dark light

powerandpassion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Supermarine Aviation Works Ltd #844021
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    So the story appears to be as follows. (BMANC) was established in April 1923 as a joint venture between Supermarine, Southern Railways and the Asiatic Petroleum Co
    In 1926 Supermarine reconfigured the Woolston Works to incorporate facilities and equipment necessary for a metal-working division.

    Reading between the lines and reflecting on Big Oil in the 1920’s investing in inventions that would increase the use of petroleum products you have to admire the oil money risk capital that went into converting a loss making boat shop into a loss making developer of sleek racing planes, punting on more prosiac Admiralty contracts for elephantine flying boats.
    I understand the Air Ministry stipulated in 1926 that all service aircraft would henceforth have to be made of metal, pushing Armstrong Siddely to convert the timber Siskin into the all steel Siskin III, Bristol’s to develop the strip steel Bulldog, Hawkers to develop the steel Hart family and it appears Supermarine to have a tense directors’ meeting to resolve to tip in a fortune to setup a metal working shop…
    Vickers was a child of Royal Dutch Shell, that made money out of Army troop carriers, Fleet torpedo carriers and a lot of ugly biplanes that never seemed to go into scale development. You can imagine the frustrated Directors meeting at Vickers where some bewhiskered titan resolved to buy Mitchell…
    The way I understand this period is by reference to to all the extraordinary dealing, spectacular failures and overnight fortunes made out of the dot com boom and Silicon Valley. Neville Shute’s “Slide Rule”, in his admission of the heart condition brought on through his experience of establishing and running Airspeed, fobbing off creditors and chancing deals that could turn fortunes overnight is a wonderful insight into what the silent bricks of Supermarine would say, if they could talk..

    in reply to: Supermarine Aviation Works Ltd #844023
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    The writing on the gauge refers to Supermarine drawing 3090, which is the main tank for the Seagull III, which you guys were flying, say the main tank held 100gals, so two tanks of 50gals each

    Thank you Schneiderman for a S6 speed type reply!

    in reply to: Mosquito wheel tyre removal #844139
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Corrhextion

    What I know see with the Marstrand tyre, referencing the wheel, is that the inner bead is hexagonal

    To avoid a hex I must correct that the bead is decagonal rather than hexagonal. I figure you don’t see this type of bead much and maybe it is a consequence of designing a small tyre to fit within an airframe and large mass or high landing speed of airframe. The streamline tyre in the picture is not a Mosquito tyre, but this seems to be a Dunlop innovation.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246865[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Supermarine Aviation Works Ltd #844149
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Supermarine petrol gauge

    Sorry to go off topic but would any of you Supermarine sleuths know what this interwar petrol gauge came off ? From Australia.:very_drunk:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246863[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246864[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Roman Numerals, Why? #844380
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Bre11t is very confusing too….

    in reply to: Roman Numerals, Why? #844382
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    simplex ut difficilius est 🙂

    in reply to: Throttle box to identify… #844767
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Phillips and Powis fingerprints

    The Miles Master I and III have the same throttle and mixture levers, in a similar box, but the friction damping knob is on the mixture side, while yours is on the throttle side. Your labeling implies you box was on the port side, throttle nearside. The Master had an additional pitch control,nearside. So maybe an early Phillips and Powis fixed pitch trainer?

    What’s that whining sound?! Mosquito! Far more interesting to see a Mozzie throttle!!:)

    in reply to: Mosquito wheel tyre removal #844801
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    assabout

    In normal engineering you nibble the nuts, then the main course, then dessert. In other words you start with a specification, prepare tooling and materials, then you make the part.

    With old stuff you would prefer to do it this way, but either the plans are missing or the materials are not available or you only have a corroded piece in you hand that you have to drive backwards into an understanding of how it was made. Often the jigsaw sits on the shelf waiting for some essential piece to become available. There is a danger in this, in that it can sit on the shelf for years, and you can corrode away, and then the final, missing piece is given to you when you are on a ventilator, which teeters between helpful and frustrating. I have to admit, most of the joy is in putting together the jigsaw, in the hunt and the companionship of the hunt. But if you want to build a house, you have to start chopping wood, and trust to things falling into place along the way. So I have to admit that this journey to make a wheel was started with no plans, no material spec, just a corroded old wheel.

    And around this, gathered in silent contemplation, a small group of practical, talented men drawn to the puzzle. But along the way we have found original material specifications and now even original plans; the delight is, they confirm what we already know. But now we can present a coherent engineering project for UC, done nuts, main course and dessert. You wouldn’t credit it at the beginning, it looked like the inside of a compost heap, but it all falls into place if you try.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246786[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246787[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Mosquito wheel tyre removal #844808
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Tail tale

    Here is the Mosquito tailwheel, which comes apart in a similar way to the mainwheel, and is also made from magnesium.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246780[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246781[/ATTACH]

    I am finding there is a surprising amount of magnesium in the Mosquito design, in all sorts of places, from small brackets to the housing of the windshield wiper mechanism. For the moment we will stick with the undercarriage, because this is made from a class of impact resisting magnesium, cast and heat treated.

    With each pour we need to retain samples of the cast material for testing, to make sure the ‘as cast’ material meets spec. So the plan is to make all the patterns necessary for a single casting session of the correct DTD material. In fact, an old pitted original wheel of the correct specification may be melted down in the crucible to be recast as a sound, new wheel, the same wheel with it’s crystals reset, made young and beautiful again.

    So the patternmaker does his stuff :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246782[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246783[/ATTACH]

    This particular wheel takes a heavy, rubber Marstrand tyre, named after its inventor. It features two prominent rubber protrustions that are angled towards each other. This creates a self centering action in the castoring tailwheel, addressing a tendency for a plain streamline wheel to set up a ground loop in the Mosquito. Here is a Marstrand tyre on what I think is a deHavilland jet nose wheel :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246784[/ATTACH]

    What I know see with the Marstrand tyre, referencing the wheel, is that the inner bead is hexagonal, no doubt to stop the tyre from spinning on the rim under the stress of landing. I don’t think Marstarnd tyres or tyres with hexagonal beads are around anymore. Do we use a 70 year old NOS Marstrand tyre or do we adopt a different, modern tailwheel to the Mosquito ? Do we make a pattern to fit a hexagonal bead or do we redesign the wheel casting to take a modern, off the shelf tyre ? In other words to we take the chairlift or start to climb Mt Everest ? Well, I figure this is about the journey so we will have to investigate how Marstrand tyres are made, starting at Everest base camp with a casting pattern for a Marstrand tyre with hexagonal bead. It might make a good door stop.

    in reply to: Italian WWII Suicide Squadron #844984
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    I have 1938-39 US magazines that describe this phenomenon as Fascist Italian strategy, so it was in the ether as Mediterranean loquacity before its expression in actuality in Leyte and Okinawa, with a less humorous, practical folk. Always an indicator of hollow logic and cruel leadership. Generally lasts for the span between an older and younger brother, both lost to this dead end idea.

    in reply to: The notorious Centaurus #845077
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Fedden Butler = FB. Fedden was the celebrity chef while Butler cut the onions, but the coding acknowledges it was a team effort. I wonder what the power to weight ratio is between 3350 and Centaurus?

    in reply to: Sískin #848265
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    It’s amazing what they can do these days with computer simulations! Even the grease looks real.

    in reply to: Bristol Bulldog flight info #849266
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Spin recovery

    Folks, I am looking for inforamtion on the flight characteristics of the Bulldog.

    Attached are spin recovery notes from RAAF Bulldog pilot recollections :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246577[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: GAF Canberra A84-226 on the move #849535
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Another great move.
    Moorabbin is turning from a great little Museum into a great, big Museum, well done.

    in reply to: Help with Bristol Bulldog Boost Gauge #849540
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Not from NZ, from UK. Something not right, call for a beer…

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,241 total)