dark light

powerandpassion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Turn RH tractor prop blade to LH tractor #865595
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    deHavilland forging blades, when Britain made things.

    Courtesy of “Metallurgy for Aircraft Engineers, Inspectors” 1946 by RA Beaumont are these fantastic photos of the forging of prop blades, which have explained the process of making blades most usefully to me. Most surprising was the Robertson rolling mill, quite an efficient solution, with a single die transforming a billet to aerofoil. As this is a British enterprise, we will say aerofoil, not airfoil. I believe an airfoil in today’s Republic is what is held together by gel for Mr Trump by his hair stylist. In the photo below a single billet is shown in the process of transformation through the rolling mill.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246033[/ATTACH]

    Here is the rear of the same mill, to show more detail of the forming die :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246034[/ATTACH]

    Correct me if I am wrong, but LH or RH tractor is essentially ‘locked in’ during this stage, with the leading edge of the aerofoil facing either left or right.
    You can’t use the same rolling die to, say, feed in the billet from the rear of the machine to change the leading edge position, because the billet can only be fed in one way. So to make a LH tractor blade, you need a different rolling die to the one used for a RH tractor blade, nyet tovarish?
    But at least the rolling die provides four manipulations out of the one lump of metal, rather than a requirement for four lumps of metal in a traditional hammer forging process.

    What is also clear in this process is the close finish to final dimensions in this primary process. I always imagined that traditional forging would produce a rough blank that would then be heavily machined. Therefore you could admit into the realm of possibility using the rough forging for one type of large blade as the basis for machining out a different, smaller profile, but nien, mein liebe Herr.

    The next step is using a hammer forge to ‘twist’ the aerofoil to give it its bite into the air. Again, I think that this die must be different for LH and RH tractor, as the die must accomodate the preform from the rolling mill, n’est ce pas ma petite lapinette rose?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246035[/ATTACH]

    Again, surprising for me, was the final upending operation, classified in my mind with stuff like the secret to making fried ice cream. Specifically, how the steel thrust washer was ‘captured’ on the blade shank, like one of those bottles of liqueur with a full pear inside it. I always imagined some grim, deaf East End jockey type with a peak cap holding a blade vertically under a drop hammer as the shank was ended…but no, it is elegantly done with a hydraulic press, quite brilliant. The thrust washer is slipped on and one ram holds the shank down while another upends, like an engine valve form.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246036[/ATTACH]

    I do, however, expect to see the chap in the photo at the tip of the blade one day perched on a high stool in Heaven, running a disapproving finger down my list of sins as I wait at The Gates. I always enjoy these old photos for what they capture of the workers, and you could write a book out of some of the faces..

    And finally all the stages of the process laid out on the grass. Fairly big blade. LH tractor? What is clear in the process is minimal rough machining.
    Obviously this would be the most efficient use of scarce aluminium, but no doubt aligning the material grain to most effectively handle service stresses.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246037[/ATTACH]

    So I am guessing you cannot make a LH tractor blade out of RH tractor blade tooling, no mate?

    in reply to: Turn RH tractor prop blade to LH tractor #865628
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    I would be grateful if anybody can positively ID it.

    Target towing winch prop.

    in reply to: Hamilton Standard 130A/B Manual #865637
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Close but no cigar

    Matt,

    I find that these kind of documents are held on the dusty shelves of old offices in which an old man will sit, quietly oiling a shotgun, muttering about flash pilots and unpaid bills for blade grinding. As they basically constitute the intellectual property of blade grinding they are passed out of the coffin of a departed grinder into the hands of their apprentice. As the art fades and the apprentices go for easier work you may find the information becomes easier to get at if you show genuine interest.

    I think I did stumble on what you are wanting but only had the wit to copy a few pages instead of sprinting for the door. Maybe the big rottweiler looking at me had something to do with my timidity. As you can see this 130B looks like a 1960’s edition, but most probably has most of the blades of interest in it. This one is in the USA. No doubt there is another at the bottom of some box. I would recommend contacting your local blade grinder to see what they have.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246025[/ATTACH]

    The way I saw this worked out on the blade was thus :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246026[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]246027[/ATTACH]

    Upon enquiry it was explained that the first 12″ dimension is the distance from the centre of the hub. As the blade is loose on the bench, I assumed that there is a set distance from the shank end, for a particular shank size, that establishes this 12″ position, and the other stations are worked out from there.
    Ed

    in reply to: Canadian Typhoon Project #866321
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Now just imagine, in a live two way conversation, the scintillating, “oh, you mean the 14 foot blades for Typhoon, I thought you meant paint scraping blades on your post…I’ve got a shed full of NOS deHavilland blades” all coming out of a live streaming event! So what you do is get someone who wasn’t born with the first Trudeau to connect a conferencing speaker phone to a web server set up to stream conversations, (plenty of providers live streaming auctions or company general meetings) then put the kid on a milk crate next to a laptop where I can email a question (even post on this forum) that your team can then answer live! You can even instantly get the kid to post an image of the watchyamacallit you might be talking about on the forum. Of course you will record the interaction for posterity. Now imagine if you could simultaneously connect Tiffy drivers in the UK, Canada, New Zealand and Australia? All this good karma will return in elusive parts and drawings! Just run it at time that is not 3am in Australia please!

    in reply to: Canadian Typhoon Project #866335
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Ian, your project is breaking a lot of ground in transparency and demonstration of old and new technologies. So can we please have a live streaming event with the ability to email questions please! Being one ocean away makes it difficult to attend!

    in reply to: RIP Pat Hassell RRHT Vice Chairman #866338
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    I benefitted from Pat’s prompt, helpful and generous assistance with information only recently. His was a generous spirit that represented the best you could hope for from a custodian. It was a shock to hear of his passing. I hope that his family can take a level of comfort from a life lived in passion until the end, a slide rule in hand. Thank you, Sir.

    in reply to: Servicing of Radioactive Instruments #866341
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    There are a number of threads that touch on this issue and invariably recoil then lapse into silent indecision. Let’s call this one the rectal digital examination of historical aviation that could manage a prostrate issue, but ends up being not done, to be faced ‘another day.’ In simple terms radium emits radiation which excites luminescence from the zinc sulphide in dial paint. Over decades the zinc sulphide breaks down and the dial paint no longer glows. The radium component, however, continues to emit radiation. If you ingest old dial paint or dust by opening a gauge, into your lungs or mouth via your fingers, you ingest a harmful radioactive substance. Never open a gauge or trifle with dial paint. The radium emits in all directions. Therefore, over decades, the aluminium of the gauge face, or the innards of the gauge may become irradiated. So the proper delousing of your gauge needs a thoughtful approach. In the end, a thoughtful approach means proper delousing will cost money. That means a small group of rare gauges might be treated and certified, while a larger group of gauges will not. I know of no service that will do this, given the cost of disposal for radioactive waste and the cost of safe infrastructure to treat gauges without harming personnel exposed to this task for 8 hours per day. These costs intersecting with a large body of collectors without the funds to support such an initiative. Perhaps Museums have funds to do this properly, but not the space in budgets. There is an opportunity for somebody to set up the right service, based on bulk servicing of a number of Museums, in order to create the cashflow to sustain the right type of solution. Ie, get 10 Museums to agree to treat 100 gauges each, 2 per month for 4 years, and use this bulk order to set things up properly. Then individual collectors could piggy back on this with individual gauges, if the economics stack up. In simple terms a certified, treated gauge would have more value, and more future, than one that is not. Until such a solution is available, like Walt Disney in cryogenic storage, do not disturb any gauge.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #869869
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Having another stab at this, and a glass of wine :

    Assuming that P&W R-2800 has a SAE60 shaft, then the appropriate hub would be 23E60, which from the outside looks like the 23E50 you see on a Dakota. The principal difference is in the spider taking a larger diameter shaft.
    and
    You have an engine with an SAE60 shaft looking for a 3 bladed prop setup capable of taking up to 2,500 HP
    and
    We are stuck with the reality that there is a lot of excess US Hamilton Standard material floating around, and that UK deHavilland material is as common today as a pimply faced youth giving up their seat on a bus
    and
    You are open to machining a new SAE60 output shaft

    1. What do the R-2800 Corsair folk do? B-26 Marauder, A 26 Invader? Corsairs take HS 6507 blades, 13 & a quarter diameter limit.

    2. DC-6 take HS 6895, if you want to go to Wright R-3350 on the Lockheed Super Constellation they take HS 6903-0 blades, not sure what diameter.

    Somewhere along this yellow brick road of postwar, high power, American radials is a simple answer ! DC-6 moved to 43E60 hubs, so 23E60 progressed to 33E60 then to 43E60, encompassing hub design changes. My understanding is that the DC-6 had reversing props, so probably the blades were allowed to rotate a lot further than the simple feathering allowed in the 23E60. But E shank blades will fit an E hub, so maybe you have a Corsair hub with DC-6 blades……

    BUT,

    All the HS blades ending with an odd number are, of course, RH tractor, while you may have a weird engine with LH tractor.
    So hubs and spiders are not the challenge, blades for LH tractor are an issue.

    So, like the Beijing Museum, you put the blades on your Spitfire the wrong way around
    or
    You find there is a forging capacity for postwar US radial RH tractor blades that can output a blank that, like the Republican voter today, might actually swing to the left.

    in reply to: Aerojumble for those downunder – This Sat #869881
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Aero bearing plate

    I went today understanding this is the LARGEST AEROJUMBLE in the southern hemisphere and was pleased to find some juicy bits and this curiosity :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245876[/ATTACH]

    This is an aero bearing plate, one of the earliest devices for calculating bearing, ground speed and drift. Inscribed on the back was the RAAF serial for a DH9, A6-8, part of the Imperial Gift establishing the RAAF after WW1. A6-8 was converted to components in 1924, and most DH-9s were gone from RAAF service by 1928. This was mixed in with jet age gauges and the usual ephemera of a jumble, a piece of the earliest aircraft in RAAF service with some of the latest. You never, never know what you’ll find if you never, never go.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245877[/ATTACH]

    I was also very pleased to find a voltage regulator for a wind powered electrical generator used on later Westland Wapitis and Bristol Bulldogs, oil dilution valve for single stage Merlin Mosquito and pilot’s sliding window for Mosquito, all the necessary accessories for the man-about-town.

    The Museum was most solicitous of my nutritional needs, putting on a BBQ, and additionally arranged a blue sky day : a well organised event, thank you.:applause:

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #869910
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    No such word as no in American business.

    I was at the Moorabbin Air Museum swap meet today and ruminated beneath the wings of their most excellent Beaufighter on this issue.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245875[/ATTACH]

    It dang well looks like a 23E50 family hub with LH tractor blades on the thing, and who am I to argue when facing an aeroplane with so many machine guns?

    If a Hercules has a SBAC 6 spline then a Hamilton Standard or deHavilland licence built 23E50 hub looks like it will fit. The good thing about the museum is that there are lots of engines around to instantly compare the sizes of various prop shaft, as you do. In simple terms the P&W R-2800 engine has a very big shaft, a 2,000 HP rating explaining the need for a big shaft and many applications to US aircraft using Hamilton Standard 23E50 family hubs.

    So, instead of climbing some Himalayan mountain to find the last Yeti chewing on the last SBAC 6 spider fitting into a 23E50 family hub you might just machine the same splines as a R-2800 shaft onto a new output shaft for a rare engine. Then you could drive down to McDonalds and order a DC 6 spider with your milk shake.

    Would you like fries with that? :eagerness:

    in reply to: Sískin #872095
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Good list

    Attached is a PDF of the Siskin III & IIIa drawings acquired so far which is, I trust, of interest to some of you. John

    John, a great list and a good start.
    My take on the Siskin III is ‘materials’ as much as ‘motor’.
    The cost of re-engineering an aerostructure will exceed the savings of using available materials, so you may as well use the original materials. The original design has a massive invested cost of computations and also has a history of safe use, so is actually the most conservative path to follow.

    But of course the original materials are no longer available.

    Siskin III I understand is strip steel construction and pin jointed tube.

    I suspect the pinjointed tube is 3% nickel alloy T50 tube.
    I suspected the strip steel was DTD 99-100-54a but have seen Bristol Bulldog drawings, completed in 1928, showing BS S40 used, later overwritten with DTD 99-100-54a.

    Now I am thinking that the Siskin III being a 1926 (?) design, might be S40 in the fuselage….
    Do any of your drawings detail material specifications and gauge of the strip steel or tube materials.

    I am looking at these materials and their availability for various strip steel designs. It would be good to know what the material requirements are for a flying Siskin III.

    in reply to: BRISTOL BULLDOG RADIO MAST #874596
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Where all the spikes from WW1 German helmets went…

    Mate, here it is, nothing that couldn’t be lathed up :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245763[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245764[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245765[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]245766[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Attempted Restoration of 6A/269 Rubber Watch Holder #875857
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Polyurethane

    Guys
    I have an actual mould
    If someone could identify a good product that is two part , thin enough to pour into the mould and is flexible like rubber once it cures , then I can make
    hundreds of these holders.

    Polyurethane is a two part elastomer that comes in a wide range of formulations providing a wide range of results. The bushes you might see used in aftermarket car suspension systems are cast polyurethane as is foam cavity filler used to insulate around plumbing entries through walls. The Germans developed polyurethane during the war as a rubber substitute. (I think they were actually trying to make a coffee substitute but the cup kept bouncing off the floor):)

    There are many suppliers of polyurethane. Open up the phone directory and they will be there. Take an original holder in or ask them to recommend a black polyurethane formulation of a similar hardness or durometer to natural vulcanised rubber. You will need some release agent to stop the polyurethane sticking to the tooling. Some polyurethanes will set without heat, generating an exothermic heat during the chemical reaction. Some set with external heat.

    I will take a few watch holders! How did you end up with this tooling ? Any more tooling ?

    in reply to: Attempted Restoration of 6A/269 Rubber Watch Holder #875956
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Another substitute for rubber is Sugru.

    QldSpitty, love it and luv u, even though you are from Qld and love Spitfires! I think I will sugru my face, create a bit of a mantlepiece bust out of cast plaster, share some of the goodness with future generations ! I do enjoy new products like this.

    So now you can CAD up a rubber part, 3D print a male and female mold, and sugru out a finished part.
    Now I wonder if black sugru will sort out spade grip material….

    in reply to: Attempted Restoration of 6A/269 Rubber Watch Holder #875989
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Interesting info. Always wondered about how to restore and stabilise old tyres, for display.
    British rubber came from Malaya up till 1941, after that I understand South American rubber kept the show on the road. I always wonder where the Germans got their rubber, unless via Vichy France and Indochina. Still you had to ship it, using neutral shipping, but how would a submarine know? The history and struggle of Allied merchant marine is known, but I wonder about the Axis merchant marine.

    Lack of access to raw rubber meant the use of more recycled rubber crumb. In grappling with the modern problem of vulcanised tyre recycling, a great body of scientific literature exists on the topic from WW2. But this was more for applications like tank wheel lining or solid rubber tyres for artillery pieces. I doubt whether raw rubber watch holders were used after 1941, as much as the old fob watch was replaced by the wrist watch. The old rubber watch holders would be made from high quality rubber. I understand that aircraft tyres would require high quality rubber : there was a great movement towards standardisation of tyre sizes to make use of rubber more efficient. I understand the development of polyurethanes and nylons was the key way Germany dealt with the rubber tyre question. Dealing with the chemistry of early polyurethanes would be very challenging.

    I understand that in any vulcanised natural rubber presentation some material would remain unvulcanised : that a solvent may ‘swell’ some part of a formulation to create some pliability. Rubber science is quite established and accessible, even though most rubber product manufacturing has shifted to China. A good ,practical understanding of rubber chemistry might be got from the local retreader, and they might have some insight into compounds that affect rubber.

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,241 total)