dark light

powerandpassion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 1,241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Global Parts Shipping,All In Good Time. #880254
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Ozjag,
    Thank you for the comments, all helps to resolve how things can work and not work.
    In terms of buyers wanting stuff immediately they can always do things anyway they chose. I figure in my experience things always come piecemeal – stuff sits on the shelf until other stuff that makes it viable to progress an aspect of a project becomes available. In the past I have gagged to have the satisfaction of holding something in my hands but then I reflect it sits on my shelf waiting for another enabling bit that may be months or years away. The key thing is to ‘know it is available and on the way’ rather than air freighted at great cost like a perishable.

    In terms of predicting when a shipment might be full, you are right, it may never be ‘full.’ But what is full ? A tea chest or a 20′ shipping container ? It doesn’t really matter. Perhaps the way to start this off is to do two shipments per year – one in June and one in December. Whatever is there, is there, when the truck arrives to pick it up. Maybe quarterly – March, June, Sept, Dec. For me, having a depot in the UK where I can send stuff that I might buy is quite useful, as it might be for somebody in the UK buying out of Australia. I find that I can get 2014 aluminium in the UK but only 2024 in Australia, while somebody restoring a US design in the UK might have trouble getting US type material in the UK. I would find it useful to combine small quantities of materials and bits at a depot knowing that I have them and that they will be safely dispatched. I might want to buy part of somebody’s library or bid on an auction on the other side of the world with some option for getting things handled locally.

    Freight forwarders do everything from mangos to mining equipment. Their standard, initial response is to say ‘no problem, leave it to me’. If it’s a 23 year old they then put down the phone and call out across the room , ” I’ve got this cranky old goat who wants to move a rusty undercarriage, is that a steam train or elastic support underwear or something ?” Then they flip through charts of custom codes and try to figure out how to combine a rusty undercarraige and mangos in one shipment leaving next week. If it’s too hard for them then the whole thing becomes hard for everybody.

    In respect of import duties small parcels today tend to get lost in the cavalcade of online ordered lipstick and Nike shoes, but the government will eventually catch up. Most folk just undervalue things. It’s like the old joke about the dying man fearing what his wife will do with his collection : “I hope she doesn’t sell it for what I told her I bought it for!”. In truth, to a dispassionate observer, most of this stuff is scrap metal, and can be defensibly described as such. Excise on old aeroplane bits will never fix any governments budget deficit. The real danger is that officialdom catogorizes scrap metal as a modern, functional aerospace component, in a circumstance where tariffs on aerospace might be more about protecting domestic manufacture of aerospace parts. So the garage restorer is presented with a horrific excise bill for scrap metal. Mostly the government is concerned with quarantine, on greasy, soily things and an easy way to modestly tithe what comes in, by relying on well prepared documentation and declarations. I might think that a piece of the Red Barons wing fabric with Maltese cross is priceless, the government would be happier to see it declared as ‘fabric sample’, because it fits a tariff code, and it’s true.

    I don’t expect to be overrun with this concept. We are all to independent and feisty and secretive to make this hum. It does no harm to set something up and let folks know that an option exists for 2-4 bulk shipment ‘shuttles’ per year and a UK – Australia (and maybe other) depot arrangement to support getting more stuff happening.

    in reply to: Magnificent Magnetos #880379
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    New Question

    OK so that’s the Learner stuff. Now let’s get down and dirty. Who wants to explain how the magnetos on the Napier Dagger worked !

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]242858[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]242859[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Magnificent Magnetos #880402
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Official Apology

    Need to get the number of teeth right and consistent between posts! I demand a recount!

    Smirky remind me never to divide a chocolate cake up in front of you ! In the interests of aviation safety and accuracy I acknowledge my counting was as accurate as a statement by the Federal Reserve of the United States estimating total government debt, sort of approximate…

    You are correct, so I put back the beer I gulped!:very_drunk:

    in reply to: Magnificent Magnetos #880606
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Ahh Smirky, you get the beer ! But first I take the foam off the top, and maybe a gulp! You get some left in the glass for pointing out my errors. But this was too easy, it was all in the link :

    “Understanding this relationship, it is possible to understand how the 10 cylinder Armstrong Siddely Serval would have been arranged out of the same magneto body, if it had a four lobe cam driving the points. Say 10 sparks are needed per 2 revolutions of the crankshaft (full cycle) and one revolution of the rotor (full cycle). Therefore 10 sparks/4 lobes equals 2.5 revolutions of the engine to magneto drive gear during two revolutions (full cycle) of the crankshaft, or 1.25 revolutions per single revolution of the crankshaft, therefore a 1:1.25 gear running off the crankshaft.

    Then the rotor, running off the 2.5 revolutions of the engine to magneto drive gear, would need to be slowed down to 1 revolution of rotor, so we gear down 2.5:1. Say we use the same rotor cog as the v12 at 75 teeth, we would need a 30 tooth drive.”

    I will post up a photo of the spindle cog to check our prognostications, then a tougher question ! Full pint’s worth.

    in reply to: Global Parts Shipping,All In Good Time. #880612
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    For example different items attract import duties at different rates, while some may be exempt. A similar situation exists between airworthy items and non-airworthy items; IIRC even between helicopter and general aviation parts.

    Likewise some items attract VAT, while others don’t. These issues can be difficult to sort out even within a shipment from one consignee, let alone from different consignees.

    Similarly who would allocate / decide who picked up the VAT portion of the cost?

    From a customs perspective the consignee is responsible for identifying and applying the Commodity Coding to the goods and this could be difficult with ‘mixed-items’, e.g. if one item was mistakenly identified could the whole shipment be impounded? If so who would be responsible for sorting out the issues?

    Twin Otter, thank you for your comments and for identifying one of the great frustrations in the process. To clarify my thoughts :

    The principal benefit of the dropshop is to be a depot with a local, caring representative. For example a seller wishes to clear out a garage quickly, but does not have the time or temperament to deal with anyone but a local buyer. I buy a Lancaster mainwheel out of the garage over the phone and get a courier to pick it up and deliver it to Whitleys Dropshop. The seller is happy quickly clearing the garage. I am happy because I have the missing mainwheel for my project and no one is snapping at my heels to get it out of the garage while I fumble through a Minestrone soup of international freight regulations and problems, forcing me to deal with expensive freight forwarders who ONLY want to get it on as airfreight, because airfreight margins are better for them.

    Whitley lets me know the Mainwheel has arrived. I am familiar with Australian Customs and Excise as the Australian dropshop. I tell Whitley, hypothetically, that the mainwheel is suitable for classification under 34-X-989-456 Tractor Wheels and Implements. If I am wrong, I have to fix it when Customs in Australia are unhappy, but I can troop down to the local customs office and sort it out. Whitley affixes my Australian address to the wheel and Customs declaration. Whitley secures a large wooden crate, and puts the mainwheel at the bottom, then surrounds it with other items individually addressed and declared that need to go to Australia, making sure to put somebody’s bubble canopy above the wheel. Once the crate is full, he contacts a number of freight forwarders and gets the best quote for surface shipping to Australia for ONE, itemised crate, for sending to the P&P Australian Dropshop. The more we do this, the more familiar we become with quarantine, customs, excise regulations between two anglophone nations with caring representatives at each end who are able to sort out issues if they arise.

    In Australia, the freight forwarder notifies P&P that Customs have put a hold on the container, because a Quarantine sniffer dog has smelt soil in the timber crate. I rush down to the Customs office with the paperwork that Whitley has given me that shows that the mainwheel was steam cleaned using a Customs approved contractor in the UK and the timber crate was appropriately fumigated and we start to work through the issue. The crate is opened and the individual packages inspected. the dog goes crazy on one package, declared as scrap metal. It is opened and a dug up Browning falls out. I am cuffed and led away to the Police. Once I am released on bond, I ask Whitley what happened. He says the package came from someone he hadn’t dealt with before and they assured him that it was OK, just some old Hurricane tubes. We decide on a new policy : all packages sent to the dropshop are opened and checked, fumigated if necessary and returned to sender if ‘not right’. Really we need to deal with folk we know who recognise the benefit of mutuality. We also need to work cooperatively with Customs who are doing their job and whose help we need to navigate through lawful import of radium gauges and deactivated weapons, if that’s what folk want, down the track.

    This kind of service is already done for niche things like paintings, for example. All we are doing is getting a niche channel going for aeroplane parts & materials, with nice caring people who know the difference between a FW190 and ME109, a Bristol Hercules and a Lockheed Hercules.

    in reply to: Global Parts Shipping,All In Good Time. #880628
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    I would like to help you Ed. PM sent.

    Thank you, PM replied to

    in reply to: Holiday Engine Mystery #880749
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    AS Lynx?

    No beer!

    in reply to: DH Mosquito exhausts #885133
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Merry Christmas

    The twin stage supercharger of later, longer Merlins moved the exhaust stacks forward, allowing ideal, efficient exhausting via six stacks. When you look at the cowling of a twin stage, there is an intake for the intercooler radiator immediately under the spinner, ie two intakes, six stacks.

    So the single stage supercharged engine has one intake, five stacks. It is good to see the Mosquitos in Colney side by side to appreciate this. A great Museum.

    Here is the ‘Siamese’ setup :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]242703[/ATTACH]

    The Siamese is quite rare, but even rarer is the ‘Rudolph’ stealth exhaust :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]242704[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Identifying This Wreck #887415
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Neema,
    Wow ! It makes sense, if your father was capable of calculating the stress on structures, that the drawings were detailed, technically adept and authentic. What did he do for a living ? I came across mine by accident, but they reward repeat browsing. I would dearly love to see the others. I wonder if your family would support a print run, because I would definitely want to buy something like that. It is Christmas, after all !

    I can understand the reservation with the plans being relied upon for airworthy structures. But : In this case they are not original equipment manufacturer plans so would doubt that any engineer could rely upon them without independently re-engineering the structures. Again, the great problem is material substitution – it is not possible to buy the original specifications of materials detailed on the plans, so they cannot be directly used, even if they were OEM plans. There is no detail for wings in the ones I have, so nothing will fly as a consequence of them in any case. I wonder if the simple addition of a disclaimer would settle any fears. This work is far too good to be hidden away and is on par with the Aeroplane cutaway drawings that were and continue to be combined into stand alone publications over the years. Something to be proud of.

    Well printed, on 6 x 4, I would pay 100 quid each for a Bulldog, Fury etc, stick it in a postal tube and there would be quite a few sales around the world to folk like me !

    in reply to: Mosquito wheel tyre removal #887497
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    K5054NZ,
    Thank you Cus for the kind words and the suggestion to deal with Avspecs et al. I think it is important that no secrets are kept between Anzacs so I have to admit the following, after a few beers :

    1. The Australian Government has concerns about the delivery, capability and vulnerability of the F35 JSF.
    2. I have been contracted to secretly investigate options in future air capability capable of rapid, domestic production by people wearing thongs-jandals.
    3. Work conducted by the CSIR during WW2 into the use of Australian coachwood and satinwood has supported the development of plantation timber for ice cream sticks that make domestic supplies of aircraft grade timber materials suitable for Mosquito production available.
    4. Accordingly I have recommended the recommencement of Mosquito manufacture, to provide a stealth (timber construction provides a similar stealth signature to the latest Big Power designs) capability with range. Given the Mosquito is capable of 1,485 miles in B35 Cookie setup I believe it is possible to carry two Tomahawks in tandem, providing a low cost stealth platform for standoff launch at 1,600 miles. In my powerpoint demonstration of this I drew a line form Darwin to Guam to a bowl of soup in a street in Beijing. This will also handle London to Trump Tower. Given the NZD and AUD the Mosquito launch platform will cost less than the Tomahawks and can be recycled into ice cream sticks later, if required.
    5. Under CER, Closer Economic Relations between Australia and New Zealand, I expect that this production will be shared between both nations, and I am starting on the magnesium components because my deal with the Government is that they negotiate some local content in this joint program and no one does magnesium sand casting in NZ.
    6. This is secret Bro.*

    *To anybody monitoring this from a Big Power, this is a joke, unless you want to buy 200 Mosquitos, in which case we are here to do business!

    in reply to: Mosquito wheel tyre removal #888055
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Thank you for your comments, I appreciate it. Hoisting a beer, even more !

    Aerospace structures are so complex, with so many bits, that no single person can ever hope to grasp all of it. The State, through its budget, and under the spur of war, originally coordinated perhaps thousands of people into the act of channelling products of science and enterprise into a single flying mechanism. It is impossible for a single individual today, however wealthy, to compete with the resources of the State, so getting an aerospace structure restored in a garage in your spare time is a tough journey. So cooperation is key, I think, to future progress, almost the mimic of the original shadow factory – subcontractor formula that the State adopted to minimise it’s costs. So you may as well let folks know that patterns exist for castings that are cheaper by the dozen.

    While the flying mechanisms remain, the folk that the State paid to train to tend to them do not, so ‘the knowledge’ is also lost. I think it is so important to share this knowledge and to make it available to future custodians, mostly unborn. It’s also fun to tool around with molten magnesium, with a beer in hand !

    in reply to: Identifying This Wreck #888060
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Neema,
    Attachments updated. I have Siskin and Gamecock, both brilliant, 6 x 4 feet plan views, came via Ebay, looked like someone was clearing out a house. I did bump into one of the restoring team for the Gamecock who stated that they never had access to this resource during their restoration until it was late in the piece, which would be frustrating, as they are remarkably detailed and researched. Recently I found some cockpit photos of Siskin and they match the Quick drawings most accurately.
    Was there some ‘hiding the lamp under the bush’ about this work in the early 90’s? What other drawings were done in this series?

    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Great photos from an exotic location, thank you !

    in reply to: Mosquito wheel tyre removal #889365
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    In attics and on forgotten shelves are the most extraordinary old files. Buried within an old engineers notes I found true gold : a complete set of DTD specifications for all iterations of British cast magnesium. These are in fact Australian Emergency Standards, verbatim copies of long vanished DTD specs. This information can allow positive confirmation of the original magnesium used in the Mosquito wheels.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]242547[/ATTACH]

    These wheels, found in Australia, were in fact made by Kelsey of Canada, so the magnesium would no doubt be American Magnesium. A most useful publication is RAAF 314, which provided an airforce equipped with both British and American designs during WW2 with translation tables between British and US materials, to allow, for example, a British aircraft to be repaired with American materials, if the British material was not available. So an obscure DTD specification can be matched with an obscure US specification, which can be matched with a modern, confirming metallurgical analysis.

    It is so vital that these old DTD specs are preserved and made available, because they are fundamental to future work keeping antique structures in the air. If you have an old DTD spec, however obscure, I would love a copy, and ultimately I would make these freely available on the web. These are orphan specs for which there is no official custodian and no coordinated effort to preserve and make available. Nothing is more confounding than to find a drawing with a DTD material specification, and be stalled because there is no way to find the spec and progress beyond this to actually work on a part.

    in reply to: Mosquito wheel tyre removal #889494
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Today we have 3D printing, CAD drafting and other productivity improvements that promise things like short run, lower cost production of antique parts. I am a fully signed up member of this movement, but when it comes to casting parts, nothing will beat the traditional pattern maker and foundry man. Can you 3D print a magnesium casting ? In a good university, perhaps. But the great advantage of 3D printing is avoiding machining out a small part from a larger piece of metal : casting, an ancient technique, already does this. No brass bell in a cathedral was ever machined out of billet. Casting is an intrinsically efficient process, where a complex pattern is amortized against thousands of repeats with economic use of metal. When I look at modern cast engine or gearbox housings today the ancient process is alive as it ever was.

    But it is harder and harder to find a pattern maker. So, can we then dispense with the pattern maker and 3D print a pattern that would traditionally be made by hand out of wood ? Perhaps we can. But first we need a twenty something with accurate measuring skills to translate paper plans or an object into a computer object. Then the object needs to be sliced up in a way that makes sense to the foundry man, who must create an air cavity in a sandbox of the final shape, based on the pattern. In other words the pattern may have to be in two or three pieces to allow a sandbox cavity to be created. Of course the foundry man and the pattern maker will allow for the shrinkage of the metal as it cools, making their patterns larger as appropriate. Then they will understand that it is fundamental that metal flows, rather than solidifies in the wrong way in the cavity, causing porosity in the final product. They will place ‘chills’ within the sandbox to ‘freeze’ some sections of the melt before others, based on experience and intuition. So the 3D pattern needs to accomodate all these things, and be designed with this in mind. In truth we need to place the pattern maker, mollified with beer in hand, with the twenty year old CAD jockey, to coach them step by step. Then the 3D pattern will then be printed out of expensive plastic, atom by atom. The pattern maker, out of beer now and impatient, will compare the cost of this with making it out of the traditional, cheap wood. In the time taken to misuse modern productivity tools, the pattern maker, roused in indignation, will make three traditional patterns at a third of the cost. So we will stick with the pattern maker, with the smell of wood shavings and time honoured traditions with the Mosquito wheel.

    Once you get to the top of the queue the patternmaker will start drawing out the process on an old bit of wood :

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]242545[/ATTACH]

    The red parts show the final part that will be machined out of the rough casting. He adds additional material, with shrinkage factors, to allow for this. He then works out how it will all come apart to allow the foundry man a chance to make an effective sandbox. The purpose with the pattern is not to make a timber facsimilie of the final product, but one made out of air surrounded by sand, where the air will eventually be displaced by molten metal. It takes a while for me to get my head around all this, and the deeper I go the more I admire the knowledge of the pattern maker and foundry man. We discuss how it would have been done in production 70 odd years ago. We cannot do the same because we are not producing thousands of units, perhaps a handful. Modern casting also incorporates improved techniques that can be taken advantage of. In truth the wheel has been sitting on the shelf at the pattern maker for some time, whispering away as he passes, and I know that’s how this trade works, percolating at its own pace, letting thoughts roll around until they are ready. When they are they burst into quick execution. The pattern maker knocks out a basic timber form in the time it would take for a CAD jockey to flick through their emails before they start the work they are there to do.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]242546[/ATTACH]

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 1,241 total)