dark light

Tempest

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 44 people wounded in heavy turbulence #695577
    Tempest
    Participant

    Also in defence of the ‘bus I once landed in total rainout with high winds in an A340 and it was the smoothest landing ever. People on the plane were clapping and pilot came up said it was the airbus’s great auto pilot system that did it so cleanly. I don’t know how the Boeing one compares or if it is the same.

    in reply to: 44 people wounded in heavy turbulence #695585
    Tempest
    Participant

    Thanks for all the input wsiwyg and others.

    I must say, as a passenger I still prefer the airbus over the 747. The 747 has noisiest cabin in history and the seating arrangements are a little clumsy. I always manage to sleep a bit on the ‘bus. I must say I don’t think the A340 is that much different in terms turbulance tolerance. But the Boeing can cruise a little higher in the first half of the flight because it has bigger engines I guess.

    in reply to: 44 people wounded in heavy turbulence #696255
    Tempest
    Participant

    Had a similar experience on a Virgin A340 (Diana) over the Congo ex JNB toward LHR two weeks ago. The plane was bucking about all over the place, worse still was noise made by luggage racks, they made a loud the creaking noise everytime the plane shook. The pilots had to change course ’45 to avoid the storms which were higher than the plane (we were at 35000).
    When we landed at LHR the brakes made a hellish rough grinding noise as well which has destroyed some of my faith in the A340. Maybe the plane was overdue for service??

    I notice when I travelled on the 777 on another occasion, there was a midwing flap that moved up and down in turbulance. Was this a kind of damper? If so why dont they fit one on the A340?

    Anyway here’s a pic after landing from same flight of A340-600, Indian Princess…

    in reply to: Mars Landers… #2676731
    Tempest
    Participant

    Best wishes for Spirit’s landing on Sunday and Opportunity next month. I’ll be glued to the Internet for it. Good luck to everybody at NASA.

    I think these missions, should they work, are going to reveal some reallys stunning science. And the pics will be amazing.

    This stuff is as good as the moon mission surely?

    in reply to: No Mars signal from Beagle probe #2681511
    Tempest
    Participant

    When Mars Polar Lander disappeared in ’99 they used the camera’s on Mars Oddessy to look for it because the Oddessy is in a better position than Hubble. Nothing conclusive was found in this case – although some people seem to think it was found intact on the surface. Go to Space.com to see this story.

    It’s possible that cameras aboard Oddessy or even Mars Express could be used to look for Beagle.

    I’m really excited about the Mars Rover missions, they’re really hi-tech, they put Beagle in the shade by a million miles and are going to give some great views of the terrain.

    Go here for the details (This is going to be big in the next few weeks):

    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/

    in reply to: 5 Su-27SMs delivered to RuAF #2681902
    Tempest
    Participant

    New Russian SU’s better than Indian or Chinese versions…

    MOSCOW (AP) – The Russian air force has begun fitting its Soviet-built
    fighter jets with new engines, weapons and avionics as part of the nation’s
    most ambitious weapons modernization effort since the 1991 collapse of the
    Soviet Union, officials said Friday.
    The first batch of five upgraded Su-27SM fighters flew Friday from the
    aircraft plant in Komsomolsk-on-Amur in the Far East to the air force’s
    Lipetsk combat training center in western Russia for evaluation and tests.
    Russian television stations showed sleek twin-engined blue-and-grey
    fighters landing at a snowy airfield and enthusiastic pilots hailing their
    performance.
    “They still smell of fresh paint. They are like factory-fresh cars,” a
    smiling squadron leader, Yuri Gritsenko, told NTV television.
    Maj.-Gen. Alexander Kharchevsky, the Lipetsk base chief, said that the
    upgraded fighter “features the latest achievements in electronics, weapons
    and navigation.”
    While the original Su-27 was designed as a fighter, its upgraded version
    can be used as a strike aircraft, Kharchevsky said in televised remarks.
    Lt.-Gen. Alexander Zelin, the air force’s deputy chief, said that the
    program to overhaul Russia’s fleet of Su-27s was set to be completed in 2005,
    the Interfax-Military News Agency reported. Zelin wouldn’t say how many
    fighters would be converted to the new standard.
    Zelin said that the plane’s new version has better capabilities than the
    Su-30MKK and Su-30MKI – the advanced versions of the Su-27 sold to China and
    India in recent years.
    “We can’t have aircraft in our inventory that would be worse than those
    sold to foreign customers,” Zelin said.
    The Su-27 entered the Soviet air force during the 1980s. The Russian air
    force so far has lacked funds for modernizing them or any other Soviet-built
    aircraft…
    Russian pilots have complained bitterly that their aircraft were falling
    apart while Russian aircraft builders were building new planes for China,
    India and other foreign clients.
    The increasing wear-and-tear on the Russian air force planes and lack of
    pilots’ training blamed on kerosene shortages have contributed to the
    increasing number of crashes of combat aircraft in recent years.
    President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly promised to modernize military
    arsenals, and next year is to see the most ambitious weapons modernization
    program since the Soviet collapse. The government plans to spend 341.2
    billion rubles (US$11.7 billion), or about 14 percent of the government’s
    2004 budget, on modernizing fighters, upgrading strategic bombers, and buying
    new helicopter gunships, missiles and other weapons.

    in reply to: Armed Japanese C-130s #2688859
    Tempest
    Participant

    That’s some site Alastair – the Dear Leaders minions calling Japanese militarists! I’m not sure what they mean when they say the Japanese have armed their C-130’s. Maybe the Japanese put ecm or elint gear on them?? It’s a good question.

    Paranioa central, the North Korean regime think the whole world is out to get them, except China, and even that’s not so certain with them. I’m sure those pictures of Saddam looking like a sidewalk meths drinker after he was hunted down have got them worried. I wonder what Kim Il Sung would look like if he didnt shave or cut his hair for 8 months and hid in pit?

    in reply to: EF2000 and F-35 #2689559
    Tempest
    Participant

    I should also point out here that France has offered Rafales to Austria at a cost 15% more expensive than the Typhoon.

    in reply to: Rafale Price – Daylight Robbery! #2690375
    Tempest
    Participant

    I’m amused that despite the fact the Austrian deal has been signed, the French are so desperate to sell the Rafale they are even trying to get a leg in at this stage.

    The French company had not participated in the original invitation to bid because it believed that the Austrians only wanted to buy cheap aircraft for the surveillance of its airspace.

    So that’s what they think of the Typhoon eh, poor loosers. Maybe they should try to sue as they did in S Korea.:o

    in reply to: General Discussion #374766
    Tempest
    Participant

    I dont feel embarressed at all

    in reply to: Are you a musician ? What do you play ? #1960577
    Tempest
    Participant

    I dont feel embarressed at all

    in reply to: how far along is the Gripens A2G capabilities? #2691435
    Tempest
    Participant

    Well I don’t have proof at this point Phantom, I did read it somewhere. But if you show me a pic of Gripen carrying the afore mentioned class of weapons then I’ll submit to your superior knowledge. Take my word for it, the main hardpoints cant take more than 1500 lbs

    Distiller, you should know God is liar. No one will be saved, most of us will die a painful death and no one above loves anybody.

    Anyway my point is that the Gripen carries half as much fuel as the Typhoon. Thus it is reasonable to assume it has a simliar range spec. Your figure of 100km, as my learned collegue Mr Phantom has pointed out, is absurd.

    in reply to: how far along is the Gripens A2G capabilities? #2691679
    Tempest
    Participant

    Forget flying it home and parking it in the garage, it would be far more fun to pick up ur date for the evening in a Gripen

    Picking up a date in a Gripen would be great, but you’d need a two seater and still there could be some drawbacks…

    As I understand the Gripen cannot carry 2000 pound class weapons, so it’s limited in terms of attacking ships, bridges, large buildings and hardened shelters

    in reply to: how far along is the Gripens A2G capabilities? #2691969
    Tempest
    Participant

    Trust the Swedes to build a fighter that you can fly home and park in the garage:)

    in reply to: Mirage 4000 #2692656
    Tempest
    Participant

    South Africa and the M4000

    South Africa would not have been in a position to buy the M4000 because of a UN arms embargo that came into effect in the late seventies/early 80’s. Also it was a very expensive bird, and in the opinion of the SAAF not neccesary for the air threat at the time, which involved a handful of Mig 21’s/Mig17’s in Zimbabwe and Angola. I think some people also saw it as a long term replacement for the Buccaneer fleet because of its long range (it had a big 900 mile+ radius I think).

    Basically Dassault discussed the project with them back in the early stages of its development. And some pilots and engineers were given a tour of project in the late seventies.

    Had they been in a position to buy it, it would have certainly been up against Mig 23 MF’s over Angola.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 193 total)