I have just finished reading Ordinary men:Battalion 101 and anyone who is looking for non-fiction to read should consider this book(i am guessing most of the members here would have some knowledge of the book)
Man of steel- noisy and very long -i nearly grew roots
Britain ruled half the world
Factually incorrect whichever way you look at it population or territory wise-way off the mark in fact.Britain was predominantly a sea power that ruled with the exception of Indian subcontinent vast,sparsely populated territories in Africa,Australia and Canada.Britain did not enjoy overwhelming military superiority on land or sea against its technological peers in Europe combined or otherwise and the same applies to industrial production.And remember UK was shut out of Europe at one time or another by more powerful land powers.
Not in any other century for that matter.
another one from same user;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=optLWxQOE20&t=77s
apologies if this has been posted before.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iVLLTlviQU
What happened to the mig35 deal?su35 deal is out of the blue.something not right here.
Israel blah blah blah.i am out
dont you get how an inch ends up being a mile?
Poland and Romania are more than willing to host US offensive or denfensive platforms with the US showing little regard for RF concerns.who knows what the future holds for these bases and this is what worries some Russian planners
take note of the “practically indentical” statement
from reuters;
In Moscow, the Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, said Russian defense experts consider the site a threat.
“We still view the destructive actions of the United States and its allies in the area of missile defense as a direct threat to global and regional security,” Ms. Zakharova said.
She said that the Aegis Ashore launchpad was “practically identical” to a system used aboard Aegis warships that is capable of launching Tomahawk cruise missile
While the United States says it has no Tomahawk missiles at the site in Romania, Russian officials say the launchpad violates a 1987 treaty intended to take the superpowers off their hair-trigger nuclear alert, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, by banning land-based cruise and medium-range missiles with a range from 300 to 3,400 miles.
The short flight time of these missiles diminished to mere minutes the window Soviet leaders would have had after a warning to decide whether to launch a second strike, raising the risks of mishaps. Any redeployment of nuclear-capable missiles in Central Europe would roll the clock back to this nerve-racking 1980s status quo.
Douglas Lute, the United States’ envoy to NATO, said NATO would press ahead with NATO’s biggest modernization since the Cold War. “We are deploying at sea, on the ground and in the air across the eastern flanks of the alliance … to deter any aggressor,” Lute said. (he is talking about MDS and so how is RF supposed to react)
What happened?why?
whether it be M1 or M2 it is still a nice suprise while we wait for PAK YES.
of all the places that rocket could have gone,it had to head straight for people.incredible