dark light

mackerel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 561 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MK356 Progress #1263264
    mackerel
    Participant

    Whats the Bell/Alarm type thing in shot two?:confused: thanks for the update jackattack and pics will be checking the BBMF website Just means you have to use one off the other spitfire’s more when the Airshow season starts next year 😀

    James

    Hi james, do you mean the two things that look like bells in the bottom left of the photo? If so then at a guess they are rubber mounts for some electrical gismo.
    steve

    in reply to: When was the last Spitfire Scrapped? #1264856
    mackerel
    Participant

    Given the fact that TB382 was the personal mount of Raymond Baxter perhaps the BBMF could raise a big chunk of money beyond the spare parts value by collecting up the frames and skins of TB382 and auctioning them with a provenance that will enable the buyer to restore it to fly at TB382?

    Hi all, has anyone noticed the spooky looking image on the cockpit combing skin just in front of the cockpit door on TB382!!!! looks like image of spit or 109. !!!! obviously a reflection of something.

    in reply to: When was the last Spitfire Scrapped? #1264866
    mackerel
    Participant

    Who was he fighting?

    RW382 wasn’t TOC by the RAF until July 1945.

    Mark

    Sorry about that Mark12 !! I’ve changed my thread to suit. I realised what i’d printed was wrong after reading more in the book.

    in reply to: When was the last Spitfire Scrapped? #1265006
    mackerel
    Participant

    I am sure there are plenty of a/c that initially were used for spares and will eventually in turn become airworthy. Examples being TFCs Gladiator, or the ARCO Blenheim as well as many Spits used during the filming of BoB…

    Do any of the MK16s have a war time combat record?

    Hi SADSACK, i’m just looking through book entitled Spitfire-flying legend & there is a section on MK XV1’s. It refers to RW382 & TB 863 both flown by Raymond Baxter between july 1944 & may 1945 in combat. Seems that they were used for ground attack.
    I’m wrong about RW382, it didnt see action. It came out of castle bromwich to late to see combat & was put in storage between 1945 &1947.

    in reply to: BAe Prototype Jet Trainer? #1266939
    mackerel
    Participant

    G-NDN1

    Goodwood doesn’t seem to have been mentioned as a place where the Firecracker has been. I have a photo of the prototype, G-NDNI, at Goodwood on 5 August 1978. That seems to be earlier than the timeframe referred to in previous posts.

    Hi Avion,time frame on your photo would be right because the first Firecracker flew in may 1977.

    in reply to: BAe Prototype Jet Trainer? #1267703
    mackerel
    Participant

    NDN firecracker

    At least one of the Firecrackers lurked in an Atlantique hangar when I worked there.

    D B-N was a consultant engineer then and used to drift in and out from time to time.

    Moggy

    Word has it that there is one or more firecrackers in a hanger at Thruxton airfield.

    in reply to: BAe Prototype Jet Trainer? #1267830
    mackerel
    Participant

    BAe prototype jet trainer

    Hi Guy’s
    pagen01, I think mackerel has answered the question, Hunting’s would only have come on board had the order been won. I also seem to remember seeing the NDN Firecracker at Farnbourough, but my memory isnt what it was, and there have been many airframes under the old bridge since then!
    At the time, there seemed to be a drop off in third party maintenance, so Fields (Hunting’s) eventualy won and settled on the Jetstream 31/32 completion center contract, but that’s another story!!!
    Ritch.

    I think it was all very political,because although the firecracker was very good the goverment of the day plumped for the tucano because of a tie up with Shorts of Belfast.

    in reply to: BAe Prototype Jet Trainer? #1267858
    mackerel
    Participant

    BAe prototype jet trainer

    R&M, so was the flying turbo Firecrackers built by Norman or by Hunting? I know it was designed by Desmond Norman.

    Hi all,
    The First 3 NDN firecracker airframes were built on the Isle of Wight in about 1983. I was working at British hovercraft corporation then & a few of us were seconded to NDN to build them. I built the tailplanes & did a substancial amount of work on the fuselages. I remember we he to re-engineer the nose wheel stowage area to allow for larger diameter wheel to be fitted because on heavy landings on soft ground the prop touched the ground. NDN fitters did the wings & fitted the airframes out. Des Norman eventually took the company to Wales, something to do with funding from Welsh development agency.!!!!!!I think Slingsbys in yorkshire had something to do with the firecracker as well.
    As for origional question about jet trainer , i’ve no idea !!!!

    in reply to: Spitfire TA805 on YouTube #1268797
    mackerel
    Participant

    So he is not the owner of it then ?:confused: and here is the video I forgot to add:o http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=A33ThFYEZNs

    James

    No he doesnt own it. The person who has bought it already has 4 or 5 spits. Cant say who coz i’m not sure if it’s common knowlage. Wouldnt mind betting that peter will get to fly her though.

    in reply to: When were Spitfire Seats Changed to Bakelite? #1268807
    mackerel
    Participant

    Can anyone tell me when the seats where changed from Metal seats to Bakelite please?

    Hi ollie, not sure about bakelite seats, but when I was at Historic Flying earlier this year i noticed they had 1 made of carbon fibre. Also they were making a seat for P9374 the MK1 they are doing. This 1 is metal & P9374 is from feb 1940 so seat change must be after that.

    in reply to: Spitfire identification n°2 #1268815
    mackerel
    Participant

    Buchon prop fitted on TE308

    Anyone notice the Buchon prop fitted to TE308?

    Hi Spade grip how do you know thats a buchon prop? Is it because the tips have flat ends?

    in reply to: Spitfire T9 question #1268968
    mackerel
    Participant

    Spitfire T9

    Sorry to pose yet another Spit question, but I’ve been wondering why Vickers chose the examples they did for conversion to T.9 status. Airframes like PV202, ML407, MJ627 etc were very well used and bruised war veterans with lots of wear and tear, so why were they chosen over far less used examples that were seemingly abundant at the end of the war? Surely a virtually factory-fresh airframe would’ve made a better candidate for conversion??

    H i Ant, The answer you are looking for maybe found in the book “Spitfire-The History” by Morgan & Shacklady. Page 378.

    in reply to: Spitfire TA805 on YouTube #1269395
    mackerel
    Participant

    Peter Monk & T8

    Hi all,
    As far as i’m aware Peter acted as front man for the new owner of the T8. Maybe next year Peter you could fly TA805 to its birth place ,ie I O W, (well second time around).

    in reply to: Spitfire TA805 on YouTube #1270459
    mackerel
    Participant

    Kent spitfire

    Hi, who was displaying TA805 on that day ? Was it Peter,John , Lee or Clive ?

    in reply to: Spitfire Wing Attach Question (replica) #1270461
    mackerel
    Participant

    Spitfire wing attachment (replica)

    Hi Tom Kay,
    If you are going to all this bother why not build a real one ?!!!!! If you intend to have two people in there have you thought about centre of gravity ? the other person in a two seater wasnt positioned between FR13 and FR14 for nothing.

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 561 total)