Picture taken in N’djamena, Chad.
Canon cover out (and only 2 GBU’s)
I wonder if they made some straffing like the F1 used to make in Africa. Would be interesting to know and with which results.
Let’s note that A to G modes for the canon has been fully opened not that long ago.
Very nice picture, thanks. But wouldn’t there be some black smoke near the gun if they had used it?
According to Le Point, the operation would be costing 400 000 euros a day in Mali with Rafale costing 27 000 euros an hour (estimate).
And Areva had had plans to mine Mali for a while now, as well as other natural ressources by other companies. The intervention in Mali might not be entirely dictated by generosity, but I do believe not allowing Islamic groups lead by Al-Quaida to get control so close to Europe is a good thing.
Islamist groups have been taking control of almost 2/3 of the Mali for months, forcing one of the strictest interpretations of the Sharia on its inhabitant, cutting hands, stoning, destroying thousands of years old monuments, kidnapping European civilians etc.
Knowing the international community was putting in place a African military force to stop their exactions in North Mali, these groups decided to act fast before such a force could be assemble to prevent them from acting.
Of course it’s more than possible that if Mali didn’t have such resources in its ground, particularly Uranium, and wasn’t the first supplier to France, there would be no French troops currently involved, but there are no one on this forum naïve enough to believe states spend millions in militarist’s interventions just because of the generosity of their hearts!
That been said, Islamic factions with very close link with extremist elements, transforming the Mali into a terrorist state isn’t acceptable and the day such groups would channel radioactive element to even more dangerous elements, or start making attacks on Europe and such those here trying to claim the moral high ground would be the first to say how unacceptable that nobody did anything in Mali and that after all it’s only because they don’t have oil…
For those crying about France being an ex-colonial power, well first of all, the Malian’s government was the one calling and for a while I might add, second of all every time the International community didn’t act in Africa it lead to genocides and such, and other powers like China have filled the void left by the ex-colonial powers.
Of course many things could have been done to help and prevent the situation maybe, calling all these groups terrorist isn’t going to help negotiate with them about a political resolution of the conflict etc. but doing nothing would have been worse than doing something in that situation.
And if you think you could have done better why are you sitting on your behind in front of your computer and why are you not over there trying to talk to people that will cut your head in a heartbeat? Beat you up because you don’t have a beard?
Anyway, on the military intervention, looks like France is now deploying two F1Rs directly from Mali to reduce the flying time. Also the presence of 4 Rafales can easily be explained by the fact that they’ve got more endurance, meaning the very old fleet of French’s tankers can focus on resupplying shorter legged aircraft like Mirages 2000D and F1 while leaving the Rafale with longer range and better protection as well as more weapons carried to strike deep behind enemy’s lines in a very vast territory that is the Mali.
But why is so much of the rest of its layout so similar to the Rafale?
Lol because it isnt…:rolleyes:

6 Mirages 2000D would be currently deployed with two Mirage F1 and 3 tankers. GBU-49/12 have been dropped already yesterday.

Rafales from the Normandie-Niémen squaddron might be deployed soon in the area to support the French operation.
To be noted that a Gazelle pilot was killed this afternoon. RIP and my condoleances to his family.
Looks like AdA dropped bombs in Mali Friday’s afternoon, and maybe today too, so far looks like Mirage 2000 and Mirage F1, but Rafales may come soon.
Lol not very informative but entertaining nonetheless. However I don’t know who found their catch phrase but IMO they should fired him/her.
“We’re Gripen pilots, we fly”… no kidding! I wasn’t really expecting them to walk to their targets with their GBU on their backpack lol…
Maybe Aeronavale has more experience in Rafale maintenance than AdA ? Marine start operate Rafale earlier than the Air Force.
Well to be honest I would have expected the M version to cost more to operate than the B and C versions…
Me too… One conventional missile will not sink a carrier. The ship does have onboard defenses aside from the aircraft themselves.
Well assuming the missile can hit something, it doesn’t have to sink it to be a real threat. The presence of such a missile might be enough for a carrier group to operate further from shore, reducing their effectiveness and overall presence.
During the Falklands war, Argentina’s exocet did manage to put a few ships out of commission without having to sink them completely.
I don’t see any countries willingly taking the chances to put even a small hole in their carrier aircraft…
Of course things have changed drastically since the Falklands war : CIWS
Either he was misinterpreted by the journalist, or Dassault is thinking to participate in Canada to make a lot of noise and use the opportunity to harass the Americans.
Dassault is simply answering a RfI from the Canadian’s gouvernment, not trying to force or do anything special. EADS, Boeing and SAAB also received one and will likely provide an answer too.
The probability of Canaday going for F-35 is very high (90% IMHO).
You may be right, but the current scandal around the real cost of the JSF might make buying that plane a political suicide, in which case, politicians are likely to avoid that plane if it means losing the election for them.
I guess we’ll have to wait for the results from the “independant” research group supposed to look into the matter. In any case, going for RfI to several aircraft manufacturers is certainly something new that wasn’t expected.
If they don’t go for F-35, they will go for the SH instead.
Maybe, depend if they’re buying the SH as a stop gap measure until the F-35 can become more politicly and financialy acceptable, or if they’re looking for a 30 to 40 years long purchase.
No way they will buy Rafale. Their main issue with the F-35 is the cost. Why on earth would they buy a non-US fighter that is horribly expensive? It does not makes sense politically and it does not makes sense economically.
The F-35 high cost is only part of the problem. The fact that many critical issues remain is also an important factor IMO.
The Rafale isn’t the most expansive aircraft around, and as I said, the current move from the Canadian’s gouvernement doesn’t just concern the Rafale, but the Typhoon, SH and Gripen as well.
In the meantime, a potential sell to India or the UAE might give the Rafale an extra boost in lowering cost, and IMO given the current capabilities of the plane, they’re worth it.
if canada doesn’t take the F-35, the Sh is the natural candidate… but a rafale proposed at a low price to force a very low bid from boeing may be a way to hurt a competitor (who already is loosing cash with the KC-30 deal that gets delayed and obviously more complicated than “expected”… )
The SH’s price is already quite lower than the Rafale, so unless Canada ask for the Silent Hornet or something, it wouldn’t be much credible IMO for Dassault to undercut Boeing.
ToT should be less than a issue compared to other countries like Brazil or India, given Canada’s industry close cooperation with the US, so the advantage for Dassault in that area shouldn’t be as good.