    in reply to: AB910 New painting #1265300
    jeepman
    Participant

    doh – brain fade – it was RF-D wasn’t it……………

    in reply to: AB910 New painting #1265420
    jeepman
    Participant

    RF-C perhaps :diablo:

    inspiration from an Airfix kit lid eh? Roy Cross’ artwork I believe – still one of the best.

    shades of the RR Spitfire XIV being painted like the Frog kit – or is that apocryphal ?

    Seriously – job’s a good’un – looking forward to seeing the whole airframe

    in reply to: Any Spiteful Bits? #1269190
    jeepman
    Participant

    Does anyone know of any Attackers in existence other than the Yeovilton aircraft? Pakistan?

    Cue

    “Attackers are important aircraft in their own right and if one is found it shouldn’t be parted out to make a reproduction/replica Spiteful or Seafang”

    Presumably if you can find the laminar flow wings, the rest is relatively “easy” The tail unit is pure late mark Spitfire, the fuselage is late mark Spitfire with raised cockpit area

Viewing 15 posts - 1,321 through 1,335 (of 1,647 total)