dark light

powerandpassion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 1,241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Historic Aviation Material Standards #799088
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation

    The complete CAC Materials Standards catalogue has now been digitised, over 400 Standards that relate to aircraft and engines of British, French, Italian and American design. On the website only a part of these is displayed as the mind numbing task of formatting individual files to be downloadable has exceeded the budget of patience available in 2017. If you are after a copy of a particular file, use the Contact button to get in touch.

    The entire collection of CAC aircraft and engine drawings, exceeding 650,000 negatives, is in the process of being digitised at ANAN Moorabbin Air Museum. It is envisaged that this process will take 5 years, but at the end of the process individual drawings for every nut and bolt of engines from the RR Merlin to 1960’s jets will be digitized, and airframes from the North American derived Wirraway to Mustang to Sabre will be available.

    As a side project, based on the original drawings of the CA-15 ‘Kangaroo’ within the Archive, an accurate cockpit is being constructed for display in 2018.

    https://www.facebook.com/CA15Kangaroo/

    in reply to: Historic Aviation Material Standards #799092
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    AGS

    Over 500 AGS standards from the 1930’s – 60’s are available. An AGS standard may consist of a number of pages, with updates to a particular page being indicated by a revision number, eg AGS 673-3 (Revision 3). In general, I have placed a number of versions of the same AGS in sequential order, by date, incorporating a number of revisions, while the file can only be practically identified by one revision. In this case I have labelled the file with the latest revision number. By reference to the revision number, the AGS appropriate to the era of interest will become apparent.

    Some documents are provided that translate AGS to later equivalent or substitute AS or British Standards.

    Many AGS for 1920’s -30’s aircraft relate to bolts, screws and rivets which are re-mustered under later British Standards.

    in reply to: Historic Aviation Material Standards #799094
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Just in time for Christmas, another 1,990 historical material standards are now available at http://www.silverbiplanes.com
    In total, nearly 3,000 historical material standards have now been digitised and are available for free download, for the purpose of enabling the safe restoration of historic aircraft.

    Forum members have been generous in digging out and sharing fantastic material : Cold Kiwi, Aircraft Clocks and Graham A, thank you ! If I have neglected to mention your contribution publicly, and a document of yours appears in the lists (RR Materials), it is either because my brain has boiled or because you are too valuable and special to be hung out like laundry on the forum. In all cases, thank you for your generosity !

    As curator of the ANAM Moorabbin Museum Archives I was privileged in 2017 to receive an extraordinary donation from the family of the late Flt Lt Kevin Kerle (1942-2004), who spent 28 years in the RAAF. Amongst his roles was the co-ordination of technical manuals for the Air Force, which included disposals of obsolete material clogging bases and stores. Kevin was an historian and contributor to many well researched articles and publications on aviation history. One of his extraordinary contributions was to fulfill the directives of higher command to dispose off unwanted publications in large waste skips, and tick the appropriate paperwork to confirm that this was officially done. On the way home he would then back his car up to the waste skip and legally fill the boot with this material, which in the end became nearly 20 metric tonnes donated to the ANAM Moorabbin Archives ! From this extraordinary collection have come British Standards from the 1920’s to 60’s, rare English language analyses of wartime Japanese aircraft materials and structures and other gems which the hard working volunteers of the archives have sorted and continue to catalog. Flt Lt Kerle, I tip my hat, Sir.

    Additional material has been sourced from the Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation collection within ANAM Moorabbin Museum Archives, including an extraordinary body of historical AGS from the CAC Lidcombe engine manufacturing plant Inspection department.

    Finding, sorting, scanning, file naming and configuring documents to be downloadable files on desktop and tablet computers takes many, many hundreds of hours. It is not possible to provide all the material found on the website. If you are searching for a particular material standard that does not appear in the current lists it may be in the pile waiting for scanning in 2018. If you do have any old material standards looking for a good home, they would always be gratefully received if you make use of the Contact button on the website.

    Brief summaries of newly available material are given below.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #800773
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    B side

    Easier than transcribing !

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #801585
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Beermat, for the sake of your legacy, and for some thumb sarking infant that will be searching this thread in 25 years time, you should repeat the table here, in respect of hydromatics. The scintillating conclusions may be lost on the other thread.

    This field is filled with vendor driven confusion and unhelpfulness, driven by an archaic, low cost IP protection strategy, which is to keep information out of the public domain. It goes against the spirit of the times, where youngsters today are growing up with ‘open source’ software, and cracking open closed information systems. The commerciality of aluminium props for historic piston aircraft is so marginal, you wish that someone would just open the door and let it go, but I suspect that the folks in charge now don’t really have the understanding of the topic that the 1960’s engineer did, so can’t find an informed basis to make a decision about this material. It sits in the too hard, too marginal basket. It looks like the US palmed it off to the Czechs, and USD sales to Texan oilmen with Mustangs still makes some Pilsner drinking accountant see big windfalls, so prices stay up. A few sales a year of custom jobs averages out OK. It’s a formula that suppresses the growth of the historic scene.

    The lack of commerciality is driven by the tightness of 95% of wallets in historic work – the obvious preference is to adapt second hand goods rather than invest in the eye watering cost of new forgings, or even a finished product from a suitable vendor. Somewhere in here the requirement for new, sound blades, obscure LH tractor blades and ‘once offs’ needs a solution, but it will never make you a millionaire. It really is a labour of love. If you want to see more stuff in the air, some other commercial formula has to evolve.

    The only weird idea that might work is to rent blades, ie use your knowledge to find/adapt suitable blades then rent them out. It’s buy cheap (your money), sell dear (over time), basically vendor finance the end user, break down the cashflow so more things can fly safely and affordably. Somebody has to stump up the risk capital and face the pressure of trying to make that capital work. It’s really a labour of love, trying to at least preserve capital, making judgement calls on what to stock, to preserve the capacity. Historic prop making is a fabulous way not to make money.

    I sense this is a temporary opportunity, adapting still plentiful HS material washing around the world into custom applications. In the fullness of time Jablo type blades fitted into a universal ‘historic’ hub/prop shaft combo can keep things going for 100 years.

    What I notice is a diminishing pool of aluminium blade shops with a diminishing pool of grey heads which doesn’t bode well for the next 25 years. Also some crazy, mystery grinding creating mystery profiles, albeit with the right numbers. Grinding is a thankless task and you won’t find too many aerodynamicists with a grinder in hand. The pool of experience from the 1940’s to 60’s, that you could expect an informed result from a supervised labourer, might not be there anymore. Who cares, as long as the thing is balanced. Performance doesn’t matter any more. Folks are maybe doing interesting, secret things matching Tracker and Trojan blades to WW2 types and there will be more and more of this, without any regulator having the experience to make a judgement call on it. It’s like radium dials, waiting for some catastrophe to spur a response….

    In the meantime you can become to go to guy to resolve dilemas. Here’s the 1947 groups and 6127, enjoy !

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #802101
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Recent finds (finally) : Hamilton Standard Catalog 130 (1947) and 130B (1958) , with blade station tables! With blade station tables!! With blade station tables!!!
    1947 presents blades in similar ‘families’ or groups. The closer the group to each other, the closer they seem to be in design. With the blade station tables, you can run your finger across the data and start to see ‘what will match with what’, in terms of whittling an apple into an orange.

    Now I am thinking of getting a uni student to transcribe station data into an excel, to create basic line graphs, to get a ‘shape’ of data. This shape could then be shifted up or down the stations to get a sense of which profile is being shifted up or down to develop different affects. Now I am a dumbo at maths, so I am open to other ideas on how to find commonalities across this data.

    There is also Rotol File 200A : Rotol Propeller Data which lists which Rotol airscrew is used on various British types.

    in reply to: Sískin #803299
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Jettison pull

    Jettison pull

    in reply to: Colour Code For Anti Glare Green On Bristol Bulldog #803309
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    The next best

    This was the next best Federal match – you are going to have to find US Federal specs for the 1960’s to navigate from here…all the best, Ed2

    in reply to: Colour Code For Anti Glare Green On Bristol Bulldog #803322
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Some US Federal colours

    I could not make an accurate match with the closest Federal colours – there seems to be a little more yellow in NIVO in comparison. This colour chip had a variation which was marked Chinook, presumably with more white in it.

    in reply to: Colour Code For Anti Glare Green On Bristol Bulldog #803337
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Not olive drab green

    Within the Archive is a box of colour chips from the RAAF in the early 60’s, which I assume are US Federal. The same colours are repeated in Matt, Semi Matt and Gloss. The chips in the photos are Matt. In the first instance I compared a 1960’s Australian Olive Drab Green, which was used on everything from tanks to toilets, and it was quite different.

    in reply to: Colour Code For Anti Glare Green On Bristol Bulldog #803345
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Finally NIVO

    A fascinating topic, and never knew what NIVO stood for, until now. NIVO has perplexed me for a long time as it was used on RAAF Bulldogs, so getting an accurate colour match is desired. Thankfully an original RAAF Bulldog prop, coated in NIVO, has been found and is shown here on display in the Archives of ANAM Moorabbin Air Museum. Also on display is a Wapiti prop covered in NIVO. Above the Wapiti prop is an Australian Demon prop with black coated fabric coming away. The light here is fluorescent, but a sense of why some recollections of NIVO describe it as ‘almost black’ can be appreciated while looking at the props from a distance. NIVO has a capacity to absorb a lot of the spectrum and it makes sense that it was used for anti glare panels, while still being effective at close range as camo for land or sea.

    in reply to: Fairey IIID research #803366
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    For the sake of the public record a complete set of drawings exist at ANAM Moorabbin Archives for the fabrication of floats for Fairey IIID floatplane as used by the RAAF. These are the same type you can see on the Portuguese Fairey IIID displayed in the Portuguese Museum. These drawings will be digitized over 2018.
    Ed

    in reply to: Midland Aircraft Recovery Group Mid 1980's old Hands? #804993
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Would the Midland ARG ever allow the remains to be used as an ID for a flying Bulldog restoration, if this ever happened……

    in reply to: Sískin #804998
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    A great project. Re the photo of the cockpit and the physical panel display, in the position of the RPM indicator (photo) you have placed the Height gauge (physical display) – does the physical display reflect a Canadian setup ? An RPM indicator surely must be there… My eye was drawn to that spot because I think we also have here in Oz a bomb jettison pull handle for you, in the photo to the right and below the RPM gauge, above the CC gear hand pump. The one here has ‘Jettison’ written on a similar looking handle, and I presume the Siskin had a cable release system… keep shovelling that snow away from the workshop door !

    in reply to: U / C Ram identification – please #804999
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Mosquito rams have steel bodies, made by Lockheed hydraulics (AIR). Steel pipe body with aluminium end pieces is not super uncommon, cheap and cheerful to make in wartime. The eye fitting at the end of the shiny and the small anchoring hole are making me think aircraft, looks like a bomb door jack, two way ram with long tongues on anchor piece allowing articulation. Miles Master and Oxford had Lockheed hydraulics. An AIR part number will confirm this. I would punt it is ‘aircraft with bomb doors’ adapted for agricultural use.

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 1,241 total)