dark light

Belethor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 173 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: French air campaign – Mali #2257627
    Belethor
    Participant

    Thanks.
    I think much of that could be attributed to general overreliance on PGMs. Modern airforces are unable to knock out even a pile of camel dung without using at least a Paveway IV.

    Yep I think you’ve pretty much hit the nail on the head there and it’s an issue that needs sorting out fairly quickly.

    in reply to: French air campaign – Mali #2257638
    Belethor
    Participant

    This is just excuse making to justify not going to Syria at that moment since Obami backpaddled at the last moment.

    Nic

    Yeah, ok, whatever :rolleyes:

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2257645
    Belethor
    Participant
    in reply to: French air campaign – Mali #2257647
    Belethor
    Participant

    Link?

    I don’t wish to be rude but Google is extremely easy to use.

    http://www.defensenews.com/article/20121217/DEFREG01/312170002/NATO-Allies-Might-Unprepared-Syria

    That’s actually a fairly recent piece on the subject but if you google well you’ll find many reports from around the time of the operation as it was widely reported by the media at the time.

    in reply to: French air campaign – Mali #2257648
    Belethor
    Participant

    Since we puppets follow US orders, it’s only logical that the US provide assistance.

    Nic

    Really? Have you forgotten Iraq? Large amounts of money owed by Hussain to Iraq was at stake and was deemed more important to French interests then obeying the Americans. (Not to mention the criminal that is Jacques Chirac who led France at the time was a pal of Hussain but that’s another story.)

    in reply to: French air campaign – Mali #2257651
    Belethor
    Participant

    Why not? A400M seems good enough to me.
    For the (not so common) items the A400M can’t carry (MBTs… yes… but I really don’t think MBTs are to be deployed by air, utterly inefficient IMO), there always is the solution to loan An-124s (as is done today), and/or act with allies (C-5s, C-17s…)
    Mind you, France used C-160s and C-130s “only” for years! The current problem is more about their age. And bigger vehicules too, but that’s OK with the A400M. 😉

    What happens when the AN-124 has been booked up beforehand by another customer and is not available? And If the A-400 is so perfect for strategic transport then why does the RAF increase its C-17 fleet whilst also being a future A-400 customer? They both compliment each other very well but one is simply not as capable in the strategic of operations as the other.

    Having to fall back on allies to pick up capablity slack is a p**s poor plan too and you’d think the French would understand this considering the way they themselves have refused to aid their so-called allies in the past (all nations do this I should add). Coalitions such as NATO are all just super until certain nations decide not to play ball. For example imagine if Germany was the sole NATO operator of an essential niche capability platform in the Libyan conflict, the rest of the NATO forces would be pretty badly screwed over. I’m sure you see the point.

    in reply to: French air campaign – Mali #2257661
    Belethor
    Participant

    Which munition stockpiles were in dire straits after the Libya campaign? I understand that the RAF was getting a bit short of dual-mode Brimstone, so issued instructions to use it only when other munitions (e.g. standard Brimstone) were unsuitable, but that was the only shortage I heard of. What do you think ran out? Paveway IV? Nope! AASM? Nowhere near – could have done a few more Libya campaigns on existing stocks, & more were being delivered. Any other candidates for shortages?

    Well then, I guess all those reports that said America was having to urgently rush stocks of munitions to NATO allies during the Libyan conflict was complete hogwash fabricated by the media. Thanks for setting me straight. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: French air campaign – Mali #2257758
    Belethor
    Participant

    Something i’ve been mulling over is how this campaign has once again shown in a negative light the dire strategic immobility of a major European power. I realise the A-400 is due to come online fairly soon but its obviously not a total solution to the problem.
    Surveillance seems to be another weak area what with having to bring American surveillance assets into theatre.
    And does anyone have any idea how the munition stockpiles are looking after the Libyan campaign as they were in dire straights back then. Has America been asked to rush munitions to the rescue again or have things improved?

    in reply to: F35 News only thread for 2013 #2258576
    Belethor
    Participant

    According to Janes article and the forum post above:

    “SOAR can detect the launch of a portable anti-aircraft missile from a distance of 10 km, air-to-air missile from 30 km and a large anti-aircraft missile at up to 50 km. “
    http://articles.janes.com/articles/Janes-Avionics/SOAR-Russian-Federation.html

    “It can detect Stinger/Igla from 10km, a2a missiles from 30km, big surface to air missiles from 50km.”
    http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/foru…p?topic=1728.0

    Sorry, but I can’t see the attached photos…

    The trouble with such systems is that yes they will probably detect a launch but is the launch that was detected tactically relevent to the detecting aircraft? Was that missile that was fired 25km in front of me even targeting my aircraft or was it targeting the 4-ship flying 10km to the port of me or the 3 ship flying to the starboard of me? Saying that was it even a SAM or was it perhaps a SSM? I’m sure you can see the point i’m illustrating.

    Ironicly missile threat detection is one area where the F-35 has a potentially the best solution to date thanks to its 360° spherical view EODAS kit.

    There’s certainly lots of interesting views and opinions in this thread too, thanks to all who have contributed so far.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2258619
    Belethor
    Participant

    I know, but there were times(since cracks appeared) the T-50-1 did not have them, found many pics…..

    Any idea what effect these strengthening ribs may have on RCS?

    in reply to: Is American aviation going downhill? #2259094
    Belethor
    Participant

    It’s also worth noting that comparing US 4th gen aircraft with Eurocanards isn’t really fair, given that the Eurocanards were mostly developed quite a lot more recently than most US 4th gen aircraft – not a fair comparison.

    Sorry I missied this first in my reply. I see your point but the Europeans quite sensibly decided to take a less ambitious and cheaper route by going for the likes of Rafale, Typhoon and Gripen over US style all-out stealth designs and it seems to have payed off big time. And so whilst the US is now stuck with a hanger queen of limited ability like the F-22 or worse still a pig of an aircraft like the F-35 the Europeans are happily flying thier aircraft and more importantly are confident in the capability of those jets.

    I mention confidence because the F-22 pilots are no longer confident in their jet as we’ve seen in the famous interview with F-22 pilots fairly recently and no doubt the WVR drubbing the F-22’s got fairly recently has had a major impact too in that the capability they thought their opponents jets would have is actually far greater than that which was envisioned by the USAF top brass which is of course a big problem and makes all those 200-1 kill ratio claims over teen series fighters by the F-22 a moot point.

    in reply to: Is American aviation going downhill? #2259105
    Belethor
    Participant

    The US does not have a monopoly on AAM’s now, and hasn’t had for decades.

    There are other countries out there apart from the US and Britain.:rolleyes:

    I also think your statement that the US 4th generation fighters are “thoroughly” outclassed by Euro canards” is a little broad.

    On topic, I think that US programmes have become a little heavy for years now, especially in the wasting of finances. The US could do cost control a little better perhaps.

    Still, you are mentioning some of the programmes with teething problems.

    Most aerospace programmes have these troubles.

    Come now, it’s widely acknowledged that the AMRAAM is THE gold standard in A-A missiles. Yes there are alternatives but nobody in the west really wants those alternatives such as the MICA. That gold standard is soon to be the the Meteor missile.
    US 4th gen fighters really aren’t the ‘western’ gold standard that they once were either. The F-15 is outcalssed by the Typhoon and Rafale, the F-16 outclassed by the Typhoon, Rafale and to a lesser extent the Gripen and the F-18E is outclassed by everything in terms of aerodynamics/flight performance.

    Teething problems, well thats one way of looking at the F-35, but really wpould you really decribe the laundry list of terrible problems the F-35 has had as ‘teething problems’? I sure wouldn’t. The jet is fundametally broken, FUBAR, an aerodynamic pig etc etc and nothing is really going to change that. It’s a f**k up of monsterous proportions.

    Same for the F-22 only this one has a nasty habit of killing its pilots. It is not very usefull WVR and gets beaten by jets that cost half its price. Almost half the fleet are NOT combat capable due to them being manuafactured so poorly and to top it off its lucky if it gets off the ground at all half the time. It’s another American f**k up of enourmous proportions.

    Dr.Snufflebug may have a point about UCAV’s but i’m not convinced that lead can be held. The French seem to be doing well and I imagine they will eventually get to the same point as the Americans but will probably do so on a 10th of the budget and end up with a superior product thanks to it being less ambitious.

    in reply to: French air campaign – Mali #2260330
    Belethor
    Participant

    Now he’s refered to as Holland the warlock.

    They’re calling him a wizard? Why?

    Belethor
    Participant

    That’s what I believe 🙂

    Then why did you state no fxed wing aircraft can go above M0.85? At the end of the day there are plenty of fixed wing jets that can push well over M0.85 on the deck, some can exceed Mach 1 on the deck too but as Sens stated it there are issues with doing it. Darryl Greenamyers Red Baron F-104* did 988 mph (mach 1.30) on the deck.

    *the F-104 was modified but it proves a fixed wing jet is not limited to M0.85

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v717/DeadRoman/48a748c2.jpg

    in reply to: UK Voyager fixes, delays to Meteor and problems with PGMs #2262890
    Belethor
    Participant

    Roughly Nine hundred Storm Shadows, and Typhoon can certainly go near them, that or planet Earth stoped being curved.

    Yeah good luck using those Storm Shaows on smart IADS operator, they’d have packed up and moved to another spot by the time the SS arrives to strike them. Meanwhile the radar set several grid squares over takes over and is now operating and covering the same sector of airspace.
    And yes i’d actually agree Typhoon can go near high end SAM systems, if, and it’s a big if, the pilot wants to go on a suicide mission. Which in all likelyhood he probably doesn’t.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 173 total)