dark light

Phil Foster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 1,404 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: This is precious #2044880
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Interesting, but thorny.
    First of all those who want the Islanders to get their wishes if 5,000 chinese immigrants arrived and settled and decided to become a french or portuguese colony would Britain accept that?

    Regarding the original post why not. The major western powers have been using major international institutions for their own ends for years. Why shouldn’t the other guys use it too?

    Well first off 5000 people suddenly turning up and deciding to be something other than Falkland Islanders might be regarded as…….erm…..whats the term? Oh yes, invaders. If on the other hand they turned up and adhered to the Falkland Islands constitution that might be a different matter.

    As to the second point. I don’t know Garry, you’d argue black was white if it scored you a few points. 😀

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: This is precious #2044886
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Just found this, it could be useful:

    http://www.falklands-malvinas.com/

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: This is precious #2044895
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    The whole thing about the Falklands/Malvinas is VERY debateable, King Jester even this:

    Its more like this: “you took that 50p coin out of my pocket, give it back!

    …..is debateable. I really don’t want this to become a slanging match and please, as Jester says, no flag waving but I have done a bit of Googling and neither claim is very clear cut.

    http://www.yendor.com/vanished/falklands-war.html

    and in Spanish:

    http://www.yendor.com/vanished/i-falklands-war.html

    The following article boils down to one irreconcileable truth. Argentina has a LOT of bridge building to do in order to convince the islanders:

    http://www.falkland-malvinas.com/Detalle.asp?NUM=5812

    Here is another point of view:

    http://www.naval-history.net/F13history.htm

    This one tells us a little about Luis Vernet:

    http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Falkland-Islands

    ………………more…………….

    http://freespace.virgin.net/gordon.smith4/F13history.htm

    In essence no claim is clear cut, Argentina’s appears to be no stronger than anybody elses but I can tell you this. If the islanders said tomorrow that they wanted to become an Argentine dependancy the British government would be celebrating in the streets. The truth though is that this is not going to happen any time soon.

    What I want to know most of all is how is Argentina going to make good on their claim, bearing in mind that they have enshrined a peaceful resolution of the issue into law? What are their intentions for the islanders? How can they be made Argentine if they don’t want to be? What will happen to them if/when Argentina gets what she wants? Will they be shipped off the Old Blighty lock stock and barrel or will they be assimilated?

    Their wishes must be upheld, they cannot/must not be overridden by political ambition and most of all there must not be another war.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: This is precious #2045465
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Any chance that King Jester could be elected to the Argentine parliament to inject a bit of wisdom to said establishment??

    HEAR HEAR!!!!

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: This is precious #2045537
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    FA sometimes you really scare me.

    Phil

    in reply to: Rafale ad: fair comment or darned cheek? #2635732
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Just as crap and arrogant as any other magazine commercial for combat aircraft.
    Both the typhoon and the Rafale are being pushed hard, so far the Typhoon has one export order but the Rafale seems to be coming higher in international competitions.
    I think for those countrys that can afford it, of which there are few, there is a place for both a Rafale type aircraft and the JSF.

    Ps, my national pride should have me defending the Typhoon to the end, but I like the Rafale.

    ’tis indeed a good looking bird.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: Rafale ad: fair comment or darned cheek? #2635753
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Now I get your point. Sorry, I wasn’t paying enough attention and yes I agree.

    Phil

    in reply to: Rafale ad: fair comment or darned cheek? #2635782
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    1- Ok, thanks. I assume this hole has been filled by now 😀

    2- it’s you who have started the comparison between the rafale F1 and the F-8, not me.
    Now you, you bring the SHar and the F-18 on the table… fine, but the rafale M F1 is still far more powerfull and has far more range than the SHar : 8 mica + 3*2000 L fuel tanks…this is only a dream for a SHAr.
    The F/A-18C is closer in AA, but whether you like it or not, the rafale M has a more modern radar and small RCS.
    Yes, the curent rafale M F1 are single role..but at least they are in service since 2001-2002 unlike the “single role” eurofighter T1 which has just received (not sure) her clearance to use the AIM-120B.

    3-

    I’m sorry for that be it is not Dassault’s fault. Wake up ! the eurofighter team has twice more test aircrafts, twice more money, twice more engineers but they are still 3 years behind the small rafale team which also has to make carrier trials…

    Well, if you say so…
    My bad, I had forgoten that Singapore had kicked the rafale out of the contest because its ESA radar was inferior to the mechanical captor.

    Well, yes, I’m French :p
    What about you ? Are you British or an incurable optimist ? 😀

    Told ya.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: Rafale ad: fair comment or darned cheek? #2635824
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Jacko. Mate. I’m not going to sit here and claim that the Rafale is a better plane than the Typhoon. Personally I think the Rafale/Typhoon was a duplicated effort, the two types are too close in capability to chose one from the other. Unless of course we take our own nationalities into account in which case I chose the Typhoon, strange really since it is in essence a true European jet and I am a Euro sceptic. Of course it has some benefits but the Rafale has others. Price-wise, I can find no hard evidence anywhere that the Rafale is cheaper than the Typhoon.

    My point is that your thread, though well researched and written, could be more objective. Getting your point across on these boards is a difficult thing to do without upsetting somebody and causing a slanging match. I guarantee that every argument you put can and will be countered and you in turn will counter that ad infinitum. The Rafale is as good a jet as the Typhoon, thats all I wanted to say.

    Phil

    in reply to: This is precious #2045628
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Britain and Argentina had always been close upto that point, I hate what happened as do most others I expect.

    Phil

    in reply to: This is precious #2045750
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Thanks for that Jester I had wondered what had happened to Galtieri. The tragic thing about all of this is that if he had not forced the issue in ’82, the islanders might be more pre-desposed to the idea of Argentine rule (if not total duristiction) as of about now. Post 1982? No, I can’t ever see them agreeing to it and if they say no, that decision must be upheld.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: What's Going to Replace Tornado GR-4? #2636623
    Phil Foster
    Participant
    in reply to: This is precious #2045863
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    wgat an idiot

    politicians, why can’t we sink them???

    We’d probably be indited if we did. 😉

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: What's Going to Replace Tornado GR-4? #2636871
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    I agree with DJJs comment about the Tranche 3 Typhoons, I can see them being signed for but only as a replacement for the Tornado GR4. I can see them all as two seaters, possibly with some airframe modifications and missionised for the primary strike/attack role. It makes a lot of sense.

    Phil

    in reply to: HMS Illustrious in dock #2045885
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Damn it all I wish they would see sense and retrofit the Blue Vixens to the new Harrier IIs. They would have to pay for system integration but the materials are all in place and ready to make the move. Better still, don’t retire the SHARs until there is a viable replacement. I know. That would be asking far too much.

    Phil

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 1,404 total)