dark light

jeepman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 1,647 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Meteor Camouflage #1275419
    jeepman
    Participant

    the pattern appears similar for the Mark I, III and IV, but changes for the F8 and FR9. Certainly the profiles for the F8 in the Warpaint and SAMI datafile titles show a measure of commonality, reflected in the side profiles

    I suppose it could be that somebody is applying an “FIII pattern” to an F8 on the assumption that it didn’t change…………..

    but it did!

    Hannants F8 or CA F8?

    sk

    in reply to: Skysport Hawker Demon and Beau #1286927
    jeepman
    Participant

    add a couple of Nimrods, plus (eventually) another Hind and an Audax and think of the attendance at an Old Warden evening display……………………

    Hawker biplane heaven

    in reply to: raf museum #1287063
    jeepman
    Participant

    Got it months ago, matey – think i even recommended it to you…….

    Agreed – good example of “aviation CSI” – and an entirely appropriate approach – but one of many

    Bob Mikesh for instance in “Restoring Museum Aircraft” even suggests putting an impermeable barrier between the original finish (ie as KD431 is now) and a new finish. That way you get the retention of the historical record and a presentation of an airframe in service………….

    As i said – each approach will have it’s supporters.

    With my Jeep for instance, the body was too far gone to do anything other than a full rebuild with new panels – but all the Ford stamped bits and Ford pattern body panels have been reinstated,reproduced or searched out to restore to it’s month/year/factory condition whilst at the same time having an eye to it’s British Army (Airborne) history. i could have just fitted any “MB jeep” part but I chose not to…………..

    in reply to: raf museum #1287127
    jeepman
    Participant

    I have absolutely nothing against leaving relatively complete airframes with their dings, scrapes and faded paintwork – it is provenance, it is history, it is reality, it is life. cf Vieux Charles. Presumably it is also today’s museological best practice to do the minimum to preserve and interpret

    My view is however that the result in this particular case is likely to be neither fish nor fowl. Remember that this airframe perhaps represents the best possible chance in this country of seeing a complete Hampden – one of the key early war light/medium bombers. Had the airframe not been so damaged then such a decision to leave completely unrestored could be justified in my mind. In this case my view is that the repairs needed to both sides compromise the unrestored side – or are they going to “distress” the new parts?

    Incidentally has any other major museum embarked upon such an approach?

    And what is the driver for this – if it’s just money then i do not think it a valid approach – pragmatic yes but questionable all the same.

    People have their own views – we will never agree – but for my part I prefer to see aircraft as in service. You may disagree – each viewpoint is valid

    in reply to: raf museum #1287642
    jeepman
    Participant

    Instead of repainting the Spitfire and Hurricane FSM’s – couldn’t they get rid of them and spend the money on something real which they don’t have within the collection?

    or spending it restoring the other half of the Hampden…………..

    in reply to: Meteor NF14 for Malta? #1288980
    jeepman
    Participant

    The Meteor Flight’s own website says that T7 WL360 is heading for Malta

    in reply to: Western Warbirds in China? #1289278
    jeepman
    Participant

    AVG P40

    has John Blackburn’s AVG P40 been recovered from Lake Dianchi in Kunming yet – or is that the one pictured?

    And does anything remain of the Belgian registered Stirling V that crashed post war at Kunming………………….:diablo:

    in reply to: Uk Fairey Battle and New Harvard arrives…(Zombie 2006) #1298405
    jeepman
    Participant

    I’m curious to hear about what happened in 87 exactly…or is this a wind up?

    Can’t wait until the day I see a Battle in the air, never thought it would happen…awesome prospect

    wind up …or wind up

    i think it was the former – or perhaps the latter – depending how you pronounce wind up

    Something to definitely look forward to- I thought the ex Charles Church/ex Strathallan example, now forever static at Brussels, represented our last chance of seeing one flying under Merlin power. Shame the Fulmar isn’t still flying – now that would have been a twosome to remember.

    I have to ask…………………………..

    will Legends still be flying when it’s ready?

    in reply to: Air(lack of)Space #1333264
    jeepman
    Participant

    seems very strange that they can’t fit in what they expected – wasn’t the layout shown on various plans of AirSpace on the website – did somebody get their scales mixed up then?? – we need to know…..

    Having said that they do seem to have learnt from the obvious mistakes in the AAM. The hanging wires seem much less obtrusive – perhaps because there weren’t (IIRC) any of those flying trapeze thingies – and also the wires are lost in the jumble of the framework of the roof. i don’t like hanging aeroplanes but AirSpace seemed much better than the AAM in this regard.

    in reply to: Martin Baker MB5 #1253735
    jeepman
    Participant

    Dakkg651

    I’ve been looking into the fate of the MB-5 for some time myself, there are numerous rumours, one involving the scrappers and another involving a fire dump….

    Tom

    Last seen at Wattisham at the back of a hangar in about 1963 wasn’t it Tom?

    Anybody wandered round Suffolk looking for it yet?

    in reply to: Bristol Fighter #1265622
    jeepman
    Participant

    Biff

    According to the other well known historical aviation monthly, it is headed for the States

    Those of us present at OW on that warm Saturday evening perhaps didn’t realise just how unique that formation of three F2bs would be

    in reply to: Make that one more. #1278767
    jeepman
    Participant

    “Grace type” two seaters

    I suppose the only “authentic” schemes for two seat Spits with two standard canopies joined by a clear section would be Soviet red stars as per Spit IX UTIs

    Is that correct Mark 12?

    Bit if I had spent that sort of money on restoring it I would paint it how I damn well liked…..

    in reply to: WANTED Photograph of DH4 Transport Conversion #1282063
    jeepman
    Participant

    DH4a

    Try image googling “DH4a”

    seemed to work for me

    in reply to: Duxford Airspace #1290418
    jeepman
    Participant

    Another Airspace question

    is Airspace still open prior to the formal opening?

    or was it simply a limited opportunity in the run up to the Autumn Air Show

    in reply to: Spiteful survivor? #1325730
    jeepman
    Participant

    Far be it for anyone to suggest anything but…

    how about the short lived post war desert scheme for 208 Sqn Spit XVIIIs

    light slate grey/ dark earth upper surfaces and MSG undersurfaces with bright red/white/bright blue A type roundels, individual aircraft code letter in white ……”S” or “G” perhaps…. and a red or blue spinner according to the flight

    certainly different – and a talking point

Viewing 15 posts - 1,396 through 1,410 (of 1,647 total)