dark light

Phil Foster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 1,404 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Il2 Fav planes #249755
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Snakeman brought up the thread I replied and I never mentioned the Spitfire you are attempting to put thoughts in my head. There is nothing ‘well known’ about your ‘facts’ because my ‘facts’ appear to differ in some respects to yours. Am I supposed to beleive the books I have read or yours? In any case I don’t understand your point about the Spitfire.

    in reply to: Il2 Fav planes #249758
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Like I said it is debateable and just because you say it is true doesn’t make it so. The argument bores me.

    in reply to: 6 British soldiers killed in Czech helicopter crash #2652225
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    My thoughts to the families but this bit:

    “The Lynx has a history of engine and rotor problems, with at least 15 servicemen being killed since the 1970s.”

    15 military fatalities in 30 years is hardly a damning inditement (please excuse my spelling) of the Lynx’s safety record. Why don’t these idiots leave their opinions at the door first thing in the morning? I thought they were supposed to report the news, not their spurious opinions.

    in reply to: Il2 Fav planes #249762
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Could you clarify exactly what youre trying to say. This thread is about favorite planes in Il-2. My favorites are the russian fighters which I think have been overlooked by sims for a long time. There are no American, German, British or Japaneese fighters that could match their climb and their maneuverability. A few of the late war powerhouses like the Sea Fury, Ta-152, Mustang could out do them with speed, but not by much. They were better than any WW2 fighter in all around dogfighting, especially the Yak-3 which german pilots were ordered to avoid engaging, and run from. Its a well deserved honor for these fighters to be in such a high quality sim, and its a previlage to be able to fly them with such realistic flight physics.
    I suppose youre going to go on about how this is “hearsay” because I havent actually flown these planes.

    Yak 3 is contemporary to other late war aircraft as it entered service in 1944. Lets have climb rate/dive rate/top speed/turn rate/etc comparisons rather than the rather confusing ‘best’ moniker. Most of the ‘best’ Russian birds were ‘possibly’ late war while many of the aircraft you compare them to and dismiss ‘might’ be an earlier war vintage. Take the Mk14 Spit (1944). In my opinion it will, in the right hands, win against most of your Russian types but thats just my opinion it doesn’t make it true. On the other hand I might be right. Your argument is presented as fact that cannot be argued against which it quite obviously can be.

    in reply to: Duxford 9/10th October #1560412
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Damn your eyes! :p

    in reply to: Real Air Spit XIV #249903
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    I want! I want! I want! Can’t see a release date yet though.

    in reply to: Duxford 9/10th October #1560519
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Oh goody goody goody!!!!! Do you know how much the gate tickets will be?

    in reply to: Il2 Fav planes #249906
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    I find it offensive that alot of people complain about lack of certain fighters in Il-2. The russians made the best fighters in WW2, no doubt. And the russian theater of war was by far the most hard fought of that war, as well as the ultimate match of mass produced technology. So their really should be a sim devoted to just that part of the war. I love flying the Yaks and La-5s and their couterpart Me-109 and Fw-190. I was dissappointed at the distribution of types in original IL-2 with like about 12 different types of IL-2s and other obscure russian models, and only 1 La-5 and a couple of Yaks. But that has been straightened out for the most part with FB.

    Well I know this is going to start some kind of argument but it isn’t meant to. Yes the Russians made some of the best fighters of WW2 but THE best? That is open to debate. I think that the original IL2 was intended by Oleg and the team to highlight the war on the Eastern Front and that it did so to such a large degree should give him and the mob a fair degree of recognition by no lesser organisation than the Russian state! By saying that the Russian theatre was the hardest fought should not take away from other theatres of war at that time either. Later additions such as the Western theatre, I think is intended to keep the money coming in because if it doesn’t then 1C might go under and that would be a worse kind of tragedy. On the whole though I can’t argue with your sentiment. 🙂

    in reply to: Which joystick do u use #250022
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Saitek X45 replacing an X35/36 combo. In fact I have a question. I find the X45 squeaky rather than stiff, scuse the smutty pun but I like the stiffness. Now I know that some have greased their sticks (this thread is going down hill fast) 😀 😀 😀 😀 but what grease is safe to use? If anybody says KY jelly I will be unable to contain myself.

    in reply to: Janes WWII Fighters #250024
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Ok, no one knows. But how do you guys find this compares graphically to the latest WWII flight sims?

    I haven’t had a copy of this for ages but it was certainly one I enjoyed. They did however give the Spit which was a MkIX the performance and the characteristics of a MkV with the 1250hp engine. It was supposed to be the Merlin 6x series with over 1600hp! As for the graphics, like I said I haven’t played if for a long time and although I was impressed back then, I was also impressed with EAW but compare that to IL2 and it leaves me a little underwhelmed nowadays. Funny world innit? 🙂

    in reply to: Polish Fitters over the UK #2666196
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Can any of the (former) geography teachers explain Phil in what continent Britain is? It’s definately not America, not Asia either, and it’s a bit too cold for Africa.

    No. Not having it! 😀

    in reply to: Polish Fitters over the UK #2666806
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    I knew it! It was the engine sound that threw me at first, it had a high pitched screaming quality to it where the Adours and RB199s of the local Hawks, Jags and Tornados have a lower bass rumbling quality. I missed the first one but got a glimse of the second as it cleared the mountains and headed for Machynlleth and I though. ‘thats no Tornado but is sure as hell it a swing winger. Now who do I know who uses a swing winger apart from the RAF these days? It could have been an Ausie F111, they are not unknown to UK skies but I know an F111 when I see one.’ It was nice to see them.

    …………..and GDL what do you mean by Europe? How dare you sir, this isn’t Europe it is Britain!!!!! Giggle, snigger, guffaw!

    in reply to: RAF Eurofighter cannon news #2666957
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    contracts were signed, cancelling contracts means paying……

    besides what’s 90 million pounds in avaition terms? pocket change?

    the british need a bookkeeper and a cost accountant.

    the gun should never have been deleted in the first place, a stricter develpment cost controll is what they need, not trying to tidy up afterwards

    We have book keepers and cost accountants but they are all crap.

    in reply to: I wonder how true this is. #2652248
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Thanks Steve you know we rely on you to steady the line. Sorry no emoticons on ‘quick reply’ but consider it a smilie.

    in reply to: il-2 #252320
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Yo Gaz hows it hangin’?

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 1,404 total)