dark light

powerandpassion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #925333
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Christmas in October

    Here are some BTH SC-9 magnetos for Jupiter : in the photo of both, the one on the left is a later SC9-5D and the one on the right is a very early SC9-1. The early one has J8149 painted on it, which I assume is Jupiter engine number 8149. In Australia, the Jupiter VI was used in Bristol Bulldogs and the geared Jupiter VIIF in Westland Wapitis. Both of these used the yoke type coupling of the SC9-1,and I assume the later type coupling of the SC9-5D was a later improvement. Both these magnetos had ignition advance via a lever linked to the throttle assembly. Later magnetos had a centrifugal type coupling that allowed for ‘automatic’ ignition advance as engine speed increased, and no external lever. I have seen all these types in the antipodes, so I assume that as improvements flowed from Bristols these were incorporated during routine maintenance.

    Here, at last, are SC9 maggies with bakelite distributor caps intact ! These are SC9-7D, which are, as far as I can make out, the last and latest variants of this 9 cylinder magneto. I have a suspicion they were used for Bristol Pegasus engines on Supermarine Walri used in the RAAF through WW2. Now we have the bakelite to reverse engineer and give life, Igor.

    in reply to: Ploughshears into swords #925353
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Which country did this happen in?

    Australia. The engine hasn’t been opened, but I doubt there would be an alteration to its innards to stop backflow of previously exhausted air on the induction cycle of another cylinder. The only way I think it worked was relatively inefficiently (high turbulence), generating a positive pressure in the exhaust manifold that escaped to a one way valve inline to an air reservoir.

    With no exhaust valve, air could not be compressed in the cylinder, only moved along, I guess a crude version of a supercharger or blower. Given the volumetric capacity, and a 1:1 drive ration to a big engine running at 2,000 RPM, this moved lots of air. It would all make a lot more sense if there was some sort of valve, at each cylinder, stopping scavenging of higher pressure air from the exhaust manifold, yes sir.

    But then if there was an inline valve betwixt engine and reservoir there really is no connection to higher pressure or atmosphere in the exhaust manifold, so new air is just being inducted and moved down the back of the bus. It probably got hot, but a radial could cope.

    in reply to: Ploughshears into swords #925360
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Am I the only one confused by this thread?

    The title is “Ploughshears [sic] into swords” yet people seem to be discussing swords into ploughshares?

    Moggy

    Over the years I have seen and found war items turned into useful objects that illustrate the “better angels of our nature”, so I guess the origin of this thread has to do with trying to document and share charming conversions of killing machinery. The title reflects on the warbird movement turning chook sheds back into representations of killing machinery, which, when I see a Messerschmitt with accurately portrayed swastika on the tailfin makes it unambiguous to me. I do find it unambiguous that my own interest in warbirds relates mostly to war and less to bird, or mostly the story of 20 year olds put into the circumstance of war, into the strange pleasure of ‘rhubarbs’ and 1,000 HP engines, nested in loss, brutality, dysentery and fear.

    I think that what happened postwar with the jetsam of state sanctioned, industrial killing should be documented before people like me make it disappear by restoring it to its original function. I am interested in sharing S>P because everything else is P>S. I understand that I have also garnished this basic thing with philosophical rantings from out of a bubblegum machine and from God, so this is why the title may seem inverted to you. If you feel it is more appropriate to change the thread title I have no objection, but old testament God can get really angry !!

    Re ploughshears, it is shears, like shearing sheep, shearing the earth, furrowing the earth, as much as it may furrow the brow.
    It’s like fishplate, or fitchplate, or de Havilland, or De Havilland, you say potato, I say po tato

    in reply to: Ploughshears into swords #925457
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Here is a Cheetah engine which was used as an air compressor. The exhaust valve gear has been removed and the exhaust manifold has been blocked at its usual exit and a pipe fitting welded in. I assume either an electric motor or other engine was coupled to the prop shaft to drive the system. I have seen this before in four cylinder car engines where two cylinders ran conventionally while two were adapted in the same way to pump air, being a self contained ‘bush mechanics’ air compressor. Given the volumetric capacity of a Cheetah engine this would have pumped a huge amount of air.

    An old truck driver walked passed this engine and instantly recognised its application as an air compressor. “Back then” he was a train fireman on diesel locomotives and said that they were adapted to the front of the very large train diesel motors to supply air for the air brakes, because the existing air compressor was not good enough. This was a direct drive off the front of the diesel crankshaft. The low revving, high torque, high horsepower diesel in combination with the high volumetric capacity of the Cheetah would no doubt supply plenty of air to an air brake system. Now that I think about the features taken off the engine and those left on the adaptation was done with the degree of practicality you might find in a railways workshop.

    in reply to: Ploughshears into swords #925467
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Not going to join in the theological debate (Despite being a clergyman’s son – or possibly due to that fact!) but as a collector of WW1 Trench Art I have always found things fashioned from military equipment and munitions fascinating. Around the area I live there are still the odd farm trailers with wartime surplus aircraft wheels, though tyres are becoming a problem I believe. Also I have heard several local versions of stories of tail wheels from crash sites being used for wheelbarrows, but have yet to actually see one! Other tales involve aircraft panelling being used to repair several chicken sheds and pigsties locally, but they are always long gone when I try to track them down! I was once involved in the recovery of a Hadrian frame that had served as a chicken shed – Now at YAM after I donated it to them.

    Abroad my fascination with French junk shops has uncovered a couple of portable compressor units featuring B17 oxygen bottles, but the wife put her foot down at the time when I suggested bringing them back in our already overcrowded VW camper (Kids and their toys taking up most of the room).

    More recently I spotted the following items on display at the excellent Szolnok Repülőmúzeum in Hungary – a stove made from a B17 wheel and some rather fetching privy doors panelled in aircraft skinning complete with the aircraft’s national insignia still showing – not sure whether retaining this had been a deliberate feature or not but the display was balanced with one being American and one German. Finally a Fiat G12 Fuselage section – the sole surviving representative of its type I believe, that had served as a woodshed on a farm in Hungary for many years, after it was destroyed on an airfield by strafing P-51s near the end of the war.

    Fantastic S>P ! I wonder how close the magnesium wheel stove might have got to rapid carbonising of the sausages !

    in reply to: Ploughshears into swords #925471
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    I think firebombers are the best examples of warbirds doing more humane work in second careers.

    Firebombers are probably the most spectacular role reversal for heavy bombers there could be. A great example. It would pay in the modern airshow, once there has been a simulated napalm dropping low pass, to send in a firebomber with dyed up retardant to put the flames out…

    in reply to: Ploughshears into swords #925474
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Great poem

    powerandpassion, if you are not familiar with it you may appreciate this poem known as The Ballad of Tubal Cain. I first discovered it years ago when it was reproduced in Model Engineer magazine and found it inspiring. Here is the link:
    http://phoenixmasonry.org/tubal_cain_poem.htm

    A great poem that sums it all up pretty well !

    in reply to: Mosquito dataplate & constructor numbers #928349
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    The aircraft was reported to have broken up in mid air. eyewitness states that it ‘exploded in the air, wood flakes came down like snow’.

    That cooling pipe was found some 150+yards from the main impact site in the approximate area where the separated engine was reported to have landed. This may well help point towards it being the Port engine that separated in flight.

    It looks to me as though there is a lot of pitch on that propeller, almost to the point of it being partially feathered?

    I have been unable to confirm if this is the Left or Right engine, does anything in the picture help? Any thoughts welcomed!

    What a terrible, catastrophic accident.
    Bit hard to rely on evidence of feathering when the blades may have impacted with aircraft, surrounding trees and ground and any of these forces would be sufficient to force the blades around or snap the feathering gear ring mechanism at the root of the blade.

    In terms of port or starboard engine in the picture it is hard, for me, to see any handed feature that would help clarify this.

    Sometimes in the detail of reports (court of inquiry?) there is enough information to reconstruct what may have happened. If the direction of flight of the P38 pilot is known (on finals in an ordained pattern around a known airfield), the traverse of the Mosquito (across left or across right), the position of debris, the gyroscopic action of a Mosquito with either port or stb engine detached might be surmised.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #928351
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Not Pilkingtonesqe.

    If you consider the methods by which a rubber stamp of a signature might have been created in the early 1930’s then I would assume the inked signature is authentic and his own natural hand writing, and the rubber stamp was more likely based on a forced and un-natural signature, intentionally done large and open to support the rubber stamp processes to reproduce it.

    The rubber stamp likely required a female mould to be created with the signature drawn deeply into it and allowed to set, or alternatively, the signature reverse traced onto the face of the rubber block and the excess rubber cut or removed leaving the type-set raised.

    Either way the smaller and tighter signature would not have reproduced very well at all.

    http://www.grmarking.com/lang/eng/id/history

    http://www.holmesstamp.com/guide/faq/stamphistory.html

    http://www.msmmarking.com/how-to-make-stamps.shtml#vulcanized_rubber

    Regards

    Mark Pilkington

    Mark, I have come to rely on you for scrupulously researched facts, not conjecture !:)
    I appreciate the research on ink stamping.
    My conjecture is that a junior signed the ink signature and the rubber stamp might be a more accurate facsimile of the real Fedden signature. For devotees of handwriting analysis the first signature is almost reticent and apologetic, while the rubber one is flamboyant and more Feddenesque. Then I think that in 1930, only a few years after the Cosmos company went broke and plunged Fedden and the Jupiter engine into difficulty, the Depression may have affected his morale as well as the prospects of the Bristol Aeroplane company, enough to make anybody’s handwriting wobble.

    I think its great to see the inventor and driving force of the Bristol Engine division signing off on obscure customer service documentation, implying a sensible commercial anxiety to make sure the business prospered. I am still waiting for a letter from Bill Gates solicitously enquiring if I need assistance with Windows.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #928356
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    When will you test your bakelite press p&p?

    Not for a while yet. The immediate purpose was to save the machine from oblivion. It was a functioning machine with dies for electrical motor components, so there is nothing to test in respect of function. The real issue is cost of tooling for a particular distributor and of course approvals for flying components, probably the first step. Most logically, distributors for the larger historic automobile market would be the place to start, to cross subsidise low volumes of aircraft parts down the track. I think this is a marathon, not a sprint.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #928358
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Yes

    I think Bakelite is a thermo-setting plastic (you have to ‘cook’ it to get it to harden) so I’m not sure how you could 3D-Print it anyway; it isn’t a reversible process either unlike most modern plastics.

    Can you still obtain asbestos?

    Unfortunately yes, in respect of the large quantity of asbestos product still ‘out there’. I was a bit surprised to see asbestos in old recipes for bakelite distributors, but understand it was a filler used for fireproofing purposes. You can add cutting open old distributors to taking off the glass front of a radium dial to the fun hazards possible in old aviation. I would imagine that, consistent with brake linings, there are modern replacement materials for this purpose, but already understand that ‘any dust is no good’.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #928669
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Baking up goodies

    With 3D design and printing now becoming more common would it be a feasible option in recreating Bakelite for ancient parts?

    Bakelite as a performance material is still quite spectacular in terms of strength, insulation and oil resisting properties. Materials currently used for 3D printing do not have these properties, so, although you could print out the object, it would not perform. There are two pack materials used for modern insulator manufacture which may allow you to pour a shape, but then you would have to certify a novel material which would not be commercial for small quantities sold to starving wallets. Also within the design of the object are a two step process involving the insertion of brass fittings, easy with Bakelite. Better just get a Bakelite press and do it the old fashioned way, including asbestos as a filler. Lucky the missus has a Thermomix so I can fine chop asbestos fibres while she is reading recipes involving beetroots.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #928865
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Fedden signature

    Fedden was the big picture man, Butler the details man who worked out all the intricacies, a real partnership. Butler had a heart attack after Fedden went, so the engine division lost both the painter and the man who strung and framed the canvas.

    Stuck in an old book in the library of the Moorabbin Air Museum were two letters concerning technical notes for Jupiter engines from Fedden in 1930 and 1931. The early one has a personal signature and the later one a rubber stamp signature, far more florid. I wonder if the first one was perhaps done by an assistant. Does anybody have a copy of a real Fedden signature to compare?

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #928888
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Reduction gear

    I have always wondered why so little remains of the Bristol Jupiter engine.

    Here is a reduction gear case !

    in reply to: Ploughshears into swords #928899
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Air compressor

    What are some of the wonderful things you have found warbirds turned into ?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]232305[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]232306[/ATTACH]
    Here is a Cheetah engine which was used as an air compressor. The exhaust valve gear has been removed and the exhaust manifold has been blocked at its usual exit and a pipe fitting welded in. I assume either an electric motor or other engine was coupled to the prop shaft to drive the system. I have seen this before in four cylinder car engines where two cylinders ran conventionally while two were adapted in the same way to pump air, being a self contained ‘bush mechanics’ air compressor. Given the volumetric capacity of a Cheetah engine this would have pumped a huge amount of air.

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,241 total)