dark light

powerandpassion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 1,241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Westland Walrus information. #893474
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    N9841 Anson 1.

    That will be sixpence thanks fella!

    Not so fast wonder dog !

    in reply to: Westland Walrus information. #893476
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Bingo

    The N prefix serial range was used twice, the first time from WW1 to 1925 or there abouts for naval aircraft. Your N9841 will be from this series and was an Avro Bison.

    Bingo on the Bison ! Putnam’s Avro Aircraft since 1908, AJ Jackson describes it as ‘exceedingly ugly deck landing biplane..its shape..was little short of grotesque.” N9841 was a Bison II. Bisons replaced Westland Walri on coastal duties in 1922, so there is a connection, apart from ugly and grotesque!

    in reply to: Westland Walrus information. #893596
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Unconfirmed picture

    ..Well…..for sure the pilot cockpit is very similar, but the rear opening, manned by Observer & TAG, is huge and included a large prone observation station.

    So one could imagine some sliding floor, W/T equipement, 2 seats, Scarff ring, etc. etc……but how does that look? Probably only a Tech manual would be helpful.

    But even FAA and RAF Museums told me they do have nothing about……

    I have the following picture from a series taken at RAE in the late 20’s to early 30’s. The picture is dated 1932. Don’t know if it is Walrus but it is something like it. In the same group of pictures there is the RAF serial N.9841, so if anybody has the N series records they could confirm a likely aircraft type.

    Also included is a picture of Armstrong Whitworth Atlas radio setup from 1927, in respect of your other request for radio details.[ATTACH=CONFIG]233430[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]233431[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #899356
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Gas starting

    Are you sure you are not confusing parts of the Jupiter ‘starting system’ for direct fuel injection?

    The Jupiter engine carried some fairly complex and exotic engine starting systems, particularly in civilian service where staffing levels were more critical, in the days before efficient batteries and electric starters. One system involved supplying a compressed air and fuel mixture directly into the cylinders although I forget the exact details; direct fuel injection, in British aircraft engines anyway, wouldn’t be seriously considered for decades after the Jupiter engine?

    All Jupiters had two sparkplug openings and one opening in the barrel for the standard gas starting system. Compared to using a Hucks starter, hand cranking or swinging a prop gas starting was always a step above. In the Bristol Draco of 1935 the fuel was injected into the bifurcated induction elbow outside the barrel and it was a direct fuel injection experiment more commonly associated with WW2 German engines. The Bristol Phoenix of 1931 was also a 14:1 compression ratio diesel version of the Jupiter with fuel injection direct into the cylinder. They really tried a lot of things and pushed the envelope on concepts, driven by Fedden’s relentless drive to develop ideas. The Draco is a strange looking version, carrying both injection pumps typical of diesels and magnetos.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #899889
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Ollie, thank you for matching the part number and the compression ration to Jupiter IX. Still, when I look in the IX manual, the finning is the ‘old type’. The only way this particular cylinder would make sense is as a test cylinder on what ultimately became the Pegasus development program. Certainly the histories show that Bristol Engines ran many trials on single cylinder test rigs.

    Based on a Pegasus type cylinder, compression ration of 5.3:1, bifurcated inlet and nothing else making sense I now think this is a test cylinder or part of a Bristol Draco engine, an experiment in direct fuel injection.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #905890
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Hi powerandpassion

    Im pretty sure your cylinder comes from a Jupiter IX. The part number is within the right range and the key is the compression ratio (5.3-1) stamped further along from the FB part number. The Jupiter Mk.IX had a 5.3 – 1 compression ratio compare that to the 5 – 1 ratio of the Mk.XI or the 5.8 – 1 ratio of the Mk.VIII. With the finer cooling fins it fits in neatly with your believe that it is from a late Mk. Jupiter.

    Ollie

    Ollie, thank you for matching the part number and the compression ration to Jupiter IX. Still, when I look in the IX manual, the finning is the ‘old type’. The only way this particular cylinder would make sense is as a test cylinder on what ultimately became the Pegasus development program. Certainly the histories show that Bristol Engines ran many trials on single cylinder test rigs.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #905895
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Balance and the effort to balance

    p&p#29: managing “creatives”. The British way (=class system) segregated “hands” totally: Fedden was not the only innovator to be denied Board status: WEW Petter, Barnes Wallis, AE Hagg (by Sir Geo. DH), J.Lloyd (by JD Siddeley), Whittle and O.Short (Nationalised, as “too difficult”)…many auto designers. S.Camm and G.Edwards were made to wait. Board issues were on a higher plane.

    Today in such as media/advertising, the suits and the creatives only thrive if they find a way to bring ideas down to earth…unlike, say this Wallis quote: ‘“practical shop element of personnel (was) bitterly opposed to (my) geodetics” S.Ritchie,Industry & Air Power, P83, who adds: ‘(He) was persuaded to accept design changes in the interests of cheapening manufacture’. Quite. See Napier for the consequences of untrammelled creatives.

    alertken, when the balance is found wonders can happen. I figure an ultimate creative was Churchill, often rejected in usual times, but supreme in unusual times. How much he internalised the tension between creativity and discipline or had the wisdom to surround himself with strong personalities to balance his own energy may never be clearly delineated. Alanbrooke, CIGS of British High Command certainly fought him ferociously, in goodwill, to align the war effort to what was possible.

    Fedden himself was Bristol ‘Old Family’ certainly if he curbed his relentless energy he could have “fitted in” more easily, but he made it hard. He is one man who refused Churchill’s request to coordinate aircraft production during the war, citing his work at Bristols as being more pressing. So he certainly made it easier for his enemies to push him aside.

    Nevil Shute in “Slide Rule” reflects that it was the British aristocracy, prior to estate taxes, that combined the surplus capital and eccentricity to fund highly risky ventures in aviation, and to do this on a grand scale. Bristols certainly took great risks in entering into aviation. Perhaps the closest analogy today is the money being spent by Virgin on spaceflight. If only Fedden could have bit his lip and if only the Bristols board could have been more patient. What has happened, has happened. Still, after all this time, stripped of high emotion, Fedden was an incredible inventor and the Jupiter a remarkable engine.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #908860
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Pegasus

    Here is the Vickers Vincent restored by the Subritzky family in NZ with its Pegasus engine. The finning is a similar fineness to the late Jupiter cylinder, but the Pegasus does not have the cylinder retaining bolts, a thin base for bolting the cylinder to the crankcase or bifurcated inlet pipe of the Jupiter.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #908880
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Forged

    It looks forged to me. Difficult to tell without a close-up look but there doesn’t seem to be any casting ‘draft’ on the circumferential cooling fins above the cylinder. Is it in your possession?

    Although many air-cooled radials had cast cylinder-heads the Bristol radial was a far superior product! 😉

    Here are some close ups of the head, I would say forged, and with comments on further post, a late Jupiter cylinder. I have looked through all AP’s for Jupiter III, IV, VI, VII, VIII, IX, XI and Pegasus. It has the Jupiter features of the retaining bolts on either side of the pushrods but the fine finning of the Pegasus. The Pegasus had the same bore and stroke as the Jupiter, but with finer finning and other improvements it was decided to rename it the Pegasus. The Pegasus ultimately became a 1,000 HP engine, not a bad development cycle for a 1920’s design, testament to improving metallurgy, better production techniques, supercharging and higher octane fuel.

    In ‘By Jupiter’ by Bill Gunston, pg 56
    “By 1931 Fedden had supervised many thousands of hours of running of…new cylinders of Jupiter size…these had roughly 50% greater cooling fin area, obtained by deeper and more closely spaced fins…the crankshaft was redesigned with larger diameter crankpin and stiffer webs…the connecting rods were of different form..a new full skirt piston was designed and a very obvious change was was the redesigned valve rocker gear and pushrods were totally enclosed..When all the improvements were incorporated in the Jupiter sized 1753 cubic inch engine the result was such an advance it was given a new name in 1932 : the Pegasus”

    Does anybody have any illustrated parts manuals for Jupiter engines or technical information on metallurgy or production ?
    Can anybody match the parts numbers ?
    How far is the school from Bristol ? I wonder if this cylinder was a lab rat used in the Pegasus development program.

    in reply to: DTD standards #909125
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Original DTD specs

    I suspect Air Ministry Department of Technical Development standards were deemed Secret with limited distribution, because I have yet to ever see an original copy. I have many references in all sorts of literature to DTD specs but even that great laxative ebay has yet to purge out an original document from somebodies shed.

    Does anybody have an original DTD document ?

    Finally I have found some original DTD specs from the late twenties, which, as I thought, are subject to the Official Secrets Act 1911 – 1920, so I can’t tell you where I found them. In fact I didn’t. I don’t know what you are talking about ! What DTD standards ? I’m sorry, I have to catch a..no! Please NO ! I have kids ! Mum ! MUMMY !!!… .. . . .[ATTACH=CONFIG]232992[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #909147
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Jupiter cylinder, we are on our way !

    Here is a Jupiter cylinder that was found during a building demolition in 1983 and thankfully saved from the scrap bin. At this stage I cannot tell if it is a forged or cast head, but it is an early cylinder. I will have to go through the APs to try and identify the exact engine model. It has a great amount of detail, the valve gear, tappet arrangements, inlet and retaining arrangement. There is a wealth of detail for metallurgical analysis and reverse engineering. If it is possible to reverse engineer nine cylinders with all this detail then maybe 30% of a Jupiter is reborn !

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]232991[/ATTACH]

    Here is the story of how it was found. If anyone knows the location perhaps its history and context can be more fully understood :

    I was working as a excavator driver and was given the job of helping demolish the old Earls Colne grammar school , it was a school I had attended a few years earlier ( not a grammar school at that time as they were being phased out )
    I looked down from the cab of my JCB and saw laying in the brick rubble this aircraft cylinder , at that time I was very much into motorcycles / engines etc so had a general interest in anything like that , it obviously did not interest any of the other workers as no one had picked it up so I jumped out and put it in the footwell of the JCB ,this would have been c 1983 .
    I do remember an old wooden hut used by the Air Cadets after school hours ( I think it was sky blue and I’m sure even had the RAF bulls eye / target painter on the apex of the shed ( sorry I don’t know the correct term ) and I believe the cylinder must have come from there when the shed and school buildings were knocked down or dismantled .

    To sum up Earls Colne Grammar was in Essex UK , I went to school there in c 1974 until 1976 before moving onto Halstead Essex Ramsey school leaving in 1980 ,and returned to Earls Colne to demolish it in 1983/ 1984 ( could be a year or two out on that ) I don’t know when the Air Cadets finished but the school was unused for several years before being demolished.

    in reply to: ID armour plate #909160
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Dimensions

    Blenheim?

    size?

    I had a piece of Blenheim plate in same colour as that

    Herewith dimensions in mm. Plate is in Australia, so something RAAF, no Blenheims ever scared a kangaroo..
    Spitfire V ? Beaufighter ?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]232990[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Mosquito Flying In UK 2015 #919134
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    I hope this happens. Would be nice to see and hear a Mosquito again.

    Will be flown over by Angelina Jolie….

    in reply to: please can any one identify this ? #919139
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Apropos Shack props

    Shackleton

    What sort of props did the Shack have, understanding that there were two sets for each engine. Was at least one set (rotating the same way) the same as Lancaster- Lincoln ?
    Thank you

    in reply to: help please. #925069
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Nie wjem

    I have asked my father who was in PAF/RAF and he does not know what AMV is or was.
    He states that the Atlee government offered PAF personnel two years subsidy for schooling/training in nominated technical courses, eg Building & Construction in ‘Milholm’, textile production in Nottingham etc in gratitude for war service and as part of demobilisation. He undertook building and construction for two years while being nominally posted to an aerodrome without aircraft and still being in uniform. Upon graduation he was discharged from the Air Force.

    Without knowing if your father remained in the Air Force, in which case a desk posting to Whitehall ‘reviewing contracts for the supply of paint for hangar roof refurbishment’ may have been typical of the postwar RAF over employment conditions, I can’t help. It does not seem he was too enamoured of the nine month posting, unless there were lots of WAAFs floating about…

    It would have been a difficult time, deciding what to do. The Communist takeover of Poland offered the real possibility of imprisonment for servicemen returning from the RAF, depressed economic conditions in the UK meant it was difficult to find a footing in the UK and the most likely proposition was the gamble of walking up a gangplank on a ship to the new worlds of Australia or Canada.

    What decision did he make in the end ?

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 1,241 total)