dark light

snake65

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 746 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2049842
    snake65
    Participant

    Both

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2049934
    snake65
    Participant

    The distinction between Improved Akula and Akula 2 is mainly inside the hull. So, if You are completing it now, there is no need to complete it as Improved Akula./

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2049936
    snake65
    Participant

    Sorry, got the name wrong, it’s Sovershenny, not Sovremenny. It was ITAR-TASS article of 30.06.2006. The text is available at Airbase forum. The link is to the Airbase page:
    http://forums.airbase.ru/index.php?topic=27181.675
    Regarding the Nerpa:
    http://www.vedomosti.ru/newspaper/article.shtml?2006/06/30/108829

    in reply to: First french Horizon frigate at sea #2050016
    snake65
    Participant

    pooh pooh pooh, anyone seen anything as ugly as this (except for Maresesti)??? Those ugly funnels and masts… YUK!
    All in all probably not a bad ship if everything works.

    It’s just De Zeven Provincen pushed to the utmost in order to bring radars as high as possible (and even more than sensible) :diablo:

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2050018
    snake65
    Participant

    Fourth 20380 is Sovremenny.
    The report on unspecified Pr.971 sub said that it started test runs on 24 June

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2050561
    snake65
    Participant

    The article on the Klinok M3 modification is very ambiguous. It states about new antenna and at the same time mentions new system for beam control. I guess what it means is that they will introduce search mode with narrower beam which is better for detection of low altitude LO objects. The same antenna (or rather the beam control system) will be used for upgrade of already existing Klinok and Osa-MA systems. The article also mentions new computer and software as well as new interface with other ship’s systems.
    By the way, antennae post of Klinok has several antennae, guess they talk about search radar, not FCS.
    I’d better go ahead with Poliment instead of spending money on Klinok. Nevertheless, the upgrade for Klinok was long due, I heard that one was intended already ten years ago, now they have a lot of oil dollars to spend 😉

    in reply to: The LAST Gearing class still in service #2050739
    snake65
    Participant

    Guess they had to canibalize at least one of the destroyers which left service for spare parts. And still it’s hell of a lot expensive to keep so old ship in service. They should turn her into a museum. Or US should consider to do that, if she is really the LAST Gearing.

    in reply to: Project 1941 "Titan" – KAPUSTA class #2050760
    snake65
    Participant

    This was for real. The largest of Soviet space tracking ships “Kosmonavt Yuri Gagarin” was taken over by Ukraine in 1991 and sold for scrap to India in 1996. Before going to the millers it had it’s last moment of glory in the movie “Virus”. The ship was 231 meters long and displaced 45 kT. There was a hell of a lot of place for bad aliens to hide.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2051130
    snake65
    Participant

    FYI, they called it an “aircraft carrying cruiser” so that the carriers built in Nikolayev in the Ukraine can pass through the Bosporus and not be stuck operating around the Crimean. There’s some law that says an aircraft carrier can’t transit the Bosporus, so it’s an “aircraft carrying cruiser”.

    Of course, the anti-ship missile batteries do help with the “cruiser” part of the definition :diablo:

    That law is Montreau (sp?) Treaty of 1936, regulating what ships an in what manner can pass Turkish straits.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2051318
    snake65
    Participant

    P-750 MeteoritM missile (weapon system Grom) was not intended to replace Granit, but rather to supplement it, as, initially, it was intended to supplement Granit on Pr.949M subs (to add strategic land attack capability), making them universal carriers. But… The missile was too long for Granit launchers, installation of Grom targeting system called for lengthening of sub for 5-7 metres, efforts to develop universal targeting system failed.
    P-1000 Vulcan was just a longer legged version of Bazalt, using more powerful boosters, titanium alloys and dropping armour to ensure 700 km range as in Granit but in less sofisticated and lighter missile. Initial plan was to replace all Bazalts with Vulcans, but it was dropped in favour of Yakhont (Onyx). This plan in turn went dead with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    in reply to: Possible info on Vikramaditya (Admiral Gorshkov) #2051698
    snake65
    Participant

    The text in Polish is about use of CAD-type program for design of scaffolds for cleaning, reconstructing and painting of Gorshkov.

    snake65
    Participant

    A fully equipped 051C at last!!!

    in reply to: Project 1941 "Titan" – KAPUSTA class #2053613
    snake65
    Participant

    I think the project name for “Komarov” was Projekt 1917 “Sirius”, although the hull of Projekt 595 merchant vessel was used.

    in reply to: Project 1941 "Titan" – KAPUSTA class #2053752
    snake65
    Participant

    Projekt 1941 was not built using hull of 1144 or 1153, it also has a different (civilian) powerplant, on par with nuclear ice-breakers.
    The other ship on Your photo is “Kosmonavt Valdimir Komarov”, built already in 1967 and decommissioned in 1989, so it has no relation to 1941. There is Projekt 1914 “Marshal Nedelin” which was built at approximately the same time as “Ural” and has the same equipment on one third of displacement. “Ural” was so costly, that after one year of service it was put on reserve.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2054166
    snake65
    Participant

    More pictures of launching 20380

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 746 total)