The USA didn’t need hard currency the way Russia did, which is why you’d never see rides being sold on SR-71.
Do you realy believe that such flights were possible in SR-71: Rools, loops, Immelmans, zoom climbs, and with civilians aboard !!
Do you know that SR-71 was limited to 2.5 G, that it was not cleared to any normal fighter maneuver, much less with civilians aboard.
That its engines could not tolerate any but mild maneuver, or unstarts occured, etc,etc.
That is not matter of hard currency.
I’m not sure why you’re trying to compare an interceptor with a spy plane, as the Mig didn’t have the same capabilities in that role.
See what Indian AF say of Mig-25 capabilities.
In terms of agility, are you suggesting that the Mig 25 is performing the maneuevers that you mentioned while flying at Mach 3?
Of course not at 3 Mach, but it is the only Mach 3 a/c ever which could do this maneuvers. That is the point.
I would guess even an F-111 could out manuever a Mig 25.
Why do you think so?
Maneuverability is not merely turn radius.
Note that FW-190 was more maneuverable than Spit 5, in spite of laters tighter turning radius.
It is the turn rate and handling at higher alpha which counts. The ability to change flight direction fast.
In supersonic maneuverability, the Mig-25 is unsurpassed.
It achieved almost 3000 km/h speed in closed circuit of mere 100 km.!!!
Sign In
