Re: Aircraft Carrier on Ebay
Originally posted by ageorge
Anybody recognise this old lady ????http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=26432&item=2449695840
I would love for someone in the US to buy it and moore it next to the Intrepid or the Yorktown, to contrast the 2 carrier designs. No offense, but I have always found the British carriers to be the best looking.
Now if I could just hit the lottery…….. 😀
Another one
This is a small, but colorful one…..
Longshot….
Originally posted by Ja Worsley
Indeed, moving away from India (Not Indiana as Buger said) Argentina are in the market for a new a/c carrier, they are looking at something similar to the Garibaldi but built in their own dockyards, they may buy two from latest sources.Question is, what would they put on them? They can’t buy Harriers because the US won’t allow them to be sold down there and Rafaels can’t opperate of the decks of a small carrier like that. Skyhawks are about ready to give up the ghost (MdB’s ones were bought for a projected 10 year service life).
Small carrier aircraft are in very short supply now-a-days. I was talking with Primer a little while ago and we were talking about the AMX being used on a carrier and it turns out that Embraer wanted to build them but the R’n’D was going to cost too much and Italy wasn’t interested. Though still a realitivly new a/c I think it would make a lovely plane for carrier use, that and the Tejas are about the same size as an A-4 and weigh in at just a little over the skyhawks load out for take off.
Are there any secondhand A-7s floating (teehee) around? They at least would be a little newer than A-4s, and still fairly capable.
My father
He flew in the Marines in the 50s, then flew for Eastern Airlines for 32 years. Just grew up in and around it.
Originally posted by Transall
China indeed.:)
I don’t have the Osprey book, but I took a look at the Ospey website and in the description of the Gladiator Aces book it was mentioned that it fought in China as well.
Presumably someone even scored 5 kills with it there, since it’s in the book.Best regards, Transall.
Some info here….Chinese Glaiators
And it does appear there was at least one ace…
Chin Shui-Tin
Did any Gladiators fight in the the Far East?
I thought I had read once of some, but cannot remember where. China, perhaps?
Re: Re: Re: lol
Originally posted by glitter
Higher expected radiation levels ??
As I said, I hope the problems get worked out. First of class are always a bugger.
Originally posted by Phil Foster
PliotGHT is a very proud man which is to be commended, theres nothing wrong with it. Unfortunately he is also convinced that France stands alone as the naton that gets it right first time every time and never makes any mistakes which is not to be commended. He also has a limited grasp of the subject matter which only weakens his arguments more.
Interesting read here:
December 4, 2003: France is considering quietly retiring their new nuclear powered aircraft carrier and joining with Britain to buy a new carrier of British design. Actually, the French had planned to built a second nuclear powered carrier, but they are having so many problems with the first one that they are quite reluctant about building another one. Britain is building two 50,000 ton conventionally powered carriers, at a cost of $2.5 billion each. France would order a third of this class, and bring down the cost of all three a bit. The new French nuclear carrier “Charles de Gaulle” has suffered from a seemingly endless string of problems. The 40,000 ton ship has cost over four billion dollars so far and is slower than the diesel powered carrier it replaced. Flaws in the “de Gaulle” have led it to using the propellers from it predecessor, the “Foch,” because the ones built for “de Gaulle” never worked right. Worse, the nuclear reactor installation was done poorly, exposing the engine crew to five times the allowable annual dose of radiation. There were also problems with the design of the deck, making it impossible to operate the E-2 radar aircraft that are essential to defending the ship and controlling offensive operations. Many other key components of the ship did not work correctly, and the carrier has been under constant repair and modification. The “de Gaulle” took eleven years to build (1988-99) and was not ready for service until late 2000. It’s been downhill ever since. So the plan is to buy into the new British carrier building program and keep the “de Gaulle” in port and out of trouble as much as possible. The British have a lot more experience building carriers, and if there are any problems with the British designed ship, one can blame the British.
NAVAL AVIATION: French Carrier Disaster Gets Very Strange
The plot thickens……………
Re: lol
Originally posted by PILOTGHT
“But carriers ? CdG is more docked than in service”
it’s clear that CdG while peace is 2/3 times in service!
she was able to spent more times in afghanistan than somes USN CVN!
but while crises, she is able to spend 5 years sailing the seas operations without any refuel or docking! so get me any others able to do the same , exept the USN?
as services, here you will see the proofs that she’s spending more times at sea than any others european carriers!
Has there been any more info on the higher than expected radiation levels? I hope they can get the bugs worked out.
Originally posted by Ja Worsley
Sader: mate I do have, I have a book all about WWII planes including prototypes, I’ll find it and get back to you on it, but till tells the tale of one flying and fighting B-29’s over Japanese territory (Can’t quite remember off the top of my head, but it’s in the book) It’s apparently fired at 2 B-29’s causing one to loose both engines on the port side, the last time up the guns jammed and the pilot decided to return to base instead of Kamikazi attacking a B-29.
Thanks Ja! I’d like to try and find a copy of that book! Hope it is available here in the States. Love the obscure bits of history.
2. During WWII, three planes were produced with Canards and a pusher engine, what were they and which country did they serve in?
XP-55 Assender, J7W1 Shinden or the Henschel KW87 and the Mig 8. The Utka was a transport plane with no real fighting abliity, but since I didn’t specify actual combat types I have to accept it. The J7W1 Shinden actually did make production and flew three missions before hostilities ceased in 45 (It was a damd big plane even by todays standards)
The bits I have read said the J7W1 Shinden only flew twice for about 45 mins. Do you have any additional info? Very interesting….
Fotki
Originally posted by Ja Worsley
Sorry guys, don’t know what’s gone wrong, will look into it, may have to post them individually off my hard drive
If you are using a Free Fotki account, they no longer allow you to link to other websites. They may show for a short time, but will go away eventually.