dark light

Mustang Fan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 72 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pics of Spitfire Mk22's?? Help! #1388555
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    Magnificent aeroplane!

    in reply to: Spitfire TE184 #1388651
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    Has anyone got a cockpit/instrument panel shot of 184 they could post please?

    in reply to: Spitfires At Airshows #1388805
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    The ‘Ultimate Spitfire’ article was, I recall, from May 1989.

    in reply to: Spitfires At Airshows #1388809
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    There was some controversy over this aircraft when it first appeared but HP57 has summed it up, it was not really pretending to be a restored machine but a ‘post-production’ prototype. The mods incorporated fill an A4 sheet closely typed. A proprtion of them are Mr Meltons mods but the majority were derived from original later production, eg: the (Modification 442) reduced span ailerons.

    An example of Mr Meltons mods would be the replacement of quick release cowling fasteners with screws. I have the whole list somewhere.

    in reply to: Spitfires At Airshows #1389438
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    That just about sums it up. It did fly very nicely I am told though and for my money – so what if it was not original. Today of course, it would have satin paintwork and a three blade prop, perhaps some cannon barrels too , if it had survived.

    in reply to: Charles Church warbirds #1389441
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    Ah – a difference of opinion! I was surprised at the suggestion from Mark 12 but I have not seen RR232 recently so cannot add anything.

    in reply to: Spitfires At Airshows #1389467
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    …not even the data plate in my view.

    Mark

    Quite right – DM never actually got round to rivetting it on!

    in reply to: Spitfires At Airshows #1389473
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    Well there you go – it was being done in the late 80’s.

    in reply to: Charles Church warbirds #1389671
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    I will go and ask him 😀

    in reply to: Spitfire TE184 #1389679
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    I was recently shown a photograph of a high-back Spitfire under restoration at Blackbushe in the late 1970’s. The top fuselage skin had been removed and very clearly you could see where the top third of the frames had been cut off and an extra ‘high-back’ bit butt-strapped on to it. Obviously original and done in the factory in wartime I do not know why, perhaps due to a surfeit of low-back frames?

    in reply to: Charles Church warbirds #1389689
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    Thats what I heard from one of their engineers at Sandown during the airshow last Summer. I replied “Oh wow – a T16!”.

    in reply to: Charles Church warbirds #1389814
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    That’ll be the SM520 at Thruxton – another two seater.

    Mark

    Yes but it was made at Airframe Assemblies and left there earlier this year. yes?

    in reply to: Charles Church warbirds #1389817
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    Do you know I could have sworn RR232 was a two seater last time I saw it.

    Mark

    Hmm, SM520 is certainly a T9 (see pic on AA’s website), the restoration of RW382 is also, I understand, to be a 2-seater and now RR232? Do they only do 2-seaters down there nowadays 😀 ?

    in reply to: Charles Church warbirds #1389844
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    The Walrus W2718 was owned (and still is) by Mr Melton. G-HUNN was flown to Duxford from Roundwood after its sale but did not stay very long.

    in reply to: Spitfires At Airshows #1389852
    Mustang Fan
    Participant

    It was pretty much a new-build, apart form the obvious items that were not re-manufactured such as oleos, wheels, instruments, spade grip, engine etc. In those days you could do that. The serial was one of a collection of ex-Aussie dataplates in Mr Meltons ownership and was chosen virtually at random, or so I was told.

    In other words, how much of the original EE606 was in the machine flying in 1989?, err none! Mark 12??

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 72 total)