the pattern appears similar for the Mark I, III and IV, but changes for the F8 and FR9. Certainly the profiles for the F8 in the Warpaint and SAMI datafile titles show a measure of commonality, reflected in the side profiles
I suppose it could be that somebody is applying an “FIII pattern” to an F8 on the assumption that it didn’t change…………..
but it did!
Hannants F8 or CA F8?
sk
add a couple of Nimrods, plus (eventually) another Hind and an Audax and think of the attendance at an Old Warden evening display……………………
Hawker biplane heaven
Got it months ago, matey – think i even recommended it to you…….
Agreed – good example of “aviation CSI” – and an entirely appropriate approach – but one of many
Bob Mikesh for instance in “Restoring Museum Aircraft” even suggests putting an impermeable barrier between the original finish (ie as KD431 is now) and a new finish. That way you get the retention of the historical record and a presentation of an airframe in service………….
As i said – each approach will have it’s supporters.
With my Jeep for instance, the body was too far gone to do anything other than a full rebuild with new panels – but all the Ford stamped bits and Ford pattern body panels have been reinstated,reproduced or searched out to restore to it’s month/year/factory condition whilst at the same time having an eye to it’s British Army (Airborne) history. i could have just fitted any “MB jeep” part but I chose not to…………..
I have absolutely nothing against leaving relatively complete airframes with their dings, scrapes and faded paintwork – it is provenance, it is history, it is reality, it is life. cf Vieux Charles. Presumably it is also today’s museological best practice to do the minimum to preserve and interpret
My view is however that the result in this particular case is likely to be neither fish nor fowl. Remember that this airframe perhaps represents the best possible chance in this country of seeing a complete Hampden – one of the key early war light/medium bombers. Had the airframe not been so damaged then such a decision to leave completely unrestored could be justified in my mind. In this case my view is that the repairs needed to both sides compromise the unrestored side – or are they going to “distress” the new parts?
Incidentally has any other major museum embarked upon such an approach?
And what is the driver for this – if it’s just money then i do not think it a valid approach – pragmatic yes but questionable all the same.
People have their own views – we will never agree – but for my part I prefer to see aircraft as in service. You may disagree – each viewpoint is valid
Instead of repainting the Spitfire and Hurricane FSM’s – couldn’t they get rid of them and spend the money on something real which they don’t have within the collection?
or spending it restoring the other half of the Hampden…………..
The Meteor Flight’s own website says that T7 WL360 is heading for Malta
AVG P40
has John Blackburn’s AVG P40 been recovered from Lake Dianchi in Kunming yet – or is that the one pictured?
And does anything remain of the Belgian registered Stirling V that crashed post war at Kunming………………….:diablo:
I’m curious to hear about what happened in 87 exactly…or is this a wind up?
Can’t wait until the day I see a Battle in the air, never thought it would happen…awesome prospect
wind up …or wind up
i think it was the former – or perhaps the latter – depending how you pronounce wind up
Something to definitely look forward to- I thought the ex Charles Church/ex Strathallan example, now forever static at Brussels, represented our last chance of seeing one flying under Merlin power. Shame the Fulmar isn’t still flying – now that would have been a twosome to remember.
I have to ask…………………………..
will Legends still be flying when it’s ready?
seems very strange that they can’t fit in what they expected – wasn’t the layout shown on various plans of AirSpace on the website – did somebody get their scales mixed up then?? – we need to know…..
Having said that they do seem to have learnt from the obvious mistakes in the AAM. The hanging wires seem much less obtrusive – perhaps because there weren’t (IIRC) any of those flying trapeze thingies – and also the wires are lost in the jumble of the framework of the roof. i don’t like hanging aeroplanes but AirSpace seemed much better than the AAM in this regard.
Dakkg651
I’ve been looking into the fate of the MB-5 for some time myself, there are numerous rumours, one involving the scrappers and another involving a fire dump….
Tom
Last seen at Wattisham at the back of a hangar in about 1963 wasn’t it Tom?
Anybody wandered round Suffolk looking for it yet?
Biff
According to the other well known historical aviation monthly, it is headed for the States
Those of us present at OW on that warm Saturday evening perhaps didn’t realise just how unique that formation of three F2bs would be
“Grace type” two seaters
I suppose the only “authentic” schemes for two seat Spits with two standard canopies joined by a clear section would be Soviet red stars as per Spit IX UTIs
Is that correct Mark 12?
Bit if I had spent that sort of money on restoring it I would paint it how I damn well liked…..
DH4a
Try image googling “DH4a”
seemed to work for me
Another Airspace question
is Airspace still open prior to the formal opening?
or was it simply a limited opportunity in the run up to the Autumn Air Show
Far be it for anyone to suggest anything but…
how about the short lived post war desert scheme for 208 Sqn Spit XVIIIs
light slate grey/ dark earth upper surfaces and MSG undersurfaces with bright red/white/bright blue A type roundels, individual aircraft code letter in white ……”S” or “G” perhaps…. and a red or blue spinner according to the flight
certainly different – and a talking point