dark light

powerandpassion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,051 through 1,065 (of 1,241 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #913826
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    It always makes me smile when I see the ‘F’ and the ‘B’ at the start of Bristol engine part numbers…

    …but what (or who) does the ‘S’ stand for?

    It is common to see ‘SFB’ at the start of wartime (and post-war) Bristol engine part numbers; I’ve always fancied that it may stand for ‘Shadow’, as in ‘Shadow factory’, to distinguish them from ‘genuine’ Bristol parts? Anybody know?

    Fedden was sacked in September 1942, could it be pique that sought to place a Mr S over Mr F ?

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #913829
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    P&P – thank you for the timing information, I’m going to work through that later purely for fun. I have seen a racing motorcycle with an engine built around a single cylinder from a radial engine, cannot remember if it was a Jupiter. Attached as I am to my inlet, I would let it go if a viable airworthy restoration project needed it.

    Robert, no worries, all part of the journey. I can now figure that a starting magneto would work on a single cylinder test rig, with a little thought about gearing. Would you consider letting go of the inlet for a single cylinder test rig, all in good time….

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #916480
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Single cylinder test rig

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]227874[/ATTACH]

    I hope to see a Jupiter in the air one day, ideally powering a Gamecock.

    This is an inlet manifold assembly, there must be other bits around?

    Robert M

    Does anybody have any detail of photographs of the single cylinder test rigs that Bristol engines set up to test Jupiters and other engines ? I presume this was something like an old single cylinder motorcycle engine with a strong crankshaft.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #917913
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Eureka

    The Jupiter, also a four-stroke, must fire all nine cylinders once in two complete revolutions of the crankshaft so the rotor must also turn one full revolution…

    …but the magneto drive-cog cam has still got four cam lobes on it but that doesn’t matter so long as the rotor is in the right position when the spark is produced.

    The rotor must rotate at half crankshaft speed so the magneto gear-ratio must turn the 9/8 crankshaft speed into one-half crankshaft speed at the rotor…

    …but I’m damned if I can work that ratio out! Unless it is 4/9 (0.444)….?

    Nope, wrong, the magneto rotor turns at 9/8 crankshaft speed…..how can that be right???

    If you take engine magneto drive at 9/8 crankshaft speed or 1.125 crankshaft speed it all falls into place, with a serendipitous 9 sparks coming from the four lobed cam driving the breaker points ! See the whiteboard which lays out the full cycles below. Finding this exquisite organization of affairs always reinforces the fact that the old timers always went for absolute perfection with their engineering, there was never any fudging. Understanding this relationship, it is possible to understand how the 10 cylinder Armstrong Siddely Serval would have been arranged out of the same magneto body, if it had a four lobe cam driving the points. Say 10 sparks are needed per 2 revolutions of the crankshaft (full cycle) and one revolution of the rotor (full cycle). Therefore 10 sparks/4 lobes equals 2.5 revolutions of the engine to magneto drive gear during two revolutions (full cycle) of the crankshaft, or 1.25 revolutions per single revolution of the crankshaft, therefore a 1:1.25 gear running off the crankshaft. :applause:

    Then the rotor, running off the 2.5 revolutions of the engine to magneto drive gear, would need to be slowed down to 1 revolution of rotor, so we gear down 2.5:1. Say we use the same rotor cog as the v12 at 75 teeth, we would need a 30 tooth drive.:applause:

    This kind of stuff was Butler stuff. All Bristol engine parts have an FB part number which was Fedden Butler. Fedden was the big picture man, Butler the details man who worked out all the intricacies, a real partnership. Butler had a heart attack after Fedden went, so the engine division lost both the painter and the man who strung and framed the canvas.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]228269[/ATTACH]
    I am going to the fridge now to have a beer.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #919082
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Ratios n Rithmetic

    Magneto rotor turns at 9/8 engine speed…..I’ve never quite figured that one out!

    I have never thought about this, but now is probably a good time to start.
    In the photos below is the V12 Kestrel accessory gear arrangement, the gear ratios (maggies driven at 1.5 crankshaft speed) and the SC12 maggie with drive cog engaging rotor cog at 24 teeth to 74 or 1:3. I can’t do maths very well, so you need to check me, but I work this out as the rotor going at 0.45 crankshaft speed.

    The last two photos are 9 cylinder Jupiter gear arrangement, with what appears to be maggies driven at 1:1 crankshaft speed. I cannot find anything as basic as the gear ratio diagram so thoughtfully provided by Messrs Rolls Royce. The last photo is the SC9 maggie with drive cog at 44 teeth engaging rotor cog at 100 teeth, roughly 1:2.3 Again, using my fingers, I think this is 0.44 crankshaft speed.

    On both magnetos a four lobe can opens the points four times for each revolution of the magneto drive cog.

    So, if this is right, for each revolution of the crankshaft, the rotor traverses 0.45% of 360 degrees, roughly 162 degrees.
    In the SC9, if the pickups are offset at 40 degrees, this is four cylinders worth of traverse.
    In the SC 12, if the pickups are offset at 30 degrees, this 5.5 cylinders worth of traverse.

    What happens in one crankshaft revolution of a V12 or a 9 cylinder radial that would make sense of this ?
    I am going off to stick my head in the fridge.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #919132
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    You couldn’t anyway…..the timing would be all wrong.

    Even if you changed the number of teeth on the gear, to 60 instead of 72 (speeding the rate at which the rotor completes 360 degrees), you would still need nine contact points on the cap that were evenly spaced around the circumference (at 40 degrees) not twelve contact points evenly spaced (at 30 degrees)…

    …even with three unused. 😉

    CD,
    I have already offended myself with talk about using a 12 cylinder cap on a 9 cylinder; I was probably drunk, this is not China were I could stuff three holes with lolly wrappers and get away with it. I was alluding to changing the brass fretwork to a nonagon within the casing, but even this I now find in poor taste. Probably I need tooling that splits in three to allow insertion of either a 9 hole element or a 12 hole element, or for the Armstrong Siddeley Serval a 10 holer.

    Your photo of a 9 cylinder cap is great, but now has setup a new worry : all the caps I see for radials seem to have HT leads coming out of the cap face, while the vee engines have them coming out of the circumference. Maybe there is a reason for this. Maybe the HT lead runs on the radials need to come out that way in order to be distributed. When you think about it the arrangement in vees runs the leads fore-aft the fuselage and the arrangement in radials runs the leads fore-aft the fuselage. So never the vee cap will meet the radial cap in the same press tooling.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #919138
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    The iCentaurus

    Chicken or the egg question.
    Don’t we see more Bristol radials because the aeroplanes they went in are (more or less) extinct as fliers, or are the aircraft rare because of the engine….lack of spares or whatever?

    In a world where there are still plenty of DC-3s (an older type with an older engine) flying with their P&Ws, there should be a few Bristol Freighters out there flying with their Hercules….

    Steve Jobs established Apple then was ejected : Apple came close to bankruptcy. Steve Jobs returned to Apple and turned it into the most valuable corporation in US history. Steve Jobs died and I do not expect Apple to continue on an upwards trajectory. It will tread water, give off some sparks then slowly die. Fedden came into Bristols and turned it into a business where nearly 90% of its revenues came from engines in the 1930’s, in the midst of Depression. Fedden, like Jobs, was a product person, an insatiable spirit driving products ahead of the curve, dragging the rest of the world into a place it didn’t know it needed to be. Both men created strong, competitive, personal tension within their markets and between the companies that carried them on their journeys. It is obvious Bristols shot itself in the head once it sacked Fedden, it lost its key animating spirit. The gentler genious of Barnwell was extinguished once he smashed his aircraft into the ground. Bristols carried on, did what it was expected to do, but did not astonish the world; trod water, then died.

    It is not just amazing that DC-3s are still flying, but astonishing that I can reach out my hand and touch two DC-2s within a few hours distance. The Bristol Aeroplane Company are Carthage, and Rolls Royce is Rome. Carthage has been destroyed,its walls rent and verily salt ploughed into its ruins. Probably deserve it. Fedden, however, deserves to be remembered by history, taken in with cornflakes by youth at breakfast, with his iJupiter, iPegasus, iHercules and iCentaurus.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #920875
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Grovelling apologies

    Hi there P&P,

    I am looking for the BTH type you have photo’s of in post 20, I have AV12 mags on my Lion engine.

    Thanks Andy

    Gawd ! I have insulted 33% of my customer base ! Sorry ! Ah yes, the AV12, mother of the SC12. Somebody needs to write a text book on aircraft magnetos. If you find any textbooks on bakelite formulations I will offer a 10% discount on AV12 caps…it will be a while I think before we succeed in outputting new caps, but it’s great to know I am not alone on the journey.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #920899
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Hi Powerandpassion,

    the market for these is booming ! if you make the BTH SC/AV12 caps I will take 4. Andy

    Andy, do you mean these new fangled caps used on those awful, modern engines like Merlins !?

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #920918
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    [QUOTE=antoni;2137124]Press moulding and injection moulding Bakelite usually uses a type of phenolic resin called Novolac. [QUOTE]

    Antoni,
    Wow ! Fantastic, thank you. It sounds like you are a chemist..can we start a PM conversation on how to resolve the formulation for old BTH magnetos, especially alternatives for asbestos? I would be grateful for a PM if you have any information. I am trying to find books on formulations but they are not easy to come by.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #920922
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Timing, Cunning and Reinventing

    A cunning plan, except one needs to be able to time the points to coincide with the passing of each pick up on the dizzy. 😉

    Rather than trying to reinvent the wheel and attempt to manufacture a distributor cap, I would talk to these guys…
    http://www.antiquedistributorcaps.com/distcaps.htm

    Ahh indeed I have many cunning plans, except I keep jamming my fingers when I close the laptop and walking into glass doors…it is hard to be cunning in historic aviation, because you keep competing with the ghosts of a room full of mathemeticians, stress calculators, draftsmen and wily old shop foremen, let alone design genii. They lived with the consequences of their actions, which was often a test pilot in a coffin, so things were pretty well worked out. You try all sorts of short cuts and keep returning to their design solutions and material choices, and when you decipher these, there is often a sweet moment when your mind shifts into a higher gear and you get something that is rare to feel in this modern world of designed obsolesence and Chinese metallurgy, which is admiration.

    Timing a mag seems logical on these babies. I have put a naked SC12 next to an SC9 in the photo and all that is different is the drive cog for the rotor arm. On the SC9 it is approximately 60 teeth and on the SC12 it is approximately 72 teeth. The lobe driving the points is the same four hump thing. So all you have to do to turn an SC9 into an SC12 is press up the appropriate rotor drive cog in the bakelite press, another piece of tooling. Probably you would CNC it out of a modern engineering plastic these days. The same bakelite cap fits on each body, but the more I think about it I would be offended by using a 12 cap and leaving 3 HT lead entries unused; what I really need is an SC9 cap to pattern off. The same magneto bodies were used for SC14 (Armstrong Siddeley Panther) and SC10 (?).

    The mob doing the antique distributor caps do a wonderful job, but use phenolic resin only and low pressure casting, which might not be as strong as the original bakelite with all its fillers. Good for popping the bonnet on a car or stinkboat, probably no good at 20,000 feet. Again the ghosts of the past would haunt me, and the custodians of safety in the present would require too much convincing to cost defensibly shift to new material choices for short run production. Mostly I want to learn how bakelite was made, then get into instrument cases, switches and other such good things, go mad with the press..

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #921728
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Bakelite press

    Relightflynn9,

    I have seen SC9-3 with the coupling for auto ignition advance, so would love to know if yours has it too. Picking the logic of magneto ‘improvements’ seems to be a matter of laying them side by side and trying to figure it out. If yours has a bakelite distributor cap, I would love to get my sticky fingers on it to pattern off. As you do, there is a high temperature, high pressure bakelite press sitting in the back shed, as I figure one day it will need to be used for these type of things. The distributor caps seem to have been made in a two step process, with an intermediate step allowing the location of a brass fretwork carrying the HT current from the rotor pickups to the HT lead connection. Apparently the bakelite was mixed with asbestos for additional fireproofing, so as well as holding off from licking radium dials we now have to not cut up distributor caps from old magnetos and sniff them.

    Here is a photo of the bakelite molding press. This stuff is still done in the low labour cost nations as essentially it is a hand fed process that cannot compete with modern injection moulding, except that modern plastics cannot compete with bakelite for specialist applications like distributor caps. No doubt as your car moves away from mechanical spark distribution, or even internal combustion, bakelite molding will go the way of the dodo.
    There is an xray of a BTH SC12 magneto distributor cap, which shows the distribution of the brass pickups embedded within the bakelite. The problem with short run bakelite production, apart from having a bakelite press, is tooling, making up a metal mold and amortizing this across the three people on the planet that might want an SC9 magneto distributor cap. Now that I think about it, the SC9 magneto body is the same size as the SC12 used on RR Kestrels. So you might use the same tooling to cast a bakelite body but have different arrangements of brass pickups to suit 9 cylinder or 12 cylinder. Ie for V12 dispose 12 pickups around the circumference and for Radial 9 dispose 9 pickups around the circumference connecting to 9 HT lead inlets, leaving three HT lead inlet holes unutilised in the same bakelite body. Eureka ! I have just doubled the market to six people !! Does anybody out there know the formulation BTH utilised in its bakelite distributor caps ?

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #924115
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Relightflynn9,

    I have seen SC9-3 with the coupling for auto ignition advance, so would love to know if yours has it too. Picking the logic of magneto ‘improvements’ seems to be a matter of laying them side by side and trying to figure it out. If yours has a bakelite distributor cap, I would love to get my sticky fingers on it to pattern off. As you do, there is a high temperature, high pressure bakelite press sitting in the back shed, as I figure one day it will need to be used for these type of things. The distributor caps seem to have been made in a two step process, with an intermediate step allowing the location of a brass fretwork carrying the HT current from the rotor pickups to the HT lead connection. Apparently the bakelite was mixed with asbestos for additional fireproofing, so as well as holding off from licking radium dials we now have to not cut up distributor caps from old magnetos and sniff them.

    In a 1944 lecture by Fedden to the Royal Aeronautical Society he states that “55% of all RAF aircraft in 1939 were equipped with Bristol engines”. These included the Pegasus and Mercury, which covers everything from Lysanders to Blenheims running nine cylinder engines which may have used BTH SC9 magnetos. In addition a great variety of civil aircraft, mainly airliners, used Bristol engines, so point to any 9 cylinder air cooled radial from the period as the home for your SC9 and you will be half right ! If you hitch your thumbs in your braces and announce that this is the SC9 used in the Wallace flying over Everest expedition then there will be very few folk who could say otherwise, unless somebody has a sneaky photo of that particular setup.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #925040
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    Jupiter magnetos

    Here are some BTH SC-9 magnetos for Jupiter : in the photo of both, the one on the left is a later SC9-5D and the one on the right is a very early SC9-1. The early one has J8149 painted on it, which I assume is Jupiter engine number 8149. In Australia, the Jupiter VI was used in Bristol Bulldogs and the geared Jupiter VIIF in Westland Wapitis. Both of these used the yoke type coupling of the SC9-1,and I assume the later type coupling of the SC9-5D was a later improvement. Both these magnetos had ignition advance via a lever linked to the throttle assembly. Later magnetos had a centrifugal type coupling that allowed for ‘automatic’ ignition advance as engine speed increased, and no external lever. I have seen all these types in the antipodes, so I assume that as improvements flowed from Bristols these were incorporated during routine maintenance. There are lots of SC7 magnetos I have seen for Cheetah engines, but fewer SC9s and SC12s for Kestrels. The bodies of these last two are identical in size, while the SC7 is smaller. ‘One day’ I will take apart and SC7, SC9 & SC12 and see what components are common, as I figure that SC7 components might have to support their larger brothers in the future.

    in reply to: Bristol Jupiter engine #927434
    powerandpassion
    Participant

    HT lead ends

    [QUOTE=Robert Edward
    I hope to see a Jupiter in the air one day, ideally powering a Gamecock.

    This is an inlet manifold assembly, there must be other bits around?

    Robert M[/QUOTE]

    Here are some HT lead ends for Jupiter.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]227877[/ATTACH]

Viewing 15 posts - 1,051 through 1,065 (of 1,241 total)