The “inbuilt” or conform anechoic tiles may be of similar concept as the “inbuilt” conform dynamic tank armour
so $900m for total contract out of which $540m for contruction. by that price they can afford alot more of these.
C’mon, they don’t give the year when the money was allocated before 2007. The boat is on the slip for years and by 2005 already was at least 50% ready. So the total cost will be much higher, to say nothing of the costs of associated Bulava. Note, that complete construction cost of 20380 lead ship was rated at 5 billion roubles. Do You expect 18 kT nuclear sub to cost only three times as much as a 2 kT corvette?:diablo:
Austin, if You are interested in Pantzyr radar, here’s a good article on Russian APARs, including Pantzyr.
http://www.vko.ru/DesktopModules/Articles/ArticlesView.aspx?tabID=320&ItemID=69&mid=2891&wversion=Staging
GarryB, no, I have no further information on naval Koalicija. All I know it exists in metal.
😀
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=99988&page=82
(note it is linked to in post 1228)
Have a look at the picture in post 1229… no it is not a photoshopped image… have seen line drawings showing internally mounted autoloaders for both barrels and it is reportedly based on a Naval artillery gun mount also in 152mm… the return of larger calibres at sea perhaps?
Polaris/Poseidon?
Technically that’s not true. The 9M96 missiles are also availale as a part of the S-300PMU-2 system.
The treaty doesn’t actually limit the range of missiles. It prevents nations from introducing technologies into countries that lack the ability to produce it for themselves.
Technically, 9M96 was developed as integral part of S-400 system, not as an upgrade for S-300. The delays in the development of S-400 caused the attempt to introduce them in S-300, thus S-300PMU-2 was demonstrated. It’s still an open question how many S-300PMU-2 have actually been deployed with 9M96, not just with system upgrade which allows to use that missile.
Regarding the treaty and the technology transfer regulations – It’s still quite heated debate on Russian forums about the actual range of missiles such as Onyx/Yakhont/Brahmos or Club family. 3M14 (Land attack Club) especially, as it’s a direct ancestor of Granat sub-launched cruise missile which ranged around 3000 km. Club is just a missile with only 300km range. Do You suppose that technology which allowed Granat to fly 3000km just vanished because a heavier WH and smaller fuel tank was fitted? Nevertheless, this is not considered a treaty violation. So, technically, we can talk about range limitation, not a technology transfer limitation.
They don’t need larger displacement to accomodate 9M96 as the FC is provided by Furke radar which is already there. Do not mistake intercept speed for the missile speed. Pantsyr missile, for instance has intercept (target) speed indicated as 1000 m/s, but the missile speed is cited as 1300 m/s. Same applies to 9M96. Yes, by the way the naval system is designated 9K96 and the new VLS may have designation 3S96.
I’m posting a picture for benefit of Brezhnev to outline what’s yhe difference between 9M96 family, which are actually S-400 family, not S-300, and the older missiles.
Austin, I’m not wanting to dinegrate Brahmos, it’s a newer missile than Onyx anyway, but it has the treaty limitation 0f 300km range, doesn’t it?
Some people in Russia are not overly happy wit the choice of 9M96 for 22380. Mind it, it’s going to be 40 km version (weight is 333 kg, compare it to even the latest version of Shtil), it’s limited for interception of targets up to 750 m/s. It was accepted instead of Naval Pantsyr, which has missiles capable to intercept targets at 1000 m/s. Still, introduction of 9M96 gives a true multichannel capacity, albeit the need of that on a corvette is discutable. 22350 is a different song, of course.
Sorry If i missed this discussion , But what is your source of Info for that statement ?
If true this system should be as good as Aster 30 if not better
can we get some specs for the 120km ranged 9M96Thanks
Austin, my source is a person from Russian Navy Research Institute, that’s as much as I can reveal. According to him, 2nd hull of 20380 will also have 9M96 instead of Kortik. Basic charcteristics of 9M96E2 – weight 420 kg, WH – 24 kg, 5m/30km, geometry is approximately the same as Shtil – 4.2-4.5 m long.
As I already posted, I don’t have a full line drawing. YET. So be patient.
What I can say for now is that the larger launcher is the 3S14 – domestic version of 3S14E export launcher for Club missiles. The domestic version allows to carry Onyx (Yakhont, Brahmos, you name it – MissMos will also sound nice for Missisippi-Moskva:diablo: ). And yes, there are 4 launchers, 4 cells each, meaning 16 missiles.
As for the SAM launcher, 22350 INITIALLY is announced with Shtil-1 (or rather Uragan) VLS, but the launcher in this drawing certainly is not a 3S90ME. There are only 8 cells for SAMs in this drawing, although there is plenty of room to install at least 4 or even 8 cells more. The launcher design for 9M96 is much more advanced and compact than for Shtil-1. What I try to convay is that first 22350 may have Shtil-1 in 24 single-missile cells, occupying approximately the same space as 8 four-missile cells of 9M96 on later ships. Mind – 9M96 right now is still being tested for the Navy, although cleared for land units.
As for installing larger units from S-300/400, I’m not sure that a 4500 ton frigate needs anything longer-legged than 120km 9M96.
Well, 9M96 and 9M317M are quite close geometrically. The launcher may house both. 9M96 is only now going through the acceptance tests, it may mean that first 22350 will be initially loaded with Shtil missile
I don’t have full pic yet. The launchers are for Onyx (the longer one) and 9M96 (the shorter).
22350
This is as far universal as Russia is going to be:diablo:
What exactly did You expect in the outer appearance? The only real mistery is the new long range missile, rumoured to be based on Antey-2500, but with a new booster and electronics. The short/medium tyre 9M96 is an open secret, being displayed at MAKS air show. The launch canisters are the same as for older 48N6 and they can house also 4 of 9M96 each. The long range missile perhaps will have the canister from 9M82, so from the outside You won’t be able to tell the difference.:diablo: