yup ur correct there, i shud have mentioed the NAVAL V/STOL, i guess, the Sea Harrier came in only in the start of the 80s and they did not had to wait long to get crowned. So in that sense the Yak-38 was the operational naval V/STOL a/c.
US Marine AV-8As were at sea long before 1975.
And didn’t they use Yak-38s in Red Dawn? ๐
As seahawk said, they had dif missions, but other than accuracy, how does the warhead of a Granit compare with the 14″-16″ AP shells that the Iowas were designed to take hits from? At best they have the same weight, but does the missile have the AP ability that the (shells that the Iowas armor was designed to defeat) did? Were these missiles designed to attack heavily armored battleships like the Iowas, which were designed with high angle shell strikes in mind, or on the types of ships that exist today, which lack most all of said armor. The Granits warhead is HE, not AP, and that has to be factored in.
I believe all the Iowa’s Tomahawks were the land attack model. and since it has no organic helo or UAV, the harpoons cannot be targeted beyond the radar horizon. the Kirov unfortunately has 3 organic helos to scout up some meat for the raptor….
so I think its like a vision impaired guy with a stick -vs- a guy with a telescopic rifle.
The Iowa is truly great in its own era and role and did a ok job in ODS-1 pounding the crap out of shore fortifications but it just aint the ship to deal with Kirov.
> So can the kirovs 20 granits deal with the Iowa’s massive armour?
I think so, esp if the Granit do a popup and terminal dive like the harpoon does.
even 5 solid hits from Granits could mission-kill a CVN, 20 is scary.
? My understanding is that the Iowas used IAVs for targeting in GW1.
Crewmen aboard the battleship Wisconsin launched a Pioneer, Air Vehicle number 159, to conduct battle damage assessment after shells from the Missouri’s massive 41-cm (16-inch) guns.
So they do have eyes in the skies.
Well done Crusader, I have been looking for pics of that Iowa class proposal for ages.
I have the whole article. To large to attach, so I just did parts of it. PM me if you would like me to email it to you.
An Iowa class proposal.
From the early 80s.
Hahahaha Funny Sader, I don’t even play it as well and up untill three nights ago I’d never used ebay before.
There is a little hope mate, France are offering their old Saders for only 1 Euro as pointed out in the F-8 Thread in the Modern Airforce section ๐ As I said, it’s only a small hope. Personally I’d like to buy two, have one as a door guard to my place and fly the other around, just to show off and out do those guys with their hotted up cars! Never did like those type!!!
I agree! That 1 Euro deal has me real interested, in that I would love to have an F-8 at our museum here in Charlotte! We are slated for an F-14, and just got a CH-46E. Also working on an AV-8A/C, but there was a delay with the Corps. I need to find out the details of the French Crusader offer….
Sader: Mate the F-8’s never took off with a full load of fuel, the cats were always prone to breaking down as it was. I remember seeing here on one tour where both her cats were down and she was just one big floating target (Mwhahahahaha oh it’s a submariners dream).
My point was just that A-7s(8676kg) and F-8s(8727kg) are very close in dry weight, so the A-7 was the closest to a real possibility, even with its higher max weight. I had read that they had had problems with the cats in the past, so that was why I asked if they were not the same. All talk, anyway, as I said. I would love to see them find a sq or 2 of F-8s to use, but I have a better chance of winning the lottery, and I don’t even play it…..
OK I’ve read a few things on this thread and I guess it’s time to clear up a few things.
1. Sao Paulo can’t operate anything heavier than the current A-4 because the steam cat she has won’t take the load, if you’ll observe, not even the Trainer versions put to sea due to the heavier weight. The MdB is looking at refitting a stronger system capable of launching heavier a/c but funds are hard to come by atm what with Brazil needing other defence toys to play with. A-7’s would be right out due to their weight as would most things these days including a naval AMX, though one thought does spring to mind, a naval Tejas might work, hmmmm.
??They launched F-8s for years, and an A-7 weighs less than an F-8, though not at full load for the later models (approx 42k lbs (A-7) vs roughly 38k lbs (F-8) ) , so I just don’t see that as being true, unless the cats on there now are less than what the French were using. Are they? The A-7s would still be able to carry a decent load, and get launched, even though this is all a pipe dream. Personally, I’d love to see them beef up the cats and get either Rafs or some secondhand F-4s with the latest goodies.
The F-18s in Tears of the Sun looked like they dropped WP, not napalm. Other than the attacking F-18s not matching the take-off /flight shots, actually a decent scene.
The Bridges at Toko Ri , We Were Soldiers and Flight of the Intruder all have great A-1 shots, if nothing else, plus as Art mentions, gotta love the Panthers in The Bridges at Toko Ri.
What about the U-Haul C-47 in Top Secret? 8^P
The Corsair II would be a good mud mover, but the carrier group needs an outer protection screen in the form of air defense fighters. Hence, the chosen platform would have to be a multirole fighter.
Multiroles: A-4, F/A-18A/C, Harrier, or the “Goshawk 200”. In the Naval Forum, someone posted some data about Sao Pauloยดs catapults and lifts: they could handle a Hornet (A/C) without its full load. The Subpar Hornet is out of question, as is a fully loaded regular Hornet.
*** Since the Brazilian military has cancelled a much more needed program – the FX, needed to protect Brazilian airspace and acquire technology – I seriously doubt that the Navy would be allowed to get new-built fighters, such as a AMX-N or Goshawk. So, it could be an upgraded A-4 or an used Hornet.
Could not the A-7s be upgraded tp improve a2a ability? They already have rails for Sidewinders, and I would think they could be bought second hand from US stock fairly cheaply. I would think that they would still have a good bit of life left in them.
I’d take a MiG-15 or MiG-17 over an F-100, F-101, or the F-102A. Sure, our planes were faster, but if you are bounced by a MiG, you are not going to be in afterburner, so you are going to be subsonic. At those speeds, the MiGs will turn circles around you and eat you for lunch. The F-101 had a higher cruise speed and good acceleration, which would help, until it pitched up and fell out of the sky. Against a MiG-15 or MiG-17, the best tactic would be high speed slash and run attacks. It would be vital to see the MiGs first, and they were smaller. The F-104 would have been super for this, but it couldn’t help take the fight to the enemy. The range was too short, it cruises subsonically like every other jet, and it can’t turn for $#!*. The F-8 Crusader was, I think, the best fighter of the era. It was built to dogfight, and it was so much better than the F-100. A bigger version with a J-79 would have been even better.
hehe, the Squids and the Jarheads in their F-8s would save the day!
(sorry, couldn’t resist!)
31 killed in Marine chopper crash
Very sad news. What kind of chopper could it be? MH-53?
A CH-53E, from what I understand. An Echo, as the Jarheads know it….
1992 Mitsu Eclipse
1989 Honda Accord
1989 BMW 525i
There was a fictional film about the USS Nimitz going through a bad storm that turned out to be a time warp. It ended up just before the Pearl Harbour attack and set about trying to change history. The bit I always remember is the Japanese pilot who has just been shot down by a Phantom (?) and is landed on the deck by a helio! But I can’t remember the title?
mmitch.
Final Countdown, and it was an F-14 that shot down the Zero. Neat movie.
We would have survived had we lost a carrier at Pearl, but I think battles may have been planned differently. Like all things, it would have changed all battles that followed. But unless they really just blew it to smithereens, like most of the important ships sunk at Pearl, it woiuld have been raised and rebuilt, so it would only delay the inevitable.
The Grumman XF5F-1 Skyrocket is an other paragon of beauty.
I can imagine that the Japanese pilots would have laughed themselves into the ocean, or something.
I wouldn’t tell the Blackhawk guys that…… ๐