As You can see on the photo from 1961 at the time Nahimov was scrapped, her forward turrets are intact, so the drawing of course is not correct. The missile tested initially on Nahimov was KSS “Strela”, the same missile arming Tu-4 aircraft. According to Project 67 all gun turrets were to be replaced by 2 SM-58 launchers. Later there was a project to rebuild Nahimov to project 71 with front gun turrets saved and M-2 SAM in the aft. Project 70 was to replace all turrets with M-2 SAMs.

Thank you Snake, I was kinda counting on you to find good answer:)

But its rahter pity that there isent that sort of system onboard. It would have made the ships capacity to increase essentially…

There’s Klub 3C14 land attack missile and of course there’s still 3M10 Granat sub-launched LACM;)

These are just universal tubes/launchers, which can launch both Vodopad/Veter and ordinary torpedoes.
P-100 as a version of early Moskit is a fiction. There is only one version of Moskit existant – surface ship launched. Even the air version was eventually cancelled. It is possible that a sub or tube launched Moskit was proposed to counter tube launched Onyx and Kalibr, but such a design has never come off the drawing board. Moskit was to replace P-15 Termit and P-120 Malakhit in service, so somebody may have jumped to conclusions that there will be a sub version to replace Malakhit on Pr.670M (CharlieII) boats.
Diamater of Moskit is 0.76m, Onyx has 0.7m, but it’s very tight-packed in the tube (0.71m).
P-100 designation was assigned to Beriev design from 1961 of silos launched medium range land attack cruise missile with estimated range of up to 2500 km.

Welcome back picture for Wayne:diablo:

To radar and Harry:
Placement of RBUs on Russian ships depends not so much on their defensive or agressive role, available space also has to be counted, because of underdeck reload magazine. On Pr.61 (Kashin), Kresta 2, Kara – RBUs are both near the bridge and near aft, on smaller Pr. 1135 Krivak they are in front only. If you propose that just by putting RBUs in front makes the use of them rather agressive than defensive, than Krivak is more agressive Anti-sub ship than others. On the other hand, both 956 (Sovs) and 1155 (Udaloy) use RBUs only defensively, cause both have them near hangar. Even Kirov has RBUs both in front and aft. Russians do realize quite well the limitation of this weapon, 20380 will not have them, 22350 will have Paket-NK (most probably). The realization, that shoot-to-kill systems have to be used together with decoys, came rather slowly. Thus RPKTZ-1 (Udav) is more a decoy system and Liven RBU (purely offensive) was cancelled all togerher, AFAIK.

are those 76mm, 100mm and 130mm???

Yes, exactly so. There’s also 57mm AU Patrul (based on A-220M). There’s even a new 152mm gun but I still don’t have a pic of that, allegedly it’s a vertical tandem system.

Something from this will surely show up on some Chinese or Indian warship also 😀

This looks like a translation of the article in Commersant Daily, it got quite unhappy remarks on Russian forums. Nevertheless, it looks true, as Russian Navy direst need is new SSBN
Regardings names, Roel, look at the names of Pr.956 😀