dark light

powerandpassion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • powerandpassion
    Participant

    Another fascinating pathway followed was ‘cold welding’, where, under vacuum, in the absence of heat, the crystal structure of a metal will merge with an adjacent, similar crystal structure. It is very counterintuitive, and only emerged in the 60’s in association with spacecraft, out of a dreadful experience in the early Gemini program, where a door could not be shut after a spacewalk. In this case, the door hinges had started to ‘cold weld’. Another example was the failure of a solar ‘umbrella’ to open as the stays cold welded together. So great care is taken in modern spacecraft to ensure no direct contact between similar metals. In a crankshaft application, its all about grain flow, determined in the original forging process. So the theory is that cold welding does not disturb the original grain flow. In theory, you could centrifugally cast identical crankshaft alloy into sleeves, creating a linear grain flow in the sleeve, which would be ideal in a ‘journal surface’. This machined sleeve could then be clamped to a prepared, cleaned, old journal, and the lot put in a vacuum chamber. After a few weeks, the join between the new sleeve and the old journal surface might be indistinguishable. I can’t think of a better way to preserve the original grain flow in the crankshaft while building up the journal surface to ‘as new’. Only way to find out is to try. Another option is fine laser engraving of the new journal surface for optimum oil holding properties. 

    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Some analyses of one sectioned Cheetah crank were done pre Covid and determined high embedded stresses in the surface of the journal. By going back to old Aircraft Engineering periodicals an article emerged showing AS factory practice was to place a finish machined crankshaft in a jig, camped in bearings, while the crankshaft was run by an electric motor, in facsimile of an installed crankshaft. The purpose was ‘work hardening’ of the journal surface, prior to the advent of nitriding, which only came into use in the WW2 period. So the ‘embedded stresses’ in the surface were purposeful work hardening. Its the combination of yellowing old books and modern forensic techniques that explains a lot. It seemed to work, as most Cheetah crankshafts you find are within limits, while they must have done a lot of hours in largely training aircraft. 

    powerandpassion
    Participant

    For the record, a 1936 Air Ministry standard for Acceptance Tests for aircooled and liquid cooled engines was obtained, as well as AS factory procedures for resolving various issues with Cheetah components. So enough data to satisfy an inspector of the day in regard to this engine type. 

    powerandpassion
    Participant

    I have a copy of AP1526 Vol II Schedule of Fits and Clearances, Cheetah IX & X. It’s a lot of pages and no time to scan. If your friend is on FB or Messenger or Whatsapp then its easy to snap and send a particular page, but not 50…

    in reply to: Part's ID query from NZ #761741
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    MG firing solenoids? 

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762363
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    With a little bit more sleuthing the Korect Depth Gauge Co becomes the more familiar KDG gauge company, though by 1935 the more familiar WW2 type KDG fuel gauge with ‘no internal tank components’ appears on ads. So the query gauge, relying on internal tank components, is in the 20’s – early 30’s period

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762367
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Fargo, thanks for the Solent contact

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762368
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Nicko, nice work on Korect gauges and bolt deciphering, thank you!

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762372
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    gauge face and side

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762375
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Here is a fuel gauge with Supermarine on the dial face, capacity 54 gallons, hopefully an indicator of application. The gauge was operated by  pushing something like a priming pump. I can only guess how the system worked, as I would assume the fuel tank was vented, so you could not pressurize the tank to get some form of pressure reading translating as fuel level. I am familiar with Televel gauges which used a float on a wire within the fuel tank, but this has no similar mechanism. It is definitely pre electric, with a 3090 drawing number. 

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762377
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    I have found one photo of a trim wheel on Short Singapore, a 1926 design, hosted on the IWM archives site. In the antipodes, only the RNZAF operated four Singapores, which were eventually scuttled in Fiji. A Kestrel pusher engine remains from a RNZAF Singapore in the excellent MOTAT Museum. Though the wheel looks very familiar to the Short Singapore arrangement, it is more ‘bent down’ than the query wheel. I am thinking that the query wheel may still fit a Napier Lion Seagull III, given the roof mounting arrangement, the Australian context, era and lack of roof for Southhampton.  

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762410
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Dover patent related to ‘Exonite’, a form of cellulose nitrate covering common on cars in the 1920’s.

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762413
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Hand scale

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762415
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Bolt head stamp

    in reply to: Supermarine Southampton or Seagull III parts #762417
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Dover patent stamp

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 1,241 total)