By way of compensation for bumping a thread I add a photo of a Hector, but it needs more Dagger please.
WONZ Podcasts have kept me company on many long country, night drives, very grateful for this remarkable body of work. Need to go to Italy or Poland or Russia next ! Keep up the huge effort and thank you.
Nixnav, welcome. Keep up the good work. There’s also an aerial camera group on FB. Interesting to see it all hooked up and working. Somebody needs to insert a digital reader into a F24 as the combination of lens and resolution would be incredible. Reinstalled in a vintage aircraft, you could identify the type of sausage in a hot dog being eaten by a spectator, beaming down live footage…
Nicko, what are FB molds doing in Australia? Wartime maintenance? Are these from railway workshops?
An extraordinary Service aviation heritage preserved in NZ, by extraordinary people.
Nice work Nicko!
Oracal, thank you for the Bristol Aerospace reference. Thank God for people who save things from rubbish bins! Eternal damnation for tidiness freaks that throw everything out! May hell for them be an eternity in a compulsive hoarders basement!
Oracal, I can concur thar RR practice was to repeat its engine number an the AM Axxxxx number on the port front foot of RR Kestrels. Napiers repeated their engine number on the port front side of the crankcase, also repeating the AM Axxxxx number on Daggers, so it seems this was Service Contract practice from the prewar. Not sure if the system persisted in the later war years, but hopefully your AM list will illuminate this aspect with more clarity. Does this list include Kestrels and Daggers?
PLA, did you build your Tucano?
Brin, 9 years takes lateness in replying past rude to pluto, however, you can find a copy of RAAF 314 and also Commonwealth materials on the http://www.silverbiplanes.com website
Some pilots have big bails.
AA, thats Maybe the OP was an AI chatbot, sent by mad Vlad to infect some DoD desktop. It’s algorithms are now assimilating the Key Forum, GEAU.
What was the councils basis for opposing development? Noise? With 2 billion people on planet earth in 1930, when many original airfields were gazetted, these fields were ‘in the countryside’. 8 billion people on earth now, with 2 billion projected to come over the next 20 years, means these airfields are now in urban or near urban areas. It is inevitable that ‘non air minded’ populations complain about noise and the chance of an aircraft in the kitchen. Electric propulsion might give a second life to inner urban airfields with less noise, but where do snarling V12s go? Their audience is still in the city. Maybe an old aircraft carrier docked in an old city port, facing the prevailing wind? Combined Air Force – Navy experience. Nice hangars, accomodation, restaurant space. Many waterways have no Local Government involvement, except for any land based infrastructure.
attorney
Lathed.