dark light

Phil Foster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,404 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-15 vs Rafale vs Typhoon #2684438
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    It ironic that people criticise the likes of the Rafale and the Typhoon because they are not fully A2G capable yet. Especially in relation to aircraft like the F15 and F16. Until the Strike Eagle the adage was always “not a pound for air to ground” and then they went and built one of the finest strike aircraft the worl has ever seen out of it. Its a bit old now but in the beginning the though of hanging bombs off one of these birds would induce apoplexy into the minds of its pilots.

    The F16 was exactly the same, introduced as a cheap light weight dogfighter it late became an excelent little strike fighter as well with many USAF F16 squadrons whose primary duty is air to ground.

    Yet the Rafale and the Typhoon were both designed with exceptional A2G capabilities from the very beginning and these capabilities are being expanded all the time. So you see people extolling the virtues of F15s and F16s while blissfully dismissing those of the Rafale and Typhoon whilst ignoring historical facts about all of these projects. That is, historical facts that would impact on their negative feeling towards anything that isn’t American. They can’t do it it is anathema to them and they will not be persuaded otherwise not matter what the truth of the matter is.

    If you really want an overview of the Typhoon’s A2G capabilities pick up a copy of this months AFM I think Aircraft Illustrated is doing it as well, there is a supplement in it, read between the lines and you will see that its A2G capabilities fall somewhere between the F16C/D and the Strike Eagle and in some circumstances exceeds both. You will find out something similar is true of the Rafale but don’t take my word for it go and read about it for youself.:)

    in reply to: Turbojets, Turbofans and hybrids #2685593
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    See – there is Euro-stuff I fancy! Then again, it’s British, not Eurish.

    Flattery will get you everywhere.:D

    in reply to: Iraqi planes found by US/GB troops ! #2685596
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Big respect for the Aussie SAS , they are they only guys the British SAS rate on a par with themselves . It would be VERY interesting to read an account of what and when both the Brits and Aussie SAS were doing in Iraq although I suspect we wont be told the full story for sometime , these guys have balls of steel and never seem to get the recognition they deserve , although the very nature of the work they do probably precludes any reports of what they are up to. Heroes – all of them.

    I don’t think they want the recognition. I am not being funny honest. The Brit SAS were a bit peeved about the whole Iranian embassy seige because all of a sudden they were all the rage. Great for recruitment but they would rather have kept it all hush hush. It wasn’t possible in the event. The SBS were reportedly sniggering about it because they remained relatively unknown and the Australian and New Zealand SAS were sniggering even more because nobody knew that the British weren’t the only ones with an SAS and they are every bit as good to boot. 🙂

    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Hmmmmm. Pulls beard pensively…………

    ……………..but these are the dodgy deals I am talking about. You can also bet your bottom pound sterling that friend Distiller will be onto the Rafale as well when it does begin to sell, which it will.

    I think.

    🙂

    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Does post 9-11 USA count as the “free world” then? Or should it be re-titled the “not-quite-so-free-as-it-once-was world” in 2003.

    A bit like “everybody is born equal but the USA is more equal than everybody else type thingy?”;)

    in reply to: Turbojets, Turbofans and hybrids #2685673
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    If you want to fly at Mach 0.8 at 36,000 ft, then you want a high bypass ratio turbofan. Its the most fuel efficient at these speeds.

    I thought high bypass engines were optimised for low altitude high speed operations. :confused:

    Phil Foster
    Participant

    In 15 years the free world will fly F-35. Just a few European kooks will seek justification not to scrap their politically/anti-US motivated geriatric hermite-antiques.

    On the other hand they might just be catching up. I can see some streamlining in European defence procurement and indeed co-operation even if we don’t see a Federal EU (gods forbid).

    We have already shown what we can do when we put our heads together and agree on something. Good results from the past 30 to 40 years are Jaguar (Britain/France), Concorde (Britain/France), Tornado (Britain/Germany/Italy), Typhoon (Britain/Germany/Italy/Spain), Airbus (most European countries have a stake in this the biggest being France/Germany with about 50% between them with Britain having a 20% stake alone). Also do not forget that the UK has a very large stake in the JSF programme as the only Level 1 partner, we are studying stealth techniques similar to those coming out of the USA because it is not a new concept to the British.

    We have learnt a lot and we have always known how to build aircraft every bit as good as the USA. Think about the P51 Mustang for a historical perspective. It didn’t really meet its potential until the British got hold of it and fitted it with a Rolls Royce Merlin engine and we were building jets long before the USA.

    Your only real advantage is money (sic resources) and when we pool our own resources in an efficient manner the USA will find it even harder to do business fairly, than it already does.

    I find your comments regarding non US products almost as a compliment. For instance your distain for the Eurofighter is only fueled by the fact that it competes well in the export market, with anything Lockheed Martin can produce and so far the only way you have been able to sell the Block 60 F16 is through the usual dodgy deals that LM are so famous for and it all comes down to money. You have more of it than we do but money doesn’t make you super human. In the words of the prophet “Your sh!t still stinks”. 😀

    in reply to: Turbojets, Turbofans and hybrids #2685681
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Since the development of the F100 more than 30 years have passed. All the math done on the F100 is very simple, it just uses high-quality (and high-cost) materials. Even the EJ200 and M88 are not designed using todays computer capabilities, since they are already 15 years old.

    I don’t accept this a) because I know your agenda and b) because it doesn’t match the results. 🙂

    You might be right of course but my hunch is that you are not and you probably know it too. 😉

    in reply to: Turbojets, Turbofans and hybrids #2685690
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Why is the F-15 equipped with turbofans? Because in the late ’60s metallurgy wasn’t advanced enough to build a turbojet with 25,000lbs of thrust and decent fuel consumption.

    ………..and this is what I am unavoidably latching onto. With initial work on the core done by Rolls Royce with its rather comically named ACME XG40 project the EJ200 is indeed aproaching that magic 25,000lbst figure. No its not quite there but you also have to remember that this is half the size of an F100 or F110 engine and the EJ2xx has a ‘potential’ of 27,000lbst.

    The way I read it you get more for less, more power is acheived by less weight, fewer parts, simpler design etc and what you end up with is effectively a hybrid engine that is more ‘jet’ than ‘fan’ with many of the characteristics of both types and a considerable improvement in both low speed cycles and fuel burn rate than the RB199 that went before it.

    Yet the RB199 is unmistakabley (scuse spelling) a ‘turbofan’. Yes the EJ200 is a ‘straight forward’ engine and I think that is why it is ‘state of the art’. If you see what I mean I’m not sure how to explain myself. Its very simplicity makes it more than the sum of its parts.

    I know I will be stepping into hot water but my next set of questions will involve the M88-2. Its concept and its format.

    http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/ef2000/

    http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/rafale/

    I’m really getting into this.

    What about the Russian engines? Just how do the different engines compare and what methods have they used? What about the F404/414 I really want to know now.:)

    in reply to: General Discussion #370420
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Erm? Lovely. Really I am very happy for you.:confused:

    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Erm? Lovely. Really I am very happy for you.:confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #370426
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    When I went to see ‘The Two Towers’ I wasn’t dissapointed as much as a bit confused.

    Because they had to fit so much into the 3 hours available an awful lot was cut out and the editing sometimes seemed a little haphazard and perhaps a little bit rushed. Not that I did not enjoy it because I did immensely and I am looking forward to seeing the Return of the King at the pictures.

    So, as I did with the first film I waited for the Extended Edition DVD which comes out perhaps 5 or 6 months after the movie DVD and I was not at all dissapointed. The editing was much better and the extra footage really made the film come together better than it did with the first cinema version.

    I think Tolkien would have been reasonably happy with what Pete Jackson and the rest of his team, actors and others have done.

    Oh and if you are interested from the age of 3, JRR Tolkien grew up just up the road from where I work. Its a place called Sarehole Mill in Birmingham and in his day it was rural countryside and villages just to the south of the city. Today it is part of a huge conurbation and Sarehole Mill is a subburb of the City of Birmingham. The Mill and its surroundings still survive though. There is a ford crossing the river not far from the mill and it is beleived that this was the inspiration for the Brandywine river crossing in the first book.

    in reply to: The Lord of the Rings… #1957215
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    When I went to see ‘The Two Towers’ I wasn’t dissapointed as much as a bit confused.

    Because they had to fit so much into the 3 hours available an awful lot was cut out and the editing sometimes seemed a little haphazard and perhaps a little bit rushed. Not that I did not enjoy it because I did immensely and I am looking forward to seeing the Return of the King at the pictures.

    So, as I did with the first film I waited for the Extended Edition DVD which comes out perhaps 5 or 6 months after the movie DVD and I was not at all dissapointed. The editing was much better and the extra footage really made the film come together better than it did with the first cinema version.

    I think Tolkien would have been reasonably happy with what Pete Jackson and the rest of his team, actors and others have done.

    Oh and if you are interested from the age of 3, JRR Tolkien grew up just up the road from where I work. Its a place called Sarehole Mill in Birmingham and in his day it was rural countryside and villages just to the south of the city. Today it is part of a huge conurbation and Sarehole Mill is a subburb of the City of Birmingham. The Mill and its surroundings still survive though. There is a ford crossing the river not far from the mill and it is beleived that this was the inspiration for the Brandywine river crossing in the first book.

    in reply to: Czech Republic chooses Swedish Gripen fighters over US F-16s #2685834
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Well Soren-a, you make an excellent point:) and welcome to the forum.

    in reply to: General Discussion #370431
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    BSE free.:D

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,404 total)